- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,811
- Likes
- 6,734
What I am saying is Napoleon made it to Moscow never once being defeated by Russians.Whatever you are trying to say oversimplifies the history, assuming you refer to 1812.
What I am saying is Napoleon made it to Moscow never once being defeated by Russians.Whatever you are trying to say oversimplifies the history, assuming you refer to 1812.
Reminds me of Saakashvili or Georgia.What he mean by that is that if Russia attack France then NATO (which is almost = to "US") will come in against Russia. And Moscow will burn (this part may be a little bit harsh Armand)?
If we accept your fairy tales, will you be happy?We don't need NATO to take on Russia. They couldn't defeat Napoleaon in the field and they certainly can't now with their 30yo rust army.
He made it to Moscow..did he come back sucessfully..?What I am saying is Napoleon made it to Moscow never once being defeated by Russians.
The Russians have a base in Syria, so they quite legitimately, with the permission of the Syrian Government, can enter their fleet there. And he wasn't rusty. But this solution would cool down hot heads, generals from the attack. No one wants to interfere with Russia. Calculate the force is an ungrateful thing to do. This is a political step, not the military.Russia is only there to evacuate its personnel when the time comes. If they wanted to make a show of force they would have brought the Kuznetsov battle group. Not a rusted Blask Sea flotilla like this.
What I am saying is Napoleon made it to Moscow never once being defeated by Russians.
On Tuesday, Jan. 8, The New Yorker gave a graphic account of what can happen to someone walking around unprotected when sarin gas is released or travels via the wind. And Syria may be the next deathly location site chosen where it is used following the Tokyo Metro gassing of 1996 and Saddam Hussein's gassing of his enemies in the 80s.
The New York Times reported that Syrian troops appeared to be mixing chemicals at two different storage sites and some fear that the weapons of mass destruction being created (WMDs) is the deadly nerve gas sarin.
Bashar al-Assad could order the weapons he has to be used, which some experts believe to be sarin gas, putting the two 500-pound bombs airborne in the space of two hours. And that gas would impact people ill-equipped to respond quickly enough, or with the needed antidote.
France does not recognise the Assad government, so they are illegitimately there without the permission of the SNC which has only authorised the French fleet. As a courtesy we will allow them to evacuate their personnel, but if they try anything we will be on them. They are quite rusty.The Russians have a base in Syria, so they quite legitimately, with the permission of the Syrian Government, can enter their fleet there. And he wasn't rusty. But this solution would cool down hot heads, generals from the attack. No one wants to interfere with Russia. Calculate the force is an ungrateful thing to do. This is a political step, not the military.
France does not recognise the Assad government, so they are illegitimately there without the permission of the SNC
The Assad regime is illegitimate having lost the faith of the people by massacring them. My government has denounced his rule and reserves the right to intercede on behalf of the legitimate ruling body of Syria, the SNC. When legal ruling parties seek our assistance in stablisation, we act. Mali is the latest example, Libya and Cote d'Ivoir before it. We have an obligation to preserve our interests in former colonies. Assad made the choice to slaughter, now he has lost control.This I know. The government Assad is legitimate because it was the favourites by the will of the people and in accordance with international norms at it is legal. And all things are to overthrow the authorities by illegal means is a coup (revolution, counterrevolution, putsch). The Soviet Union, Western countries, almost 10 years is not recognized, although there was already a functioning Government. And here, Syrian rebels not created any institution of power, and they have already recognized the West because they are so advantageous. All violations of international norms, all leading to the same wrong actions by other countries. As an example: it was impossible to recognize, as sovereign countries - nor Kosovo nor Abkhazia.
Syria is a sovereign state and a member of the United Nations. She was no longer a colony. All from French claim of the old interests of the ridiculous. It is as if Britain demanded their rights in India. Non-compliance with norms leads to a chaos..The Assad regime is illegitimate having lost the faith of the people by massacring them. My government has denounced his rule and reserves the right to intercede on behalf of the legitimate ruling body of Syria, the SNC. When legal ruling parties seek our assistance in stablisation, we act. Mali is the latest example, Libya and Cote d'Ivoir before it. We have an obligation to preserve our interests in former colonies. Assad made the choice to slaughter, now he has lost control.
It is sovereign under the rule of the SNC. if they request our assistance, we are obliged to give it to stop the bloodshed. All of our colonies are part of the French sphere unless they wish nothing to do with us.Syria is a sovereign state and a member of the United Nations. She was no longer a colony. All from French claim of the old interests of the ridiculous.
If the legitimate government of India requests British assistance, they are well within their right to give it. The norm is not to slaughter your people. We intend to see that end.It is as if Britain demanded their rights in India. Non-compliance with norms leads to a chaos..
And on what basis the SNC.-legal the government?It is sovereign under the rule of the SNC.
Actually Comrade Armanda has explained that's based on "Might is right".And on what basis the SNC.-legal the government?
Because Assad is illegitimate and the SNC is the only internationally recognized body to replace him.And on what basis the SNC.-legal the government?
SNC is not internationally recognized.Because Assad is illegitimate and the SNC is the only internationally recognized body to replace him.
It is recognized by three dozen countries and has representatives with China and Russia.SNC is not internationally recognized.
It is recognized by three dozen countries and has representatives with China and Russia.
Russia, China, India, Brazil, Iran, Indonesia, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Mexico (that's >51% of world's population), and many other countries, do not recognize SNC. To suggest that SNC is internationally recognized is delusional.only three dozens???
world has near 200 countries!