Here you go gentlemen, an example... who claims to believe in all that shit but makes excuses what asked to demonstrate. But your already know that.
That's why when Israeli bombs Gaza, muzzies aren't like "oh chill they just went from duniya to jannah.. No biggie"
No. You're pissed at me, so logic didn't penetrate.. but I'll assume they may have a good reason & ask. Because (stay with me here) they probably maybe might be right.
No. You're pissed at me, so logic didn't penetrate.. but I'll assume they may have a good reason & ask. Because (stay with me here) they probably maybe might be right.
you can't view peoples emotions online. so you can't say for sure whether i'm angry at someone or not.
probably being right implies there is a chance of being wrong too.
and how much probability of being right?
probabilty of 96% of obtaining head in a certain coin toss scenario does not mean that tail is impossible.
it means the more number of tosses, the more there is a " CHANCE" of obtaining head.
and again number of heads probability approaches 96% only when number of tosses approach infinity.
you can't speak of probability in history.
either you can assert it or you don't know. there is no room for probability when it comes to history.
who knows who's ancestor were oppressing who in 10,000bce , 20,000bce, 50,000bce.
just reading some part of history and judging everything.
well, you sure have a right to do that.
but it makes you an unpopular & unreliable person for any discussion on any topic, even if it is about main battle tanks.
because you would similarly come to conclusions on weapon systems without reading the full reasons or stories, production history, isometric drawings, requirements of field marshals etc.
that's all.