- Joined
- Jun 5, 2017
- Messages
- 16,330
- Likes
- 70,171
Russia-Ukraine thread
Discussion RSS
Discussion RSS
OMG, imagine using 155mm against individual soldiers. How much a 155mm cost, around 20-25 lakh.You are generalizing.. Telegram and twitter is littered with accurate Russian first shots ( mostly Krasnopol) .. like the below one from today..
Well.. unlike the yanks Ruskies don't have the luxury of calling an airstrike on a lone Taliban sniper.. They will settle for an artillery strike..OMG, imagine using 155mm against individual soldiers. How much a 155mm cost, around 20-25 lakh.
Most likely tank rounds u can see the incoming projectile at 00:48OMG, imagine using 155mm against individual soldiers. How much a 155mm cost, around 20-25 lakh.
USD as global reserve currency has its benifits. But this type artillery warfare is probably not best suited for IA.Well.. unlike the yanks Ruskies don't have the luxury of calling an airstrike on a lone Taliban sniper.. They will settle for an artillery strike..
45 lakh, a simple m107 shellOMG, imagine using 155mm against individual soldiers. How much a 155mm cost, around 20-25 lakh.
why are they so expensive?45 lakh, a simple m107 shell
Dumb shell
Ye to krasnopol guided shell tha sir
Waar me paisa Paani ki tarah behta hai
How would I know sirwhy are they so expensive?
No way a Dumb shell 155mm is 45 lakh. I read it is somewhere from 1lakh to 1.5lakh. Excalibur will be around 60 lakh per round.45 lakh, a simple m107 shell
Dumb shell
Ye to krasnopol guided shell tha sir
Waar me paisa Paani ki tarah behta hai
Uhh.. any tactic that leads to progess is a good tactic, by definition. War tactics and strategy are all about the bottomline & end justifying the means - if it works, its good. if it does not work, it sucks. Russian tactics are good, because they are gaining ground. Its just that simple.Just like tanks are obsolete hot takes became popular in the initial weeks, now it's time for Russian mass artillery is soo awaswm hot air. Just having more boom does not nessesarily mean the Russians have better technology (they don't) or that they have better tactics - hard to make a convincing argument when they are making progress only at excruciating pace even after lobbing so many shells that the landscape looking like this.
They made more progress than israel in 2006, which had the latest American arms and funding.Just like tanks are obsolete hot takes became popular in the initial weeks, now it's time for Russian mass artillery is soo awaswm hot air. Just having more boom does not nessesarily mean the Russians have better technology (they don't) or that they have better tactics - hard to make a convincing argument when they are making progress only at excruciating pace even after lobbing so many shells that the landscape looking like this.
No way a Dumb shell 155mm is 45 lakh. I read it is somewhere from 1lakh to 1.5lakh. Excalibur will be around 60 lakh per round.
Specifically what progress?They made more progress than israel in 2006, which had the latest American arms and funding.
Just sayin’
Gaining land against Europe’s largest proxy army despite having no manpower to hold it?Specifically what progress?
Ok I thought you were talking about artillery technology.Gaining land against Europe’s largest proxy army despite having no manpower to hold it?
Nvm. My fault. I think I understood your other post wrong. My apologies.Ok I thought you were talking about artillery technology.