- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 14,139
- Likes
- 8,594
Gloria Allred is our Patron Saint.No offence
It seems everyone in US sues somebody. They only need a reason, No matter how small it is
Gloria Allred is our Patron Saint.No offence
It seems everyone in US sues somebody. They only need a reason, No matter how small it is
Well, they are not the same women in each case.First, women press the government to pass laws to protect them from violent men, because they cannot defend themselves, and then they sue the government because they want to defend the country from violent men.
I guess that makes sense in a woman's mind!
One line epithets are not approved for discussion on DFI. You could look it up in the rules.You are a sexist.
But separate standards in the US Army are the rule, in reality. I have seen it.Of course, she must meet the same standards of fitness and physical ability as the men, there shouldn't be separate standards just to let women in.
Correction:^^
In either of two "opportunities" are to exist, women must be able to hold an MOS in a Combat Arm (Infantry, Armor, Artillery or Engineers). Just a fact.
In the mid-1980s the Combat Support (CS) branches were incorporated into the regimental system. Unlike the Combat Arms, which each had several regiments, CS branches retained their "Corps" title. The entire branch was integrated into a regiment under the "whole branch" concept.
There is a poorly defined distinction between the "combat arms" (who actively try to kill the enemy, as attack helicopters do), and the combat support and combat service support branches. Combat support, in theory, refers to those who actively facilitate the battle (such as the Signal Corps, Military Intelligence, Engineers, Military Police, and the Special Operations Forces' Psychological Operations and Civil Affairs units) while combat service support (CSS) refers to those who sustain the ability of the combat arms to fight by transporting the ammunition, fuel, food and water, servicing and repairing the equipment, providing health care, sorting the mail and providing other personnel and administrative services.
IMHO women can fight, and are usefull in some roles, but in some, they are just useless. I seen a women in Bundeswehre serving as tank crew members... the sight was just embarrasing for these women, the chick barely was capable to load a main gun, not to mention other stuff with vehicle maintnance services, that requires to do things with some other, heavier than ammunition, components of vehicle, for example road wheels or sprockets.
It was me, wasn't it? That day on the tank range?I have seen some men have the same problems.
Yes, you are a regressive sexist.Told you you'll paint me as a regressive sexist.
You see, a man is no one to tell a woman what she should be doing or not doing. That's her own business. But as it happens, the army is run by men not women. So if they want combat, they should just raise their own army. I know it sounds silly, because women in combat sounds similarly silly if you ask me.
Do you believe in God? If yes, good, if not even better, that means you believe in science. Both say clearly that men and women were not built for the same thing originally. There's a reason you've got a pole and she's got a hole. Neither God nor Evolution is stupid enough to create copies of same things in different sexes.
In any case, the majority of women, even if they pass the test, won't be able to handle the heat of the battle. Their brains and bodies aren't wired to do so. These are not my words. It's our job to protect our women and children first and foremost and not theirs. This is the way it has been intended. You can deny all you want to, but I welcome you to back it up with facts to the contrary.
In any case combat is a mark of masculinity. Why would feminists judge a woman through the prism of masculinity?
I look at it from a cost point of view. It is much easier to recruit suitable men for combat, probably because higher percentage would qualify.Yes, you are a regressive sexist.
It is true that the majority of women would not be able to handle warfare, but then no one is suggesting that we conscript all women into the army. There are also plenty of men who would be unable to handle war. However, those women who are capable of handling combat and meet the necessary requirements for armed service should not be barred from doing so simply because of their sex. That would indeed be sexism.
In my own hometown we have a female icon who was famous for her exploits on the battlefield and who humbled her male rivals. You can read about her to clear any doubts: Rani Rudrama Devi - The Brave Queen Of Medieval Kaktiya Empire- Her Life and videos � www.dilipkumar.in
She is no woman, why would a lady have to grow muscles like Arnold? she lose her femininity the moment she take steroids for muscle growth.How women like her Damian?