by mid 2018 we will have more paki kills than kargil war. This too without actually going to war.some reports saying 15 rangers got ticket to jannat today.....more rangers are waiting for jannat in queue....
....I know it's not enough....but India is their father...they should remember
The police and internal intelligence have improved a lot. Even the most corrupt police departments don't compromise when dealing with terrorism.It may sound cynical but I am thinking why there are no terror attacks in the hinterland or metro cities of India. Why Pak is not doing what it knows best. Is it the fear of retaliation or lack of capability.
Both ; But The threat is always thereIt may sound cynical but I am thinking why there are no terror attacks in the hinterland or metro cities of India. Why Pak is not doing what it knows best. Is it the fear of retaliation or lack of capability.
Firstly, the number of casualties on the Paki side have been discerned from signal intercepts. It's 12 Rangers so far.Given the communication tunnels behind Pakistani bunkers, there could be possibility of lesser damage. Did we hear the communication chatters to confirm this big kill? My point is if we destroy their posts, send forces to capture that post permanently.
That's the thing though isn't it.UN doesn't care about skirmishes as long as there is a territorial status-quo. The UN is aware that Pakis send terrorists over to India, and will give India a long rope as far as Indian regular forces crossing LoC for retribution is concerned. Our best bet is to terrorize Pak's entire forward deployment to a point where it rethinks the strategy behind sending terrorists over with covering fire from Paki regulars. In a bid to conserve trained, experienced, and valuable officers, Paki forward deployments will increasingly consist of non-coms and sepoys, with command and control deficiencies. That will work wonders for India if one morning Delhi decides to cold-start.
Pak's response, on the other hand, appears to be to show to the Indian media that India's tit-for-tat strategy isn't stopping Paki action, and that talks are the only way forward. It appears like a vicious cycle, but it really isn't. Indian action must always be an overreaction to Paki action. Sustained escalation over extended periods (i.e. 5 years or one BJP term) is a strategy that hasn't been tried by India in the past, and is worth exploring.
15 is what I'm guessing10-15 rangers killed is BS in my opinion.
There's like less than 3% chance of mortars and machine gun fire causing casualties in that magnitude on LoC/IB.
But destruction of 4 BoPs is confirmed which as per historical trends would suggest about 2-4 casualties.
Few corrections there. First. Doval doctrine is not defensive offence but Offensive Defence.That's the thing though isn't it.
Even if we are winning these skirmishes, these events as a whole aren't stopping.
Pakis always initiate it, meaning they think that we are reactionary.
Something happens, pakis start cease fire violations, we escalate and they stop.
Again, later that year something happens and the cycle starts all over again.
There really are only two way to stop these wannabes.
Cold Start, which may or may not lead to a full scale war.
Or a sustained and consistent policy of, as Ajit Doval puts it, "defensive offense" over a period of years.
We need to have mechanism in place such that whenever pakis think of escalation on the LOC, we kick start the proper channels in Balochistan and some other vulnerable areas in pakistan so that their forces are immediately stretched thin and they stop right in their tracks.
We do this over and over again, so much so that Pakis eventually realise that starting something on the LOC means they get fucked on their western border and this becomes the general practice.
And maybe I'm being hopeful but if we do defensive offense properly it just might be possible to bring them to the table and make them give up without even fighting.
After all, let us not forget these are the same people who gave up and accepted defeat publicly and surrendered en masse, all 93000 of them, the only such public surrender in the history of modern warfare.
I honestly think that if we can give them a good scare and make them think that they will be royally fucked from all sides, they will bend over, cower and just give up.
Attacking their vulnerabilities i.e. economically, politically, culturally, etc may also come in the defensive offense strategy.
Who is this guy Manu Pubby? Is he oblivious to the past 3 years of what's happening at the LOC?
30000/00/0000000000000000
It may sound cynical but I am thinking why there are no terror attacks in the hinterland or metro cities of India. Why Pak is not doing what it knows best. Is it the fear of retaliation or lack of capability.
Nah, the civilians are really injured, I saw their pics. Btw, it seems dead bodies of Pakistani soldiers killed today aren't dispatched to their hometown yet. Let's wait for some time.https://www.dawn.com/news/1380743/3-pakistani-civilians-injured-in-indian-ceasefire-violation-ispr
Bhai ye lo agaya
civilian injured
paki soilder s are immortal...........
US pressureIt may sound cynical but I am thinking why there are no terror attacks in the hinterland or metro cities of India. Why Pak is not doing what it knows best. Is it the fear of retaliation or lack of capability
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LOC, LAC & International Border skirmishs | Indian Army | 1990 | ||
LOC, LAC & IB skirmishs | Indian Army | 1958 | ||
India-Pakistan LoC/IB Skirmishes in the Aftermath of August 5 2019 | Indian Army | 7949 | ||
Amid LoC skirmishes: Pakistan to release 367 Indians on Aug 24 | Pakistan | 29 |