Umayyad Invasions of India - The First Wave

Chimaji Appa

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
634
Prelude:
The Arab empires emerged in around 640 with the rise of a new religion, named Islam,. After winning several battles with the Eastern Romans and the Sassanids of Persia(Iran), they had reached the frontiers Indian Subcontinent at around 640 after destroying the Sassanid Empire. The Rai kingdom of Sindh clashed with the Arabs first, but were defeated in the Battle of Rasil, and lost the entire Balochistan to them.
At around 712, Sindh was captured by Muhammad Bin Qasim, a young general of the Iraq Governor, due to getting lucky in the Battle of Raor against the Brahman king of Sindh, Raja Dahir. His rule as the new governor of Sindh lasted few years, before being called back and executed by the new Caliph(main ruler) for being “too tolerant”.

First Invasion:
His successor, Junayd ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Murri, attempted to make inroads into India via Rajasthan, while he sent a contingent north towards the Kashmir- Kangra. The army sent north was defeated by Lalitaditya Muktapida of Kashmir and Yashovarman of Kannauj (Kanyakubja), while the Arabs under Junayd who went west made significant inroads into Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Gujarat. This was a full scale invasion with the purpose of adding another province to the Empire. However, upon entering Malwa (Madhya Pradesh) they were crushed by the Gurjara- Pratihara King, Nagabhata 1 as well as his feudatory Bappa Rawal (founder of the Guhilots of Mewar). The Gurjara king successfully expanded his power throughout Rajasthan.

Second Invasion:
The next Arab invasion happened about 10 years when later when
the next governor of Sindh, Al-Hakam ibn Awana, took a different approach. He went south via Gujrat up to the Navarasi River, overrunning every little kingdom in its way from Rann of Kutch to Surat. However, south of the Navarsi laid the powerful Kannadiga Chalukya Dynasty which annihlated this army. The general of the Chalukyan army even received the title of “Repeller of the Unrepellable” as shown in his copper plate inscription. Al-Hakam ibn Awana is said to have died fighting a smaller kingdom, most probably the Maitrikas of Gujurat, on his way back.

Aftermath:
Following the losses on 3 different fronts, no other major Arab expedition was taken into India. Several minor expeditions were taken into India, but they were successfully stopped by the Gurjara Pratihara Kings Nagabhata 2 and his son Mihira Bhoja. In India, a 200 year long struggle commenced between the Pratiharas of Rajasthan/Gujurat, the Rashtrakutas of Karnataka, and the Palas of Bengal for the Kannauj Kingdom.

Sources:
Majumdar, R. C. (1977). Ancient India (Eighth ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass
Richards, J.F. (1974). "The Islamic frontier in the east: Expansion into South Asia". Journal of South Asian Studies.
Majumdar, R. C., ed. (1955). History and Culture of Indian People. Bombay
Puri, Baij Nath (1986). The History of the Gurjara-Pratiharas. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
 

LurkerBaba

Super Mod
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
7,882
Likes
8,125
Country flag
The next Arab invasion happened about 10 years when later when
the next governor of Sindh, Al-Hakam ibn Awana, took a different approach.
...
Aftermath:
Following the losses on 3 different fronts, no other major Arab expedition was taken into India.
Contrarian view:

This brushes over the fact that Sindh was lost and no attempt was made to re-capture it. These tactical victories were good, but an overall strategy was completely missing.
 

Chimaji Appa

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
634
Contrarian view:

This brushes over the fact that Sindh was lost and no attempt was made to re-capture it. These tactical victories were good, but an overall strategy was completely missing.
I am of that opinion as well. You should read my post in the Tripartite struggle thread. The whole 200 year conflict was completely useless. The Indian kings should’ve united and focused on the next big threat at its doorstep- Islam. The Pratiharas, Palas, or Rashtrakutas would’ve been able to keep the Ghurids at bay, but the 200 year struggle weakened all 3. Hindu crusades should’ve occured, Sindh And Punjab should’ve been recaptured, and the Hindu kings should’ve made it loud and clear like the European crusaders did; we will unite to keep Islam at bay. Hindu kings were on the defensive waaay to much, and we lost it all in The end.
 

vampyrbladez

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,260
Likes
26,566
Country flag
I am of that opinion as well. You should read my post in the Tripartite struggle thread. The whole 200 year conflict was completely useless. The Indian kings should’ve united and focused on the next big threat at its doorstep- Islam. The Pratiharas, Palas, or Rashtrakutas would’ve been able to keep the Ghurids at bay, but the 200 year struggle weakened all 3. Hindu crusades should’ve occured, Sindh And Punjab should’ve been recaptured, and the Hindu kings should’ve made it loud and clear like the European crusaders did; we will unite to keep Islam at bay. Hindu kings were on the defensive waaay to much, and we lost it all in The end.
If only Shivaji was born earlier. I feel generations of Hindus have been 'cucked' because of this stupid caste divide and regional egos!
 

Srinivas_K

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
7,420
Likes
12,945
Country flag
If only Shivaji was born earlier. I feel generations of Hindus have been 'cucked' because of this stupid caste divide and regional egos!
Not because of only caste system as western scholars and media portray, but mainly because of the central Asian phenomena and failure to adopt to the new technologies and strategies of invaders, infighting among the local kingdoms also an important cause.

Warriors do not need to be from particular caste, they may come from any caste.
 

Chimaji Appa

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
634
Edit: it appears that Qasim sent a general and contingent that was defeated by Lalitaditya and Yashovarman of Kannauj, not Junaid. Although, I am not sure which one. It would make sense that Qasim attempted to expand up north was repulsed by these 2 rulers, as Junaid was focusing on his western campaign.
 

Chimaji Appa

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
634
If only Shivaji was born earlier. I feel generations of Hindus have been 'cucked' because of this stupid caste divide and regional egos!
Put nowadays Hindus in our ancestors spots, history would be much different. In fact, it would be the exact opposite.
 

Chimaji Appa

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
243
Likes
634
Not because of only caste system as western scholars and media portray, but mainly because of the central Asian phenomena and failure to adopt to the new technologies and strategies of invaders, infighting among the local kingdoms also an important cause.

Warriors do not need to be from particular caste, they may come from any caste.
This is correct. The Nandas, Kakatiyas, and several Vijayanagar generals were all shudra. There were also several important Brahmins to note, a unknown one being Skanda of Prithviraj.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top