Looks real to me. I tried enhancing it further and like DaVinci code, the picture was speaking a thousand words to me. Enhanced pic:
Looks real to me. I tried enhancing it further and like DaVinci code, the picture was speaking a thousand words to me. Enhanced pic:
Let's face it. Both projects are unlikely to have progressed from wind tunnel testing.
Unless they progress to full scale mockups like this baby....it's all speculation.
They are all speculation until they are inducted in their respective air forces.
Anyways, Koji, isn't that the Mitsubishi ATD-X?
Is there some information about the specs?
If it exists, then how about opening a new thread for Japan.
well, Japanese have world class "machining and material" ,which is " the base of all bases".
however, Jananese is not good at management of project........F2.H2...etc all proves it.
besides it, japnese has many "blanket " to filled
are you out of your mind the Japs have Building aircraft since ages even after the second world war it was only till the 50's and early 60's that they completly dependend on USA for every thing with the Letter Defence in it
Mitsubishi F-2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mitsubishi F-1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ShinMaywa US-2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kawasaki C-1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kawasaki C-X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
well, chinese anti-stealth passive rada is ready to export!
that is why Chinese is not interested on Czecho's villa passive radar,although Czech tried its best to maket it to CHinese. .
Guest
Ok I cant read anything. Can you type down what is written there for me Badguy.
[QUOTE=badguy2000;23979]it is how the passive radar net works
wheere is the proof. we actually don't believe communist created spam. You have to bring a credible Information. Only pakistanis will believe you on this junk. First shoot down something stealthy, then we will listen to you. why don't u start with shooting down one the japanese F-22A. Please do your self a favor and post this some chinese viannen_10:
the anti-stealth radar is called " DWL002 PASSIVE DETECTION SYSTEM" ,which is introduced in english on the third picuture.:blum3:
Yjanks badguy...and why do u like that tongue smiley that much?
[QUOTE=JattDaDanda;23982]that just prove how you are ignorant!
passive radar has been used to detect traditional stealth objects like sub for decades.
it is not strange at all to use passive radar to detect new stealth objects like stealth birds.
Czech developed similar anti-steath radar several years ago,called "volla".
Czech once tried to market radar to Chinese, but failed.
now, the CHinese indigenious radar is ready to export, which exactly explains why Czech failed to market their "volla".
if you export this there is a chance USA will get it and reverse engineer it.
USA needn't RV it at all, because yankees mastered the tech long ago.
in fact ,the theory how passive radar can be used to detect stealth objects is very very mature.
During cold war, Yankees ,soviets ,UK and France all used passive radar to detect/trail each other's sub.
Frankly speaking , it is just a myth that "steath birds" like F22 can not be detected .
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)