just a thought
=====
Interplay of paradigms
one thing that is getting apparently clear is that mere existence of a paradigms does not lead to guaranteed outcomes, nor should favourable outcomes by chance be treated as validation of success of a paradigm. there is an amount of time and resource that needs to be put in to even expect an reasonable outcome, depending on the paradigm. and there could be multiple paradigms operating simultaneously, some essential some nice to have, never the less all requiring attention.
Wrong strategy would be to leave it fate, if a favourable outcome is perceived to be imperative. of course it could be the case that one needs to prioritise paradigms based on resource available, as long as it is understood that outcome will be delayed since dedicated effort has been delayed.
and then there is a case of competing paradigms between friends or foes, whoever is putting in efforts is more likely to see outcomes, as compared to the one who is not investing any effort into it.