Re: Chinese are "mongrels" & they "shoot their own people" says Austra
I had to look for the meaning of mongrel on google...
Well it's a bad word to be used for anyone and this douchebag manages to call 1.3 billion chinese as mongrels.
It's not necessarily bad in Australian English. While I'm not, if I was rugby player I'd be pleased to be described as a mongrel.
Let's not delude ourselves
We'll still be wogs and slumdogs to the anglos and next to our (chinese) asian brothers because we alienate ourselves by trying to demean them when theyre simply asserting themselves rightfully.
Last I checked it was hundreds if not over a thousand indian students who got violently attacked in Austrailia not the thriving prosperous chinese community in Aussieland
The reason Chinese are pro money/assets in the west is because the only way to get anglos to not discriminate or brutalize you is by having enough money
things are so bad indians have had to hold multiple protests involving thousands of people in austrailia. Indian media which is notoriously indifferent to indian people suffering has commented on it ad nauseum
Indian, particularly Indian students, have earned themselves a bad reputation in Australia. Mainly for abuse of the conditions of student visas, but also for those protests a few years. As a group, Indian students seemed to have calmed down. But, those protests were up there with Islamic groups demonstrations in Australia with the bizarre rhetoric making all sorts of ridiculous allegations.
Strange those protests, and "gangs of racist Australian attacking Indians" coincidenced with a change in Australian student visa policy which particularly affected Indians...
And you're the champion of the Indian media, are you OTM Shank? Yes, their stories on Indians in Australia were very accurate and useful.
You're in Canada OTM Shank? Are you one of those Vancouver Punjabi gangsters attempting to take over the city's drug trade at the point of a gun? Thankfully, Australia's Indian community hasn't gone the same way as Canada's. Well, at least not yet.
Absolutely true.
Before the influx of Asian immigrants, Australia do not have a limit on immigration since the majority of immigrants are from the "white" world. Suddenly, when more and more Asians entered Australia, they adopted immigration quotas and policies. Now its not about race, but it's about preserving the Australian culture and way of living.....meaning preserving white Anglo culture. And, they don't call that racism, what a joke.
There is certainly an element of race here with a minor influence of religion. Racism is not dead, it's called with a different term now.
Before the influx of Asian migrants? Which influx are you talking about 1870, 1980? The history of the Australian nation isn't so long, but it goes back to before 2000.
Immigration limits have been around (sorry I can't be bothered checking the date) since forever. They were definitely in place long before the majority of immigrants to Australia no longer came from New Zealand and Great Britain.
Always amuses me when Indian's talk about the White Australia Policy. Conversely, it annoys me when many Australians discuss it as Australians are awful at knowing their own history.
Indians and Japanese (they were our allies in 1900) were exempt for the White Australia Policy.
For entry into Australia, under the White Australia Policy, an arrivee had to pass a written test which was in an European language. Immigration officials decided which European language the test would be in and the majority of people denied entry, under the White Australia Policy, were European communists in the 1920's-1930's (They would get a test, which they'd fail, in Celtic or Basque language).
The White Australia policy was the idea of Australian trade unions and church groups. Unions didn't like wealthy Australians employing large numbers of (typically Chinese) labourers at low wages and the Church were opposed to Coolie labourers as they considered it to be, effectively, a form of slavery. Right wing politicians would have opposed government control over "assisted immigration" of Asian labour as those workers were important to industry. But unions and church groups, were pragmatic enough to realise that the Australia of the period was profoundly racist and if they called their policy the White Australia Policy, no right wing politician would vote against.
In retrospect, it was terrible name... But yes, while people here don't seem to understand Australia, I don't think the White Australia policy or Australian racism is relevant to this discussion.
