Scientists reconstruct faces of Indus Valley people

Indo-Aryan

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
815
Likes
884
Country flag
A genetic study published in Nature in July 2016 found that WSHs were a mixture of EHGs and "a population related to people of the Iran Chalcolithic". EHGs were modeled as being of 75% Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) descent. A significant presence of WSH ancestry among populations of South Asia was detected.

How is Iran Chalcolithic related to Iran Neolithic population who forms the major ancestry component of Harappans?

EHG have 3/4th of their ancestry related to Tarim People between 2000-1500bce. Did Tarim ancestry ever percolate into the South Asian populations of Afghanistan & Kashmir.

What does steppe ancestry really mean?
Does it mean we carry some parts of Iran Chalcolithic and ancient North Eurasian ancestry among us?

How similar these original ancient North Eurasian were to the people who migrated there from Asia.
 

Indo-Aryan

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
815
Likes
884
Country flag
Another assumption is Yamnaya spoke Ancient/late PIE which again has no basis to it.
 

Indo-Aryan

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
815
Likes
884
Country flag
No one really talks about the impact of Harappans on BMAC.

No one talks about the impact of Sakas on South Asians.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,213
Country flag
If these AIT propagandists call "Out of India theory" as Hindutva Fantasy, then call their AIT as Mleccha fantasy or Marxshit fantasy , that's it simple.
The problem is that we Indians let colonizers define our history rather than put our own research forth. For example, European and the West still classify us, northeastern people, as "Tibeto-Burman". There was no clear defined racial lines in the ancient world as the cultures were common.

Tibetans intermarried with mountain-dwellers as well as those living in the Gangetic plains and oriental features were never seen as 'foreign' in Indian history; EVER. Even Tibetans were used to non-oriental-looking Indians ("Indo-Aryans" as the colonizers call it) because of intense cultural exchanges, pilgrimage to Kailash, etc.

Only Chinese, Japanese & Koreans were seen as foreigners because of the sheer distance & very distinct features.

The weird part about all this is that both Tibetan and Burmese heavily borrow from Sanskrit. This was done to make the language more eloquent like Sanskrit is and done so voluntarily by the kings of Tibet and Burma.
Burmese is written in a script derived from Sangam-era script; much of the ASEAN countries' scripts are all based either in Tamil or Sanskrit.

But when we put this forward, they dismiss this completely as though we are uttering some imaginary shit. And the worst part is, we let them control the narrative.
 

Freakk

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
77
Likes
300
Country flag
So Scythians were Europid but spoke Iranian language. Interesting!

A genetic study published in Nature in May 2018 examined the remains of twenty-eight Sakas buried between ca. 900 BC to AD 1, compromising eight Sakas of southern Siberia (Tagar culture), eight Sakas of the central steppe (Tasmola culture), and twelve Sakas of the Tian Shan. The six samples of Y-DNA extracted from the Tian Shan Saka belonged to the haplogroups R (four samples), R1 and R1a1. The samples of mtDNA extracted from the Tien Shan Saka belonged to C4, H4d, T2a1, U5a1d2b, H2a, U5a1a1, HV6 (two samples), D4j8 (two samples), W1c and G2a1. The study detected significant genetic differences between the Sakas and Scythians of the Pannonian Basin, and between Sakas of southern Siberia, the central steppe and the Tian Shan. Tian Shan Sakas were found to be of about 70% Western Steppe Herder (WSH) ancestry, 25% Siberian Hunter-Gatherer ancestry and 5% Iranian Neolithic ancestry. The Iranian Neolithic ancestry was primarily male-derived, probably from the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex. Sakas of the Tasmola culture were found to be of about 56% WSH ancestry and 44% Siberian Hunter-Gather ancestry. The peoples of the Tagar culture had about 83.5% WSH ancestry, 9% Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) ancestry and 7.5% Siberian Hunter-Gatherer ancestry. The study suggested that the Saka were the source of west Eurasian ancestry among the Xiongnu, and that the Huns probably emerged through conquests of Sakas by the Xiongnu, which is characterized by increased levels of East Asian paternal ancestry in Central Asia.

These guys migrated into India 200bce and ruled from 150bce-400bce.

View attachment 115583
OlD tweet,but this is very false.

All scythians show 30-40% bmac ancestry of iranN+chg.
Indo saka genetics are like 50-60% bmac,
 

Freakk

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
77
Likes
300
Country flag
Main Kushan rulers
  • Kujula Kadphises (c. 30 – c. 80)
  • Vima Taktu or Sadashkana (c. 80 – c. 95)
  • Vima Kadphises (c. 95 – c. 127)
  • Kanishka I (c. 127 – c. 150)
  • Huvishka (c. 150 – c. 180)
  • Vasudeva I (c. 190 – c. 230)
  • Vāsishka (c. 247 – c. 267)
  • Little Kushans (AD 270-350)
They too became more Indian than Indian themselves 😍

View attachment 115587
Scythians were our men who conquered east europe and defeated Romans in many battles.

Scythians are like 30-40% iranN+chg genetically,Which is the major Ancestry of ours.
Scythians got langauge and culture and religion from bmac,our people.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top