Sorry Kunal, they I will say you know nothing. I actually hold different AK variants including "Beryl" and I had opportunity to hold MSBS, INSAS compared to MSBS is a stone age weapon in terms of modularity, ergonomics, literally everything.What if i told you Beryl is nothing like INSAS and MSBS which your new toy is now close to INSAS ..
Would You be so kind and writ me what is better in INSAS then in Beryl rifle?
beryl nothing compared to insas . Insas have many variant like kalantak etc. And each have their own specific work like kalantak is light weight.@abhi_the _gr8_maratha
so adult argument "we are superpower, we have nukes and you not - India strong!11111!"
more seriously - when you will realiza that sucht argument is in fact insult for your country and in fact phatetic here?
You must escape it to direction "superpower" thinks like nukes, IBCM, space program etc becouse on lower level - conventional warfare many program in India (Bhim, Bhay, etc) faild in compare to polish analoges, and in fact even "sucefull" program like INSAS are not better then analoges - for example Beryl, but they are ussaly deade later after polish ones...
So sucht argument about "superpower" IBCM and nukes in in fact extremly stupid
Would You be so kind and writ me what is better in INSAS then in Beryl rifle?
becouse I really don't see bigger difrences in general idea. Bothe weapons now are good but they are on circa 1980-1990 level, despite well known INSAS rifle problems whit quality of the first batches and traditional too long developing phase...
btw: both where tested in combat as I understand? Polish ones Beryl was tested in Irak, Afghanistan etc... and perform extremly good.
1."Beryl" in basic variant have barrel with lenght of 457mm and a twist rate of twist rate is 1:9 inches as it is considered by our military as most universal twist rate for rifling.
Polish military uses different versions. Some units especially lower and rear echelons use wz.96A which does not have all features, however high readiness units mostly use wz.96C.
Yes, but remember that "in mass" in Poland means something completly diffrent then in India
Number of Beryl and Mini Beryl in Polish Army is counted as 35 000.
=============================
so standard is like on this photo for 2009 batch:
1.But the "Beryl" rifling is more unviersal.
No. 5.56 INSAS is a different round and is ~ 3mm longer than standard 5.56 NATO. INSAS can fire 5.56 NATO round but a NATO standard gun cannot fire 5.56 INSAS.
1.But the "Beryl" rifling is more unviersal.
2.Regulator is a nice thing but not nececary, besides this "Beryl" is a modified AKM in it's essence, and the fun fact, nobody never complied about "Beryl" reliability from beggining of it's service, INSAS had problems with reliability. SO you know, fancy features are nothing if rifle does not work properly.
3.Nah, you can have carrying handle, but in the end sling is enough, you think our soldiers were never serving in combat conditions? Sometimes patrols could be very long, and noboy ever said that carrying handle is nececary.
4.Larger weight might be actually advantage, as we know slightly heavier weapons are more accurate.
5.I said that "Beryl" can use different types of 5,56x45mm ammunition, you can use SS109, M193, M855/M855A1, hey I can put OFB rounds in to "Beryl" magazine and fire it without problems.
6."Beryl" sights can be zeroed up to 1000m, but obviously such weapons are mostly designed to fire no further than 600m.
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | Russia to supply air defence system and small arms to Pakistan | Pakistan | 3 | |
|
Gun memes | General Multimedia | 83 | |
|
Israeli-Indian JV to make small arms in private sector | Defence & Strategy | 15 | |
|
India identifying requirement for small arms fire detection system | Indian Army | 6 |
