Just to reinforce my point.
Sohail Tanveer is an example of aam abdul who gets cookies(sporting contact, visiting India) from neighbor(India) but then he goes back and bad mouths the neighbor(India). Here is a video of Sohail Tanveer abusing the Indians(particularly Hindus) after exclusion of Pakistani cricketers.
Also, notice the attitude of the anchors, they freely abuse India. If the public media uses this kind of language to describe India, Indians and Hindus, then what would be the attitude of the aam abdul?
Rather than being grateful for allowing Sohail Tanveer to participate in the first IPL, he abuses India for not buying him again. Sohail Tanveer earned US $ 100,000 in first IPL which is equivalent to 84,00,000 Pakistani rupee. Yet, he has no gratitude, instead he is angry that the 'evil hindus' have not bought him again. He displays a typical pakistani sense of entitlement: that the world owes them something. So, when the neighbor(India) tries to befriend the kid(aam abdul) with cookies(sports, enterntainment, culture,..etc), the kid(aam abdul) only has contempt for the neighbor(India).
Even after making such abusive statements, Sohail Tanveer has been hosted by India. Sohail Tanveer recently attended the high profile wedding of Sania Mirza and Shoibh Malik. Link
. Later, he visited Kolkatta to attend an IPL match.
He further hopes to play for the future IPLs
Even though he has not displayed any sense of regret or shame at his earlier statements. Neither has he apologised.
Now, some Indians may construe this as India's magnanimity but it will be viewed by the aam abdul(in this case Sohail Tanveer) and the rest of the world as contemptible cowardice or complete lack of self respect.
In this case, the aam abdul sees no reason to question his parent(PA) because gets his cookies anyway from the neighbor. But instead, if the cookies are stopped by the neighbor(India) then aam abdul will look towards his parent(PA) for cookies.