A lot of countries have stake in afghanistan true but India is one of the highest investors in afghanistan.
Assets would have come in handy had they coordinated with the ANA from the get go same goes for militant groups.
US departure was imminent and that became clear the moment taliban landed in qatar. We should have started our preparations from then itself.
Unlike many other countries the situation in Afg affects us more due to the proximity of talibani groups with ISI.
Northern alliance could have worked had everyone stepped in last year itself now it is a little to late.
See this is where the problem is even if we would be having assets or ANA fully supported by us they would be of no use, they all are islamic supporters remember they will choose Taliban before us anyday and for ANA even we had armed them to teeth they would have lost even if we had done it 2 years back it would have resulted in failure why I am saying this is that you need will and man to fight which are in short supply for ANA and majority of thier leaders are corrupt and don't really have any stake in winning the fight.
And we can't send our man at any cost there it would be wise to keep them at loc rather than in Afghanistan.
And here when all our journalists are talking about assets like how we close a single consulate according to them USA, China, Russia all got assets and investments but they also closed before us and USA had to run in night remember. These guys have just got intelligence agencies to bitch about nothing more.
And when we talk about assets in what context we are talking about is it human intelligence, is it mercenaries, is it Taliban warlords, is it other countries intelligence agencies what is a asset? Are our journalists saying we built a dam there so we should send army there to protect it or deploy our assets just to protect a consulate is it worth it?