What if we had to choose between MBT's.

Atul

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
514
Likes
9
Was the Choice of T-90 a Right one?

Were other options worth a Second look?

Here in, this Thread, we would discuss about other MBT's vis-a-viz the T-90.

Here in is the List of MBT's:
Merkava_mk4


Leclerc


Leopard_2a6


Challenger_2


M1a1_Abrams

===============================================
Please Comment on how Our Very own Bhishma stands against the ones stated above & if it is indeed the right choice.


Some info about the Bhishma:
T-90 Bhishma or Bheeshma. It is a license-built variant in service with the Indian army. It lacks Shtora countermeasures system, but retains the 9K119 Reflex ATGM capability. It is also powered by the 1000 hp diesel engine.:vehicle_tanke:
 

sky

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
340
Likes
25
I'm british so i may seem biased but i would choose the challenger 2 . Having spoken to friend's who served in our armed forces,they are adament the challenger is the best tank in the world bar none.

During the gulf war 1 the challenger was a star performer,even the american's were impressed by its performance .
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
7,955
Likes
28,990
Country flag
Leopard 2A6, Challenger 2, and M1A2 Abrams are superior to [the vanilla] T90, beyond doubt. The question is viability. T90 is already indigenously made, and it's also getting its share of modernizations. T90M being a good example. When we can make larger quantities of T90(M) locally, why import the more expensive M1A2 or Challenger2? Money saved is better spent in increasing the quantities.
 

Atul

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
514
Likes
9
the Question here is since Russia is turning out to be a Non-Reliable partner for supplies, would it had been better had we opted some other MBT.
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
7,955
Likes
28,990
Country flag
I think purchase of MBTs (and supplies / spares / tech. assistance / training) is less viable than further development and indigenisation of T90. Now that India is making its own T90s under license(?) from the Russians, our indegenisation (manufacture of complex equipment, components, and munition) should only proceed forward. Setting up new channels for purchase of MBTs from EU, Israel, and US is only going to be an expenditure. For once we must give our developers some canvas. Despite three decades in development, Arjun, for example, has shown that all our developers need is some canvas.
 

Atul

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
514
Likes
9
I think purchase of MBTs (and supplies / spares / tech. assistance / training) is less viable than further development and indigenisation of T90. Now that India is making its own T90s under license(?) from the Russians, our indegenisation (manufacture of complex equipment, components, and munition) should only proceed forward. Setting up new channels for purchase of MBTs from EU, Israel, and US is only going to be an expenditure. For once we must give our developers some canvas. Despite three decades in development, Arjun, for example, has shown that all our developers need is some canvas.
Dear Tarun,

my Question is prior to the purchase of T-90 had we got the options then what? which one of the listed is the best & why?
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
7,955
Likes
28,990
Country flag
There's no telling how reliable a military partner remains in the long run. One mistake our policy makers have made is that there has not been a single country with which we have had the kind of defense procurement ties we have had with the Soviets/Russians, until recently. Conversely, replacing the Russians with partners we're unfamiliar with isn't a good choice either.

But if I were to choose among those MBTs, I would choose the Leclerc for its comparatively low unit cost, unclassified armour (helps us make our own shards), 1500 hp engine, decent ~500 km range, and the fact that we've had reasonably good defense equipment ties with France, (during the time when T90 was being purchased)
 

ppgj

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,029
Likes
165
if you go by the present i would go for arjun. but because your following-

Dear Tarun,
my Question is prior to the purchase of T-90 had we got the options then what? which one of the listed is the best & why?
i would have gone for Leclerc. why? because of this-

Arjun MBT weight implications | Frontier India Strategic and Defence - News, Analysis, Opinion - Aviation, Military, Commodity, Energy, Transportation, Conflict, Environment, Intelligence, Internal Security

checkout the comparison table in the report.
 

Srinivas_K

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
6,021
Likes
7,174
Country flag
one of the reason IA is going for T90 is that it can resist the radiation levels of nuclear explosion.
 

bengalraider

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
3,778
Likes
2,609
Country flag
The IA needed a tank that could be inducted in large no's at a relatively modest cost, we had already operated the T series for quite some time (since the T-55)and hence we decided to go for the T series, simple economics that's it!

If the IA had an unlimited budget and could choose any tank i believe it would have gone in for either the M1A2 T.U.S.K or the Leopard 2a6, But it did not so the best that could be bought was bought.
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
america would not give TOT with abhrams , T-90s is the best tank in the world
 

K Factor

A Concerned Indian
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
1,316
Likes
144
one of the reason IA is going for T90 is that it can resist the radiation levels of nuclear explosion.
Skumar, NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical) protection is one of the most basic features of all modern MBTs, and even APCs and IFV today. All the other tanks mentioned above can do that as well.

T-90s is the best tank in the world
:swtf:
 

bengalraider

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
3,778
Likes
2,609
Country flag
america would not give TOT with abhrams , T-90s is the best tank in the world

Dear Mr Singh,
please elaborate as to how you have come to that conclusion
q1.does the T-90 provide better safety than an abrams if yes then how?
q2. is the T-90 more accurate than a challenger if yes then how?
q3. is the T-90 better suited for urban warfare than a leclerc if yes then how?
q4 . is the T-90 a better all-rounder tan the leopard 2a6 if yes then how?
 

firechameleon

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
14
Likes
1
i think we should also consider operational costs.... for me i like the mighty challenger... BUT it's a turbine based gas guzzler... i think financiallly, t-90 best suites us....

if money is no issue, then either challenger or the israely tank......
 

K Factor

A Concerned Indian
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
1,316
Likes
144
i think we should also consider operational costs.... for me i like the mighty challenger... BUT it's a turbine based gas guzzler... i think financiallly, t-90 best suites us....
Challenger does not use a turbine engine, it uses a conventional V12, 1200hp engine. The M1 Abrams uses a Honeywell Turbine, which gives it 1500hp, but the exhaust gases are so hot that anyone standing near the tailpipe will get scalded badly.
 

StealthSniper

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
1,111
Likes
60
I would take the Leopard 2 tank in an instant if I had a choice of tanks to choose for the Indian Army.

YouTube - Leopard 2 Tank Documentary



But for India's needs I like the T-90s. It has a low profile, a powerful engine, and India has been using Russian tanks for a long time so they are familiar with it. Only thing I think is a weakness for the T-90 is the autoloader. But if money was no object and we could get any tank we want, I would get the more mobile, more advanced and better looking Leopard 2.
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
[/B]
Dear Mr Singh,
please elaborate as to how you have come to that conclusion
q1.does the T-90 provide better safety than an abrams if yes then how?
q2. is the T-90 more accurate than a challenger if yes then how?
q3. is the T-90 better suited for urban warfare than a leclerc if yes then how?
q4 . is the T-90 a better all-rounder tan the leopard 2a6 if yes then how?
abram and safety but at what cost,those depleated uranium armour is environmental hazard,plus those tanks are made for crusing ,in big cities ,i have seen a picture of abrams with small refrigirator inside in deser storm operations
the missile defense systems give the T-90 maybe an advantage against modern ATGMs
The M1A1 weighs 63 tons...the T-90 weighs 46. ,hence T-90 is faster
not forgetting ,the logistics required for MIAI is very expensive
OPERATIONAL RANGE AND IN WEAPONS T-90S IS BETTER

Challenger 2 is equipped with a 120 mm . The T-90's main armament is the 2A46M 125 mm smoothbore gun.
operational range of challenger 2 -450km
operational range of t-90s -550km
power of the engine in challenger 2-1200hp
power in T-90s - 1250hp

T-90s has 3tier defense system whereas challeneger has only 2 tier defense system

if you want to compare t-90s with any tank it would be leopard 2,not forgetting that germans have always , made good tanks ,leo2 is not exception,plus looking from IA side ,T-90s is the most logical choice
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
69
I know the T-90 came with a TOT, am just evaluating what if the other 5 options had come with a similar price TAG & TOT. what then?
You must be joking... the Germans, Brits, French, Usraelis... they haven't sold tank ToT to any customers. The Abrams the US has been selling to Arabs are stripped down steel pieces of junk according to Amerikan tankers. Even a modernised T-72 would make short work of it according to a USMC major I know. The T-90S is the only game in town for a modern home built tank... unless you want to go Chinese.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top