There is extreme intolerance, says Shah Rukh and Aamir Khan

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
8,812
Likes
9,146
JuD chief invites SRK, other ‘such Muslims’ to Pakistan
TNN | Nov 5, 2015, 05.32 AM IST


Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the alleged mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.

NEW DELHI: Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the alleged mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, has invited Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan to Pakistan.

"Any such Muslim, even Shahrukh who is facing difficulty and discrimination in India because of Islam are invited to stay in Pakistan," he tweeted from the handle, @HafizSaeedJUD01, on Tuesday. The account is not verified.

"Even the renowned Indian Muslims in the field of sports, academia, arts & culture are fighting a constant battle for identity inside India," posted Saeed, also Jamat ud Dawah chief, in another tweet.

In a series of tweets, Saeed lauded Indian intellectuals for raising their voice against intolerance.

"We welcome Indian Intellectuals raising voice against intolerance inflicted by Hindu extremists if & whenever they come to Pakistan. We would be pleased to demonstrate to them JuD's ongoing relief and rehabilitation efforts for minorities living in Pakistan," he posted.

"Discrimination against minorities in India particular (sic) Muslims are proof enough that Modi's India no more secular. Its fascist Hindu state," he said.http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-Muslims-to-Pakistan/articleshow/49666990.cms
I would like to see SRK's reply to this.
 

Bangalorean

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
6,217
Likes
6,610
Country flag
Yeh toh hona he tha na...years of Bollywood indoctrination has got us to this point and they've only become more aggressive in their social engineering agenda. I shudder to imagine where we will be with blatantly anti Hindu/Pro Pak movies like PK & Haider. I'm arguing on a forum against SRK, and I'm in the minority. Can't tell Pakis from Indian liberals.
I'm sure that is a Bollycrap forum, please correct me if I am wrong. Just curious to know which one it is.
 

DingDong

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
2,511
Likes
4,478
Country flag
JuD chief invites SRK, other ‘such Muslims’ to Pakistan
TNN | Nov 5, 2015, 05.32 AM IST


Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the alleged mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.

NEW DELHI: Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the alleged mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, has invited Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan to Pakistan.

"Any such Muslim, even Shahrukh who is facing difficulty and discrimination in India because of Islam are invited to stay in Pakistan," he tweeted from the handle, @HafizSaeedJUD01, on Tuesday. The account is not verified.

"Even the renowned Indian Muslims in the field of sports, academia, arts & culture are fighting a constant battle for identity inside India," posted Saeed, also Jamat ud Dawah chief, in another tweet.

In a series of tweets, Saeed lauded Indian intellectuals for raising their voice against intolerance.

"We welcome Indian Intellectuals raising voice against intolerance inflicted by Hindu extremists if & whenever they come to Pakistan. We would be pleased to demonstrate to them JuD's ongoing relief and rehabilitation efforts for minorities living in Pakistan," he posted.

"Discrimination against minorities in India particular (sic) Muslims are proof enough that Modi's India no more secular. Its fascist Hindu state," he said.http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-Muslims-to-Pakistan/articleshow/49666990.cms
"Such" Muslims and Intellectuals must take this offer without any further delay.

In my view the "Award Wapsi" died Afzal Guru's death at the moment when Arundhati Roy joined the bandwagon.

Found this in my mailbox

SHAME ON YOU SO CALLED INDIANS.

The Sinister and Nefarious Design of Breaking India forces EXPOSED. MUST READ for Modi Govt. Supporters.

1. GOI intelligence has investigated ‪#‎AwardWapsi‬ & primary report suggest that US-Saudi-Pakistan are involved.

2. It started when few Senior Congressmen + JNU Professors + Sr. Journalists + Sahityakars met and these writers were convinced to use Dadri incident as fool proof issue

3. The first meeting held at JNU and later at India International Center & Habitat center. At first these Sahityakars were reluctant to fall in line due to fear of negative reaction but then they were narrated about the favors from Congress

4. They were shown how they got awards, favors, threat from Modi & fund shortage. Later Nayantara Sahgal was introduced. And was made to lead protest.

5. Nayantara Sahgal was the turning point due to NEHRU connection and all were promised full backing of Media, Congress & international opportunity.

6. Globally 150 writers & journos were hired to write article on #AwardWapsi & to build image of India as " INTOLERANT" nation under Modi

7. To promote & divert in benefit of Pak-US-Saudi, Ford Foundation & Green Peace hired an international PR firm and millions were invested as fee & benefits

8. The Writers, Poets, Narayan Murthy, Raghuram Rajan, film-makers..they all used one word which is common in every statement " INTOLERANT". How is it possible ALL use same word even when caught off guard for comment?

9. Bihar election is just BONUS. Start point is US-PAK-Saudi (UPS) want to STOP India's efforts to secure UNSC Seat. Not surprising, Congress is party to this. Also as per latest reports in west, US is worried about its people driving toward Hinduism & Vatican is worried on Christian future. This explains why Pope was in US during Modi visit. Surely he didn't come to hear India & Pakistan development plan at UN.

10. UPS designed Chakravyu of "Human Rights" to project INDIA as a country INTOLERANT to other religions, a Hindu terror promotor under MODI. PR firm and Presstitutes are all to take it to world via International Press. Saudi Arabia is Chair of UNHR commission, a Pakistan friend & very soon with Pakistan going to question India's human right violations. WATCH it, its coming.

11. This report is with MODI govt & Modi's UAE visit was one trump card to counter it. In GOI investigation, it has come up that the PR firm has funded many presstitutes, print, TV, writers, film associations & makers in $$

12. Condition of funding is to "Keep Dadri & #AwardWapsi etc. alive at all cost till Nov 5 & dig out incidents which can be linked even for short term"

13. If BJP lose Bihar, it will be projected as Govt which is crushing Human Rights on International platform including UN.This will STOP make in India & FDI inflow derailing MODI development for rest of the term. Also Article 370 revocation & Uniform Civil code will be in the frozen bag.

14. If BJP wins Bihar then major country wide RIOTS planned so that GOI is busy in it till 2019 and to project MODI as an incompetent prime minister who pushed nation into riots and unrest. Hardik Patel was a good attempt but Social Media & GOI busted it.

15. After Bihar election, as Amit Shah indicated in the Arnab interview, GOI will go in full throttle to counter the notorious & nefarious design & full investigation of #AwardWapsi gang

16. Request to all Modi Govt supporters, please don't fall in TRAP. Expose media, politicans, seculars but with FACTS. Check images if they are photoshop. You all are FIRST line of defence to MODI Govt. You voted him for 5 years. TRUST him. He has the toughest JOB on earth.
 

Hari Sud

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
1,747
Likes
2,233
Country flag
Shah Rukh Khan is missing the point. He jumped into the intolerance fray because he has been directed not by convictions of his own but opportunity was right to plead the Muslim causes after Congress party lost the general election badly. Then came the deliberate muck raking of Dadri beef eating row. Of course persons like Shah Rukh Khan are all right with pork eating issues. Cow is sacred to the Hindu majority -85% but pork is abhorrent to 14% minority Muslim. They like all pork selling shops closed down in Muslim majority areas, if they get an opportunity.

Remember Mr. Shah Rukh Khan, that Muslim in Bollywood reign the silver screen. There are three Khans - Shah Rukh Khan, Amir Khan, and Salaman Khan, they rule the silver screen. They have been ruling it for last twenty years. These Khans offer no opportunity to anybody else to rise to the top. Many times the Dawood Ibrahim money to make a movie is denied because it does not include one or the other Khan, hence Khan rule of silver screen continues unabated. It is filling the pockets of Khans including Dawood Ibrahim with unlimited cash, much of it unaccounted for I.e. black money. I suppose you are alright with it, because the financier is Muslim, the actor is Muslim and the incoming cash although is all Hindu cash, but suits you fine. You are not intolerant with it.

Let us open pork butcher shops next to a Mosque and follow it with gay bar and a strip club all in the vicinity of the Mosque. Since you are a tolerant man, these should be alright with you. Now, do not tell me that you are opposed to these. What happened to your tolerance.

I suppose Mr. Shah Rukh Khan that tolerance lessons are all for Hindu majority. These do not apply to you and your Muslim brothers.

We have a bunch of awardees, all leftist and all Congress Party supported, returning their awards. They waited too long to return, perhaps they were reluctant, but one of the many reasons they are returning awards is that the political party who was directing this retuning awards campaign was waiting to malign the BJP to be in the middle of an election fray and then start this campaign of retuning the awards. Congress party for the last sixty years, preferred leftist intellectuals for awards. They loved them and at a critical time like now, they would could ask them to return the awards and create a scene for the media to harp on it.

Well go ahead and return these awards, what are waiting for.

Think Mr. Shah Rukh Khan before you become a politician.
 

Agnostic_Indian

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
930
Likes
243
Politicians should stop talking rubbish about Shah Rukh Khan: Anupam Kher
Politicians should stop talking rubbish about Shah Rukh Khan: Anupam Kher



Anupam Kher has come out in support of Shah Rukh Khan after Yogi Adityanath compared SRK with Pakistani terrorist Hafiz Saeed for his comments over intolerance in India.
By: PTI | Mumbai |Updated: November 4, 2015 6:07 pm
Anupam Kher took to Twitter to blast the controversial statements made by some of the BJP leaders againstShah Rukh Khan.
Anupam Kher has come out in support of his “Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge” co-star Shah Rukh Khan after Yogi Adityanath compared the Bollywood superstar with Pakistani terrorist Hafiz Saeed for his comments over intolerance in India.

Kher, 60, took to Twitter to blast the controversial statements made by some of the BJP leaders against Shah Rukh Khan.

Hitting out at Shah Rukh two days after the actor added his voice to the protest by the intelligentsia against the ‘climate of intolerance’, Adityanath also suggested that the actor should go to Pakistan.

In another controversial remark, the Gorakhpur MP said Shah Rukh should remember that if a “huge mass” of people in the country would boycott his films then he would also have to wander on streets like a “normal Muslim”.

http://indianexpress.com/article/en...ing-rubbish-about-shah-rukh-khan-anupam-kher/
 

Screambowl

Ghanta Senior Member?
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,959
Likes
7,860
Country flag
Politicians should stop talking rubbish about Shah Rukh Khan: Anupam Kher
Politicians should stop talking rubbish about Shah Rukh Khan: Anupam Kher



Anupam Kher has come out in support of Shah Rukh Khan after Yogi Adityanath compared SRK with Pakistani terrorist Hafiz Saeed for his comments over intolerance in India.
By: PTI | Mumbai |Updated: November 4, 2015 6:07 pm
Anupam Kher took to Twitter to blast the controversial statements made by some of the BJP leaders againstShah Rukh Khan.
Anupam Kher has come out in support of his “Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge” co-star Shah Rukh Khan after Yogi Adityanath compared the Bollywood superstar with Pakistani terrorist Hafiz Saeed for his comments over intolerance in India.

Kher, 60, took to Twitter to blast the controversial statements made by some of the BJP leaders against Shah Rukh Khan.

Hitting out at Shah Rukh two days after the actor added his voice to the protest by the intelligentsia against the ‘climate of intolerance’, Adityanath also suggested that the actor should go to Pakistan.

In another controversial remark, the Gorakhpur MP said Shah Rukh should remember that if a “huge mass” of people in the country would boycott his films then he would also have to wander on streets like a “normal Muslim”.

http://indianexpress.com/article/en...ing-rubbish-about-shah-rukh-khan-anupam-kher/
The only Rubbish is, he is pro Indian .......... may be this Anupam Kher meant :p
 

asingh10

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
1,785
Likes
3,449
I don't really care for Anupam Kher or Raveena Tandon support to BJP either. No I know for a fact that most of these Bollywooders are loyal to the fraternity before anything else. Can't really expect anyone in an institution like Bollywood to be a patriot. No expectations.
 
Last edited:

asingh10

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
1,785
Likes
3,449
Funniest thing I saw on this Bollywood forum is Pakis + some Indian libs pushing the idea that situation of Muslims in India is similar to Blacks in America who are oppressed by majority.

http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4498542&PID=128164431&#p128164431

^^ The above poster is a paki btw.

Notice how they take western ideas of minorityism and transpose it on Indian society without taking into any consideration towards cultural context or Indian history. Blacks were taken as slaves by whites to America, in India it was the Hindus who were turned into slaves by Muslims and sold them in markets of Middle East & Central Asia. Muslims were part of the ruling elite, divided the country into 2 and yet it is the Hindus who should bear the 'oppressor guilt'.

Like Sardar Patel said, a 'minority' that divides a country is no minority at all. This myth of muslim victimhood and false narrative of minorityism needs to be destroyed if India wants to move ahead or we will be stuck in these kind of sickular-communal debates forever. Muslims got what they wanted in 47 with Pakistan and look what they have done with it, which Hindu is oppressing them there ? They got the best lands in Punjab and see it with where it is today (fortress of hafiz syed) vs what Sikhs have done in E.Punjab (Green Revolution). If Muslims are backward, it is because of the choices they have made for themselves.
 
Last edited:

vayuu1

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2015
Messages
833
Likes
1,082
Country flag
Funniest thing I saw on this Bollywood forum is Pakis + some Indian libs pushing the idea that situation of Muslims in India is similar to Blacks in America who are oppressed by majority.

http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4498542&PID=128164431&#p128164431

^^ The above poster is a paki btw.

Notice how they take western ideas of minorityism and transpose it on Indian society without taking into any consideration towards cultural context or Indian history. Blacks were taken as slaves by whites to America, in India it was the Hindus who were turned into slaves by Muslims and sold them in markets of Middle East & Central Asia. Muslims were part of the ruling elite, divided the country into 2 and yet it is the Hindus who should bear the 'oppressor guilt'.

Like Sardar Patel said, a 'minority' that divides a country is no minority at all. This myth of muslim victimhood and false narrative of minorityism needs to be destroyed if India wants to move ahead or we will be stuck in these kind of sickular-communal debates forever. Muslims got what they wanted in 47 with Pakistan and look what they have done with it, which Hindu is oppressing them there ? They got the best lands in Punjab and see it with where it is today (fortress of hafiz syed) vs what Sikhs have done in E.Punjab (Green Revolution). If Muslims are backward, it is because of the choices they have made for themselves.
In short jo Pehle se hi katey hue ho wo desh ko kya jodenge, that's why they are called kat***.
 

Nicky G

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
2,929
Likes
6,779
Country flag
15. After Bihar election, as Amit Shah indicated in the Arnab interview, GOI will go in full throttle to counter the notorious & nefarious design & full investigation of #AwardWapsi gang
Unless people are put behind bars and their credibility publicly destroyed including government acknowledgement of foreign links, there will be no use of such 'investigations'.

Anyway, lets wait and watch, given the track of this government on countering the narrative, I have little hope.

Politicians should stop talking rubbish about Shah Rukh Khan: Anupam Kher
Politicians should stop talking rubbish about Shah Rukh Khan: Anupam Kher



Anupam Kher has come out in support of Shah Rukh Khan after Yogi Adityanath compared SRK with Pakistani terrorist Hafiz Saeed for his comments over intolerance in India.
By: PTI | Mumbai |Updated: November 4, 2015 6:07 pm
Anupam Kher took to Twitter to blast the controversial statements made by some of the BJP leaders againstShah Rukh Khan.
Anupam Kher has come out in support of his “Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge” co-star Shah Rukh Khan after Yogi Adityanath compared the Bollywood superstar with Pakistani terrorist Hafiz Saeed for his comments over intolerance in India.

Kher, 60, took to Twitter to blast the controversial statements made by some of the BJP leaders against Shah Rukh Khan.

Hitting out at Shah Rukh two days after the actor added his voice to the protest by the intelligentsia against the ‘climate of intolerance’, Adityanath also suggested that the actor should go to Pakistan.

In another controversial remark, the Gorakhpur MP said Shah Rukh should remember that if a “huge mass” of people in the country would boycott his films then he would also have to wander on streets like a “normal Muslim”.

http://indianexpress.com/article/en...ing-rubbish-about-shah-rukh-khan-anupam-kher/
Why Mr. Kher, because he is from your fraternity or you have good relations with him?

Did you ask this joker Khan to stop talking rubbish about India?

This is the same non-sense about Bolloywood supporting Sanjay Dutt or Salman Khan because they knew them well.
 

tsunami

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
1,331
Likes
3,661
Country flag
Unless people are put behind bars and their credibility publicly destroyed including government acknowledgement of foreign links, there will be no use of such 'investigations'.

Anyway, lets wait and watch, given the track of this government on countering the narrative, I have little hope.



Why Mr. Kher, because he is from your fraternity or you have good relations with him?

Did you ask this joker Khan to stop talking rubbish about India?

This is the same non-sense about Bolloywood supporting Sanjay Dutt or Salman Khan because they knew them well.
Well Anupam Kher have always criticized those who have returned their awards. But still I do not believe that idiots like yogi aditya nath, Sakshi Maharaj, Sadhvi Prachi these are constantly putting Central Govt. in troubles. Because of these idiots winter session will not go smooth. They are just giving opposition a reason to make noise nothing else. Many people and even I don't like these kind of statements.
 

anoop_mig25

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,556
Likes
2,536
Country flag
https://vivekagnihotri.wordpress.co...l-those-who-take-stupid-statements-seriously/

BY Vivek Agnihotri Posted onNovember 4, 2015

Dear ‘stupid statement’ lovers,

Have you ever lived in a joint family? Or have you ever been to a big, fat Indian wedding? Have you noticed there are different kinds of people, groups. Exactly like our country.

1. The doers: People who organise everything, manage and keep and control monies so that everything runs smoothly. They hardly sleep and are at work when everyone is partying. They are answerable and responsible for everything. That’s the PM and his cabinet

2. The family: a group of people who are interested in wedding, dance, food, fun and all the benefits of a wedding but they are always figuring out their importance in the scheme of things. They may bitch about bride’s or groom’s family members but mean no real harm. They have suggestions for everything but are too lazy to actually work. This is the ruling political party.

3. Neighbours: They have no role to play in the wedding but they want it to fail. They are perpetually seeking bad news that is good news for them. That’s the opposition.

4. The cribbers: Then there is always one ‘Allahabad wale Foofa Ji’ who is always unhappy about something and doesn’t join the celebrations until given importance or a gift. He is neither responsible nor answerable but plays his ego all the times. These are the intellectuals.

5. Widowed Buaji: There is always one relative who loves to nitpick. This relative will bitch, crib, gossip, badmouth the hosts and his/her intention will be to somehow spoil the party, even if he/she has to lie, spin, misinform or manufacture a lie. They will always look at the negatives and rundown the success of the party. This is the media.

6. Khatiyabaaz Tau Ji: These people sit on a charpoy (Khatiya) and keep an eye on the traditions, culture and morality, commenting on dancing youngsters, drunk youngsters and keep passing comments about values/morals. They are always first to pick up brewing affairs. No-one listens to these moral keepers anyways but when they get an audience they exaggerate and say things which anyways have no impact on the wedding. These are the inconsequential fringe elements.

7. Baraatis: All they want is that ‘ladkiwaale’ should keep them happy. No-one, including them, knows what makes them happy. They can make or break a wedding party. You have to keep most of them happy at all the times. With freebies, facilities or both. These are the citizens/ voters.

Every wedding has a unique power system. In last 67 years, in this big, fat Indian political wedding, the doers and baraatis were inconsequential and the entire wedding was run by No 2 to no.6.

What has happened suddenly that, in Modi’s ‘out-of-the-box-politics’, he has eliminated groups from no. 3 to no. 6. When you make 5 groups out of 7, inconsequential and irrelevant, they make lot of noise. They want the wedding to fail. They gang up. Some, with strategy, and some with their stupidity.

Now decide, who matters to you. Who would you like to listen to? If you still want to subscribe to stupid statements and go by what the neighbours (media) or khatiyabaaz (fringe) or frustrated Bua ji are saying, chances are, in sometime, you may also turn stupid.

With love:

A proud Baraati

Vivek Agnihotri

November 3, 2015
 

Agnostic_Indian

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
930
Likes
243
Unless people are put behind bars and their credibility publicly destroyed including government acknowledgement of foreign links, there will be no use of such 'investigations'.

Anyway, lets wait and watch, given the track of this government on countering the narrative, I have little hope.



Why Mr. Kher, because he is from your fraternity or you have good relations with him?

Did you ask this joker Khan to stop talking rubbish about India?

This is the same non-sense about Bolloywood supporting Sanjay Dutt or Salman Khan because they knew them well.
Only one talking rubbish is those who linked srk to hafiz saeed and asked him to go to pak and so on.
Srk's comment is not anti india.
 

Nicky G

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
2,929
Likes
6,779
Country flag
Well Anupam Kher have always criticized those who have returned their awards. But still I do not believe that idiots like yogi aditya nath, Sakshi Maharaj, Sadhvi Prachi these are constantly putting Central Govt. in troubles. Because of these idiots winter session will not go smooth. They are just giving opposition a reason to make noise nothing else. Many people and even I don't like these kind of statements.
Again, did Anupam Kher ask the joker Kahn to shut up about his non-sense?

Ground reality is different from what English speaking junta believes. They would want to labor under the delusion that development is all that matters. Reality is a different matter and the likes of people you mentioned, whom you don't seem to appreciate serve their purpose.

Only one talking rubbish is those who linked srk to hafiz saeed and asked him to go to pak and so on.
Srk's comment is not anti india.
I don't find this joker Kahn or his comments worth responding to debating, I am concerned with Anupam Kher's biased view, since he seems to stand up in some cases but refuses to do so here - either due to his relationship or work prospects or whatever.

Besides, I am sure your definition of whats anti-India is very different from mine, so no point getting into in here.

Finally, if the joker Khan has a right to spout his BS, every other Indian has the right to call him out and judge his views as they see fit - including him to get out of this country. As much as you'd like it to be the case, freedom of expression cuts both ways.
 

tsunami

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
1,331
Likes
3,661
Country flag
Commies/Sickulars/intelluctuals can abuse or compare RSS as ISIS,Modi is hitler etc but Hindu RW must stay silent.
SO,In India freedom of speech is only for so-called Commies/Sickulars/intellectuals but not for any one else.:pound:Congress days are over and they knows it but still they have numbers in RS,obviously they disturbs the Parliament with or without statements.

I like those kind of statements very much for me they are mild reaction and want more in future insha***. :D
They have every right to say Soniya is Dayan and Rahul is randi ki aulad, or congress is gadho ka mela. Do personal attack if you face personal attack. But saying "Agar navratri me Beef ban nahi hua to masjid me ham pork fekege". What the hell was that.
 

Agnostic_Indian

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
930
Likes
243
Again, did Anupam Kher ask the joker Kahn to shut up about his non-sense?

Ground reality is different from what English speaking junta believes. They would want to labor under the delusion that development is all that matters. Reality is a different matter and the likes of people you mentioned, whom you don't seem to appreciate serve their purpose.



I don't find this joker Kahn or his comments worth responding to debating, I am concerned with Anupam Kher's biased view, since he seems to stand up in some cases but refuses to do so here - either due to his relationship or work prospects or whatever.

Besides, I am sure your definition of whats anti-India is very different from mine, so no point getting into in here.

Finally, if the joker Khan has a right to spout his BS, every other Indian has the right to call him out and judge his views as they see fit - including him to get out of this country. As much as you'd like it to be the case, freedom of expression cuts both ways.
does everybody has the right to freedom of expression?
Yes.
Srk as well as the yogi Adityanath type also has the right.
srk did criticise the intolerance prevailing in india, recent incidents and comments of politicians are a good example, even this thread itself is a example of intolerance.so he is right.

You can criticise srk on facts but calling him pakistani etc is coming from a mindset that muslims belong to pakistan or those indian muslims who critise anything in india should automatically be a pakistani at heart.

What if i call yougi adityanath or the sadhvi as ISI agents ? What if i say they have taken money from pakistan to show india in a bad light in international community, what if i say they are helping pakistan to justify two nation theory ? I have freedom of expression right ? Will that be a right exercise of freedom of expression from my part to make such wild allegations ? Certainly not. Same way calling srk as pakistani just because he criticised them is not justifiable..what yogi aditaynath etc expressed using his freedom of expression is totally wrong...if srk move a deformation case they could even get punished for that.
Now baout anupam kher...he criticised writers as well as film makers for returning their award..he will criticise srk also if he had returned the award..that's his stance..but at the same time he will defend srk if he is called as a pakistani etc for criticising or even for returning the award..mr.kher takes a stand based on right and and wrong(as per his judgement) on each issue according to its merit..he is not playing for a particular team so he is not liable to support anyting and everything coming from a particular team or side.
 
Last edited:

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,742
So the snake oil salesman is with his usual snake oil again. No onenhere is asking for imprisonment of the Paki stranded in India called srk. They are only criticising what he said. And freedom of expression goes all sides. Calling this paki wannabe for being a paki wannabe also falls under freedom of expression.

Reg intolerance into his thread, killing someone who is trying to kill you in self defence is also murder now? How typical - equal equal ,the kind you expect from the islamist pigs and the commie thugs. No, calling out these paki wannabes stranded here is not the same as the invisible and visible jihad waged on us by the Islamist pigs and the closet islamist pigs like sharuk khan. We are just exercising our right to free speech. Free speech does not allow you the immunity from criticism for you chutiyapa like the snake oil salesman here is peddling.

See folks, this is your average " true "seculairst . these snake oil sales men expose themselves now and then, and so make note of them. Also, This is why I am against this whole business of secularism be it true or false . we have to do what it takes to protect our rights and ensure our survival. If secularism and tolerance is a road block for our survival and is used against us, like the snake oil salesman above, there is no point in continuing it. See how these snake oil salesmen think that we have to tolerate their intolerance in the name of secularism? Really?

I mean, think about it folks, They are gonna call you intolerant whether you just call them out or kick them out. So why bother with just calling them out when you can kick them out? Let these snakes migrate to porkistan and live there and bitch about intolerance and secularism there. Time to do what it takes for our survival rather than playing by the rules which are rigged against us.
 
Last edited:

Articles

Top