it's not a question of "if" U.S provides intel to canada. they are treaty partners, intel will be shared.
it's not like diplomats don't know this.
anyways, if today's bhawal is based on that CBC news reports, then they are clutching at straws to cover for their PM. CBC is their doordarshan, ofcourse they will cover for their PM.
it doesn't look like canada's deputy PM has any clue either.
Not going by their state TV. I don’t think there is a treaty where the US is obligated to share every single Intel. If this was the case, the US would have first called us up and warned that they have no option but to share this Intel and that Modi better butter up Trudeau during G20. The US did nothing of the sort. Plus indian officials did not agree to the Intel presented as credible during the NSA level conversations. And the US would have known that India rejected the so-called Intel. All this means is that US would have asked parties to go quiet and sort it out privately.
Trudeau going rogue means he just did not get any backing from the US potentially because the intel was not convincing enough for the US to force India to privately ack the incident. If the US pressed, India would have had no option but to give in. So, nothing Canada says and does makes sense.
What I am saying is regardless of everything the Khalistani terror presence in Canada is now widely seen by the world. We must use this opportunity to threaten Canada with a reference to FATF. We must gain intelligence that shows Canada khalistanis financing terrorism in India including through their consulates here. The US will be against us doing so. Now everything can be privately settled by the 3 parties. India cannot walk away from this without getting Canada to ack that it was deliberately harboring terrorists.