What is dying a Hindu mean... the other guy said it but you didn't make him explain... bro stop promoting this hatred. What good is that guy doing by spreading misinformation? British ruled in from 1858-1947, they arrived in 1608... "Sikhi" existed before this from Guru Nanak and was culminated in 1699, way before the British even took over the Maratha. God bless you.
Brother, the British came to India in 1608 and began exploring from the South, but fought the Maratha wars in the 1800s as they slowly progressed up into India and taking over. How would they have created Sikhism. Just a simple glance over Indian history of the period will tell you this as I'm not a historian, but if you read the guys article you can clearly see his bigotry through his comments... I especially liked it when he made fun of us by calling Canada "KENEEDAAA" in the article.I would suggest a civilized convo, instead calling names to your own fellow countryman/brother
Although I agree that the Sikhi is on the same ideological spectrum as Hinduism, as having shared values and ethos
I'm not aware of the British creation, (I may be wrong)
Would like to read more on it before making a comment
Ajit Vadakayil is a meth head
LOL I didn't take him seriously but I cannot stand idly by and say nothing, some else will take this and spread it further or just out right believe it. I'd consider it a rant with copy and paste and heavy edits (pseudohistory). I don't see our Sikh brothers making articles defaming Hinduism or distorting references but alas this is the society we live in I guess. I respect your approach towards this even though you knew this guys ideological beliefs.Ajit Vadakayil is a meth head
I don't want to come off as a rude person
But
It's your fault if you take Shitheads like Vadakayil seriously, he comes up with conspiracy theories like this every time he smokes a joint
Cheers mate
What fudu lok fudu soch & what hate? Facts doesn't care about your bull s**t & feelings. There was another Marathi manush guy giving character certificate for Rajputs, as it was his to give anything to anyone.
Fellow countrymen can do all the propganda against my community but when countered with facts muha don't spread hate, don't do this Don't do that.
Its you and Only you who not just acted as a communal vile but have the most pathetic and disgusting mindset to begin with.
Who did I vilify? Please explain and define the word. I even said God bless. Please don't add to his rant, his wife didn't even convert to Islam when Banda and her family were captured, she didn't convert when Banda was being fed his sons flesh... she kept her faith until the end (she took her own life). You tell me how she acted against him? Why you fail to mention the context. I'm not sure why you can't understand that Banda used to read hands and tell fortunes before he became a Sikh, (name was Madho das bairagi) after realising that just being an ascetic sadhu is not going to win a war or save themselves from Mughals.
You just said what you are acting out. History doesn't care for anyone's feelings hence the reason you can't pick and choose what belongs and what doesn't; and begin changing it to fit your narrative (what the author of the article is doing). How about the propaganda and slander against the Sikh community, don't don't fall under "my" or are the ones in India not considered apart of India. This wasn't factual by any means necessary, and yeah its called being a nicer person (ever heard of it) but all I'm getting from you is hostility. I didn't tell you what you can and cannot do, just pointed out what the guys intention was when writing it. You saying "my community" is all the more reason you are getting defensive for no reason, no one said anything about you or whatever community you are from Mr. Bulgaria. The only ones spreading propganda against the majority in India is the other half of the majority; while the common folk fight amongst themselves, the politicians and wealthy keep looting India.
