Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
- Oct 13, 2015
I agree that we should take the fight to the enemy unlike our defensive posture which we have under most of the govt in power.people from our mountain division must play more and more role in infowar, proxy war and security, obviously majority from these himalayan states are in security only . Because, they are the ones who do not believe in just defense but also offence, it is not easy for intruders to make them intellectually weak. India can only gain territory and ideological advantage under their command in current age.
Yes off course, his paki isi bosses must have ordered him to say so.Another bhaijaan sermonizing the virtues of Pakis to be allowed to work in India.
Note the last line - "Bollywood has a huge number of fans in Pakistan and earns a good share of income from the neighbouring country.”
This is why so many Bollywood flicks of late are basically into Wagha Candle Worshipping and pro Paki in nature. Who gives a damn about being patriotic or even slightest concerned about the same Pakis trying to infilitrate or destroy India as long as box office revenues keep on coming.
You can’t stop Pak artistes from working in Bollywood: Salman Khan
Reacting to the recent debate over prohibiting Pakistani artists from working in our country, Bollywood star Salman Khan has said that art and entertainment have no boundaries, adding that they shouldn’t be mixed with politics.
“Now that everything is digital, Indians love to watch each and every entertainment show, including popular Pakistani shows . So, art and entertainment have no boundaries. Entertainment is evaluated by what common people want to watch,” Salman said.
Salman added that politics and art needn't mix because both countries are fond of each others' entertainment industry.
“Politics and art should not be mixed. This is not what common people want,” Salman Khan said, adding, “If someone wants a Pakistani actor who can portray a role better, nobody can put a constraint. Bollywood has a huge number of fans in Pakistan and earns a good share of income from the neighbouring country.”
Not just Khans, there are others including the "eminent literati" who as if on a cue can feign selective outrage and use ultra leftism and "being tolerant" as a tool to protect and promote seditious and anti-national activities.Yes off course, his paki isi bosses must have ordered him to say so.
With every passing incident, these khans traitorous asses are exposed all the more.
True. I read that Jammu Dogras slaughtered thousands of Yousafzai Pashtuns. Their women were sold in Jammu and Lahore markets.Not Hari singh Nalwa but the biggest persecutor of muslims (pashtun, kashmiri and some punjabi) were Dogra/jamwal Rajputs in the north.Sikhs were pious religious rulers but Dogra/jamwals taught these inbreds a lesson that they still not forget.Apart from Azan ban by Akalis and turning the Badshahi mosque of lahore into horse stable just to humiliate Punjabi musalman.
Rannvir singh Dogra put 1 RS for 1 yousufzai pashtun head,Hunza tribe were mercilessly massacred and their women were sold in Hira Mandi as prostitutes they cleansed the valley from pashtun filth, cow slaughter was punishable by death, Azan was banned forced labour of kashmi muslims (including women) was widespread.
Dogras are the role model how to rule subhuman savages and force them to complete submission.pashtun only retuned in 1947 when dogras were weakest and Nehru was reluctant to annex the POK.
1.The valley was cleansed from pashtuns by dogras, they never got the courage to return back for they remembered the thrashing they got by dogras, they only returned in 1947 when dogras were duped by British and their military commanders.True. I read that Jammu Dogras slaughtered thousands of Yousafzai Pashtuns. Their women were sold in Jammu and Lahore markets.
Sounds familiar? Same story was told at the time of Gujarat riots. I was disgusted when I first heard it. It was never proved to be true in courts, though one can raise doubts about fairness of trials.The pregnant women were killed and were ripped open and their unborn babies were cut into pieces.
I don't think there is anything wrong in paying evil with evil. If the opposing side was not above destroying our women and children, then we should not hold back when dealing out the same to them. There is no morality when it comes to survival. And of course, we are in a war for our survival.^^^ There is nothing to be proud of atrocities on women and children. They should not be mentioned in boastful manner. It would be shameful if true (not war but treatment of women and children)
Also some of the stories might be lies and exaggerations. I am not saying entire accounts of massacres are wrong but not every word of the accounts written by british allegedly told by Muslims survivors has to be correct. What makes me suspicious about this is this story :
Sounds familiar? Same story was told at the time of Gujarat riots. I was disgusted when I first heard it. It was never proved to be true in courts, though one can raise doubts about fairness of trials.
However after many years once I accidentally stumbled upon a Shia discussion forum, unrelated to India and was surprised to read exact same story being told about the first Shia-Sunni battles that occurred more than thousand years ago. It seems it is a popular Muslim mythology to portray the evil enemies.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|ATTENTION!! - Please be extremely aware and be careful of what you post here.||Internal Security||3|
|H||Islamic extremism in India||Politics & Society||1014|
|India: Liberal Democracy and the Extreme Right||Politics & Society||7|
|India not home to largest number of people in extreme poverty now: Study||Economy & Infrastructure||0|