- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,988
- Likes
- 9,931
Buddy you need to educate yourself about your country's history.Not even Indira considered it to be a enemy act. So who are you to decide?
Buddy you need to educate yourself about your country's history.Not even Indira considered it to be a enemy act. So who are you to decide?
Nope there are plenty: Vedda, Moors, Tamils, SInhalese, and sprinkling of Malay, Borah, Memon and Burghers aka of European originBecause Sri Lanka don't have ethnic divisions like in India. Sri Lanka is only a historical homeland of Sinhalese.
Neither had developed an extensive civilization and culture in Sri Lanka except Sinhalese.Nope there are plenty: Vedda, Moors, Tamils, SInhalese, and sprinkling of Malay, Borah, Memon and Burghers aka of European origin
That was after 1977 mate. Learn some history.Actualy she did, She was the brain behind LTTE
I think it is you that need to be educated.Buddy you need to educate yourself about your country's history.
So living more than 100 years gives them right to the land they live on? So within next few years Indians could ask for separate homeland from British or Canadians maybe?They do, They have bee living for more than 100 years. If it werent Sinhalese wont have right over Island too. Maybe only tribes like Vedda would have rights over Island. Considering some genetic studies show that Sinhalese originated from Kalinga area.
Sorry for mentioning 100 years. New refernce materials predates their existence much much before, which in understandble, because tamils could "walk" into Lanka anytime via Ram Setu feature adam's /bridge, considering in ancient times, that place was very shallow. Tamil Nadu being neighboring of Lanka, would have arrived much earlier in Lanka before Kalinga origin Sinhalese. Some of the Vedda tribes in north Lanka, one of the original Lankan tribes, adopted Tamil culture in ancient times, points to the fact. So if you deny Tamils right over Island, same can be said for Sinhalese. So only abroginals would be orignals owners, isnt it? By that logic, all Pakis would need to be kicked out of Pakistan and thrown into Arabian sea, as their nativity cant be established to Indian subcontinent, by their own accountSo living more than 100 years gives them right to the land they live on? So within next few years Indians could ask for separate homeland from British or Canadians maybe?
What makes you think that Veddha's need to have the full right over the island?
The sinhalas who are claiming the Island are migrants from Orissa and Kerala !Because Tamils don't have a historical homeland in Sri Lanka. But they have a one in Tamilnadu. That's what bothering me.
Right after you pappu.............I think it is you that need to be educated.
Brother i am from himachal pradeshSomebody was pushing their poor refugees in our country.
They pushed about a million refugees creating trouble for us.
So, we helped those people to draw put their own country from that somebody.
That country is now a days called Bangladesh.
I guess I must call @SREEKAR @Srinivas_K @south block and @gslv markIII here.
Being from South India, they will tell what how strong p**sies and d**ks they have for doing your ratein rangeen.
Dreaming of detaching South Block from India?
Thank your God because Sri Lanka was one of few countries which India did not re occupy during it's unification program.
So are their any Sinhalese in Orissa or Kerala? Like to see them.The sinhalas who are claiming the Island are migrants from Orissa and Kerala !
Tamils have a history of thousands of years.
Read about Chola empire you have no idea about Tamil history !So are their any Sinhalese in Orissa or Kerala? Like to see them.
Tamils have a history of thousands years in Tamilnadu. Not in Sri Lanka. The most funny thing is that the so called thousand year old people don't even have a capital city or any kind of ruins to show to the world. Very peculiar.
Walking into Sri Lanka and going back doesn't count in nation states. What we need is a people who has civilized a certain area for a long period of time to claim it as their own. Unfortunately for Sri Lanka Tamils, they don't have such a civilization.Sorry for mentioning 100 years. New refernce materials predates their existence much much before, which in understandble, because tamils could "walk" into Lanka anytime via Ram Setu feature adam's /bridge, considering in ancient times, that place was very shallow. Tamil Nadu being neighboring of Lanka, would have arrived much earlier in Lanka before Kalinga origin Sinhalese. Some of the Vedda tribes in north Lanka, one of the original Lankan tribes, adopted Tamil culture in ancient times, points to the fact. So if you deny Tamils right over Island, same can be said for Sinhalese. So only abroginals would be orignals owners, isnt it? By that logic, all Pakis would need to be kicked out of Pakistan and thrown into Arabian sea, as their nativity cant be established to Indian subcontinent, by their own account
Are you brain dead? I'm talking about Sri Lanka. Not about Cholas. You Indians seems to lack any kind of brain power lately? Too much cricket maybe the cause.Read about Chola empire you have no idea about Tamil history !
I'm always ahead of you kiddo. Don't worry about that.Right after you pappu.............
Are you brain dead? I'm talking about Sri Lanka. Not about Cholas. You Indians seems to lack any kind of brain power lately? Too much cricket maybe the cause.
Answer directly next time. Or else it is not worth commenting to your post.
You are overlooking my questions. Please answer them.
Who migrated? Vijaya was an Indian prince. He wasn't a Sinhalese.also you are denying the historic migrations of your people.
So you take note of the history from maps like these? Dude.......
you have no idea about history !
The only education I need regarding blood and soil nationality is on Ironmarch thank very much.....I'm always ahead of you kiddo. Don't worry about that.