South Korea's fertility rate falls to lowest in the world

SKC

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
8,782
Likes
30,252
Country flag
Yes, in USA it is possible because no one in USA is American, all are foreign origin.
Fun Fact: as high as One-third of US population as German origin by mid of 1800s.
There was huge favor and support for Germany before world wars in 1900s.

If US was not involved in World wars they was change they would have supported Germany from outside.
 

HitmanBlood

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
1,459
Likes
12,175
Country flag
I think inflation rate is the key factor that has thrown the world to the dogs.
In the 1960s a typical American middle class family could have three kids, a housewife, a car and house on loan on the salary of just the husband alone.



We have to high a population in this world. The earth could sustain 3 to 4 billion population with ease but 7 billion is too much.
Also add human greed into it. Idea of women in workforce came from greedy company owners who started to stagnant salaries of employees so it became difficult to raise a family on one salary. greedy economists supported this as increase in productivity per capita. On top of this capitalist culture of more materialism destroyed what was left.

So adding women in workforce increased productivity for western nations but destroyed families, reduced their fertility rate but most importantly it reduced male role in society as a provider and reduced female role as a caretaker. It made both genders obsolete. This resulted into more confusion and more destruction.

Labor-Force-Participation-of-women-in-the-US-1955-2005-768x424.png
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,173
Our father used to say that most of our ancestors didn't bother doing jobs because we had enough land to feed us for lifetime i.e., someone who had 25 acres could easily feed 10 mouths and earn from it too.

In 0.5 acre u could get 2ton rice for the family enough for 10 People.

1 acre of land could get u 2 ton of wheat enough for 10 People.

1 acre of land could get u 1.5 ton of potatoes.
1 acre 1.5 ton onion.
0.2 acre 1 ton tomatoes.
0.5 acre to 250 kg sugar.
0.1 acre can produce enough milk to feed a family of 10.
1 acre can produce all kinds of vegetables.
1 acre for fruits

So All around 5 acres for a family of 10.

Moving from agri based to service based has also caused lots of problem.
The population increased but the land didn't.

Today the situation is such that a Indian family has only 0.96 acre land per family.
 

Blademaster

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,313
Likes
27,193
Our father used to say that most of our ancestors didn't bother doing jobs because we had enough land to feed us for lifetime i.e., someone who had 25 acres could easily feed 10 mouths and earn from it too.

In 0.5 acre u could get 2ton rice for the family enough for 10 People.

1 acre of land could get u 2 ton of wheat enough for 10 People.

1 acre of land could get u 1.5 ton of potatoes.
1 acre 1.5 ton onion.
0.2 acre 1 ton tomatoes.
0.5 acre to 250 kg sugar.
0.1 acre can produce enough milk to feed a family of 10.
1 acre can produce all kinds of vegetables.
1 acre for fruits

So All around 5 acres for a family of 10.

Moving from agri based to service based has also caused lots of problem.
The population increased but the land didn't.

Today the situation is such that a Indian family has only 0.96 acre land per family.
Is that for the year? How much tons of each type of food does a person need & eat per year?

And also, is it feasible to encourage farmer families to enter into a co-op where they would pool their land holdings into one big holding corporation and move their homes into an area reserved for housing and such and use the rest of the land for cultivation? It would reduce the waste created by dividing lands further for each next generation. The ownership of the land would simply be passed onto the heirs as shares and the owners are free to hire workers or till the land and get another job.
 

Sonic Wasp

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Messages
28
Likes
72
Country flag
Is that for the year? How much tons of each type of food does a person need & eat per year?

And also, is it feasible to encourage farmer families to enter into a co-op where they would pool their land holdings into one big holding corporation and move their homes into an area reserved for housing and such and use the rest of the land for cultivation? It would reduce the waste created by dividing lands further for each next generation. The ownership of the land would simply be passed onto the heirs as shares and the owners are free to hire workers or till the land and get another job.
Well the idea of co-ownership is great but will only work if actively supported by government and judiciary ensures that no kabjabaji will happen
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,173
And also, is it feasible to encourage farmer families to enter into a co-op where they would pool their land holdings into one big holding corporation and move their homes into an area reserved for housing and such and use the rest of the land for cultivation? It would reduce the waste created by dividing lands further for each next generation. The ownership of the land would simply be passed onto the heirs as shares and the owners are free to hire workers or till the land and get another job.
Entire BIMARULAND will riot.
People don't like Gov fucking with land. Same reason it's not rast to procure land for Industries.
Worst of the worst states have SeZ or a Industrial town we have none such.
 

Blademaster

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,313
Likes
27,193
Entire BIMARULAND will riot.
People don't like Gov fucking with land. Same reason it's not rast to procure land for Industries.
Worst of the worst states have SeZ or a Industrial town we have none such.
Government won't be invovled - only that the proper forms are followed for the best interest of the farmers. Farmers would have to run the co op themselves. And the farmers are free to get out of the co-op and get the land back but it means giving up any benefits and returning any and all things owned by the co-op such as machinery, tools, and housing etc.
 

Love Charger

चक्रवर्ती
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2021
Messages
12,823
Likes
34,486
Country flag
Government won't be invovled - only that the proper forms are followed for the best interest of the farmers. Farmers would have to run the co op themselves. And the farmers are free to get out of the co-op and get the land back but it means giving up any benefits and returning any and all things owned by the co-op such as machinery, tools, and housing etc.
And how will be incoms of a cooperative distributed?
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top