- Joined
- Nov 10, 2020
- Messages
- 12,207
- Likes
- 73,694
Frenly reminder...But first, what about the rights of muslims in Afghanistan?
Frenly reminder...But first, what about the rights of muslims in Afghanistan?
How do Taliban know how to speak Hindi? Because Afghans learned Hindi from Bollywood and Pakistan, Talibs either watch Bollywood (haraam in mazhab) or the rest we know, born and brought up by Pakistan.
Pakistanis are sharing this video shamelessly, “wow Indians ki beizzati hahaha, hahaha India poor, hahaha Taliban savage”, the same is applicable to Porkisx100.
Subhanallah
As if there were no US flights before the Talis took over Kabul and as if the US was inviting all Afghan citizens. What he said is more of a tongue in cheek remark. A better anchor would gave pinned him. That said, I haven't even played the video.Pakistanis are sharing this video shamelessly, “wow Indians ki beizzati hahaha, hahaha India poor, hahaha Taliban savage”, the same is applicable to Porkisx100.
Neither have IAs if there were no US flights before the Talis took over Kabul and as if the US was inviting all Afghan citizens. What he said is more or a tongue in cheek remark. A better anchor would gave pinned him. That said, I haven't even played the video.
Veet few people are questioning the decision to get out. The question is how they did it smells like a planned hand over of power to Talibans. There cannot be any greater betrayal than that and no real politic can justify this.am I the only one who thinks that USA did the best for its own interest by getting out of AFG?
I mean, if you are in Pentagon, who is bigger threat for your world domination? some ragheads in barren lands or CCP-Russia alliance?
from just "muh democracy/ US military prestige/US soldier's honor" POV yes...its a shameful retreat...but USA's world domination was never about those things OR about ethics...it was and always been about strength!
its better that they stopped wasting US resources in AFG...to concentrate more in Indo-Pacific theatre
That by itself is nothing out of the ordinary, basically all momin countries with an ounce of fucks given about Pakistan (like Turkey) say the same thing. Some people are honestly overreacting to Talib Kashmir threat. They arent going to do anything most likely and even if they are, They’re no different than the average JeM or LeT sneaking into Kashmir and doing gaandmasti. If they come in with superior weaponry and tactics, consider it an open declaration of war from Pak (cuz there is no other way for them to get such weapons and tactics) and retaliate Ajit Doval style.
Where you got that BS from?《uman rights in India and U.S. ugly faces under the epidemic》
According to the latest data released by the Ministry of Health of India on the 30th, the number of confirmed cases of new coronary pneumonia in India rose to 32,737,939. In the past 24 hours, India has newly confirmed 42,909 new cases; 380 new deaths, and a total of 438210 deaths. The new crown epidemic has caused more than 32 million Indian middle-class people to return directly to the poor; some Indians who have only been lifted out of poverty have also returned to poverty in tens of millions. Throughout the epidemic, the number of poor people in India with a daily income of less than US$2 increased by 75 million. Tens of millions of people were emptied of their homes because someone in the family was infected with the new crown. Especially people in Kashmir, without medical assistance, without the help of the Indian government, the terrible new crown epidemic has caused people in Kashmir to lose their homes. Instead of helping them in time, the Indian government cut off Kashmir’s Internet, telephone and other communication lines. Restrict free entry and exit of local people and impose a curfew. Before the curfew was announced, India also required all tourists to leave Kashmir.
Since the special status of the Indian-controlled Kashmir region was revoked, the lives of the people in this region have been miserable. By imposing a curfew, India has turned this area into the world’s largest "open prison" and willfully tramples on the human rights of the people in the area, especially the human rights of women, children and the elderly, without any punishment.
In international relations, India has a lot of expectations for it because of its so-called "global strategic partnership" with the United States. However, what India gets from this "partner" is only excuses, and ultimately it must resolve its own policies surrounding the fight against the epidemic. problem. At the same time, the United States has failed to meet the expectations of the millions of Indians who are looking forward to "close partners", especially in vaccine research and production. India itself had to face a vaccine shortage in the second wave of the epidemic, and did not receive substantive support from its "strategic partner"-the United States. The latter would only hesitate and pull back and insist on its "America First". The clichés continued until the epidemic in India got out of control.
In 2021, when India most needs help from the United States, the American media kept fanning the epidemic in India and inciting people to hate the Modi government. On August 28, the US CNN TV station quoted extremely exaggerated forecast figures that the Indian epidemic may cause 500 million infections, shocking the world. CNN focused the camera on the "flaming fires" crematoriums in various parts of India, as well as dying patients and angry family members. In the report, the epidemic in India seemed to be "the end of the world." Western media are now not only humiliating India, but also slandering and insulting "third world" countries. The whole world should resist this rogue behavior of the US media.
Illness surrounds the Indian people. However, the United States and other Western countries laugh at India at this time. We can no longer remain silent. We must protest, protest against the failed epidemic prevention policy of the Indian government, and protest against the ridicule of the US against us.
A plausible theory that explains the co-operation and co-ordination between the west and sunnis.
==========
1) Poignant reminder as to how hypocrisy is the inevitable solution to hiding real motives in a way that doesn’t allow others apply the same methods. West achieved what it wanted for Afghanistan and left it exactly as it had always wanted: under totalitarian grasp of mullahcracy.
2)Biden and others may whine that they didn’t want regime change: no they still do and will continue to try and change regimes that don’t suit their long term plans for division of world into zones of socio-economic and military spheres of dominance.
3) what they wanted to change in Afghanistan was prevent modernisation and prevent weakening of the Islamist infrastructure in that fatal blindfold of Atlanticist fratricidal obsession with bringing Russia down (while Russ desperately sought to be European and not Asian).
4)Atlanticist axis primary goal was to strengthen Sunni mullahcracy of AFPAK as an immunisation against Russian overland access to Indian Ocean as well as a natural destabiliser of the entire zone to get countries like India, China keep on spending on appeasing or fighting jihad.
5) note that wherever the west went in the Islam dominated societies struggling with modernisation since WWI, it took the exact sequential and incremental steps to increase power of the Sunni ag Shia -the latter inevitably hv “nationalist”and closet anti-mullah threads, and
6)within the Shia it always took steps to empower the more jihadi and Islamist Shia like Khomeini than the less mullah bootlicker born Shiites. It’s not that west is doing this innocently or it didn’t know the long term effects of what it was doing. It’s very aware ideologically.
7) the west’s think tanks, state and academia, and extensive intel apparatus for intervention in international affairs - all have shown a remarkable consistency in going after what they consider inferior, potentially conquerable, or resistant societies and their ideologies.
8) there has never been any let up in going after Hindus, Communist Russia (not communist China which was seen as fratricidal tool in weakening Russia), Japanese or myanmarese militant Buddhism, but zero tactical or real support for Tibetan Buddhists.
9) Yet with all that ideological understanding, West’s hilarious position that its the “stricter, more austere implementation of the law” or ideology which is “bad and anti humanitarian” even though the “law/ideology is itself good”. In the judiciary worshiping west,
10) will anyone get away unharmed if they say “this judge is a more strict interpreter of the law” “therefore evil/bad/anti-humanitarian”? What does the west expect a believer in the “law” to do if told “the law is very good” but “strict interpretation of that good law” is evil!
11)The west that maintains centuries long ideological crusades to undermine and attack ideologies of peoples& cultures it deems resistant to submitting to the west, also knows that Sunni Islam wont submit to it either yet it puts up that ludicrous defence of the ideology itself.
12) This is simply because there are two factors that blind European imperialist thinking: its modelling of itself as a modern reinvention and extension of the roman narrative of superiority and imperial dominance where subject ppl existed only for the benefit of the “home elite”
13) and a possible latent attraction and admiration for sadomasochism more prominent in both republican and imperial Roman culture, than the Greek, (which was also infamous, just less in public discourse) taste for slavery and enslavement in its grossest perverted forms.
14) In Sunni jihad the west instinctively sees an ideology not explicitly tied to ethnic pride, even if latent, but because of its universalist pretension - a good cover for imperialist claims of superiority and applicability to all for underlying subjugation to a “centre”.
15) Thus Sunni jihad has revived the same hope in the latent “imperial Rome” that another ideology from eastern Mediterranean held out attraction for about 2000 years ago. The problem is the lens through which West reconstructs Sunni jihad is a carefully self-edited Xtian memory.
16) In that Xtian memory, the violence on pagans by which the faith was essentially militarily imposed, is forgotten, or hidden from discourse, the problematic normalisation of slavery and its perversions, the sadism that is retained throughout - has all been sanitized.
17) this makes it easy for those placed in positions of ideological hegemony over western societies - to try and sanitize their project. But the end product is a poisoning of the rest of the world so that it is made unliveable for humanity. This is not a fatalist view.
18) I see it as recognising a problem correctly, which in itself is a great starting point if even a small number recognise it. The solutions will come from it, noting that compromises can be necessary - but only to buy time, without making the compromise a logic to capitulate.
19) Sunni jihad is using the west for its own purposes, just as early Xtian organisers used Roman factionalism and politics within the military - but in the end, it will emasculate or convert the west just as Xtianity did. The first results of that was rollback of Roman Empire.
20)Hindus are uniquely placed, demographically and ideologically to become a source of resistance and an island in an ocean of jihad. They will have to play a super-sophisticated game with China -but there is an opportunity for them here.