SavageKing456
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Messages
- 3,090
- Likes
- 18,176
how about making a dedicated EW based naval aircraft like growler based on TEDBF?
Why not wait for first flight , we may see such platform on mk 2 tejas also before on tedbfhow about making a dedicated EW based naval aircraft like growler based on TEDBF?
In dreamland I would love to see an IN MiG 29K do a Balakot like op inside Paki land. But I wouldn't trust an RD-33 engine on such missions. Its famous for conking out.Navy has different goals . It's not just carriers but land based fighters too . Navy will eventually try to wrestle total coastal defence away from airforce so it needs larger numbers of Aircrafts.
Beside jet will have to evolve with time keeping pace with enemies field.
In mig29 K has newer engine than legacy rd33. Even mig29upg has newer version. Engines are not a problem.In dreamland I would love to see an IN MiG 29K do a Balakot like op inside Paki land. But I wouldn't trust an RD-33 engine on such missions. Its famous for conking out.
It's going to be anti sub anti ship hub for armed forces. Sort of an anti access area denial type of setup.Yes Anadaman and Nicobar needs atleast 1dedicated Regiment of S400 too.
They are less of a problem. RD-33 family has many reliability issues.In mig29 K has newer engine than legacy rd33. Even mig29upg has newer version. Engines are not a problem.
It will have such capabilities, but dedicated? I don’t think navy will spend that much on it.how about making a dedicated EW based naval aircraft like growler based on TEDBF?
No, you’ll need twin stabilisers considering if it is actually required or not.I have a query!
wouldn’t canted twin vertical stabiliser would have been a better option in comparison to the single one provided right now??
if I did understood the video correctly!No, you’ll need twin stabilisers considering if it is actually required or not.
Why would there be a drawback of a basic thing that makes an airframe an aircraft???if I did understood the video correctly!
The canted twin vertical stabiliser has all the positive outcomes compared to the vertical one.
more stealthy
more manoeuvrable at high angle of attack
smaller size means less stress on airframe
etc.
But no particular drawback
Why the hell they aren’t providing it in TEDBF where it will help in more control while landing it on the deck(which is more important in naval use) even though it is there in AMCA.Why would there be a drawback of a basic thing that makes an airframe an aircraft???
Dude it’s already a canard-delta wing aircraft.Why the hell they aren’t providing it in TEDBF where it will help in more control while landing it on the deck(which is more important in naval use) even though it is there in AMCA.
even making the fighter height in excess of 5.3m.
doesn’t this design looks better even with delta canard config.Dude it’s already a canard-delta wing aircraft.
That is why this design is not being used?doesn’t this design looks better even with delta canard config.
Don’t know why but let’s see what are the changes that gonna happen after the wind tunnel tests are completed!That is why this design is not being used?
Delta will only get single tail wingDon’t know why but let’s see what are the changes that gonna happen after the wind tunnel tests are completed!
Dude it's not just about canted vertical stabilizer , whole airframe should have design so that dual one is feasible , generally their rear is more flat but tedbf us more curvier , look at sukhoi , it's back , amca , j 20 , f 22 , f 35. , Design is much differentDon’t know why but let’s see what are the changes that gonna happen after the wind tunnel tests are completed!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
TEDBF | Knowledge Repository | 0 | ||
Maldives : News, Updates & Discussions. | Subcontinent & Central Asia | 2 | ||
Latin America : News , Updates & Discussions. | Americas | 7 | ||
European Union(EU) Politics - News, views and Updates | Europe and Russia | 7 |