Sabre-rattling over Iran

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Patriot missiles in Turkey threaten "world war" -Iran army chief


The planned deployment of NATO Patriot missiles along Turkey's border with Syria could lead to a "world war" that would threaten Europe as well, Iran's military chief of staff was quoted as saying on Saturday.Turkey asked NATO for the Patriot system, designed to intercept aircraft or missiles, in November to help bolster its border security after repeated episodes of gunfire from war-torn Syria spilling into Turkish territory.



General Hassan Firouzabadi, the Iranian armed forces chief, said Iran wanted its neighbour Turkey to feel secure but called for NATO not to deploy the Patriots in its easternmost member state, which also borders Iran.

"Each one of these Patriots is a black mark on the world map, and is meant to cause a world war," Firouzabadi said, according to the Iranian Students' News Agency. "They are making plans for a world war, and this is very dangerous for the future of humanity and for the future of Europe itself."

Iran has been a staunch ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad throughout the 21-month uprising against his rule and long a strategic adversary of Western powers who have given formal recognition to Syria's opposition coalition.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta signed an order on Friday to send two Patriot missile batteries to Turkey along with American personnel to operate them, following similar steps by Germany and the Netherlands.


Iranian officials including parliament speaker Ali Larijani have previously said that installing the Patriot missiles would deepen instability in the Middle East, and the foreign ministry spokesman said they would only worsen the conflict in Syria.

Turkey has repeatedly scrambled jets along its border with Syria and responded in kind when shells and gunfire from the Syrian conflict have hit its territory, fanning fears that the civil war could inflame the wider region.


UPDATE 2-Patriot missiles in Turkey threaten world war -Iran army chief | Reuters
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
NATO chief denounces Iran's allegations on Patriots


NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Monday denounced claims by the head of Iran's armed forces that the deployment of Patriot missiles in Turkey was part of a plot to start world war.




"I completely denounce these allegations," Rasmussen said in response to a question at a news conference.

"We have made it clear right from the outset that the deployment of Patriots is a purely defensive measure.

"We are there to defend and protect Turkey. We have no offensive intention whatsoever."

At the request of member state Turkey, NATO has agreed to provide Patriot missiles to bolster its border defences amid tensions with the embattled regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

On Saturday, the joint chief of Iran's armed forces General Hassan Firouzabadi said the Patriot deployment was part of a plot to "create a world war".

"The Patriot (missiles) are threatening. Each one of them is a black dot on the map, (setting the stage) to create a world war," he said. "This is very dangerous for everyone, and even for the future of Europe."

And Monday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cancelled a planned visit to Turkey just a day after his foreign minister too warned Ankara against hosting the US-made missiles.

"The deployment of Patriot missiles will achieve nothing but to provoke and, God forbid, result in being forced into an uncalculated action," Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said in remarks reported by the official IRNA news agency.

"Their deployment will be more provocative rather than deterrent," he said, adding they would not "help regional security".

NATO chief denounces Iran's allegations on Patriots
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Iran welcomes new nuclear negotiations


Iran's top nuclear negotiator on Friday welcomed the return of leading world powers to talks over the country's disputed atomic programme, but urged them "not to repeat their past mistakes".



Talks stalled in June when Iran rejected a proposal to suspend part of its nuclear programme, asking for more substantial relief from sanctions.

Saeed Jalili, the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said Friday that Iran had invited world powers to resolve the impasse six months ago, which had now been considered.

"There was a six-month delay but they recently announced they are ready to come back for talks," he told journalists at the Iranian embassy during a trip to New Delhi.

"We welcome their return to the talks. We hope that they will come to the talks with a constructive approach and (that) they will not repeat their past mistakes," he added, without elaborating.

The last round of talks between Iran and the so-called P5+1 powers -- the United States, Russia, China, France, Germany and Britain -- yielded no breakthrough in Moscow in June.

In late November the six powers engaging Iran over its nuclear programme said they were willing to hold a new round of negotiations with Tehran.

Western powers accuse Iran of seeking to acquire a weapons capability under the guise of its nuclear energy programme. Iran denies the charge, saying its work is for peaceful purposes only.


Iran welcomes new nuclear negotiations: official
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,606
Confirmed? Massive Explosion at Iran Nuclear Facility

An explosion deep within Iran's Fordow nuclear facility has destroyed much of the installation and trapped about 240 personnel deep underground, according to a former intelligence officer of the Islamic regime.

The previously secret nuclear site has become a center for Iran's nuclear activity because of the 2,700 centrifuges enriching uranium to the 20-percent level....

The regime believes the blast was sabotage and the explosives could have reached the area disguised as equipment or in the uranium hexafluoride stock transferred to the site, the source said. The explosion occurred at the third centrifuge chambers, with the high-grade enriched uranium reserves below them.
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
US says Iran blast reports not credible

The White House on Monday dismissed reports of an underground explosion at Iran's Fordo atomic plant and also accused the Islamic Republic of adopting delaying tactics on nuclear talks.



Iran had previously condemned reports in sectors of the US and Israeli media about the alleged blast as "western propaganda" designed to influence the outcome of its stalled nuclear dialogue with Western powers.

"We have no information to confirm the allegations in that report, and we do not believe the report is credible," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

The reports cited the conservative American news website WND, which reported that an explosion at the Fordo facility on January 21 had caused major damage and trapped workers.

Iran has several times accused Israel and the United States of taking action to sabotage its nuclear program, through assassinations of its scientists and unleashing computer malware against its facilities.

The Fordo site is dug into a mountain near the holy city of Qom, some 150 kilometers (90 miles) south of Tehran, to protect it against air strikes.

Iran says it has been targeted previously, and blamed an explosion that reportedly cut the power supply to Fordo on saboteurs.

The site, whose existence was revealed by major powers in 2009, began in late 2011 to enrich uranium to purities of 20 percent, a process at the heart of US and western concerns that Iran is trying to make a nuclear bomb.

The last round of Iran's talks with the so-called P5+1 -- the United States, Britain, China, France, Russia -- held June in Moscow ended with a stalemate, as did previous rounds.

The sides have failed to agree on a new stage of talks, blaming each other for uncertainty over a date and venue. The US side has said Iran was offered talks in Istanbul at the end of this month, but never confirmed.

"Iran, not for the first time, has been continually putting forward new conditions as a delaying tactic," Carney said.


"Negotiations about negotiations is a familiar tactic that only results in further isolation and more pressure on Iran."

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said the ball is in Iran's court after the US proposed "another set of dates and another range of venues in February."

She said the US had been extremely "open and flexible" but that Washington had to ensure the talks were held in "a venue that's not politicized."

"I don't think we're going to Tehran, for example," she added. Tehran and Washington have not had diplomatic relations since the storming of the US embassy in the Iranian capital in 1979 and the subsequent hostage crisis.

US says Iran blast reports not credible
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Netanyahu Tells America It's Now Or Never

Netanyahu has drawn a line in the sand, only this time, it's for the U.S.

According to a Maariv report, when speaking to a visiting delegation from the American Jewish Committee, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel was simply not strong enough to force a halt to Iran's nuclear enrichment program. In order to halt the program, Bibi said, the U.S. would have to strike, and they must do so this year.


Netanyahu:
"The sanctions are only likely to stop Iran if there is a credible (military) threat over their head ... and in order for it to be a credible threat, you need to mean it, meaning that if the sanctions don't work – and they haven't until now – you will use it," he said





He followed this up by saying that 2013 would be the last year America could effectively put an end to Iran's nuclear program. If not, they would get their hands on enriched uranium and build a bomb in "a short time" according to Netanyahu.

Others seem to think a strike would be ineffective.

An AP article published late last year covered a report compiled by the nation's top national security experts and former military commanders. The report indicated that a "surgical strike" would only set back Iran's nuclear capability.

"You can't kill intellectual power," said retired Army Lt. Gen. Frank Kearney, former deputy director at the National Counterterrorism Center and former deputy commander of U.S. Special Operations Command who endorsed the report.

Going a step further, the analysis says what would be needed to truly reform Iran's nuclear aspirations would equate to full ground war — something the U.S. is unlikely to engage in.

Then there's the perception of attacking yet another Muslim country.

From the AP:Report: US strikes on Iran would risk major war

"Planners and pundits ought to consider that the riots and unrest following a Web entry about an obscure film are probably a fraction of what could happen following a strike – by the Israelis or U.S. – on Iran," retired Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold, an endorser of the Iran report and a former operations chief for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an interview.
Since the report came out just days following Benghazi, it was largely missed by the world press. Nonetheless, Iran's nuclear aspirations worry the international community, regardless of what their stated purposes are.

Even if Netanyahu's apocalyptic nuclear Iran claims sound quite similar (actually, identical) to claims made in the early 2000s ... and the 90s ... and the 80s ... finding a solution to balancing Iran's pursuit of dual use technology with that of international security seems imperative — especially considering the achievement becomes more likely as technology in general advances.

That is, unless the world is okay with another long-term ground war.

Netanyahu Tells America To Bomb Iran - Business Insider
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Attack on Syria would be seen as attack on Iran - Tehran


Iran would consider any attack on Syria an attack on itself, a senior government official was quoted as saying on Saturday, in one of Tehran's most assertive defences of its ally yet.


Iran is a key supporter of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad who is fighting a near two-year-long revolt. Tehran has already repeatedly warned the West against intervening in the conflict against Assad.

"Syria has a very basic and key role in the region for promoting firm policies of resistance ... For this reason an attack on Syria would be considered an attack on Iran and Iran's allies," said Ali Akbar Velayati, an aide to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to the Mehr news agency.

Tehran sees Damascus as part of an axis of opposition to Israeli and Western influence in the Middle East.

In September, an Iranian military official was quoted as saying Iran would take action if the United States was to attack Syria.

Shi'ite Muslim power Iran and Syria, whose leader follows an offshoot of Shi'ite Islam, signed a mutual defence pact in 2006, but little is known of its details or whether there are any other signatories.


Attack on Syria would be seen as attack on Iran - Tehran - Yahoo! Finance UK

More news sources

'Attack on Syria is attack on Iran' | News24

Iran warns against attacking Syria | Toronto Star

Iran accuses Western powers and regional states of supporting and arming the Syrian rebels, while the rebels accuse Iran of sending fighters from its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to help Assad crush the uprising.
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Biden: U.S. prepared to hold direct talks with Iran only if regime 'is serious'


American vice president says Tehran must prove it is negotiating in good faith; 'our policy is not containment - it is to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.'





The United States is prepared to hold direct talks with Iran in the standoff over its nuclear ambitions, Vice President Joe Biden said Saturday - but he insisted that Tehran must show it is serious and Washington won't engage in such talks "just for the exercise."

Washington has indicated in the past that it's prepared to talk directly with Iran, and talks involving all five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany have made little headway. Several rounds of international sanctions have cut into Iran's oil sales and financial transactions.

Last month Iran, in a defiant move ahead of a new round of talks expected soon with the six powers, announced plans to vastly increase its pace of uranium enrichment. That can be used to make both reactor fuel and the fissile core of warheads.

Biden told an international security conference that "there is still time, there is still space for diplomacy backed by pressure to succeed." He did not specify any timeframe.

He insisted that "the ball is in the government of Iran's court" to show that it's negotiating in good faith.

Asked when Washington might hold direct talks with Tehran, Biden replied: "when the Iranian leadership, the supreme leader (Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), is serious."

The U.S. has long made clear that it is prepared to meet directly with the Iranian leadership, he added - "that offer stands but it must be real and tangible and there has to be an agenda that they're prepared to speak to."

"We're not prepared to do it just for the exercise," Biden told the Munich Security Conference.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, whose country is a key player in the six-nation talks with Iran, said he "would strongly support what Vice President Biden said about the need for incentives to be clearly shown to Iran."

"We have to convince Iran that it is not about the regime change," he said.

Iran insists it does not want nuclear arms and argues it has a right to enrich uranium for a civilian nuclear power program, but suspicion persists that the real aim is nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic hid much of its nuclear program until it was revealed from the outside more than a decade ago. And defying UN Security Council demands that it halt uranium enrichment, Iran has instead expanded it.

"Iran should not wait any longer to take up the willingness Vice President Biden has stressed to hold substantial negotiations on its nuclear program," said Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle of Germany, whose country has been one of those trying to resolve the issue. He added that 2013 would be "decisive" for hopes of a diplomatic solution.

"From our point of view, announcing an accelerated expansion of uranium enrichment in Iran is the wrong signal," Westerwelle said.

Biden underlined that "our policy is not containment - it is to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon."


The conference - an annual gathering of top security officials - also gave Biden an opportunity to address the civil war in Syria. He planned to hold separate meetings with Lavrov, international peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, and Syria's top opposition leader, Moaz al-Khatib. Russia is a longtime ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Biden stressed the conviction of the U.S. and many others that "President Assad - a tyrant hell-bent on clinging to power - is no longer fit to lead the Syrian people and he must go." He said that "the opposition continues to grow stronger."

Despite differences, "we can all agree on the increasingly deep plight of the Syrian people and the responsibility of the international community to address that plight," he told an audience that included Lavrov.

But Lavrov fired back that "there are a lot of question marks about the Western approaches to those developments," in the region, asking whether supporting antigovernment protesters justified terrorists, and questioning when it is "permissible to cooperate with regimes and when is it legitimate to argue for their removal."

"We are all interested in the stability of the Mideast and the African continent," and for governments to be democratic and peaceful, Lavrov said. "If we agree on these common objectives we could probably agree on some transparent and common rules for all actors to follow."

Lavrov also suggested Biden's statement that Assad must go was counterproductive.

"The persistence of those who say that priority number one is the removal of President Assad - I think it's the single biggest reason for the continued tragedy in Syria."


Biden: U.S. prepared to hold direct talks with Iran only if regime 'is serious' - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,606
Biden acts the buffoon at all times, and asks for Iran to be serious?
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
US takes aim at Iran and Russia over Syria


US officials said Iran is stepping up its support for the Syrian regime and that Russia is still arming it while Israel has fired missiles into the country, heightening fears that the conflict may spill over Syria's borders.



The assessments came as US Vice President Joe Biden prepared to discuss the crisis at meetings with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Syrian opposition chief Moaz al-Khatib and UN-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi.

Fresh concerns about the 22-month conflict drawing in the wider region arose after Damascus threatened to retaliate over a reported Israeli air raid and key ally Iran warned the attack would have "grave consequences."

President Bashar al-Assad's regime accused Israel of sending its warplanes to attack a military research centre in Jamraya, near Damascus, on Wednesday.

Israel has so far maintained a stony silence, as well as over separate reports its aircraft had hit a weapons convoy near the Lebanese border.

However a US official said Friday that an Israeli air raid in Syria this week struck surface-to-air missiles and a nearby military complex on the outskirts of Damascus, as Israel feared the weapons would be transferred to Hezbollah.

"There were surface-to-air missiles on vehicles" that were targeted by the Israel aircraft, the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told AFP.

They were believed to be Russian-made SA-17 anti-aircraft missiles
, he added.

The planes also bombed an adjacent military complex of buildings suspected of housing chemical agents, the official said.

Israel has frequently warned that if Syria's chemical weapons fall into the hands of Lebanon's Shiite movement Hezbollah, Israel's arch-foe and close Damascus ally, this would be a casus belli.


The United States is also concerned that "chaos" in Syria could allow Hezbollah to obtain sophisticated weapons from the Damascus regime, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told AFP in an interview.

The Lebanese army, meanwhile, said two soldiers were killed in a clash with unidentified gunmen in a village near the border with Syria on Friday as the military hunted a man wanted for "several terrorist attacks".

After Wednesday's alleged air strike, Damascus affirmed "Syria's right to defend itself and its territory and sovereignty."

Damascus ally Iran was also strident, with Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian warning that the "Zionist regime's attack on the outskirts of Damascus will have grave consequences for Tel Aviv," ISNA news agency reported.

Russia expressed "deep concern" over the reported strike, saying it would be a brazen infringement of the UN charter and unacceptable.



S. Korea, US in naval drill amid N. Korea tensions
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
the arrival of the amount of inventories Syrian uranium to Iran through Iraq


"arenas of liberation"
science site "arenas of liberation", the amount of inventories Syrian uranium have been moved to Iran through Iraq and arrived at the Iranian authorities actually.
senior source said the amount is part of the tens of tonnes owned Syria and was intended for use in the Syrian nuclear reactor bombed by Israel in the region of Deir al-Zour west of the country in 2007.



With no clear sources the way it was through the transfer amount over Iraq, but he explained that the transport operations of the Organization of the quantities of raw uranium in Syria to Iran continued for about weeks, and transfer came after serious concerns Dhahran possible fall of the Assad regime, and the development of the forces do not want Iran seized on the Syrian stockpiling of uranium.

Wade source what I went to him information Western that Syria may possess about 50 tonnes of uranium is enriched, stressing that that such inventory is of interest to Iran for use in its nuclear program, especially that indicators loss Syrian regime to battle to stay are almost certain.

surprised Source be stocks Syria of materials and chemical weapons is what sparked concern U.S. and Israel, with no stop at the reservoir Nizam al-Assad of uranium, explaining that "the enrichment of the kind of crude and is enriched does not mean it is not important, and was on the circuit interested fate Assad to stop When possible transfer of uranium to Iran, particularly the latter are Temtemlk high technologies in enrichment, and therefore can convert raw in Syria to an active and enriched in Iran and easily, especially as the transfer of Iran to Damascus a lot of weapons and equipment have been through Iraq, also through the content to transfer what you see Damascus important ally Tehran. "


and the United States announced that it "will focus in the form of more on how secure the weapons stockpile chemical with the Syrian regime in the event of the fall of President Bashar al-Assad," while reports surfaced stating "store Damascus tens of tons of uranium is enriched."

expert nuclear proliferation as "Carnegie Institute" Research in Washington, Mark Hibbs says, "was to be a stockpile of fuel for the reactor in there somewhere. illogical and a nuclear facility or nuclear reactor without any fuel."

and, as regards the transformation of Iraq into a passage for the transfer of weapons and equipment from Iran to Syria, has confirmed reports American documented the dozens of flights in this regard, prompting Iraqi authorities giving in to U.S. pressure and having searched two aircraft, but officials in Washington scoffed at it when they said that Baghdad was $ Tehran date inspection aircraft to ensure that there is no prohibited substance.


Source: the arrival of the amount of inventories Syrian uranium to Iran through Iraq - Iraqi Dinar News, Information and Facts - IRAQI DINAR
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Obama green light for Israel to strike Iranian-Syrian-Hizballah military links


The air raid over the Jamraya military complex near Damascus Wednesday, Jan. 30, attributed to Israel by Western sources was Israeli's first assault on the Syrian-Hizballah military compact forged between Bashar Assad and Hassan Nasrallah.
That was the real strategic import of the operation, which took place with the approval of US President Barack Obama, debkafile's military sources report.



In every other respect, it was a surgical strike on a well-defined target, comparable to Israel's attack in September 2007 on the nuclear reactor North Korea was building at El Kabir in northern Syria. The object then was to sever the Syrian-Iranian-North Korean nuclear link before it took physical shape and began turning out plutonium for Iran's nuclear program.

After its destruction, Tehran and Pyongyang decided to cut Syria out of their nuclear plans because its proximity to Israel made any nuclear site an easy mark.

The overriding importance of the attack on the Syrian military compound therefore lies in its three objectives:



1. The Jamraya complex was selected because it serves the shared military agendas of Syria, Hizballah and Iran.
The bombers struck three targets: a Syrian chemical weapons store and laboratories; a depot holding the sophisticated weapons Iran had sent Hizballah in the last two years - some of which, like the SA-17 anti-aircraft missiles, are termed "game changers" in a potential clash with Israel; and a large fleet of trucks standing by to ferry the munitions across the border into Lebanon.
Israeli threats to destroy the weapons had so far prevented their transfer.
In a separate building at Jamraya, Hizballah forces learned how to use the new Iranian hardware and maintained a team of drivers ready to move the arsenal over to Lebanon. This building was not attacked.



2. The air strike was a move toward disrupting the cooperative military efforts of all three allies in Syria and Lebanon;


3. Israel took its first step into the Syrian conflict.


As we first reported in the latest DEBKA-Net-Weekly out Friday, the operation went forward with a green light from President Obama, after he was briefed on the plan by AMAN (Israeli Military Intelligence) commander, Maj. Gen. Aviv Kochavi at the White House on Jan. 22.
Our sources also reported that another Israeli emissary, National Security Adviser Yakov Amidror, visited Moscow at the same time to warn Russian leaders of the coming attack in Syria.

While Russian officials voiced objections to Israeli attacking Syria, they also apparently omitted to forewarn President Assad of what was coming and he was taken by surprise. After the raid, President Vladimir Putin advised the Syrian ruler to refrain from exacerbating the military situation with Israel.

The reported Israeli strike on Jamraya had two key consequences of future relevance:

a) President Obama's consent for Israel and its armed forces IDF to be the first pro-Western power to intervene in the Syrian war, after keeping them out of involvement in the Arab Revolt raging around its borders for two years:

b) Officials in Tehran publicly warned last week that an attack on Syria would be deemed an attack on Iran, a message no doubt underlined through diplomatic channels to Washington. Nonetheless, after holding the Israeli government back for years from striking Iran's nuclear sites, Obama approved an attack with the potential for widening into a major Israeli-Iranian military clash.

While the importance of keeping sophisticated missiles and poison gas out of Hizballah hands cannot be overrated, debkafile's sources in Washington and Tehran reveal that what really pushed the US president into his change of face was Iran's withdrawal from the secret talks he set much store by for a diplomatic resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue.


Three further changes of major strategic importance occurred this week.

Tehran informed the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna that new, high-speed IR2m centrifuges were being installed in Natanz to expand the 20-percent uranium enrichment taking place at the Fordo underground facility.

The Iranian letter was posted to the IAEA the day after the two Israeli emissaries visited Washington and Moscow.

The diplomatic channel to Tehran was symbolically shut down in Washington last week by the resignation of Gary Samore, President Obama's Coordinator for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Counter-Terrorism and Arms Control.

debkafile discloses that Samore was lead negotiator in the failed nuclear talks with Iran. His exit means that he sees no way of curbing Iran's race for a nuclear weapon. He has taken up an appointment as Executive Director of Research in the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center.

US Vice President Joe Biden provided the third key development. Asked Saturday, Feb. 2, in Munich when Washington might hold direct talks with Tehran, he replied dismissively: "When the Iranian leadership, the supreme leader, is serious."

Biden spoke for the Obama administration when he suggested that Khamenei has not been serious to date.

All three events contributed to the US president's decision to let Israel have a go at the Syrian military complex, thereby broadcasting a signal to Tehran that, in the absence of serious negotiations, Washington is ready to expand its efforts for breaking up the Iran-Syrian Hizballah axis, using the IDF as its hammer.



Obama green light for Israel to strike Iranian-Syrian-Hizballah military links
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
North Koreans among 40 dead at Iran nuke plant


The explosions at Iran's Fordow nuclear facility Jan. 21 killed at least 40 people, including two North Koreans, WND learned Sunday.Meanwhile, the Islamic regime is labeling WND a "mouthpiece of the CIA" for its exclusive reporting of the blasts.

The bodies of 11 of the technicians and scientists are beyond recognition, a member of the security forces at the facility told WND. According to this source, 60 others are in critical condition and have been transferred to the central base of the 27th Division of Mohammad Rassool Allah, which is equipped with a modern medical facility and is between Tehran and Qom.

At the time of the explosions, the source said, 203 Iranian scientists and technicians along with 16 North Koreans had been logged in at the site, though the initial report listed 240 people.

The day before the explosions, the North Koreans had brought in new equipment, described by the source as touch-screen monitors the size of TVs that were installed in the monitoring room and some new parts that were installed in the centrifuges before the start of the enrichment process.

The explosions were reported exclusively by WND Jan. 24, with updates Jan. 27, Jan. 29, Jan. 30 and Jan. 31, and that the trapped workers included 16 North Koreans: 14 technicians and two military attaches.

The source said many of the centrifuges have been destroyed and rescuers have still not accessed the reserves of the 20 percent stock of enriched uranium to assess the level of radiation.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has not visited the site since the explosions despite media rumors that it has, the source said. Because the regime's Ministry of Defense covers the project at Fordow, officials of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization were allowed to visit it on Jan. 5.

In an unusual move, the IAEA issued a brief statement on Jan. 29: "We understand that Iran has denied that there has been an incident at Fordow. This is consistent with our observations."

IAEA spokeswoman Gill Tudor emailed that response to reporters. However, when pushed by WND, Tudor could neither confirm nor deny the incident had taken place and did not say whether inspectors had visited the site after the explosions, despite some media reports that it had.

Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi, representatives of the supreme leader and intelligence officers from both the Ministry of Intelligence and the Revolutionary Guards have visited parts of the site that have been cleared as secure. A counterintelligence committee has been formed to investigate the incident, which already has been called an act of sabotage, with Israel the prime suspect.

The regime is debating about how to explain the incident at a later date depending on the level of destruction, the source said, but because of internal rifts among President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Majlis (parliament), Ahmadinejad or others connected to his team will soon reveal the incident.

Regime media have solely based their denial that the explosions occurred on a statement by White House spokesman Jay Carney, who told reporters on Jan. 28: "We have no information to confirm the allegations in the (WND) report and we do not believe the report is credible."

However, the Islamic regime's official news agency, IRNA, in a report on Jan. 30, called WND a "mouthpiece of the CIA" and its reporting mere propaganda by the West before the start of renewed negotiations between Iran and the 5-plus-1 powers – the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China, plus Germany.

IRNA's report said: "WND, which publishes under the direct control of the CIA, on Thursday, Jan. 24, reported that an explosion took place at Fordow that destroyed much of the facility and trapped 240 personnel. WND in its report interestingly touches on the previous sabotage at Fordow and in a coordinated effort, the White House denies having information and the Israelis state their happiness of such an event. The propaganda by the West continues with the BBC reporting that Iran has denied the report put out by Reza Kahlili, a former CIA spy in the Revolutionary Guards."

IRNA, in its extensive report, covered all the recent WND revelations about Iran's nuclear program and Russia's involvement in it. It said that "Two days prior to the publication of the explosion report, WND reported that an Iranian spy in the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, has informed the Islamic republic that Tel Aviv and certain Western countries have plans on covert ops for the destruction of Iranian nuclear sites. This news agency (WND) in another report states that the recent negotiations between the IAEA and the Iranian counterparts for the inspection of the Parchin military site was a failure and that Iran will resort to publication of documents from the Shah era to further pressure the U.S."

IRNA concluded that "the West knows this is psychological warfare (and it) will not disrupt the goals of (Iran) in the negotiations, but it tries to fill that void with propaganda against clear and logical policies of the Islamic Republic, which is the result of their hatred against the government of Iran."

The regime media have also attacked Hamidreza Zakeri, the former officer of Iran's ministry of intelligence, now living in Europe, who has provided information on the Fordow explosion and other valuable insights into the regime's illicit activities.

The Fordow nuclear site was central to the regime's nuclear bomb program, built 300 feet under the belly of a mountain where over 2,700 centrifuges were enriching uranium to the 20 percent level. That level could within weeks be further enriched to nuclear weapons grade.

In a letter to the IAEA two days after the reported explosions, Iran said it plans to install thousands of its upgraded centrifuges at the Natanz facility. The source stated that this was as a direct result of the explosions at Fordow.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran's Revolutionary Guards and author of the award-winning book "A Time to Betray" (Simon & Schuster, 2010). He serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI).


North Koreans among 40 dead at Iran nuke plant
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,609
Likes
25,435
Country flag
So Iran says that attack on Syria is attack on Iran?

Israel has already attacked Syria by planes.
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
So Iran says that attack on Syria is attack on Iran?

Israel has already attacked Syria by planes.
You will see Irans action with their Home made 5th Gen Fighter qaher 313 within a days :hehe:
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
Iran FM: US changing approach to Tehran


Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said on Monday he saw US Vice-President Joe Biden's offer this weekend of bilateral dialogue between their two countries as a sign of a change in approach to Iran by the US administration.

"As I have said yesterday, I am optimistic, I feel this new administration is really this time seeking to at least divert from its previous traditional approach vis-à-vis my country," Salehi told the German Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin.

Salehi, who attended the Munich Security Conference at the weekend where Biden made the offer, said in Berlin that it was still very difficult for Tehran and Washington to trust each other. "How do we trust again this new gesture?" he said.

Salehi said he hoped Barack Obama would keep what he said was a promise by the US president to "walk away from wars...and approaches that bring destruction, killings, bloodshed". He did not elaborate.

Negotiations between Iran and six major world powers - Russia, China, the United States, Britain, France and Germany - over Tehran's nuclear activities have been deadlocked since a meeting last June.

European Union officials have accused Iran of dragging its feet in weeks of haggling over the date and venue for new talks.

The EU said this weekend it had proposed talks in the week of Feb. 24 which could happen in Kazakhstan. Salehi called this "good news" - but the EU says Iran has not yet accepted.

Iran FM: US changing approach to Tehran - Israel News, Ynetnews
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
Iranian Majlis speaker calls for expansion of ties with India

TEHRAN – Iranian Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani has called for the expansion of ties between Iran and India.

During a meeting with Indian Ambassador to Tehran D. P. Srivastava on Tuesday, Larijani emphasized the leading roles of the two countries in the international arena and said that Iranian parliament is keen to increase parliamentary cooperation with India.

Iranian Majlis speaker calls for expansion of ties with India - Tehran Times
 

average american

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
1,540
Likes
441
If Iran developes nuclear weapons they are going to be treated by the USA and its allies like a pariah same as North Korea, the results will be sanctions and boycotts forever, its theri choice. Like my dad use to tell me Son I cant stop you from doing what ever you want but I can make you sorry as hell.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top