- Joined
- Aug 10, 2020
- Messages
- 29,418
- Likes
- 112,981
Ya'll Nibbiars let's keep it's India or else lock this thread @ezsasa Nibba @Indx TechStyle Nibba.
I didn't mean to derail this thread nibba but siteing reference is important.Ya'll Nibbiars let's keep it's India or else lock this thread @ezsasa Nibba @Indx TechStyle Nibba.
Let me guess !
(1) Overpopulation
(2) Insufficient water
(3) Most areas are too close to ocean so chance of flooding
(4) Earthquakes, too common in JPN.
I don't see a harm even in a 100 million people city.
Science and tech can manage it well, if properly planned.
Still Tokyo ranks very highly in livability index
Article expired
News on Japan, Business News, Opinion, Sports, Entertainment and Morewww.japantimes.co.jp
Its all about planning even China is building these megacities or atleast connecting two cities to make it into a megacity for higher productivity
Navi Mumbai was said to be the best of the all Planned cities in India since independence and until 1 decade back people used to confirm that it is actually really well planned.
this is too old, as of now many things have been changed.
Ya'll Nibbiars Yeah. And there are no traffic jam's.Navi Mumbai was said to be the best of the all Planned cities in India since independence and until 1 decade back people used to confirm that it is actually really well planned.
But now no new news comes from Navi Mumbai!
How did it turned out to be in actual? Is it still well planned?
Amazing. I actually like the grid based city planning as done in Europe. Always wondered why no Indian city follows grid based architecture.
This guy actually made a great video about ChandigarhAmazing. I actually like the grid based city planning as done in Europe. Always wondered why no Indian city follows grid based architecture.
US follows more of Cul-De-Sacs city planning:
in WW2 when germans & brits razed many european cities, they got the opportunity to redesign entire cities afresh. grid architecture was already present pre ww in spain i think.Amazing. I actually like the grid based city planning as done in Europe. Always wondered why no Indian city follows grid based architecture.
US follows more of Cul-De-Sacs city planning:
It indeed is a well planned city with it's big roads, pedestrian infra, huge and well designed stations etc. But it has not reached it's potential in terms of its proximity to Mumbai.Navi Mumbai was said to be the best of the all Planned cities in India since independence and until 1 decade back people used to confirm that it is actually really well planned.
But now no new news comes from Navi Mumbai!
How did it turned out to be in actual? Is it still well planned?
Ya'll the business ever shifted due to it's the Scale down version of the Charles Correra the original was in the much larger scale's.It indeed is a well planned city with it's big roads, pedestrian infra, huge and well designed stations etc. But it has not reached it's potential in terms of its proximity to Mumbai.
Vashi and Belapur which were supposed to be alternate business districts never really took off and have small companies. The majority of actual business activity takes place in Airoli-Ghansoli-Mahape belt and far flung Taloja MIDC (which is not part original Navi Mumbai plan and currently it is part of Panvel Municipal Corporation).
I hope Navi Mumbai lives up to it's potential and the vision with which it was created and not just another pricy satellite town of Mumbai for people to commute to Mumbai form.