16th NAM (Non Aligned Movement) summit in Tehran, Iran

Bushra Aziz

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
85
Likes
25
Cheaper shorter. Yes.

Safer. No.

Even NATO trucks are not safe in Pakistan!
Had this been the case the Americans would have not played apology with Pakistan drama to resume the NATO supplies. BRO has done a good job which will connect Iran with Afghanistan and Central Asia.
 

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
Had this been the case the Americans would have not played apology with Pakistan drama to resume the NATO supplies. BRO has done a good job which will connect Iran with Afghanistan and Central Asia.
proof by U.S Gov that how Unsafe is Pakistan.

THREATS TO SAFETY AND SECURITY: A number of extremist groups within Pakistan continue to target U.S. citizens and other Western interests and Pakistani officials. Terrorists have demonstrated a willingness and capability to attack targets where U.S. citizens are known to congregate or visit. Terrorist actions may include, but are not limited to, suicide operations, bombings -- including vehicle-borne explosives and improvised explosive devices -- assassinations, carjackings, assaults, and kidnappings. Pakistani military forces are currently engaged in a campaign against extremist elements across many areas of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and parts of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) Province, formerly known as Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP). In response to this campaign, militants have increased attacks against both civilian and government targets in Pakistan's cities and in late 2010 launched several coordinated attacks against Pakistani government and civilian targets, especially in Bajaur and Mohmand Agencies.

The presence of al-Qaida, Taliban elements, and indigenous militant extremist and sectarian groups poses a potential danger to U.S. citizens throughout Pakistan, especially in the western border regions of the country. Continuing tensions in Muslim-majority countries and territories also increase the possibility of violence against Westerners. Although the Pakistani government has heightened its security measures, particularly in the major cities, terrorist groups continue to seek opportunities to attack locations where U.S. citizens and Westerners are known to congregate or visit, such as shopping areas, hotels, clubs and restaurants, places of worship, schools, or outdoor recreation events.

Visits by U.S. government personnel to Peshawar, Lahore and Karachi are limited, and movements by U.S. government personnel assigned to the Consulates in these cities are severely restricted. The security situation in many rural areas is extremely hazardous. U.S. citizens, including officials, are required to obtain advance permission from local or federal authorities to travel to the FATA, large parts of KP Province, and Balochistan Province. U.S. officials in Islamabad are instructed to restrict the frequency and to minimize the duration of trips to public markets, restaurants, and other locations. Only a limited number of official visitors are placed in hotels, and for limited stays. Depending on ongoing security assessments, the U.S. Embassy places areas such as hotels, markets, and/or restaurants off limits to official personnel. U.S. citizens in Pakistan are strongly urged to avoid hotels that do not apply stringent security measures and to maintain good situational awareness, particularly when visiting locations frequented by Westerners.

Suicide bombing attacks and political violence continue to occur throughout the country on a regular basis, often targeting government authorities such as police checkpoints and military installations, as well as public areas such as mosques and shopping areas. Some of the major incidents that have occurred since September 2010 are cited here. On September 1, 2010, 33 persons were killed and over 150 injured in three back-to-back suicide bomb blasts during a Shia procession in Lahore. Two days later, 73 persons were killed and 160 injured in a suicide bombing at a rally organized by the Shia Imamia Students Organization in Quetta. On December 25, 2010, a female suicide bomber detonated a bomb at a checkpoint outside a food distribution center in Khar, Bajaur Agency, killing at least 43 and injuring 72. On January 4, 2011, well known Governor of Punjab Province Salmaan Taseer was assassinated in the Kohsar Market area of Islamabad. On March 2, Federal Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti, the sole Christian member of Pakistan's cabinet, was also gunned down on the outskirts of Islamabad. On May 20, a U.S. consulate general vehicle in Peshawar was attacked, killing one person and injuring a dozen, including two U.S. employees of the mission. On May 22, more than a dozen gunmen stormed Pakistani Naval Station Mehran in Karachi. On May 26, a suicide bomber blew up a car laden with explosives at a checkpoint near a police station in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, killing 32 persons and injuring 60 others. In September 2011, suicide bombers in Quetta attacked a senior military officer, killing 23 people.

Since late 2007, occasional rockets have targeted areas in and around Peshawar, including in the direction of Peshawar International Airport. In June 2009, the Peshawar International Airport closed for two days for unspecified security concerns. Also in July 2009, some airline carriers suspended service to the airport. For the most up-to-date information on aviation safety and security, U.S. citizens should regularly monitor the Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs' website.

U.S. citizens throughout Pakistan have also been kidnapped for ransom or during the course of personal disputes. Reported incidents include two separate kidnappings in the summer of 2011 in Lahore, one victim of which was a USAID contractor. Earlier occurrences include the 2010 kidnapping of a U.S. citizen child in Karachi, and the 2009 kidnapping of a U.S. citizen official of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in Balochistan. The kidnapping of Pakistani citizens and other foreign nationals, usually for ransom, continues to increase dramatically nationwide.

We remind U.S. citizens that even demonstrations intended to be peaceful can turn confrontational and possibly escalate into violence. Rallies, demonstrations, and processions occur regularly throughout Pakistan on very short notice and have often taken on an anti-American or anti-Western character. U.S. citizens are therefore urged to avoid the areas of demonstrations if possible, and to exercise caution if within the vicinity of any demonstrations. Because of the possibility of violence, U.S. citizens are urged to avoid all public places of worship and areas where Westerners are known to congregate. U.S. citizens should stay current with media coverage of local events and be aware of their surroundings at all times. Information regarding demonstrations in Pakistan can be found on the websites of U.S. Embassy-Islamabad and Consulates in Karachi, Lahore and Peshawar.

During the Islamic (Shia) religious observance of Muharram, hostilities targeting religious sects often increase.

It is best to avoid public transportation. For security reasons, U.S. Mission personnel are prohibited from using trains, taxis, or buses. (See the Traffic Safety and Road Conditions section below). Men and women are advised to dress conservatively, with arms and legs covered, and to avoid walking alone. It is unwise for anyone to travel on the streets late at night. Visitors to Pakistan should maintain a low profile and be aware of their surroundings.

Gilgit-Baltistan (formerly known as the Northern Areas): Northern Pakistan has the greatest concentration of the highest peaks in the world. This attracts trekkers, mountaineers, and mountain climbers from all over the world. Trekking in Pakistan involves walking over rugged, steep terrain, where one is exposed to the elements, often at high altitudes. The Pakistani Ministry of Tourism has defined trekking as walking below 6000 m. It has designated three trekking zones: open, restricted, and closed. Foreigners may trek anywhere in the open zone without a permit or the services of a licensed mountain guide. For trekking in the restricted zone, foreigners must pay a $20 per person, per trek fee to obtain a trekking permit from the Ministry of Tourism. To hike in the restricted zone, foreigners must also hire a licensed mountain guide, buy a personal accident insurance policy for the guide and the porters, and attend a mandatory briefing and de-briefing at the Ministry of Tourism. No trekking is allowed in closed zones, which are located near the Pakistan-Afghan border and near the Line of Control between Pakistan administered and India-administered Kashmir.

While we continue to discourage non-essential travel to Pakistan, the safest option for trekkers is to join an organized group or use a reputable firm that provides experienced guides and porters. Trekkers are also advised to sign-up with STEP and to provide a copy of their itinerary to family or friends in the United States. While overall crime in the northern areas is low, there have been occasional assaults on foreign visitors. The U.S. Embassy in Islamabad strongly recommends that U.S. citizens exercise extreme caution when trekking at high altitudes. Only experienced mountain travelers should tackle the northern mountains of the Hindukush, the Karakorams, and the Himalayas.

All peaks/routes for mountaineering in Pakistan have been designated as open or restricted zones. Permits for climbing peaks are issued by the Ministry of Tourism and fees vary by altitude and time of year. A Pakistani Army Liaison Officer must accompany all mountaineering expeditions. Visit the Pakistan Tourism Development Cooperation website for the most current trekking and mountaineering information.

Khyber Pahktunkhwa (KP) Province, formerly known as the Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP), and Gilgit-Baltistan: Because of the high security threat level, the U.S. Consulate in Peshawar no longer provides routine consular services. The U.S. government currently allows only essential travel within the FATA and KP Province by U.S. officials. Security and logistical challenges may affect the Consulate's ability to provide emergency consular services in this area. Pakistani security forces are currently engaged in a campaign against extremist elements across many areas of the FATA and parts of KP Province. Access to many areas of Pakistan, including the FATA along the Afghan border, is restricted by local government authorities for non-Pakistanis. Travel to any restricted region requires official permission by the Government of Pakistan. Failure to obtain permission in advance can result in arrest and detention by Pakistani authorities. Even in the settled areas of KP Province, terrorist activity and sectarian violence are common. Terrorists and their sympathizers regularly attack civilian, government, and foreign targets. U.S. citizens are also frequently targeted. There have been bombings in Peshawar of varying sophistication since September 2006. Members and supporters of the Taliban and al-Qaida are known to be in the FATA, and may also be in the settled areas.

Pakistan-administered Kashmir: While direct military hostilities between India and Pakistan across the Line of Control (LOC) are infrequent, militant groups engaged in a long-running insurgency on the Indian side of the LOC have bases and supporters operating from the Pakistani side. Most of these groups are anti-American, and some have attacked U.S. citizens and other Westerners. The Government of Pakistan restricts access to many parts of this region and requires that visitors obtain a permit from the Ministry of Interior before traveling.

Punjab Province: Violence has increased in Punjab Province in the past two years. In addition to the incidents cited above, there have been several incidents of violence since late 2010. On October 25, 2010, a bomb exploded in the eastern gate of the Baba Farid Shrine in the Pakpattan district of Lahore, killing six persons and injuring several others. On January 25, 2011, an attack on a Shia procession in Lahore reportedly killed 11 people and injured 50. On March 8, an attack on a gas station in Faisalabad reportedly killed at least 20 people and injured over 120.

As a precaution against these possible dangers, U.S. citizens are cautioned to maintain good situational awareness. The Wagah border crossing into India near Lahore remains open daily (from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.) for travel to and from India if the passport holder has a valid visa for both countries. Visitors are advised to confirm with Pakistani authorities the current status of the border crossing prior to commencing travel. U.S. travelers to Jhang, Attock, Dera Ghazi Khan and Khushab tehsils, as well as Jauharabad tehsil in Muzaffargarh district, require permission from the Ministry of Interior.

Sindh Province: In Karachi and Hyderabad, there has been recurring violence characterized by bombings, violent demonstrations, and shootings. The most notorious attack occurred in October 2007, when a suicide attack on former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto killed more than 130 and injured approximately 375 people in Karachi. Over the last two years, Karachi has been wracked by political violence.

A list of the most visible terrorist incidents over the past year follows:

On October 7, 2010, eight persons were killed and over 60 injured in a suicide attack at the Abdullah Shah Ghazi shrine in Karachi. On November 11, another major attack targeting a police installation in Karachi killed 20 persons and injured 150 in a suicide car bomb blast at the Crime Investigation Department. On December 28, an explosion wounded several students at Karachi University. In many areas of the city, there is resentment toward outsiders. Electrical power outages ("load shedding") for many hours a day are commonplace and have led to sporadic demonstrations and violence in some parts of the city. Non-essential travel to these cities is strongly discouraged.

From the start of 2011 to the present, armed factions linked to certain political parties have engaged in the targeted killings of their opponents. In these targeted killings, it is not uncommon for bystanders to become victims. On January 25, two police officers were killed near a Shia procession in Karachi. On April 21, an explosion in the Birch Club by the Grass Market in the Lyari area of Karachi left approximately 15 people dead and 35 injured. On May 22-23, militants attacked the Pakistan Naval Station Mehran in Karachi. During the 16-hour siege, the gunmen killed 18 and injured 16 others. In July, 324 people were victims of targeted killings. On September 19, militants bombed the residence of a senior police chief in Karachi, killing eight people.

U.S. citizens and other Westerners continue to be a potential target of hostility and anti-Western mob violence. The U.S. Consulate General in Karachi in particular has been the target of several major terrorist attacks or plots in recent years. Both Sindh and Balochistan are transshipment points for U.S. military equipment en route to Afghanistan. Personnel, ports, vehicles, and storage areas believed to be supporting U.S. military shipments have been the subject of terrorist attacks. Also, as U.S. military operations in Afghanistan increase, the probability of attacks and violence against Westerners may increase. In rural Sindh Province, the security situation is hazardous, especially for those engaged in overland travel. The Government of Pakistan recommends that travelers limit their movements in Sindh Province.

Balochistan Province: The Province of Balochistan, which borders both Iran and Afghanistan, is notorious for narcotics and other forms of cross-border smuggling. Members of the Taliban and al-Qaida are also believed to be present there. Tribal unrest sometimes turns violent. Travelers wishing to visit the interior of Balochistan should consult with the province's Home Secretary, as the provincial police presence is limited. Advance permission from provincial authorities is required for travel into many areas. Local authorities have detained travelers who lacked proper permission. Quetta, the provincial capital, has experienced an increase in bombings, occasional gun battles in the streets, and the imposition of curfews. Terrorist attacks against Pakistani government installations and infrastructure have been reported from 2009 to the present.

Stay up to date by:

Bookmarking our Bureau of Consular Affairs website, which contains the current Travel Warnings and Travel Alerts as well as the Worldwide Caution.
Following us on Twitter and the Bureau of Consular Affairs page on Facebook as well.
Downloading our free Smart Traveler IPhone App to have travel information at your fingertips.
Calling 1-888-407-4747 toll-free within the U.S. and Canada, or a regular toll line, 1-202-501-4444, from other countries.
Taking some time before travel to consider your personal security – Here are some useful tips for traveling safely abroad.
 

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
@Bushra please try to give proofs for your statements! don't talk hazy dazy
 

Bushra Aziz

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
85
Likes
25
When there is on ground reality, no proofs are required. Can you carryout comparison of both the routes i.e. route via Pakistan and Zarang-Dilaram... as later is most dangerous till the time peace in Kabul is not restored. Of course, there is no on going traffic of NATO containers on that route.
blank_quest is referring more than one year old media report. We should not forget that around 1.5 millions people in Afghanistan and Pakistan have been killed as the result of US and allies missiles and drones attacks. Setting on fire of one or two trucks means nothing in war. There is also a big business going on in which arms and ammunition of NATO containers are intentionally off loaded by foreign elements to prepare grounds for unrest in the future. We the Eastern people will never have any idea of The Great Game till the time we are prey ourselves of over a century old game.
 
Last edited:

ani82v

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Messages
1,006
Likes
707
Country flag
Had this been the case the Americans would have not played apology with Pakistan drama to resume the NATO supplies. BRO has done a good job which will connect Iran with Afghanistan and Central Asia.
So you're saying that nothing happened to NATO trucks before Salala attack???
 

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
@bushra Please share me some links ,if any, so that I can understand what you are trying to convey~~ I am not getting what are you trying to say?
 

Bushra Aziz

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
85
Likes
25
No! it is not the case. The responsibility of protection of these containers/trucks is not with Pakistan but attempts of safe passage are always facilitated. However, in the troubled areas and war zones sometimes things are not that simple as presented in media. The route is still safe as compared to Afghanistan but one need to be ready for one or two odd incidents.
 

ani82v

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2012
Messages
1,006
Likes
707
Country flag
No! it is not the case. The responsibility of protection of these containers/trucks is not with Pakistan but attempts of safe passage are always facilitated. However, in the troubled areas and war zones sometimes things are not that simple as presented in media. The route is still safe as compared to Afghanistan but one need to be ready for one or two odd incidents.
In short not safe!
 

Bushra Aziz

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
85
Likes
25
No! they are comparatively safe. Security can be further enhanced by improved coordination. The point is there is no other option but to use this route if US and allies have to withdraw safely.
 

blank_quest

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,119
Likes
926
Country flag
No! they are comparatively safe. Security can be further enhanced by improved coordination. The point is there is no other option but to use this route if US and allies have to withdraw safely.
yes! pakistan is comparitively safer than afghanistan! and any other country in the list ??:taunt:
 

Cliff@sea

C'est la vie
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,370
Likes
1,028
Country flag
Iran to present 'acceptable' proposal on Syria


TEHRAN - Iranian Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Salehi said the Islamic republic will present an "acceptable and rational" proposal on Syria crisis at the upcoming Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Tehran, Press TV reported Friday.

Iran will present a proposal to resolve the ongoing crisis in Syria during the next week's NAM summit, Salehi was quoted as saying.

"We believe that the proposal is acceptable, rational and principled and will include all parties involved in Syrian issues, " said Salehi, adding that "it will be very difficult to oppose it. "

He noted that Iran has been in close contact with many countries as well as the Syrian opposition over the past year since the outset of the crisis in Syria, emphasizing that the ground should be prepared for an understanding between the Syrian government and opposition.

Salehi also pointed to Iran's proposal to host talks between the Syrian government and opposition in a bid to end the violence in the Arab nation and expressed hope that Tehran would host the talks after the NAM summit.

He said most of the opposition have expressed their readiness to attend such talks, according to the report.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2012-08/25/content_15705088.htm
 

Cliff@sea

C'est la vie
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,370
Likes
1,028
Country flag
Re: PM to arrive in Iran tomorrow to attend NAM Summit

Iran's proposal on Syria to be discussed - China.org.cn

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said Saturday that Iran will present a " comprehensive" proposal to solve Syrian crisis and it will be discussed on the sidelines of the 16th Non-aligned Movement (NAM) meeting to be opened in Tehran on Aug. 26.

On Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Salehi said that the Islamic republic would present an "acceptable and rational" proposal on Syria crisis at the upcoming NAM summit.

"We believe that the proposal is acceptable, rational and principled and will include all parties involved in Syrian issues, " Salehi said, adding that "it will be very difficult to oppose it. "

The 16th NAM summit will be held in Tehran from Aug. 26 to Aug. 31, while heads of state and government would meet on Aug. 30-31.

Head of Iranian Majlis (Parliament) National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, set foot in the Syrian capital Saturday in a two-day visit, during which he will meet with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and other members of the Syrian government.

Boroujerdi told reporters that Syrian Prime Minister Wael Halki will take part in the upcoming NAM summit in Tehran.

Boroujerdi expressed optimism and said that "soon we will see a solution to the current problems."

"Our message to the brothers in Syria is a message of love and we hope to see stability and security in Syria," he said.

Iran will continue its support of the Syrian government and nation and will expand its ties with the Arab country in diverse areas including the parliamentary relations, the official IRNA news agency quoted Boroujerdi as saying in Damascus.

Meanwhile, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman said Saturday that regional issues and developments will be on the agenda of the NAM meeting.

Also, issues concerning Palestinians, Iraq, Afghanistan, Latin America and Africa will be included in the discussions of the NAM participants, said the Iranian spokesman.

In the NAM meeting, 27 presidents, two kings, seven prime ministers, nine vice-presidents, two parliament speakers and five special envoys will take part, Mehmanparast told semi-official Fars news agency on Saturday.

Iraqi ambassador to Tehran Mohammed Majeed al-Sheikh said Saturday that the forthcoming NAM summit in Tehran will be a " golden opportunity" to resolve regional and international issues, according to Press TV.

"The Tehran summit can be a center for dialogue among countries to settle the issues in the region by regional nations and governments," al-Sheikh was quoted as saying.

The region is currently facing many developments, said the Iraqi ambassador, stressing the meeting should focus on ways to restore rights of the oppressed Palestinians.

A member of Iranian Majlis said Saturday that the NAM member states play effective role in the world developments and the nations expect the movement to seriously discuss international developments, IRNA reported.

Zargham Sadeqi told IRNA that the NAM member states can play active role in making decisions on major international developments.

On Saturday, an Iranian military commander said that Iran's chairmanship of the NAM for the next three years is an indicative of the failure of the U.S. unilateral policies, Press TV reported.

Commander of Iran's Basij (volunteer) Forces Brigadier General Mohammad-Reza Naqdi told reporters here that Iran's chairmanship of the movement has challenged the U.S. power.

Naqdi added that "Washington would better give up its irrational stances toward Iran and stop its acts of sabotage."
 

Cliff@sea

C'est la vie
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,370
Likes
1,028
Country flag
Re: PM to arrive in Iran tomorrow to attend NAM Summit

PressTV - 'Non-Aligned Movement members seek reforms in UN structure'

(Click link for the Video )

Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast has stressed the importance of the 16th Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Tehran, saying the Islamic Republic is holding the meeting at a "critical juncture."


He added that the NAM summit indicates that the source of global management is suffering from weaknesses and deficiencies, stressing that there is a need for "new innovations and initiatives" in order to improve the situation in the international domain.

The Iranian spokesperson emphasized that the NAM, which is the second major world body next to the United Nations, can play an "effective and crucial" role.

He expressed hope that senior officials attending the NAM summit in Tehran would be able to discuss the lofty goals of the movement.

He cited intervention by major powers, their expansionist policies and violation of territorial integrity of other countries as main reasons behind insecurity in many countries.

"At the same time, the existing crises indicate that these few, specific countries are not able to run the affairs of the world, and also they are not able to run the international organizations. Therefore, if independent countries contribute to this universal management and play their roles, we will obtain development and sustainable peace more swiftly," Mehmanparast further said.

Press TV has conducted an interview with Ramin Mehmanparast, Foreign Ministry Spokesman, to further discuss the issue. The following is a rough transcription of the interview.

Press TV: First I'd like to ask you about the significance of Iran hosting this NAM meeting at this very important juncture in global politics.

Mehmanparast: In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. The 16th Non-Aligned Movement summit is being held at a critical juncture in the history of international relations.

The summit is being held in Tehran at a time when Western countries are facing major financial and social crises. This indicates that the source of global management is suffering from weaknesses and deficiencies. There's a need for new innovations and initiatives in order to improve the situation in the international domain.

In the meantime, the wave of Islamic Awakenings sweeping the Middle East and North Africa has led to major developments. Countries where people have a greater role for determining their destiny, they are in fact seeking to cut their dependence on the major powers.

All these conditions indicate that the Non-Aligned Movement with the 120 member states and 17 observer countries and organizations is the second major world body next to the United Nations. This organization can have an effective and crucial role to play.

At this critical juncture, we see that the delegations have widely welcomed their participation in the summit. This indicates the importance with respect to the timing of the summit.

Hopefully, with participation of senior officials from these countries, hopefully we'll be able to discuss the lofty goals of the movement and also the topics that have been on the agenda, and the circumstances to necessitate their influence on the international arena.

I think that one of the issues that is commonly on the agenda, that is a topic of the meeting, is sustainable peace under a common universal management.

This means that all independent countries and member states of the Non-Aligned Movement are after the establishment of peace and security throughout the globe, a type of peace that has to be a sustainable one, and also the factors that can guarantee such a peace, such factors must be obtainable.

Now, one of the main reasons for insecurity in many world countries is the intervention by major powers there, expansionist policies and the fact that they violate the territorial integrity of other countries.

They threaten other countries in order to attain their interests. They resort to military tools, and they also unilaterally seek to impose certain laws. These are the variety of topics that has caused concerns among the member states.

At the same time, the existing crises indicate that these few, specific countries are not able to run the affairs of the world, and also they are not able to run the international organizations.

Therefore, if independent countries contribute to this universal management and play their roles, we will obtain development and sustainable peace more swiftly.

We hope that this meeting in Tehran would prove to be successful in obtaining this goal with respect to the fact that the three-year period of presidency by the Islamic Republic of Iran will begin from Thursday after the transference of the rotating presidency from Egypt to Iran, and the necessary planning has been made for further measures in order to turn this movement into an influential body in the international arena with the help of all the members states.

We think that this is going to be a turning point in the history of the Non-Aligned Movement.

Press TV: I'm glad you mentioned the presidency of Iran from Thursday, as you've mentioned, of the Non-Aligned Movement. Can you tell us a little bit about if Iran will be restructuring anything within the NAM to make it a more effective body to fight many of these issues that the world is facing?

Mehmanparast: Well, one of the main reasons that the movement formation has been defined as a movement is that the independent countries that did not want to align with the Western blocs, they wanted to in fact create a new movement.

In order to avoid turning into a bloc, they did not go after the mechanism of an organization. They tried to make this body a more flexible body in order to be able to present its views on a variety of issues.

Therefore, the structures that normally are defined for the bodies and organizations do not exist within the Non-Aligned Movement. But we think the developments are going in a direction that necessitates certain changes so that we'll be able to make more effective and more useful use of the existing capacities.

The 120 member states form a more capable body. They in fact comprise 55 percent of the world population and 20 percent of the economic and financial circulation of the world. They can have an effective role in the international arena.

Therefore, the innovations, initiatives and plans can be raised, but these plans and initiatives have to be endorsed by all the member states. We think that as far as the statute of the body, the movement is concerned we can work out new plans.

As far as the economic structure is concerned, and also making the bilateral and multilateral cooperation a targeted one, we can present initiatives and innovations.

If there's defined cooperation within these countries, this can boost their abilities for countering unilateral decisions by other powers.

There are many initiatives and agendas, and hopefully we will be able to gradually move on with these initiatives and suggestions so that we'll be able to make use of independent countries in order to reach a point, in order to have a better world with enhancement of peace and security, and countries will be able to obtain their rights and defend their territorial integrities; in this way, reduce the gap between the developing and developed countries.

Press TV: I also want to talk about specific issues, if I may. The issue of Syria of course is important. We've heard talk and reports that Iran will be hosting a number of meetings with specific countries about Syria. What more can you tell us about that?

Mehmanparast: Speaking of peace and security in the regional countries is related to peace and security throughout the whole region. This is particularly true about a country like Syria that is a strategic situation. It's in the neighborhood of the Zionist regime.

The Zionist regime is the source of all regional and international threats.

In line with the issue of the Islamic Awakening, these pro-Zionist Americans did not manage to block this wave of Islamic Awakening and it feels that it has been harmed by the independence-seeking waves of this region and also it's going to lose the supporters of the Zionist regime.

They started in acts of causing seditions. On the pretext of defending public demands, they tried to pave the way for military intervention or they were after fomenting tension inside these countries.

The issue of Syria, what you see in Syria, actually, is beyond the ongoing developments, the demands of the opposition. Speaking of a Syrian issue, it's something beyond these domestic issues.

We believe that the interventions are not aimed at resolving the crises in Syria, the issue in Syria and the problem in Syria. They even may not be pleased with any sort of [solution] between the opposition and the government.

When Mr. Kofi Annan was designated as a special envoy and he presented his special 6-point peace plan, and there are some countries who have fully supported the plan, we believe that this is a good framework for, in fact, directing the situation in an appropriate way.

In any case of obtaining success, we've witnessed measures by foreign countries aimed at fomenting tensions and fomenting violence, and sending more arms into Syria in order to hamper the formation of a calm atmosphere, and hamper any peaceful condition from taking shape.

Therefore, the Islamic Republic of Iran is of the view that with the help of countries that have closer political views, it's feasible to pursue our plan so as to resolve the problem inside Syria as soon as possible with the help of the Syrian officials and also the conflicting parties.

We held a meeting in Tehran. It was the Syrian Friends meeting in Tehran. There were several countries and international organs participating. There were many issues raised.

One of the proposals by the Islamic Republic of Iran was the formation of a contact group so that effective countries, along with countries that believe with a peaceful resolution of the Syrian issue, they would just cooperate with each other.

In the course of the OIC summit in Mecca, Mr. Morsi also presented a proposal so that four powerful countries of the region including Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey would cooperate and hold consultations in order to look into regional crises such as the Syrian crises.

Also, there was a proposal that was immediately welcomed, that was two phone conversations between the Egyptian foreign minister with the Iranian foreign minister, and this is indicative of preparedness of both parties in order to seriously follow up this issue in order to improve the situation in Syria.

The NAM meeting is an opportunity and it can be analyzed from two perspectives. One aspect is that speaking of the meeting's documents reference has been made to the regional crises. There are three different chapters where the issues are addressed.

One is global and international issues that are related to the ideals pursued by the NAM.

Also, the regional crises is addressed by the second chapter issued such as in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, in Africa, Latin America and so on.

In the third chapter, reference has been made to the topics of development and human rights combating illicit drugs and combating human smuggling, and also subjects related to food security, health, energy security, access to information technology and so on. These are developmental topics.

Really, the framework of this document of the meeting, we also have issues related to the regional countries such as Syrian issue and in yesterday's expert level meeting, within the framework of the political committee, different issues were raised. Also, the Syrian issue was addressed at the committee.

There were minor differences of views among some NAM member states and with the management of the Islamic Republic of Iran. But by bringing their views closer together, an agreement was reached.

This agreement that has been reached among the expert level meeting in yesterday's session indicates that there is a suitable atmosphere for adopting effective decisions. In this way, we can make use of the capacity for resolving the crises.

Of course, this has to be confirmed at this afternoon's meeting. This afternoon we have the closing ceremony of the expert level meeting, and the secretary general will in fact present the views of the committees. In case there's no particular consideration, it will be finalized and endorsed.

Tomorrow, at the foreign ministerial meeting of NAM member states, it's going to be put forth.

This is a natural process and the Syrian issue is addressed as well. On the sidelines of this meeting, there is a valuable opportunity. There are senior officials of countries that have close views and they are concerned about the Syrian issue. They are seeking a solution.

We will make use of this opportunity on the sidelines of the meeting, and a comprehensive plan has to be raised. The views of all the conflicting parties will be included in this plan.

The government of course is ready to take more steps with reforms provided that the situation has calmed down. Hopefully, we will be able to make use of this opportunity for resolving the Syrian issue.

Press TV: Another issue, Mr. Mehmanparast, Mr. Salehi, the Iranian Foreign Minister, brought up the issue in his opening statement about the United Nations, and reforms that are needed in the United Nations itself.

Can you tell us about what Iran is thinking about as far as that goes, as far as the UN Security Council goes, etcetera?

Mehmanparast: One of the topics that's being raised amongst NAM member states is the changes that are necessary in the UN, Security Council and also other UN affiliated bodies.

Speaking of the general condition in the international arena, it's a special condition. We can compare it to the situation prevailing after World War II. There were new powers taking shape and some powers were facing a declining trend. There were new currents emerging in the international arena.

The situation's becoming similar to the post World War II era. There's a need for reconsideration.

If this structure was effective, we wouldn't have to face so many crises today. There was a good definition presented at the outset, but in practice there were political pressures by certain powers. You see that many issues of interest are being misused.

There is a motive among member states of the Non-Aligned Movement to have reforms for a better performance of the UN, the Security Council and also UN affiliated bodies and organs.

We, during our presidency over NAM [and] through the collaboration of member states, we seek to present initiatives and plans so that the Non-Aligned Movement as an integrated body with a unified approach would present its views with necessary reforms at the UN and international relations. Hopefully we will be able to attain the objectives set by NAM and also the goals that most of those countries believe in.
 

LurkerBaba

Super Mod
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
7,882
Likes
8,125
Country flag
Pm: Avoid cosying up to iran

From B Raman's blog

---

The Prime Minister, Dr.Manmohan Singh, has gone to Teheran to attend the summit of the Non-Aligned Movement. His participation in the summit will provide him with an opportunity to meet leaders from important countries of the NAM and to have another round of bilateral talks with President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan. Even if nothing substantive and substantial comes out of his meeting with Zardari, it will still be useful to keep the bilateral dialogue process going despite Pakistan's uncooperative attitude in dealing with terrorism and Psyjihad emanating from Pakistani territory.

2.India no longer plays the kind of leadership role in NAM as it used to in the past. We don't have to shed tears over it. While multilateral relationships are still important in economic matters, bilateral relations need to have greater priority in our national interest.

3. We have to carefully weigh the relative importance of our bilateral relations with Israel, the US and Iran before deciding whether any new policy initiatives are required in our relations with Iran. I do not think so.

4. We tend to be emotional in discussing our relations with Iran with deep nostalgic references to the civilizational links with Iran. Iranian leaders and analysts too talk of this civilizational relationship, but without any sign of nostalgia or emotion.

5. When Iran decided to start a covert war against Israel through acts of terrorism against Israeli nationals and interests in the territories of other countries having an Israeli presence, it chose India as one of its anti-Israeli covert warfare grounds. It tried to orchestrate the killing of an Israeli national working in the Israeli Embassy in New Delhi last February.

6. It did not allow any nostalgic or emotional attachment to its relations with India to come in the way of its sponsoring an act of terrorism against an Israeli national in our territory. It would not hesitate to sponsor another act of terrorism against Israel in our territory if a favourable opportunity presented itself without bothering about its impact on its bilateral ties with India.

7.Our strategic and national security interests should be the decisive factor in our policy-making towards Israel, the US and Iran. Yes, Iran has been an important factor in our energy security. But in other dimensions of national security, its role has been minimal and will continue to be so. It has no security-related modern technology. Its attitude on Pakistan-sponsored terrorism against India has been ambivalent. Its support for Indian interests in Afghanistan is uncertain. If it acquires a Shia A-bomb, we will be faced with Sunni as well as Shia bombs.

8.Our strategic and national security interests should dictate a careful nursing of our relations with Israel and the US, both of which have been more beneficial to us than Iran. Both have modern security-related technologies. Israel has never hesitated to share its technologies with India----even sensitive ones. The US is not as willing as Israel, but its attitude should improve as our bilateral relations improve. We have common strong interests with Israel and the US in countering jihadi terrorism. The intelligence agencies of India, Israel and the US have had a long history of co-operation in the exchange of intelligence. India shares a common interest with Israel and the US in monitoring and countering malign nuclear developments in Pakistan and Iran.

9. We should maintain our present economic relations with Iran so long as international circumstances and Iran's willingness permit it. Where the importance of our economic relations with Iran come into conflict with the requirements of our national security, which demand continued close relations with Israel and the US, strategic and security considerations should prevail over economic.

10. If one day Iran stops its energy supplies to India, we can find alternate sources. But if we allow emotional considerations relating to Iran affect the strengthening of our strategic and national security related ties with Israel and the US, we cannot find equally beneficial and dependable alternate strategic partners. ( 28-8-12)

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre For China Studies.)


Raman's strategic analysis: PM: AVOID COSYING UP TO IRAN
 

Jim Street

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
279
Likes
126
Country flag
Would like to see what would be India's foreign policy in future if US-Israel and Iran dispute increases. Another aspect will be how much US will back Israel against Iran.

Iran is way more necessary then ever. Our investment and future energy source will be from CARs and Iran not to forget minerals from Afghanistan. Currently Iran means a lot for us both strategically and economically way higher than Israel. But from defense POV, Israel has provided state of the art technology but its subjected to US pressure (AESA radar case).

Are we getting into too much complicated situation by maintaining relations with all these nations instead of joining one side entirely. latter option doesn't work in International politics especially in current condition and state of India.

I would like to ask the think tanks and senior members to explore these two scenarios. or propose other scenarios which may happen and our future policies.
 

Cliff@sea

C'est la vie
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,370
Likes
1,028
Country flag
Re: PM to arrive in Iran tomorrow to attend NAM Summit

UN chief decides to attend NAM summit despite opposition from the US and Israel.

UNITED NATIONS, Aug. 28 (Xinhua) -- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki- moon on Tuesday left New York for Tehran, the capital of Iran, to attend the 16th Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit, UN spokesman Farhan Haq said at a daily news briefing here.

Ban will convey to Iran "the clear concerns and expectations of the international community on the issues for which cooperation and progress are urgent for regional stability and the welfare of the Iranian people. These include Iran's nuclear program, terrorism, human rights and the crisis in Syria," the spokesman said.

"The secretary-general looks forward to the summit as an opportunity to work with the participating heads of state and government, including the host country, towards solutions on issues that are central to the global agenda, including follow-up to the Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development, disarmament, conflict prevention, and support for countries in transition."

Ban also takes seriously his responsibility and that of the United Nations to pursue diplomatic engagement with all of its member states in the interest of peacefully addressing vital matters of peace and security, Haq said.

Last Wednesday, the UN chief announced his decision to attend the NAM summit, slated for Aug. 30-31 in Tehran, despite strong opposition from the United States and its close ally Israel, who had even termed Ban's possible trip to Tehran as a "big mistake."

Nearly 100 members of the NAM have indicated their willingness to take part in the upcoming summit, reports said.

The United States and its Western allies have long accused Iran of secretly developing nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only.

The five permanent members of the UN Security Council, Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany have held many rounds of negotiations with Iran on the issue, with no substantial progress achieved so far.

Ban wants to see an Iranian role in the political settlement to the 17-month Syrian crisis, but his intention was blocked by Washington and its allies.

"The secretary-general will have a range of meetings with Iranian officials, and is expected to meet the (Iranian) supreme leader and the president," Haq said.

The secretary-general is scheduled to return to New York on Saturday, he added.

UN chief leaves for Iran to attend NAM summit - Xinhua | English.news.cn
 

average american

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
1,540
Likes
441
Why did the Non-Aligned Movement pick Iran for a meeting, to me it allways seems that NAM is against anything that the US supports,, they allmost allways voted witht he USSR when the USSR was a world power. They allways voted against Israel.....You cant be Non Aligned if your for one side or another.
 

Cliff@sea

C'est la vie
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,370
Likes
1,028
Country flag
in a bid to keep things in balance NAM has often sought to act as a counterweight to one side's growing influence over the other . . .Hence this perceived bias .

I see nothing wrong with it .
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top