UK ELECTION CIRCUS

[Armand2REP]

Ah so you have "become" French? Interesting, because that may explain the rather feverish patriotism.

And as for turning your previous "west" into "the country we came from", you have got us mixed up with the "Asian" UK Labour supporters or your banlievues.

As far as the Indians are considered, we obey laws, learn the language, don't rape, or claim special privileges or religious rights while outperforming the superior westerners in schools, universities and medical colleges.

That's plenty of fucking "assimilation", and a great deal more than the British, French and other westerners did when they came over first.

It comes down to a simple question of what you want to be and where is the best place to be that. If you want to be British then you would do that in Britain. If you want to be Indian the best place to do that is India. It is like sitting on a fence torn between two sides. The beauty of this life is that we can choose what we want to be. The tragedy of this life is people who don't know what they want to be and never being contented with who they are.

 

[Icarus]

Ah so you have "become" French? Interesting, because that may explain the rather feverish patriotism.

And as for turning your previous "west" into "the country we came from", you have got us mixed up with the "Asian" UK Labour supporters or your banlievues.

As far as the Indians are considered, we obey laws, learn the language, don't rape, or claim special privileges or religious rights while outperforming the superior westerners in schools, universities and medical colleges.

That's plenty of fucking "assimilation", and a great deal more than the British, French and other westerners did when they came over first.

As @south block said, no matter how good a slave you are to your western masters (as is evident from this post where you're literally pleading that you're an obedient, law-abiding immigrant), they will always see you as another version of the Mussalman, nothing more. You will never be treated as an equal.

 

[temujin]

Lol, another torn Salwar in paki closet. Remember reading those comments on news portals by Abduls writing India dare snap relationship with UK over corbyn resolution on Kashmir.

Corbyn is out. Thanks for that paki ****** who did jihad on bridge and displayed his pakistaniyat.

Some tweets says corbyn was leading till 5 pm and then hard working brits voted after their job hours. Gives an impression that freeloaders, good for nothing Abduls form votebank of corbyn.

Shame I'm not in the UK atm to soak in all the drama. I've long quit watching or listening to the BBC but do tune into LBC occasionally and it was funny how every Paki, Muslim ringing in was rooting for Corbyn despite Communism being complete anathema to Islam-these bastards will join hands with even the devil if he furthers the interests of their death cult (a bit like their alliance with Congis in India). They must be shell shocked from Corbyn's trouncing- hope their tears are still stinging lol

As for the Tory win, a lot of it is to do with popular anger at Labour's repudiation of its original stand on Brexit but its also likely that the Brexit Party actually helped the Tories several seats by taking votes off labour. They also damaged the Tories in some seats but I think the seats gained outweigh any losses.

The real brain behind Boris is Dominic Cummings, his chief advisor- he's not wasting any time and is already on a war path against the entrenched leftist elite, starting with the Civil Service, Supreme Court and the BBC. Expect lots of changes in UK politics in the next few years, including closer alignment with India as things unfold..

 

[sorcerer]

It comes down to a simple question of what you want to be and where is the best place to be that. If you want to be British then you would do that in Britain. If you want to be Indian the best place to do that is India. It is like sitting on a fence torn between two sides. The beauty of this life is that we can choose what we want to be. The tragedy of this life is people who don't know what they want to be and never being contented with who they are.

No matter what you turn into you never forget your monther land...as for that matter.
cuz if you get thrown out by the natives of that land no matter what..you need to have a fall back plan...even though with a passport and other crap..you are still adopted by the new land.
Thats how things are gonna be in the coming years yo...
Brace brace brace!

 

[Indx TechStyle]

@Haldiram yeh loh GK naya!

Naya toh nahi hai bhai.........

 

[temujin]

15 Indian-origin MPs in new UK Parliament - Times of India
LONDON: The House of Commons will have 15 Indian-origin candidates after four new Indian-origin candidates - including a PIO set to be Britain's youngest-serving MP - won seats in Thursday's general election and all 11 PIOs defending their seats retained their seats.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...in-new-uk-parliament/articleshow/72550708.cms

Narayana Murthy’s son-in-law, Priti Patel among 15 Indian-origin winners in UK election
Rishi Sunak, the son-in-law of Infosys founder NR Narayana Murthy, also secured a resounding victory with 36,693 votes, marking a majority for the Tories of 27,210. The 39-year-old has been the MP for Richmond, Yorkshire, since 2015.

Source: The Qunt ..so not posting the link

Rishi Sunak impressed with his media performances during the campaign and is tipped for a promotion. Also Sajid Javid is hardly a full blown Paki-he owns a dog so he has committed kufr already and he is super hard on muzzies so I wouldn't worry too much about him being chancellor

 

[sorcerer]

Rishi Sunak impressed with his media performances during the campaign and is tipped for a promotion. Also Sajid Javid is hardly a full blown Paki-he owns a dog so he has committed kufr already and he is super hard on muzzies so I wouldn't worry too much about him being chancellor

Quechen would be to take back London...and kick the Jihadi London mayor from pakistan out!

 

[Armand2REP]

No matter what you turn into you never forget your monther land...as for that matter.
cuz if you get thrown out by the natives of that land no matter what..you need to have a fall back plan...even though with a passport and other crap..you are still adopted by the new land.
Thats how things are gonna be in the coming years yo...
Brace brace brace!

UN Conventions don't work that way. Your citizenship can only be revoked if you have dual citizenship somewhere else. You cannot be made stateless and the UK Nationality Law reflects that. It takes years to re-acquire Indian citizenship and is only at the behest of India if you are worthy enough to return. If your parents were born pre-Independence it speeds it up but if you are a young guy your parents wouldn't have been old enough to qualify and have to follow the same lengthy process as everyone else.

If the UK turns facist and rejects UN Law and their own current law and starts throwing out foreigners you will be made stateless. If you truly fear this I suggest getting OCI so you can at least stay in India without problems. It will take a long time to get your citizenship back.

 

[temujin]

Quechen would be to take back London...and kick the Jihadi London mayor from pakistan out!

Difficult since Londonistan is full of 'diverse' types who will vote for this jihadi crook again. Shaun Bailey, the Tory candide being black may garner some of the diversity vote but he'll be up against it in a run off. Rory Stewart, an ex Tory (used to be a spy-read the account of his journey by foot along the Hari Rud from Herat to Kabul in Winter tracing Babur's journey 5 centuries ago- it's fascinating- other than that he's an almighty twat) is also running. He may get a lot of the left-liberal- diverse votes so Shaun will be in with a chance if Rory ends up in the run off instead of Khan.

 

[temujin]

Duplicate post..….........................

 

[temujin]

UN Conventions don't work that way. Your citizenship can only be revoked if you have dual citizenship somewhere else. You cannot be made stateless and the UK Nationality Law reflects that. It takes years to re-acquire Indian citizenship and is only at the behest of India if you are worthy enough to return. If your parents were born pre-Independence it speeds it up but if you are a young guy your parents wouldn't have been old enough to qualify and have to follow the same lengthy process as everyone else.

If the UK turns facist and rejects UN Law and their own current law and starts throwing out foreigners you will be made stateless. If you truly fear this I suggest getting OCI so you can at least stay in India without problems. It will take a long time to get your citizenship back.

The UK has recently stripped many jihadis of citizenship, rendering them stateless. That Bongoli jihadi bride Shamima Begum and the ISIS 'beatles' being cases in point

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-begins-appeal-against-loss-of-uk-citizenship

 

[Armand2REP]

The UK has recently stripped many jihadis of citizenship, rendering them stateless. That Bongoli jihadi bride Shamima Begum and the ISIS 'beatles' being cases in point

They have stripped over 100 jihadis of citizenship and they had dual nationality. The other three cases are still working around the judicial system. If a person is made stateless it is a violation of international law.

 

[temujin]

They have stripped over 100 jihadis of citizenship and they had dual nationality. The other three cases are still working around the judicial system. If a person is made stateless it is a violation of international law.

None of the so called ISIS Beatles or Shamima had dual nationality- my understanding is that they are revoking citizenship of those who may be entitled to another citizenship by virtue of ancestry. This could of course be challenged in ECHR but I think the current dispensation is determined to keep these individuals out not least because the policy is a very low cost vote winner.

 

[Bhoot Pishach]

Mean while what Punjabies think about English PM!!

 

[Armand2REP]

None of the so called ISIS Beatles or Shamima had dual nationality- my understanding is that they are revoking citizenship of those who may be entitled to another citizenship by virtue of ancestry. This could of course be challenged in ECHR but I think the current dispensation is determined to keep these individuals out not least because the policy is a very low cost vote winner.

Of course the Home Office wants to keep them out, the question is will the Hague allow them to do so. The ECHR will not have authority once Brexit is completed but they will still be subject to the ICJ. If the UK goes completely rogue of international law there will be consequences.

 

[temujin]

Of course the Home Office wants to keep them out, the question is will the Hague allow them to do so. The ECHR will not have authority once Brexit is completed but they will still be subject to the ICJ. If the UK goes completely rogue of international law there will be consequences.

ECHR derives its authority from the convention and Council of Europe so will continue to apply post Brexit. I believe Shamima has been denied legal aid to pursue her case through the courts and the government is bound to put up a spirited defense wherever the matter is heard

 

[Armand2REP]

ECHR derives its authority from the convention and Council of Europe so will continue to apply post Brexit. I believe Shamima has been denied legal aid to pursue her case through the courts and the government is bound to put up a spirited defense wherever the matter is heard

ECHR rulings are not binding and if you aren't in the EU there are no repercussions for violating them.

 

[temujin]

ECHR rulings are not binding and if you aren't in the EU there are no repercussions for violating them.

ECHR has nothing to do with the EU- convention rights are enshrined in UK statute through the Human Rights Act and the government has a legal responsibility to ensure that its actions are in conformance with it. The 1st port of call for the jihadis in this instance would be the Supreme Court which can declare incompatibility (could be Article 8 or the one on fair trial that are engaged in this instance) and if the government does not offer remedy, the case can then be taken to ECHR whose ruling would be binding on the government through the HRA (hence why there is talk of scrapping the Human Rights Act in favour of a Bill of Rights)

 

[Armand2REP]

ECHR has nothing to do with the EU- convention rights are enshrined in UK statute through the Human Rights Act and the government has a legal responsibility to ensure that its actions are in conformance with it. The 1st port of call for the jihadis in this instance would be the Supreme Court which can declare incompatibility (could be Article 8 or the one on fair trial that are engaged in this instance) and if the government does not offer remedy, the case can then be taken to ECHR whose ruling would be binding on the government through the HRA (hence why there is talk of scrapping the Human Rights Act in favour of a Bill of Rights)

The UK has not ratified the European Convention on Nationality so the ECHR has no jurisdiction in this case. The only court outside of the UK that has jurisdiction is the ICJ.

 

[sorcerer]

Difficult since Londonistan is full of 'diverse' types who will vote for this jihadi crook again. Shaun Bailey, the Tory candide being black may garner some of the diversity vote but he'll be up against it in a run off. Rory Stewart, an ex Tory (used to be a spy-read the account of his journey by foot along the Hari Rud from Herat to Kabul in Winter tracing Babur's journey 5 centuries ago- it's fascinating- other than that he's an almighty twat) is also running. He may get a lot of the left-liberal- diverse votes so Shaun will be in with a chance if Rory ends up in the run off instead of Khan.

hmmm...
How much of the economy does London control..how important it is in policy making when it comes to India or having control over the parliament of UK