US position on Syria directly endorses terrorism - Lavrov
Washington's reaction to blasts in Damascus is a downright justification of terrorism, slams Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. US State Department announced that terror acts in Syria are not surprising in light of the Assad regime's actions.
"This is direct endorsement of terrorism. How are we supposed to understand that?" Sergey Lavrov shared his astonishment at a press conference in Moscow. "This is a sinister position, I cannot find words to express our attitude towards that."
Lavrov also expressed his surprise that the UN Security Council refused to condemn acts of terror in Syria. The US permanent representative to the UN Susan Rice has stated that terror acts in Damascus contribute to speeding up the adoption of a resolution on Syria according to the Chapter 7 of the UN Statute, which implies harsh sanctions, including resorting to force.
"In other words this means 'We are going to support such acts of terrorism until the UNSC does what we want'," Lavrov commented on the US representative's actions.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said recently that there should be closer work with opposition in Syria as it captures more and more territories to prepare new actions of resistance to the government in Damascus.
Lavrov noted that there were reports that the opposition has taken control over border posts on the Iraqi and Turkish border with Syria and reportedly, there were cases of looting of Turkish property. According to some sources it was not Free Syrian Army militants that captured those posts, but by groups linked to Al-Qaeda, and Russian diplomats are verifying this information.
"If such actions of taking territories by terrorists are supported by our partners, we would like to ask them what their position on Syria is. What do they want to achieve in this country?" Russian FM demanded.
As for the EU unilateral sanctions against Damascus, they contradict the decisions taken by the UN Security Council and agreements reached at the Geneva talks, stated Lavrov.
"We believe the chosen unilateral way contradicts the principal of shared management of affairs accorded with the Geneva agreement," Lavrov said, adding that Russia advocates collective discussion of any questions.
"Unfortunately, when the EU, US and some other states began to adopt sanctions on Syria they did not consult with us at all," Lavrov observed.
Now that the Syrian crisis is over a year and a half old it is not exactly correct to appeal to the Security Council to adopt sanctions, shared the Russian diplomat.
Lavrov stressed that should the international community intended to address the Syrian crisis collectively – it should have been done that way from the very beginning, dealing with both combatant sides equally.
The heads of the EU foreign ministries have made a decision to broaden the list of Syrian officials banned from EU, also freezing their bank accounts and assets in EU countries.
Additional measures have also been adopted to ensure arms embargo on Syria. Henceforth, sea vessels and cargo aircraft heading for Syria are subject to compulsory inspection in case there are grounds to suspect they carry arms and prohibited equipment to Syria.
US position on Syria directly endorses terrorism - Lavrov — RT
US/British/Western position in World directly endorses terrorism
Agent Vinod, an "exact similarity" with my Experience
I found an exact similarity of my experience with a recent released Indian movie, "Agent Vinod"........ its not about Bollywood movies but, I just saw 'Agent Vinod' few months before and at the end he 'correctly' found out the main enemy who was controlling bomb blasts in India from Britain. that man made the exact same type of arguments to Vinod (Saif Ali Khan), like, "you can't understand what happens when chinese share market go up, what if something happens in different parts of world bla bla, geo-political reasons etc." this is the same type of bullshiits, the reasons, why top politicians of West are now involved in terrorism now days, I got a direct experience with that......
(like how I saw different bomb blasts in India being discussed around me in 2008 in WMA Ltd, with full misuse of Western media to trade those Bomb Blasts on the international platform. and even if we found ISI was behind that, as Kasab type IM's men were finally found Pakistanis at the end in 2008 itself, but one thing was certain that Western/British rulers were never willing to stop those dramas. and hence I got enough reasons to believe that those ISI agents were "Double Agents", working for US/British/Australian governments, who controlled/guided IM for the different attacks in India in 2008, and were given direct support from the Western governments to do so in India............)
this is the same type of philosophy with which the people like Mr T.Blair, Mr Howard, Mr Blair, Mr Bush and many other retired president and PMs of West are struggling with, mainly Mr Bill Clinton. the would be 'Cultural Wars', the sense that it's the blacks who feed whites, it's the white women who try for money by having closeness with rich immigrants, it's the rich immigrants doing white collar jobs who are superior to those local whites who work in work shop bla bla. and what may happen if this change may get established, to religious aspects/ to cultural aspects/ to national identities/ to Western identity, for the people who first proud to be a Western and then Americans, Italian, Australian, Canadian, British etc. and what if this or that?????? What may happen to West if chinese shares go up, and why few bomb blasts are required in such cases, these British and British origin politicians have all the good reasons for that. And at the end, Agent Vinod used an Al Qaeda suicide bomber to kill that British politician and took a picture of all those who were friends of that certain British man who was behind organizing bomb blasts in India.........
and many times I found western rulers, mainly British Origins of US/UK/Australia etc, have infused every strength of their country to get something done in India, on the diplomatic level/political level/full misuse of Media/ using businessmen like Bill Gates, Buffet etc..... and what I would recommend from my side, "I always try to find out why British and British origin americans/australians are sh!!ts/pigs and then I always catch them, and Indian government also has to do the same." and about the politicians/diplomats of Britain and british origin americans/australians/canadian etc, Indian government has to understand that they will have to finally kill these british politicians/diplomats, whether they may do it in front of the world or not. and even if India may not get chance to kill these british origin politicians, but Indian government always have to identify the main enemies, as these are those who even control pakistan/ use pakistan as an arm against India, regardless how many wars India-Pakistan has fought till now. India will only have to fight with British and British Origin politicians/diplomats of US/Australia/Canada etc, whether India gives space to these people to help them do their work easily in India or not. or, India would become like China and declare them national enemies....
India just has to understand that if they find snakes and British Origin politicians/diplomats then they will have to first kill that british origin politician of US/UK/Australia/Canada etc, later think for the snakes........
=>
Belief Vs Ground Reality
A long time before a high ranked western official told me, "only your belief help you see the reality." she meant to say that, "only belief of ours are behind the truth we see.".......
and in other words, if you believe Mr Jesus Christ was Son of God then believe in it, similar to over 1.5bil christians of the world otherwise no one can guarantee what might have happened around 1000 years before and from my side, I find him a type of psycho who was put on the front with his claim to be "Son of God", which might be intended to challenge the Rule of that country by introducing a 'belief'. so in response, the rulers of that country hanged Mr Jesus and his followers and told him to ask your father to come down and help you. but regardless all,
the 'business' of that incident on the name of Christianity is still being done......
we now find too many wars organized on the name of 'identity crisis', "political differences", "cultural war" etc but it all are intended to achieve religious goals and 'Rule' for the White/Christian/Western dominance, who are now look like prepared for even millions of deaths like in 19th/20th centuries, how different western countries fought with each others to take over other countries. as, now US/West are losing their greatness, based on publicity/military strength and the technology they got by help of professionals of the developing countries.......
and I replied to that lady, Ms Bevan, that, "when poor education level fall to a certain level, the only thing remain is, what we believe in regardless how things really work." there is no other reason to pick reality/truth on the basis of 'belief' only.....
one day i was told by few that people like me are not loyal to australia and i replied, "i may be loyal to you but not 'blindly', first because of moral ground and second, its looks like soon US/EU economies may fall and it will then bring australia under a serious military threat also as australia survive on 'security guarantee' of US/EU only and fall of US/EU will make a difference. and hence, I wont lose opportunity to go to the emerging markets in future in tough circumstances. as, the way you want me to always be loyal to australia in all the right and wrong case, the other side may also ask me the same if I will again try to back to that country????? the way i came here, if i again go somewhere else in search of better career opportunity in my profession then i would leave some space for myself to go back also, isn't it? coming to australia won't be a 'One Way Path'????????
overall,
I found Western Rulers want only those Indian/Chinese who either 'Hate' their countries or may be made a complete 'toy'/'robot' by misuse to government resources...........