The future for Air India, India's national carrier

Should Air India be privatized??

  • Yes

    Votes: 38 71.7%
  • No

    Votes: 11 20.8%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 4 7.5%

  • Total voters
    53

ZOOM

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
577
Likes
11
In major countries across the globe, national carrier were dissolved or privatized them if it really financially viable to operate any longer. Privatization of National carrier doesn't guarantee its success as can be seen from bleeding Financial states of major private airlines like Jet Airways and Kingfisher who are not even able to clear their outstandings related to Fuel. Under such circumstances, they are forced to consolidate their Human resource which has backfired in so serious manner that any major restructuring will be greeted with lots of anger. Even recent NACIL's(a merge entity between AI and IA) decision of Pilots pay cut has been dealt with major strike which nearly added wooes to restructuring process.

In fact, Air India and Indian Airlines were merged keeping in mind arresting increasing expenditure and losses as it was thaught that new management would bring in consoldiatation by pulling expertize and experience of both seperatly operated airlines, but once again mismanagement crept up and as a result merge entity is finding exceedingly difficult to integrate software related database and hence would likely to lose prestigeous place in Star Alliance, an outfit for major airlines in the world.

Under all such happenings and resultant consequences, it would be much prudent to scale down its operations and minimize its route as recently been undertaken. At the same time, source management expertise by recuriting heads of major multinationals and domestic companies who are about to take retirement and make them a part of independent board.

One thing is clear, we cannot undertake major exercise of converting Public sector like Air-India into private entity, no matter how innovative the measure can be, only major upgradation and modification on Management and Human resource level in due course is a way forward.
 

ppgj

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,029
Likes
168
but even the private airlines are having tough time!! remember jet terminating the employees? aviation sector in india has been hit by ATF (aviation turbine fuel) which costs quite a bit vis-a-vis the rest. all private airlines have been having tough time. some are in the red. if you look in the recent past some have shut or merged. unhealthy or uncompetitive routes also have contributed to the problems they face. it was sunrise sector sometime back, still can be!!
in essence, privatisation may not necessarily mean good.

AI-
1. because of social responsibilty, being under GOI, caters to uneconomic sectors.
2. has to cater to lot of VIPs at govt cost.
3. since can't fire employees, the employees become inefficient and unproductive.
4. competition which has crippled all.

the government needs to take holistic view on all the problems from fuel to men to machine to taxes etc..
 

RPK

Indyakudimahan
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
4,970
Likes
229
Country flag
India to infuse equity into Air India by March: Praful Patel

New Delhi, Nov 13 (ANI): Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel has said India will infuse equity into ailing state-run carrier Air India by March.

Talking to reporters here on Thursday, Patel said: “We are broadly looking at an equity infusion linked to monthly performance parameters. This is not the total equity infusion, which is being looked at for Air India. So, it is in a way we are also going to see how it performs on a monthly basis to be able to finally take a call at the end of March as to what will be the final support which the government will provide.”

Patel said the airline would have to generate 20 billion rupees through cost cuts and revenue gains.

“We have discussed some parameters specially on revenue enhancement and cost cutting and Air India has to also perform according to certain parameters. We will be reviewing all these on a monthly basis,” he added.

In October, Patel said the government would back Air India with up to 50 billion rupees if the carrier made the same amount through cost cuts and other measures, a proposal which was protested by unions.

The airline declared a loss of billion dollars in the financial year March 2009, while in September, around 400 Air India executive pilots went on mass sick leave for four days to protest pay cuts, resulting in more than 200 flights being cancelled and the airline losing more than one billion rupees. (ANI)
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Alrite, here's more compelling evidence to warrant a revaluation of Air India's current pathetic publique status:


Air India may stay in the red till end-2017

Air India, run by National Aviation Co. of India Ltd, has already accumulated losses of Rs7,200 crore and is saddled with debt of Rs15,241 crore

Feb 2, 2009

New Delhi: Beleaguered flag carrier Air India will continue to accumulate losses for at least another seven years, the Union civil aviation ministry told a group of ministers (GoM) meeting on Wednesday.

“The projections are that even at the end of 2017, we will still be in losses,” an aviation ministry official who was present at the meeting told Mint on condition of anonymity. “That is not a situation the government can accept. All options are open now.” Union home minister P. Chidambaram had asked for an extrapolation of Air India’s balance sheets in a GoM meeting in November.

Air India, run by National Aviation Co. of India Ltd, has already accumulated losses of Rs7,200 crore and is saddled with debt of Rs15,241 crore. It is making payments for 111 aircraft worth Rs50,000 crore.

Wednesday’s hour-long GoM meeting was attended by Chidambaram, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee, petroleum minister Murli Deora, civil aviation minister Praful Patel and Air India chief Arvind Jadhav.

“These are testing times for the aviation industry... Extraordinary measures need to be taken,” Patel said after the meeting. The minister added the airline was unlikely to meet its target of reducing costs by Rs2,000 crore by March. Air India has shown savings of just Rs753 crore in the previous six months.

Ministers also slammed the airline’s restructuring plan and refused additional equity infusion until it achieved the cost-saving target.

Air India is seeking Rs1,200 crore for the fiscal year ending March 2011, as part of a Rs2,000 crore bailout package promised by the government to raise its paltry Rs145 crore equity. The government has approved Rs800 crore for the ongoing fiscal year.

“The GoM felt there was no revival plan... They have asked us to prepare a cabinet note without sweetening it,” the ministry official mentioned earlier said.

Another official said the civil aviation ministry has been asked to prepare a cabinet note outlining the airline’s cost-cutting steps.

The ministry, in the note, is likely to seek permission for slashing the wages of more than 30,000 employees and creating three subsidiaries for cargo, ground handling, and maintenance, repair and overhaul, the official said.

“We require tough decisions howsoever unpalatable they maybe. The shareholder has to give a green signal,” a third government official who was at the GoM meeting said.

[email protected]

PTI contributed to this story.


http://www.livemint.com/2010/02/03235329/Air-India-may-stay-in-the-red.html


In related news, some restructuring:
Air India to hive off cargo business by April
Group of Ministers to assess Air India's turnaround plans
 
Last edited:

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
Privatization may not be the way out. For your reference--

China's Private Airlines Losing Altitude01-08 10:44 Caijing comments( 0 )



Financial troubles and shareholder disputes are rocking the nation's private airline sector at a tough time for the entire industry.




From Caijing Magazine



China’s fledgling private air carriers are struggling to survive. Airports have issued ultimatums to United Eagle Airlines, Juneyao Airlines and East Star Airlines for overdue bills. And cash-strapped Okay Airlines, the country’s first private carrier, recently suspended all flights.



These were among the first private airlines to take off after China opened the aviation market to competition in 2004. Now, besieged by slumping demand, shareholder squabbles, credit constraints and management problems, they may become the first Chinese carriers to go out of business.



Private airlines are not the only carriers indebted to airports and fuel suppliers. Almost all the country’s major airlines -- including Hainan, Air China and Southern -- have appeared since last March on a Civil Aviation Association of China (CAAC) black list of indebtedness. At the top was Hainan, which owed 100 million yuan to airports.



CAAC said 70 percent of the nation’s domestic carriers operated in the red during the first 10 months of 2008. Losses totaled 4.3 billion yuan.



A bright prospect among private carriers is Spring Airlines, which recently decided to save money by cutting management salaries by one-third. But its plan to launch an initial public offering in October had to be postponed indefinitely.



When private airlines first took off, some speculated they would not be able to raise funds as easily as state-owned carriers. Recent events have fanned that theory.



“Banks are not lending to private airlines,” said Liu Jieyin, Okay’s former general manager. “Instead they’re practicing a rather stringent policy.”



A senior CAAC official told Caijing some government policies favorable to the aviation industry have also applied to the private sector. However, he added, the government is unlikely to invest in carriers in which it is not a shareholder.



And unlike the travails of state-run airlines, the current crisis in the private aviation sector often has been in the public eye. Shareholder disputes are not uncommon among China’s private carriers. Some fights have been nasty.



Observers say many private Chinese airlines suffer from management chaos because they lacked adequate financial support at inception. Financial pressures have forced them to regularly introduce new investors, they say, which in turn can hurt company management and render board decisions ineffective.



Clipped Eagle



United Eagle, which ranked seventh on CAAC’s black list with 39.5 million yuan in debt, recently became the first domestic carrier publicly penalized for failing to pay airport bills.



The airline received a letter from Sichuan Airports Corp., which oversees all Sichuan Province airports, in late November demanding immediate payments and threatening a five-step sanction process. The airline was ordered to pay 30.45 million yuan in overdue takeoff and landing fees, plus surcharges, accumulated between March 2007 and October 2008. The threatened penalties would start with service phase-outs and end in legal proceedings.



The first step was taken December 1 when the airport authorities closed United Eagle’s VIP lounge at a Sichuan airport. Sun Zhijun, the airline’s financial director, told Caijing his company sought a settlement and rushed 1 million yuan to airport officials. But the airport did not buckle.



The airline then promised to pay monthly installments of 1.5 million yuan starting in January. It also pledged to incur no new debt and clean up all overdue bills ahead of schedule if it managed to complete an expansion and restructuring plan.



Based on these promises and partial payments, the airport agreed to resume some services. But by then United Eagle’s debt, including money owed the airport and banks, had grown to 90 percent of assets. Sun said the carrier, while seeking new investors and additional investments from existing shareholders, is now on the verge of bankruptcy.



United Eagle was established by Li Jining and two partners in Chengdu in June 2004 with 80 million yuan in registered capital. The airline bid for more investors in December 2006, prompting Sichuan Airlines Group to buy a 20 percent stake for 20 million yuan. Subsequently, Sichuan Airlines CEO Li Haiying became the new legal representative and general manager. Six months later, a shareholder based in Guangdong Province transferred some of his shares -- a 21.4 percent stake -- to Shanghai-based Juneyao Group, which also controls Juneyao and Okay airlines.



By June 2007, Chengdu-based Huaying Investment Consultancy Co. Ltd. had become the largest of five shareholders, with a 29 percent stake in United Eagle. A month later, the shareholders increased their total investment to 150 million yuan from 100 million yuan.



But the airline continued to lose money. On July 17, 2007, three United Eagle flights were grounded at the Shijiazhuang airport after fuel suppliers, citing overdue bills, refused to refuel planes. To cope, shareholders coughed up 50 million yuan the next day.



Caijing learned that United Eagle’s board of directors is currently considering several strategies to save the airline. Proposals include increasing the capital base, boosting investment, borrowing from banks and cutting costs.



Lan Xinguo, president of Sichuan Airlines, said shareholders are enthusiastic about adding capital, which is expected to grow to 400 million yuan. But he denied that the Sichuan group, which has 200 million yuan in debts of its own, will buy out United Eagle.



Not Okay


Trouble also vexed Beijing-based Okay Airlines which, citing safety concerns, suspended all flights December 6. That came two weeks after Okay’s controlling shareholder, Juneyao Group, asked CAAC for permission to suspend flights.



Since then, Caijing learned, CAAC has tried to mediate a dispute between Juneyao and Okay’s smaller shareholders, so far without success.



Juneyao took control of Okay a year after the airline was launched in 2005 with 300 million yuan in registered capital. Initially, Okay sought to partner with Korean Airlines. But it went with a Chinese investor to avoid foreign control of company shares.



Juneyao now holds 63 percent of Okay’s stake through its subsidiary Beijing Okay Traffic and Energy Investment Co. Minor stakeholders are Dadiqiao Investment Co. Ltd. (Beijing), with 26 percent, and three individuals.



Within 24 hours of the airline’s grounding, dozens of fuel suppliers started withdrawing lines of credit and demanded settlements in cash. Aviation companies typically settle fuel bills on more flexible terms.



Tensions ran high as Juneyao accused Okay’s management of collaborating with fuel suppliers. But management and the four smaller shareholders pointed a finger at Juneyao for allegedly telling airports about flight terminations in advance, causing fuel suppliers to overreact. Minor shareholders also said Juneyao failed to consult with them before deciding to halt flights, even though company rules say important operation decisions must be approved by two-thirds of stakeholders.



The carrier had been operating in the red. Okay’s operational losses and shareholder-management conflicts had long been reported by the media.



But in recent months, the airline’s relationships with airports, fuel suppliers and others fell off a cliff. Now, suppliers “do not believe in contracts,” Liu said. “They only accept pre-payments in cash.”



Juneyao and Liu also clashed over his position with the airline. The parent published a notice saying Liu had been removed. His job was taken over by Wang Junjin, the president of Juneyao Group, Juneyao Airlines and Okay.



Okay employees, who said they have remained on the job as well, told Caijing staff that the group, not the airline, had announced the suspension of all flights.



Discord among Okay’s board members and executives continued after the flight suspension. Minor shareholders December 11 issued a joint statement attacking the “crimes” of Juneyao. The parent fought back with a counter statement.



Liu blamed unscrupulous shareholders for the disputes. “When Juneyao came in, we had a good relationship with it,” he said.



But later the minor stakeholders sued the group for allegedly fabricating board decisions, illegally firing Okay managers, and other charges. They also accused Beijing Okay Traffic of injecting less than half of the capital promised as controlling shareholder.



Juneyao officials denied the charges, and said the capital for Okay was provided by May 2006.



1 yuan = 14 U.S. cents
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
WTF? They need an 'expat' to turn Air India around ?


Air India may soon appoint an expat COO

29 Mar 2010, 0132 hrs IST, Manisha Singhal, ET Bureau




MUMBAI: Air India is likely to appoint a foreigner as chief operating officer (COO) in a bold attempt to turn around the beleaguered national carrier. A sub-committee of the board headed by civil aviation secretary M Madhavan Nambiar on Saturday interviewed three candidates, all expatriates.

According to Air India sources, the three are Gustav Baldauf, currently executive vice-president, flight operations, Austrian Airlines; Brock Friesen, COO, Air Malta, and George Reeleder, managing director, Rapidair, which is Air Canada’s domestic airline. The new COO, sources said, would have the task of salvaging Air India’s fortunes in three years. The three were chosen from 140 applicants for the post.

Air India’s chairman and managing director, Arvind Jadhav, and recently-appointed corporate bigwigs on Air India’s board such as Anand Mahindra, vice-chairman and managing director, M&M, Sajjan Jindal of JSW Steel and Uday Kotak of Kotak Mahindra Bank were part of the team interviewing the prospective COOs.

Of the three, Mr Baldauf has had an India stint in 2005 when he was with Jet Airways as its vice-president for flight operations. Austrian Airlines is also a member of a group of airlines called Star Alliance, which Air India is to formally join soon.

Air India brass feels that Mr Baldauf will be helpful in this because the airline is facing trouble becoming a member of the alliance over quality issues. A final decision will be taken after necessary government approvals are in place, the sources said. Some aviation experts, however, feel the entire exercise is pointless.

“For Air India to hire a COO without a business plan in place does not make much sense. In any case, high calibre people do not apply through advertisements for jobs like these. Air India is not very sure what kind of organisational and management structure it is going to be in the next three to five years’ time,” said Kapil Kaul, CEO (India and Middle East), Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation. Air India does not have a COO. Last month a panel was appointed to fast-track the process.

Air India is in the process of changing its routes as well as its organisational structure. It has incurred heavy losses projected to be over Rs 5,000 crore for the financial year ending March.

The airline has also cut excess capacity and is currently carrying out an exercise to pare loss-making routes. It recently received the government’s sanction for an equity infusion of Rs 800 crore with a provision of an additional Rs 1,200 crore in the next fiscal.

The airline has also raised over Rs 700 crore from bonds for aircraft acquisition and is slated to announce cost-saving and manpower rationalising measures soon.


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...-appoint-an-expat-COO/articleshow/5736819.cms
 

Known_Unknown

Devil's Advocate
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
2,626
Likes
1,670
What we need is not privatization, but appointment of competent ministers and personnel to run Air India. We need a long term vision of the development of the aviation sector in India and the role of Air India within it. And lastly, we need to shed the mentality that all state owned industries need to make a profit to justify their existence. That runs counter to the very fundamental aim of setting up these industries in the first place-that of national development. The primary role of government owned enterprises is not profit-that is the sole motive of the private sector-it is the development of the country through providing services to as many people as possible, whether that entails incurring a loss or not.

This propaganda of the private sector which is hungry for a piece of India's national assets should be treated as just that-propaganda.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
What we need is not privatization, but appointment of competent ministers and personnel to run Air India. We need a long term vision of the development of the aviation sector in India and the role of Air India within it. And lastly, we need to shed the mentality that all state owned industries need to make a profit to justify their existence. That runs counter to the very fundamental aim of setting up these industries in the first place-that of national development. The primary role of government owned enterprises is not profit-that is the sole motive of the private sector-it is the development of the country through providing services to as many people as possible, whether that entails incurring a loss or not.

This propaganda of the private sector which is hungry for a piece of India's national assets should be treated as just that-propaganda.
The problem with AirIndia is it is loosing money because of gross inefficiency and cut-throat competition and costing the exchequer. What AirIndia couldn't do, that of serving the middle class masses of India, was done by low cost private airlines. By trying to keep the white elephant going on we are bleeding the money of tax payers. That is not acceptable.
 
Last edited:

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Jeezus, this is pathetic...


Air India names Baldauf as COO

7 Apr 2010, 0031 hrs IST,PTI


MUMBAI: National carrier Air India on Tuesday named expat Gustav Baldauf as its chief operating officer, who along with CMD Arvind Jadhav, will play a key role in turning around the loss-making airline.

According to a statement by the airline, the Air India board in its meeting today approved the appointment of Baldauf, who earlier had a stint with private airline Jet Airways.

Baldauf, currently Executive Vice-President, Flight Operations, Austrian Airlines, was named as COO after being short-listed along with two other expats from amongst 140 applicants.

Air India's Chairman and Managing Director Jadhav and corporate bigwigs Anand Mahindra, S Jindal and Uday Kotak had recently interviewed the three aspirants.

Baldauf's stint with the Naresh Goyal-led Jet had apparently worked in his favour.

The board has also also decided to present a comprehensive turnaround plan for the airline, which is projected to incur a loss of over Rs 5,000 crore in 2009-10, within 30 days.

According to the statement, four committees-- audit, finance, strategy and HR -- have been set up to provide inputs to the management and through which progress of the turnaround plan will be monitored.

"Each of the new independent directors is committed to helping the airline and will devote time to this through their participation in the committees," the statement added.

The new directors who have been recently appointed are industrialists Anand Mahindra and Harsh Neotia, Amit Mitra of industry body FICCI and former Air Force chief Fali Major.

This was the first Board meeting the new members have attended.

Further, it was decided that the Board would not comment on the specific turnaround tasks until the comprehensive plan has been presented to it by Air India's Chairman and the new COO, the statement said.

Seized by the pressing need for an IT system, the Board decided to press ahead with its maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) and "all quick-hit IT decisions", the statement said.

The board has authorised the committee to meet in 15 days to take a decision on this issue, it added.



http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...-names-Baldauf-as-COO/articleshow/5768370.cms
 
Last edited:

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
I'm keen to know what Gustav Bildauf's credentials are. This seems to be a desperate measure by Air India before a private issuing of shares for the PSU happened. The concern seems to be over jobs and connectivity. And I think the conundrum was that the downturn was the worst time to do it. But in the long-run, Air India will need massive capital injection and a commitment to responsibility if they are to remain competitive with the players in the private sector, which I think will only happen in a semi-privatized / privatized form. I'm willing to give it one last chance with their induction into the Star Alliance in 2011, but I think then, that should be it.
 
Last edited:

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
My good friend's parent is one of the top EDIT -25 - in Air India. Shocking stories. It is beyond redemption, it has to be wound up.
 
Last edited:

Aruni

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
47
Likes
37
Zoom makes an extremely valid point. Many European 'flag carriers' were privatised a while ago but are still losing money. For example, British Airways recently announced heavy losses. Privatisation does not automatically guarantee higher labour productivity as well, as the recent BA cabin crew strikes in the union well demonstrates. However, one issue to consider is the operational control managers have when operating in the private sector. BA and Iberia have recently announced a tie-up to derive economies of scale and reduce costs. On the other hand, witness the problems the Italian government has faced with the failing Alitalia, in particular to attract additional funding to keep it afloat.

Air India should be privatised with the government retaining the substantial enough shareholding to have a couple of seats at board level and block special resolutions of shareholders if need be. Otherwise, external investors should be encouraged to take a majority stake in Air India to drive the business forward on a profitable footing. Given the routes it operates, the government should be able to get a decent price for a 50-60% share offload. It could even consider a split divestment, with 30% going to retail investors and the other 30% sold to another airline with the option to acquire another 21% from the government were the share price to hit 'x' times the current level in 5 years and net profit to hit 'y' times the current level in the same time frame.
 

Akash

New Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
6
Likes
1
We meet again, eh aruni?

This is one reason why AI should be privatised!

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...led-AI-flight-for-IPL/articleshow/5846394.cms

A Delhi to Coimbatore Air India flight, IC 7603, scheduled to leave at 5.20am on April 20, was aborted less than 12 hours before its departure to allow the aircraft to be deployed as a chartered flight for ferrying civil aviation minister Praful Patel's daughter, Poorna Patel, and some IPL players from Chandigarh to Chennai.

only in india can a minister use state services for his own personal use. Try let that happening in the US or UK or any other developed country
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Air India domestic ran with 22% Flyer load

Manjuu V, TN, Feb 13, 2011 l 01:58 am IST


MUMBAI: Air India should get into the Guiness Book of World Records: the national carrier would be the only one in the world that operated over 9,000 flights last year with less than one-fourth of its seats occupied.

The average passenger load on Air India's domestic flights was an abysmal 22.2% in 2010, according to statistics released by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation ( DGCA). Air India domestic flight means, AI-coded flights that operate between Indian cities.

The airline operated 9,366 such departures last year. For instance, in the Jeddah-Hyderabad-Mumbai leg, the Hyderabad-Mumbai flight would be the domestic operation of Air India. The 22% passenger load is only for Air India's domestic leg. Air India had an average passenger load factor of 67.9% for its international flights in 2010.

IndiGo had an average passenger load factor of 83.8%, the highest in domestic sector. A passenger load factor is the percentage of passengers carried to the number of seats offered on a particular flight.

Some of the routes on which Air India's Boeing 747s and Boeing 777s fly with one-fourth passenger loads are Hyderabad-Mumbai, Calicut-Kochi, Thiruvananthapuram-Calicut, Ahmedabad-Mumbai. "An airline seat is highly perishable, it is worse than fruits and vegetables," said a top airline official. "The moment the aircraft doors are closed, the empty seats have gone rotten and cannot be sold," he adds.

Said an Air India commander: "There is no dynamic marketing done for these flights." So, on many days, the scene inside a typical Boeing 747 aircraft, say, a Calicut-Kochi flight, is such that the cockpit and cabin crew members outnumber the passengers on board.

Flying jumbo jets on short flights brings added losses. For instance, Air India flies a Boeing 747 between Kochi and Calicut as it has no parking bay in Calicut airport. "The aircraft flies to Kochi only to park. The flying time of about 25 minutes. It flies at 12-13,000 feet and the fuel efficiency is so low that it cuts out whatever profits the airline made on the Jeddah-Calicut sector," he adds.

"With the amount spent on fuel in a month to fly the B747 to and from Kochi, the airline could construct an apron for parking in Calicut airport itself." The worst load factor was in the month of February and March, when it dipped to 17.3 percent. "That would be an international low. It is highly unlikely that any B747 flew with that much load in any part of the world," said a source.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...an-with-22-flyer-load/articleshow/7485099.cms
 

thakur_ritesh

Ambassador
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
4,435
Likes
1,733
ok well, a simple take on the issue now and a changed one to what i last said especially after listening to radia tapes.

it is good to see the former minister be removed and a new one brought in, what one will hope for is this chap is honest and sincerely works for the AI and not for kingfisher and/or jet airways or some other private airlines!

if that were to happen then yes, the AI can be revived and no, for that the AI doesnt need to go private.
 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
Air India was a well run airline till 1977 when Morarji government chose to privatise the Tata run airline. Since then we've seen the airline being treated as a milch cow and into ground by corrupt and complicit politicians and officials and ever eager employees. If privatisation is to be considered then what are the options?

1. The carrier to revert to Tata control and them being given a free hand to restructure the organisation and the employee rolls.

2. Invite bids from domestic and foreign entrepreneurs, but then one runs the risk of having someone like Naresh Goyal acquire Air India and establish a monopoly.

3. As pointed out, privatisation has been a mixed bag- Airlines did show healthy profits but slipped into red for various reasons and had to be bailed out by the tax payer- JAL being a most recent example. So how should privatisation be pursued?
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Air India was a well run airline till 1977 when Morarji government chose to privatise the Tata run airline. Since then we've seen the airline being treated as a milch cow and into ground by corrupt and complicit politicians and officials and ever eager employees. If privatisation is to be considered then what are the options?

1. The carrier to revert to Tata control and them being given a free hand to restructure the organisation and the employee rolls.

2. Invite bids from domestic and foreign entrepreneurs, but then one runs the risk of having someone like Naresh Goyal acquire Air India and establish a monopoly.

3. As pointed out, privatisation has been a mixed bag- Airlines did show healthy profits but slipped into red for various reasons and had to be bailed out by the tax payer- JAL being a most recent example. So how should privatisation be pursued?
One has to remember, that with the private air lines, it was the global financial crisis that required bailing out. With Air India, it is a systemic crisis. The Unionists, because it is a government organization, have a clout unmatched by any of the employees of other efficiently-run private airlines. They go on strikes, refusing to work, when they are confronted with retrenchment <lazing around, on a large government cushion> or when confronted with no pay. On the other hand, because the Airlines is continually running at a loss, it is unable to pay its employees. This is, in fact, a vicious cycle. One that starts with the inability to respond to economic cycles, by retrenching workers, because they are a government union. We all know the government sector is fat and bloated. The private sector, on the other hand, is far more efficient. If Air India was privatized, it would be able to follow much more trim management practices. On the other hand, if it were to remain public, it would always need government dole-outs, even if it had good management, in economic downturns because it could not sack its employees <or had serious constraints in sacking them>. Let's not get snazzy with the hoopla here: Air India is not the pride of India <it is, infact, the shame of India>. And the Government does not need to own airlines, not in a country like India, and not in a country with a 6% fiscal deficit <which, if I'm hearing correctly, has lately narrowed down to 5% of GDP>.
 

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Air India pilots threaten to go on strike

Updated on Tuesday, February 08, 2011, 09:39





Mumbai: Toughening its posture against the deferment of payment of January salary to February 14 by Air India management, a section of its pilots on late Monday threatened to go on a flash strike to protest the move.

"We demand that our salaries should be disbursed by 5pm of February 10, failing which we will go on flash strike," Indian Commercial Pilots Association General Secretary (ICPA) Capt Rishabh Kapoor said.

The management has deferred the salary twice in this month, Kapoor said adding this is not acceptable to pilots. Citing cash crunch, Air India Monday delayed for the second time payment of salary to its 30,000 employees for the month of January.

The national carrier, which had earlier said that the salaries would be disbursed on February 10, now says that they will be paid on February 14.

"In supercession of earlier notification on the subject (salary for January 2011) will be disbursed on February 14 and not on February 10, as advised earlier," the airline said Monday.
Airline officials said that the delay was due to the critical financial position.

A January 31 notification had said that due to "critical financial position" it has been decided to delay the salary disbursement for the month of January 2011 to February 10.

The ailing national carrier, however, posted Rs 49.48 crore worth of operating surplus in December and Rs 21.66 crore in November.

Air India employees used to get their salary on the last day of the month but after facing financial crisis the airline management decided to disburse the salary on the 7th of every month. The airline's salary bill is to the tune of Rs 31,000 crore per annum.


http://biz.zeenews.com/news/news_content.aspx?newscatid=3&newsid=20758
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
It would be nice to have a phased privatisation. The government can retain partial ownership and try to work it out with private-public system. It should be seen if it works.

In any case, efficiency and accountability of Air India has to improve. Otherwise, it will keep losing passengers and the end result will be liquidation of the airline.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
.....And lose the privilege the Ministers, MPs and Bureaucrats enjoy?
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top