Skirmishs at LOC, LAC & International Border

[Kazah]

Pakistani Lt. drowned in river indus while he was fishing

seems legit

 

[COLDHEARTED AVIATOR]

Multiple posters pointing the faults in your argument, yet I am the troll b/c logic like God works in mysterious ways.

This is not even an argument. All of it could also be put as


You know it so tell it.
Tell what is elevetion of Chushul. Tell where are the roads in Zojila pass.

Bas faltu ke argument pel raha hai

BC pehle Kashmir aake dekh tere tau ne tank chalana he yaha pe?

 

[LordOfTheUnderworlds]

Spot on! The Paki military and so called experts think that the frikkin Nasr is a panacea for the so called CSD.

Well, as I've brought out some time ago in a post on another thread that has been lost in the labyrinths of DFI, here's how ineffective Pak's much hyped 'star wars weapon' would be for the benefit of those who aren't aware....

For a max 5kt warhead (max 5kt warhead on Nasr which is between 1 to 5 kt)

– Blast and fireball radius 500m or approx < 2 sq km

Integrated Combat Group frontage < > 10 km with two combat teams up. Depth < > 5 km. Total area covered approx 50 sq km.

How many nukes would be required to 'destroy' one CG? - 25.

Initial strike with 10 -15 combat groups simultaneously. Total area covered < > 500 sq km.

Minimum battlefield nukes needed to 'destroy' the CGs > 250 Nasrs! (Most A vehicles would be M-kills and thus repairable in situ).

That’s a hell of a lot of Nasrs required! Remember, all tanks and personnel carriers are protected from nuclear radiation. There will be no infantry out in the open. And then, most armored vehicles affected would be M-kills and not K-kills.

So, going a step further, 250x5 kt =1250 kt ie, equal to the yield of 65 Hiroshima atom bombs on Pakistani territory (as these will be employed only after the CGs have penetrated deep into Pakistan and would be used as a last resort!!) What would be left of Eastern Pakistan? It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face!

And do they have that many Nasrs? Highly doubtful. Have they been tried and tested? Nope! Will they work? Allah knows! And most of all, before they can fire off their second Nasr, the Pakis will have a whole lot of Indian-made mushroom clouds to contend with!!

Wouldn't these CGs have mobile SAM units to neutralize some of the Nasr's?
.
On a lighter note, DRDO should install remotely controlled self driving mechanism in older tanks and send them as decoy CG into Pakistan so that Pakistan does world a favor and nukes itself.

 

[Anikastha]

Pakistani Lt. drowned in river indus while he was fishing

seems legit

He must have jumped into River.
Why?
1) may he thought he could be safe from Indian artillery pounding if he crosses river.
2) Taliban / tribes men chased this chap who must have mis behaved with some. So he jumped desperately to escape.

 

[Pandeyji]

BC pehle Kashmir aake dekh tere tau ne tank chalana he yaha pe?

...............................................

 

[Anikastha]

Wouldn't these CGs have mobile SAM units to neutralize some of the Nasr's?
.
On a lighter note, DRDO should install remotely controlled self driving mechanism in older tanks and send them as decoy CG into Pakistan so that Pakistan does world a favor and nukes itself.

Haha funny....
Let DRDO complete the pending projects. Don't give them this Idea. They will immediately jump into this to escape from work. Typical sarkaar babus.

 

[AMCA]

................


........................

 

[Anikastha]

Are you talking of this:::::::::::::

Nope Drdo tested Guide bombs last November. Named Sudharshan as mentioned above by our Brother @Bhumihar . I have read many articles , they stated officials were not impressed by quality or something like that.

 

[aghamarshana]

Pakistani Lt. drowned in river indus while he was fishing

seems legit

They didn't pray Allah to give him 72 virgin hooris...Selfish Bastards.

 

[SanjeevM]

Wouldn't these CGs have mobile SAM units to neutralize some of the Nasr's?
.
On a lighter note, DRDO should install remotely controlled self driving mechanism in older tanks and send them as decoy CG into Pakistan so that Pakistan does world a favor and nukes itself.

During liberation of Bangladesh, dummies were air dropped with parachutes to inflate the numbers of paratroopers dropped in Bangladesh liberation so that Pakistanis fear of large number of Indian soldiers on the ground. During world war dummy tanks were deployed and dummy aircrafts (inflated balloons) were deployed by allied forces to lure German fighters to waste their bombs on decoy targets instead of real targets. What you mentioned is a good idea. Shhhhhhhh....... Let's not discuss more about this. Let army, DRDO and other agencies think about this....

 

[Suryavanshi]

During liberation of Bangladesh, dummies were air dropped with parachutes to inflate the numbers of paratroopers dropped in Bangladesh liberation so that Pakistanis fear of large number of Indian soldiers on the ground. During world war dummy tanks were deployed and dummy aircrafts (inflated balloons) were deployed by allied forces to lure German fighters to waste their bombs on decoy targets instead of real targets. What you mentioned is a good idea. Shhhhhhhh....... Let's not discuss more about this. Let army, DRDO and other agencies think about this....

000000000000000000000000000000

 

[indiatester]

Spot on! The Paki military and so called experts think that the frikkin Nasr is a panacea for the so called CSD.

Well, as I've brought out some time ago in a post on another thread that has been lost in the labyrinths of DFI, here's how ineffective Pak's much hyped 'star wars weapon' would be for the benefit of those who aren't aware....

For a max 5kt warhead (max 5kt warhead on Nasr which is between 1 to 5 kt)

– Blast and fireball radius 500m or approx < 2 sq km

Integrated Combat Group frontage < > 10 km with two combat teams up. Depth < > 5 km. Total area covered approx 50 sq km.

How many nukes would be required to 'destroy' one CG? - 25.

Initial strike with 10 -15 combat groups simultaneously. Total area covered < > 500 sq km.

Minimum battlefield nukes needed to 'destroy' the CGs > 250 Nasrs! (Most A vehicles would be M-kills and thus repairable in situ).

That’s a hell of a lot of Nasrs required! Remember, all tanks and personnel carriers are protected from nuclear radiation. There will be no infantry out in the open. And then, most armored vehicles affected would be M-kills and not K-kills.

So, going a step further, 250x5 kt =1250 kt ie, equal to the yield of 65 Hiroshima atom bombs on Pakistani territory (as these will be employed only after the CGs have penetrated deep into Pakistan and would be used as a last resort!!) What would be left of Eastern Pakistan? It’s like cutting off your nose to spite your face!

And do they have that many Nasrs? Highly doubtful. Have they been tried and tested? Nope! Will they work? Allah knows! And most of all, before they can fire off their second Nasr, the Pakis will have a whole lot of Indian-made mushroom clouds to contend with!!

Correct me if I am wrong, but as of 2016 they had 24 launchers (ref). May be they added 12 more if they were serious over the last year. With the number you calculated, that would mean they must use almost 7 warheads per launcher.
That would be a serious issue on security. Imagine one Indian special forces team that can be flown in, and one of the launchers and few warheads are out of their control! This considering our satellites are monitoring them fairly comprehensively.

 

[captscooby81]

Any one here has info about the cause of death . I think this is the second jawan death from Arunachal sector in last one week .

 

[pankaj nema]

Any one here has info about the cause of death . I think this is the second jawan death from Arunachal sector in last one week .

View attachment 22773

NSCN attacks ; Now they have reached Arunachal

Insurgents Trigger Blast Under Army Vehicles In Namsai

http://www.theshillongtimes.com/2018/01/24/insurgents-trigger-blast-under-army-vehicles-in-namsai/

 

[Bornubus]

Deadly precision

=======

The head constable was behind his LMG and was retaliating to Pakistani fire from a loophole of one foot by one-foot square. Enemies target that. A bullet entered from the loophole and hit him. It was very unfortunate,” he said.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/civilian-dies-in-pak-firing-across-rs-pura.html

 

[Suryavanshi]

Deadly precision

=======

The head constable was behind his LMG and was retaliating to Pakistani fire from a loophole of one foot by one-foot square. Enemies target that. A bullet entered from the loophole and hit him. It was very unfortunate,” he said.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/civilian-dies-in-pak-firing-across-rs-pura.html

Sniper attack definitely .

 

[Bornubus]

Sniper attack definitely .

AMR most likely, old but same tactic as us



full read and example

===========

 

[aditya g]

Deadly precision

=======

The head constable was behind his LMG and was retaliating to Pakistani fire from a loophole of one foot by one-foot square. Enemies target that. A bullet entered from the loophole and hit him. It was very unfortunate,” he said.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/civilian-dies-in-pak-firing-across-rs-pura.html

The BSF officer in a press conference clearly stated that this was not sniper fire. The post was already under attack and a bullet entered the loophole.

 

[Jaymax]

The BSF officer in a press conference clearly stated that this was not sniper fire. The post was already under attack and a bullet entered the loophole.

BSF has Vidhwansak rifles (around 400). Are they not being used here ? AFAIK, their rounds have high penetration capabilities.

 

[Anikastha]

BSF has Vidhwansak rifles (around 400). Are they not being used here ? AFAIK, their rounds have high penetration capabilities.

I don't think so they are being used right now.