sorcerer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,919
- Likes
- 98,474
Said the words that will be picked by the libtards and the rainbow people and then start a viral dance on SM.Ek se bada ek joker
Said the words that will be picked by the libtards and the rainbow people and then start a viral dance on SM.Ek se bada ek joker
Ek se bada ek joker
After the NDA came to power FSB ecosystem suffered a lot inside India. Thats true..no wonder russia is sort of pissed off.Russia's convergence with Pakistan and China on Afghanistan and Taliban is scary because this could expand to other areas later.
Dude, the Nambi Narayanan incident happened after Soviet Union fall. And that wasn't even military tech. Why would the USA allow a strong economy with an independent foreign policy to rise? If India reaches middle-income status and then manages to graduate to a knowledge-based economy, India would have a larger R&D budget and more scientists than USA. After that, its only a matter of time before USA is dethroned as the world's "leader". Why is it so hard to understand for you? USA is the final boss in this game. China is a chu-boss (mid-level boss). Of course none of this makes sense if China gets there first and China is getting there first, which is why US is wooing us to join their anti-China alliance. Same thing happened after WW2. USA first supported Soviets against Nazis, then turned on Soviets. Agreed that also had an ideological dimension, but that also exists here: Hindu-majority India is not ideologically compatible with Western civilization.That was the prime minister's conviction in 1970s. His people, especially oppressed groups like Balochi and Sindhis won't watch their kids starve to death because of nuclear weapons, something that which the average Paki doesn't even know the meaning of.
The entire American military would not be destroyed even if Pak nuked itself. At most there will be like 50k troops involved at any given time. Plus any war would be fought with allies like India and NATO.
As for the shackles thing, that was a cold war era mentality because of fears that India would join the Soviet Union. Nowadays, it's China that they want contained. In order to use India for that purpose, you NEED the shackles removed. Pakistan has out-lived its usefulness. Balochistan and Sindh alone (as independent countires) can serve the purpose of blocking Chinese and Russian access to the Indian Ocean.
1.) Why are you banned again?With China's rise, and this shitshow, their image is down the drain.
Their allies have begin to question them. It is where it is with the help of its allies.
Japan is planning to drop their 1% policy on defence. Will they be a threat?
Power Balance is coming back to asia. It can't keep up.
By isolationism I mean keeping control over Americas, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and maybe Europe.

Narrative will beISI's Washington DC station chief is gloating on successful completion of phase 1.
There is definitely a toolkit which is co-ordinating all this messaging.
View attachment 105504
View attachment 105505
Agreed. Which is why China is cosying up to Taliban. Another thing, China has already bought the right people to prevent that from happening.IMO with the US's pivot to Indo-Pacific they will also push a change in the global islam khatre me hai narrative, push the focus to China, pass them the crown of "the great satan" and direct as much of the global jihad attention towards them. Chums like Qatar will be very helpful in this pivot. So tomorrow (or rather a few years down the line) if a paxi nuke goes missing there will be a greater chance that it will end up in Beijing rather than New York or even New Delhi.
But that's just it though, China is getting there before India. It may be that US wants to shut down India before they can become the next China, but with no other true allies against China as well positioned as India is, it's more in their interest to help India grow to the point where they can seriously threaten China, than to keep them down and miss that opportunity.Dude, the Nambi Narayanan incident happened after Soviet Union fall. And that wasn't even military tech. Why would the USA allow a strong economy with an independent foreign policy to rise? If India reaches middle-income status and then manages to graduate to a knowledge-based economy, India would have a larger R&D budget and more scientists than USA. After that, its only a matter of time before USA is dethroned as the world's "leader". Why is it so hard to understand for you? USA is the final boss in this game. China is a chu-boss (mid-level boss). Of course none of this makes sense if China gets there first and China is getting there first, which is why US is wooing us to join their anti-China alliance. Same thing happened after WW2. USA first supported Soviets against Nazis, then turned on Soviets. Agreed that also had an ideological dimension, but that also exists here: Hindu-majority India is not ideologically compatible with Western civilization.
.
Pakistan will never give up its nukes willingly. They know they'll be toast the minute they do. Average Pakis know one thing: without the "bum" they will be "bumbed" by India. The Paki establishment has spent resources so that the average Paki understands why the "bum" is important. And its not that hard to understand in the first place.
That's I want more Muslims in Europe.. With a little more than 5 percent Muslims, France already has had enough..I don't understand leftists' love for Islamists' c***s![]()

Any evidence for this?After the NDA came to power FSB ecosystem suffered a lot inside India. Thats true..no wonder russia is sort of pissed off.
This so called Talibani just called mother "ma". Not "ammi" or whatever they call in Pashto ("moor" I think). And they don't have guns despite the stock clearance sale. Looks like fake video from jokers in Deoband. Even if its real, "ane do".