Biological impulses are moral codes. If you are non abrahamic, then there is no original sin. If there is no original sin, then a species cannot be immoral, period. There is no universal moral code- there is morality specific to the species - which is defined by the dominant species-wide behaviour irrespective of population groups and isolates. It is called natural morality - which in non abrahamic sense, is not defined by god. Hence the famous hindu-buddhist saying 'it is moral for a tiger to hunt, it is moral for a deer to run'. A few examples of species-wide dominant moral code for species homo sapiens, is corporal punishment towards one's own children. Monogamy. reverence of one's parents. Bias towards one's children. These are fundamental, species-wide morality for species homo sapiens, irrelevant to religion.amusing dawkinsian cope, but no.
That you are not capable of comprehending the epistemological distinctions between abrahamcist monolatry and prior endemic pantheism of the world, let alone providing a single piece of criticism of a non abrahamic religions, proves your functional illiteracy of the topic at hand. Wank off all you want about eternal punishment, all that renders you is a joke who doesn't even comprehend the argument he is making, and with whom he is making.
Gifs are not an argument, edgelord.
Plato is a moron btw. Do you even comprehend the number of idiotic assumptions he assumes by default to make that idiotic argument?
Muh evolutionary biology is cope by idiots who don't understand game theory and super rationality. Biological impulses are not "moral codes" lmao, Morality involves controlling and harnessing your biological impulses in a non destructive manner.
Prove a single piece of your moral code to have a non religious origin. Go on. I am waiting. Maybe you will actually learn to think and communicate instead of brainless regurgitation.
One thing is true, I am quite condescending towards your lowest denominator arguments that only convince the absolute illiterates.