Russia is not an individual project - Professor Jukka Korpela
https://aratorkustannus.wordpress.com/2014/05/
Western sanctions against persons Putin's close circle. Helsingin Sanomat, presented 13.5. photographs of this oligarchy. Environment minister Niinistö spoke the previous evening Cheesyly at A studio of how Putin should steer towards the Western policies. Came to mind 80's kremlologian times when listed on the Communist Party secretarian names and evaluated, who is the hawk and who dove. Ratings went wrong because the side rose to the leadership is usually some unknown person.
American culture is a world of individuals. There's fighting for good and bad together. This model leads to classify at the Middle East at the Far East at the Eastern European leaders. When evil is identified, a coalition with the good is formed, so that fairness. Time after time follow disappointments when, after all, does not work at all.
East societies are communal. They justice and truth are not tied to the individual and the judgment of, but justice aims of Community balance. Therefore, all human rights are not absolute rights of the individual, but the right to live in the correct (ie, the correct approved) values. Individuals therefore do not implement their own passions, but the success of the Community. Pluralism is not in this world, but the ideal of a threat and a sign decadence. Although the communal world is not honest, altruistic nor fair, it controls the business activities to other solutions than the Western man might think.
Work and research experience, says that Putin's assessment of Russian society, Brezhnev, Gorbachev and Stalin project is a mistake. Russia's history is full of all the world, "nobodyj
Russia is not an individual project - Professor Jukka Korpela
Western sanctions against persons Putin's close circle. Helsingin Sanomat, presented 13.5. photographs of this oligarchy. Environment Niinistö spoke the previous evening Cheesy A studio of how Putin should steer towards the Western policies. Came to mind 80's kremlologian times when listed on the Communist Party piirisihteerien names and evaluated, who is the hawk and who dove. Ratings went wrong because the side rose to the leadership is usually some unknown person.
American culture is a world of individuals. There's fighting for good and bad together. This model leads to classify at the Middle East at the Far East at the Eastern European leaders. When evil is identified, a coalition with the good, so that fairness. Time after time petytään, after all, does not work at all.
East societies are communal. They justice and truth are not tied to the individual and the judgment of, but justice aims of Community balance. Therefore, all human rights are not absolute rights of the individual, but the right to live in the correct (ie, the correct approved) values. Individuals therefore do not implement their own passions, but the success of the Community. Pluralism is not in this world, but the ideal of a threat and a sign decadence. Although the communal world is not honest, altruistic nor fair, it controls the business activities to other solutions than the Western man might think.
Work and research experience, says that Putin's assessment of Russian society, Brezhnev, Gorbachev and Stalin project is a mistake. Russia's history is full of all the world, "nobodyjä", which are soon gone, and begun to function snapped the former elite. This is successful because it is only an administrative operator nor the Western person from believing the political reforms.
Ideological revolutions have never been part of this, other than at the level of words. I have actually seen, although history textbooks chock-full of stories revolutions occurred in Russia. In fact, they have changed very little content themselves. This was the case even of the Soviet Union gave birth to the October Revolution, the. Putin has even itself a good example. He came from obscurity. His specific character is efficient administration. Nothing arbitrary ideological or societal he has not made.
The current debate in Russia ideology summed up like this. Russian power is ideologyness in the sense that power usage is pragmatic. However, it is ideological in that the background is a multidimensional russionasims, which is believed to make the Russians as unique. This was the case during the Soviet era and today the Tsar. This is the power of the masses and the Republic, but at the same time they both are also prisoners. Eurovision Song Contest winner Conchita Wurstin aroused reaction in Russia to prove that a pluralistic civil society, the opposition is not due to the leaders but the whole moral atmosphere in society.
Is it worth begins to analyze Russia as a phenomenon and forget about the individual level, in the sense of trying to think Putin to Western multi-party democracy actor. Putin does not run its own political agenda, but is managed by being Russian. At the same time, of course, action will also enrich him, as similar policies have enriched the oriental rulers for thousands of years. East did not see nor know how to distinguish public and private and individual and collective one another. Still, Putin and other leaders have also this system prisoners. They can lead to the system for his own benefit only in accordance with its rules. If they change the rules, to replace them as soon as possible by another dictator who respect these rules. In principle, just that crashed Gorbachev. Western countries will remember him for good and bad Russians
ä", which are soon gone, and begun to function snapped the former elite. This is successful because it is only an administrative operator nor the Western person from believing the political uudistusagendoista.
Ideological revolutions have never been part of this, other than at the level of words. I have actually seen, although history textbooks chock-full of stories revolutions occurred in Russia. In fact, they have changed very little content themselves. This was the case even of the Soviet Union gave birth to the October Revolution, the. Putin has even itself a good example. He came from obscurity. His specific character is efficient administration. Nothing arbitrary ideological or societal he has not made.
The current debate in Russia aatteettomuudesta summed up like this. Russian power is aatteeton in the sense that power usage is pragmatic. However, it is ideological in that the background is a multidimensional venäläisyys, which is believed to make the Russians as unique. This was the case during the Soviet era and today the Tsar. This is the power of the masses and the Republic, but at the same time they both are also prisoners. Eurovision Song Contest winner Conchita Wurstin aroused reaction in Russia to prove that a pluralistic civil society, the opposition is not due to the leaders but the whole moral atmosphere in society.
Is it worth begins to analyze Russia as a phenomenon and forget about the individual level, in the sense of trying to think Putin to Western multi-party democracy actor. Putin does not run its own political agenda, but is managed by being Russian. At the same time, of course, action will also enrich him, as similar policies have enriched the oriental rulers for thousands of years. East did not see nor know how to distinguish public and private and individual and collective one another. Still, Putin and other leaders have also this system prisoners. They can lead to the system for his own benefit only in accordance with its rules. If they change the rules, to replace them as soon as possible by another dictator who respect these rules. In principle, just that crashed Gorbachev. Western countries will remember him for good and bad Russians