Anshu Attri
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 1,218
- Likes
- 679
Sukhoi Su-50 Firefox?? Is this the PAKFA or an upgraded version of the Su-35BM?
Right now Its prototypes are known as T-50 so most calling it SU-50, It may change..Sukhoi Su-50 Firefox?? Is this the PAKFA or an upgraded version of the Su-35BM?
Firefox is i believe the nato name for the aircraft , like the Fulcrum is to the Su-30Sukhoi Su-50 Firefox?? Is this the PAKFA or an upgraded version of the Su-35BM?
Fulcrum - Mig 29Firefox is i believe the nato name for the aircraft , like the Fulcrum is to the Su-30
Lol , i can't believe i got those mixed up.Fulcrum - Mig 29
Flanker - Su 30
True , that's why you have not heard SU-50 firefox form any official.I see - Firefox!
I thought that Firefox was the fictional NATO name for a (fictional) Mig-31 in some novel.
Fictional military aircraft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Of course, you need to know what I am talking about to understand.That is your opinion and hardly supported by fact......
No, you need to support your opinion with facts.Of course, you need to know what I am talking about to understand.
No. You just need a link to click on which says the F-22 has more drag. Specifications are obviously not enough for you.No, you need to support your opinion with facts.
To identify it according to their convenience. All birds that start with the letter "F" are fighters, like Flanker, Fulcrum,Foxbat.can you please tell me why do nato still give names to russian missiles and fighters which at times sound very funny.
J-10 does it and so can the F-15 ACTIVE. I guess Rafale can do it too. But that's not demonstrated.Actually, F-22 is one of the very few western fighters which can do the Pugachev Cobra maneauver, which I am certain cannot be done by a fighter with high wing drag (like F-15).
can Su-30MKI do this Cobra manoeuvres with full load of weapons???J-10 does it and so can the F-15 ACTIVE. I guess Rafale can do it too. But that's not demonstrated.
The wing loading on MKI is higher than the F-15.
Interesting words coming from the mouth of the master Sukhoi designer.DATE:20/06/11
SOURCE:Flight Daily News
PARIS: Russia's PAK-FA fighter shows promise
By Alan Dron
Russia's Sukhoi PAK-FA stealthy fifth-generation fighter is showing promise in its test-flight programme and will probably fly at Moscow's MAKS air show in August, says United Aircraft chief Mikhail Pogosyan.
"There is no aircraft in the world that doesn't undergo certain modifications based on the test [programme] results. The most successful only require minor modifications to support systems. Our experience so far gives us confidence that we will avoid significant problems. The past year gives us sound grounds to say we are moving in the right direction.
"We're quite happy and pleased with the course of testing."
Two prototypes are now flying at the Gromov flight test centre at Zhukovsky, a suburb southeast of Moscow.
© Sukhoi
Russia has a requirement for 150 or more of the aircraft, which carries the internal Sukhoi designation of T-50, to enter service from 2015-16. India plans to buy between 200 and 250 of a modified design under the designation Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft.
Pogosyan denies that New Delhi is simply providing funding for Russian designers to produce a modified aircraft for the Indian air force's requirements.
He says India is bringing its own engineering input to the joint variant, although he declines to detail New Delhi's contribution beyond saying it covers aspects of airframe design, software development and other systems.
Pogosyan points to previous co-operation between the two countries in which Indian engineers helped to develop the capabilities of the Sukhoi Su-30MKI in Indian service as evidence of India's engineering expertise.
Asked for his professional opinion on China's J-20 stealth fighter unveiled in January, Pogosyan says: "You'd better ask the Chinese."
Pressed on whether he feels the aircraft is a genuine prototype or merely a technology demonstrator, he says: "China's aviation industry has achieved really significant progress. But on the other hand, to create a really competitive product is time-consuming, demands significant experience in the engineering field and experienced human resources."