Why are we not allowed to buy lands or freely move in North east India?

[kurup]

These kind of restrictive laws should have no place in India . Just like Article 370 was strike down , these laws should be removed as well .

 

[Swiftfarts]

These kind of restrictive laws should have no place in India . Just like Article 370 was strike down , these laws should be removed as well .

No they should be there. Those restrictive laws are there to protect native people, there culture, there rights over there land from greedy predators from outside. after all india is a federation of states. India is not some lumpa and chodhu personal jaagir after all.

 

[shade]

And who will do the civil war .
Against whom you intend to fight .
Indian nation never genocides people out of free will .
You remove those barriers, people from bengal and assam and bangladesh will flood there .
These guys kill bangladeshi without remorse .
Assamese are same too.
Road and rail connectivity will be increased .
As it's the case .
Please don't antagonize them , for chyna is right there at your doorstep near those places .

Their oogah boogah will start with full force eventually, backed by Chings anyway, and we only share land border with Chings in AP, and those tribes there are completely chill, and very patriotic .
Troublesome tribes/states are Meteis( Manipuris ), Kokborok( supposed "natives" of Tripura state instead of the Bong majority there ) and Nagas.

I personally think , settlement of indic tribes in large no there will be final solution .For them
They can't kill all of us with dao , can they ?

Yes it's the only solution, you have the Tripura model and the Assam model to look at.
imo Assamese should be promoted in doing settlement of these areas, to start they can focus on "reconquest" of border districts of Assam that are connected to Al-Bongolistan.
In old times Bongs could do it( They converted a large amount of Manipuris to Hinduism some 100-200 years ago ), now I doubt they have the capability.

 

[shade]

No they can't be rescinded anytime mate. Those privileged are there for reason.

They can m8, 370 gaya na? what could Mufti, Omar and their well wishers in Pindi do apart from crying?
Kashmiri ghazis are now being domesticated as pet dogs now, from the jackals they were before.

The same fate awaits these Naga, Metei types if they start doing some stunts because of the lalach of chink money and illusion of Cheeni abbajaan coming to save them.

 

[Swiftfarts]

They can m8, 370 gaya na? what could Mufti, Omar and their well wishers in Pindi do apart from crying?
Kashmiri ghazis are now being domesticated as pet dogs now, from the jackals they were before.

The same fate awaits these Naga, Metei types if they start doing some stunts because of the lalach of chink money and illusion of Cheeni abbajaan coming to save them.

Kashmiri jihadis and Kashmir is a different problem all together. same is not the case with NE. Insurgency is not as brutal as J&K for obvious reasons. You are comparing apples and oranges. Even in Kashmir if you read what has been introduced after removing 370 is something similar to Himachal next door. I assure you that won't stop islamist from there usual tactics. What is needed is strong military presence and crackdown on foreign funds and NGO. NE are ethnically , cultural different people from mainland all together. Such action will create more problem anger , trouble and resentment. islamist from west and Bangladesh lumpas are a bigger threat then these NE rebels, since the motivation in former is 10 times higher than later. and the later demographic trajectory destiny is against them.

 

[kurup]

No they should be there. Those restrictive laws are there to protect native people, there culture, there rights over there land from greedy predators from outside. after all india is a federation of states. India is not some lumpa and chodhu personal jaagir after all.

In that case every state in India has its own natives , culture and right of land ... so we should make these laws applicable to all states .... and give in to the Son of Soil demands.

 

[Swiftfarts]

In that case every state in India has its own natives , culture and right of land ... so we should make these laws applicable to all states .... and give in to the Son of Soil demands.

Yes that's up to those states. Many do have such laws i think. nothing wrong with it. Metropolitan cities should be avoided from such laws though.

 

[porky_kicker]

In Assam non domiciled persons can buy land .

Other states can't , supposedly to protect the tribes .

Actually it was to allow unhindered evangelism of the NE , congi was complicit in it .

Anyways I believe in future the rest of the states must be open up , ie atleast implement a 25% quota where land can be owned by non domiciled people.

Main problem is even before Hindus from other states can buy land , large hordes of muzims already in the NE states will grab most of the land , it is a complicated situation created by congi since independence.

Only solution imo is to reconvert the entire NE back to Hinduism , and break the hold of abrahamics in NE and then bring in changes.