Royal British wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

Status
Not open for further replies.

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
How Harry & Meghan's Royal Wedding Broke Tradition
From their elderflower cake to the St. George's Chapel locale, the couple broke away from all kinds of royal wedding traditions.


Meghan Markle and Prince Harry put their own unique spin on royal tradition at Saturdays's wedding service held at St. George's Chapel. The biggest break to royal protocol: the couple held hands during the ceremony—which is traditionally a big no-no.

On May 19, Markle and Prince Harry will wed at St. George's Chapel at Windsor Castle, about twenty miles west of London. Traditionally, most royal couples get married at the capital's Westminster Abbey, where Prince William and Kate Middleton said their "I dos" back in 2011.

The non-traditional choice of venue is not a full break from royal protocol—the duo will follow a number of royal couples who walked down the aisle at the Windsor Castle locale. More recently, Harry's cousin Peter Phillips and wife Autumn Kelly were married at St. George's Chapel in 2008. Harry's father, Prince Charles, and stepmother, Camilla Parker Bowles, shared a special blessing ceremony at Windsor Castle after their civil service marriage in 2005.

"Windsor is a very special place for Prince Harry, and he and Ms. Markle have regularly spent time there during the last year," a rep from Kensington Palace explained to Peoplein November of last year, when the venue was first announced. "They are delighted that the beautiful grounds of Windsor Castle will be where they begin their lives as a married couple."

To the disappointment of British citizens, Prince Harry and Markle will marry on May 19, which falls on a Saturday. Traditionally, a royal wedding falls during the work week (Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge were married on a Friday), and the residents of the British Commonwealth are granted a "bank holiday" (i.e. no work). Despite opposition, banks in the United Kingdom will remain open on May 19, according to British Prime Minister Theresa May.

For royal fans tuning into the televised event from across the pond, the weekend ceremony is probably preferable, so you don't have to play hooky to see Markle's dress in real time. However, the ceremony is scheduled to take place at 12 PM local time, which translates to 7 AM EST/4 AM PST, meaning an early Saturday morning wake-up call for those of us in the U.S.

The official wedding guest list has not been released to the public, but we know Markle and Harry deviated from royal tradition with their invites due to the smaller size of their ceremony location. In early March, Kensington Palace announced the couple invited 2,640 members of the public into the grounds of Windsor Castle to watch the bride, groom and wedding guests arrive at the chapel and view the carriage procession after the ceremony. This doesn't typically happen—traditionally, royal wedding invitations are only issued to guests attending the ceremony and the reception.

For his wedding to Kate Middleton in 2011, Prince William did not issue any invitations to the public—he invited 1,900 guests to the Westminster Abbey ceremony. St. George's Chapel at Windsor Castle has a maximum capacity of 800 people and does not accommodate the 2,000 guests traditionally invited to attend the royal weddings held at Westminster Abbey. This may be why Harry and Markle sent public invitations for honored citizens to join in the pre- and post-ceremony processionals.

The public guests reportedly include 1,200 members of the public "from every corner of the United Kingdom" who have been nominated by nine regional Lord Lieutenant offices, according to Kensington Palace. Harry and Markle have requested the guests be from various backgrounds and ages, including young people who are active in their communities. Adding to the couple's philanthropic mission, 200 people from charities that Markle and Harry have become associated with, 100 students from two local schools with close ties to Windsor Castle (The Royal School in Great Park and St. George's School), 610 Windsor residents and members of the St. George Chapel, and 530 members of the Royal Households and Crown Estate will be included.

For esteemed guests inside the chapel, the May 19 ceremony is likely to be a star-studded event. Rumored celebrity guests include royal favorites Elton John, the Spice Girls, David and Victoria Beckham and Kate's sister Pippa Middleton. There's also a chance we'll see a few of Markle's A-list pals, like Serena Williams and Priyanka Chopra, at the ceremony.

The Wedding Party
Traditionally, British weddings don't have a maid of honor. Instead of adult friends, it's typical that children of the royal family or aristocracy will serve as the "wedding party." The Duchess of Cambridge broke this rule when her sister Pippa became the most famous maid of honor of all time at her 2011 wedding to Price William. And now, it looks like Markle will also deviate from royal tradition by appointing a maid of honor to stand with her on her big day.


Getty Images
Early in January, it was reported that Markle had already chosen a maid of honor, but since then, the identity of her right-hand woman has not been confirmed. Royal speculators are betting Markle has chosen her longtime BFF and stylist Jessica Mulroney as her MOH.

Mulroney and her husband Ben (son of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney helped Markle and Harry stay undercover after their romance first broke news. She also accompanied Markle to the Invictus Games closing ceremony, her first public appearance with Prince Harry.

The Bridal Escort
Meghan Markle's father reportedly does not know if he'll be escorting his daughter down the aisle on May 19. As is tradition in America, British royal protocol holds that the bride's father escorts her to the groom on her wedding day, as was the case when the Duchess of Cambridge walked down the aisle beside her father at Westminster Abbey.

The Cake
Harry and Markle landed on a surprising lemon elderflower-flavored cake for their wedding. Last month, Kensington Palace confirmed that Claire Ptak, owner of Violet Cakes, an organic bakery in London, would be crafting a spring-worthy "lemon-elderflower" dessert for the couple's May 19 "I dos."


According to the Palace, "The couple have asked Claire to create a lemon elderflower cake that will incorporate the bright flavors of spring. It will be covered with buttercream and decorated with fresh flowers."

Though the elderflower cake is sure to be delicious, it goes against royal wedding cake protocol, which states the wedding cake should be fruitcake—not a flower-flavored cake. Kate and William enjoyed an eight-tier fruit cake after tying the knot.

The After-Ceremony Processional
Though Harry and Markle will participate in a procession through the town of Windsor after their official vows ceremony, it will look different from the traditional royal walk. Since the couple's wedding venue is outside of London, they will not have a London procession.



Furthermore, due to distance, it's likely that the day will not include an iconic balcony kiss, which Kate and William partook in after their wedding ceremony. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge famously kissed in front of an enormous audience on a balcony at Buckingham Palace on their wedding day. Since Windsor Castle is 45 minutes away from this site, Markle and Harry will have to create their own iconic kiss moment.
 

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
and lol , another royalty ,















 
Last edited:

airtel

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
3,408
Likes
7,644
Country flag
1. Feminist …
2. she’s a divorcee
3. got married in her late twenties early thirties (born 1981 married 2011) , marriage lasted only 2 years (2011-2013)
4. married a film producer (likely a career move)
6. Suits: the series that launched her career started in 2011…the year of her marriage (1st episode: 23 june 2011).
5. not only is she older than him she’s almost 40 (37) , menopause is coming .
6. she’s older than his older brother’s wife




This marriage has “agenda” written all over it , The worst part about this is Cuck Harry is giving women around the world impression they can now ride the co*k carousel until their late 30’s and still land their ‘Prince Charming’. :facepalm:

20+ years of dick riding all through their top tier (late teens and early 20’s) and even 2nd tier (late 20’s to early 30’s) SMV years with no perceived consequence of not landing a 1st rate husband in their late 30s ..:smash:



Her "Save Africa and post it on Facebook" career:


Her "selfie" career (she's the one laying on the floor):


Her Instagram career:


Her Hollywood career:



Her "dogg lovin'" career:


 
Last edited:

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
1. Feminist …
2. she’s a divorcee
3. got married in her late twenties early thirties (born 1981 married 2011) , marriage lasted only 2 years (2011-2013)
4. married a film producer (likely a career move)
6. Suits: the series that launched her career started in 2011…the year of her marriage (1st episode: 23 june 2011).
5. not only is she older than him she’s almost 40 (37) , menopause is coming .
6. she’s older than his older brother’s wife




This marriage has “agenda” written all over it , The worst part about this is Cuck Harry is giving women around the world impression they can now ride the co*k carousel until their late 30’s and still land their ‘Prince Charming’. :facepalm:

20+ years of dick riding all through their top tier (late teens and early 20’s) and even 2nd tier (late 20’s to early 30’s) SMV years with no perceived consequence of not landing a 1st rate husband in their late 30s ..:smash:



Her "Save Africa and post it on Facebook" career:


Her "selfie" career (she's the one laying on the floor):


Her Instagram career:


Her Hollywood career:



Her "dogg lovin'" career:


you dont sound any different than her estranged half brother who himself wrote a letter to the prince harry requesting him not to marry her ,
because according to him she is " shallow , conceited and jaded woman " and then wrote another letter to meghan markle for apologising for his remarks about her at his previous letter ,
thats hypocrite of her brother who himself arrested for holding gun on his fiancees face ,
if bjp claim about hinduism is really that high then hindus shouldnt be giving founded hate or disrespect for women for their feminism atleast , leave that for islam and christianity ,

yeah she was an actress and had a lifestyle of an actress and same about her social media , she is 3 years older than him but thats personal matter ,

also she is a divorcee but the world is lot bigger for rss ideology of ram - sita jodi ,

is it that divorcee women should not get remarried or should get divorce at first place and ideally should become ghoonghat slave or sati of her husband ,

marrying a divorcee is unorthodox for british royal family themselves even though divorce is not uncommon at the british royal family ,
but she not a first divorcee marrying into the british royal family ,

king edward was abdicated because he refused to end his marriage proposal with an twice divorcee american socialite women which means edward gave up his throne for his love ,

this was when england was a monarch and throne means real power and edward was already a king ,

that did not setup any agenda on the contrary it became crisis for the monarch , the british royal family and for england besides what benefits edward got from his marriage to a twice divorcee woman , but they both remained married throughout their life ,

meghan got her prince but prince harry and he is not a king like edward but he is sixth to the line of succession to the throne but he may have to do the same thing as edward did ,
he also gonna have to give up his claim to the throne for his marriage but at what success for the feminist agenda if he is doing for it ,

and do the british royal family values the feminist agenda more than monarch .
 

YagamiLight

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2017
Messages
515
Likes
787
Country flag
1. Feminist …
2. she’s a divorcee
3. got married in her late twenties early thirties (born 1981 married 2011) , marriage lasted only 2 years (2011-2013)
4. married a film producer (likely a career move)
6. Suits: the series that launched her career started in 2011…the year of her marriage (1st episode: 23 june 2011).
5. not only is she older than him she’s almost 40 (37) , menopause is coming .
6. she’s older than his older brother’s wife




This marriage has “agenda” written all over it , The worst part about this is Cuck Harry is giving women around the world impression they can now ride the co*k carousel until their late 30’s and still land their ‘Prince Charming’. :facepalm:

20+ years of dick riding all through their top tier (late teens and early 20’s) and even 2nd tier (late 20’s to early 30’s) SMV years with no perceived consequence of not landing a 1st rate husband in their late 30s ..:smash:



Her "Save Africa and post it on Facebook" career:


Her "selfie" career (she's the one laying on the floor):


Her Instagram career:


Her Hollywood career:



Her "dogg lovin'" career:


One more bad thing happens to the britshit crown. Me likey:megusta::megusta::megusta::megusta:
 

airtel

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
3,408
Likes
7,644
Country flag
you dont sound any different than her estranged half brother who himself wrote a letter to the prince harry requesting him not to marry her ,
because according to him she is " shallow , conceited and jaded woman " and then wrote another letter to meghan markle for apologising for his remarks about her at his previous letter ,
thats hypocrite of her brother who himself arrested for holding gun on his fiancees face ,
if bjp claim about hinduism is really that high then hindus shouldnt be giving founded hate or disrespect for women for their feminism atleast , leave that for islam and christianity ,

yeah she was an actress and had a lifestyle of an actress and same about her social media , she is 3 years older than him but thats personal matter ,

also she is a divorcee but the world is lot bigger for rss ideology of ram - sita jodi ,

is it that divorcee women should not get remarried or should get divorce at first place and ideally should become ghoonghat slave or sati of her husband ,

marrying a divorcee is unorthodox for british royal family themselves even though divorce is not uncommon at the british royal family ,
but she not a first divorcee marrying into the british royal family ,

king edward was abdicated because he refused to end his marriage proposal with an twice divorcee american socialite women which means edward gave up his throne for his love ,

this was when england was a monarch and throne means real power and edward was already a king ,

that did not setup any agenda on the contrary it became crisis for the monarch , the british royal family and for england besides what benefits edward got from his marriage to a twice divorcee woman , but they both remained married throughout their life ,

meghan got her prince but prince harry and he is not a king like edward but he is sixth to the line of succession to the throne but he may have to do the same thing as edward did ,
he also gonna have to give up his claim to the throne for his marriage but at what success for the feminist agenda if he is doing for it ,

and do the british royal family values the feminist agenda more than monarch .

You are extremely brainwashed & blue pilled tradcon .
Read actual Books related to Hinduism ............not the politically correct version taken out of context ..................Hinduism & all the all successful cultures around the world are based on patriarchy , there are reasons why almost all the Non-patriarchal societies could not develop

Web Images NewsNext pajjg.jpg


.......next time please do not involve religion to support feminism because these feminists dont follow any religion or tradition & please stick to logic & facts .



now about this propaganda marriage >>
she herself admitted it >>



now check this Facebook post ( with thousands of likes and so many delusional people sharing it = )

same message was shared by many other pages to spread such Ideology .


What a shitty and unrealistic example Prince Harry is setting for all the impressionable young men and women out there…He sends a message to women that they can live without consequence AND still get massive rewards for it.

I’m sure it is a marketing ploy to create a progressive , liberal image of British Prince for blue pilled audience ..........& spread more degenerate behavior .


what is the Meaning of " equal partner " ?? is she equal to him in terms of money , influence , power or fame ??

cooking & cleaning for Your own family = slavery ??

what is an " abusive " husband ?? expecting a cup of tea after paying for her food , house , electricity , jewellery , cloths etc is abusive behavior ?? in western feminist countries divorce rate is above 50% & most of the divorces are initiated by women .............so 50% of the men are abusive ?? :scared2::scared2:)

leave your husband even if you are a mother ( demand alimony & dont care about kid ) & you will still get a prince charming ?? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
Last edited:

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
You are extremely brainwashed & blue pilled tradcon .
Read actual Books related to Hinduism ............not the politically correct version taken out of context ..................Hinduism & all the all successful cultures around the world are based on patriarchy , there are reasons why almost all the Non-patriarchal societies could not develop

View attachment 25334

.......next time please do not involve religion to support feminism because these feminists dont follow any religion or tradition & please stick to logic & facts .
neither me do approve feminism nor do oppose it because it has its good or bad things so you are very much wrong at your evaluation ,
because me never said " hinduism " but me actually said ' rss ideology ' which means me actually wasnt talking about ' religion ' but ideology ,

as you mentioned hinduism and patriarchy then you may know that ancient hindusim also has matriarchal roots ,
it changed because of invasion of islam and not because it was bs ,
but here the word ancient is more meaningful than many hindu would think because that ancient hindusim is very different than present hinduism ,

and obviously many hindus gonna disagree because they see present hinduism as an extension of the ancient hinduism but they or anyone would never know or understand the distinction between them ,

me dont think that some african tribal example would assist your point ,
there are probably another reasons besides matriarchy for poverty of african nations ,
these remote african tribes and the reason for there poverty could be as same as of poverty of indian tribes ,

and to say or suggest the reason that they are inferior or primitive because of their tradition is same as when bbc implies that india is a shitty country because of hinduism ,

most of the hindus proud infact brags about how much hinduism values women power or shakti but thats usually when its about proving how much it is better than others while drawing comparison with islam and christainity ,

this version of feminism is a western concept which maybe different than indian concept of nari shakti so maybe thats why it does not fits with indian society but the reason for feminists to oppose religion and traditions is that they see them made as per convenience for male domination which why feminists got such militancy ,

now about this propaganda marriage >>
she herself admitted it >>



now check this Facebook post ( with thousands of likes and so many delusional people sharing it = )

same message was shared by many other pages to spread such Ideology .


What a shitty and unrealistic example Prince Harry is setting for all the impressionable young men and women out there…He sends a message to women that they can live without consequence AND still get massive rewards for it.

I’m sure it is a marketing ploy to create a progressive , liberal image of British Prince for blue pilled audience ..........& spread more degenerate behavior .


what is the Meaning of " equal partner " ?? is she equal to him in terms of money , influence , power or fame ??

cooking & cleaning for Your own family = slavery ??

what is an " abusive " husband ?? expecting a cup of tea after paying for her food , house , electricity , jewellery , cloths etc is abusive behavior ?? in western feminist countries divorce rate is above 50% & most of the divorces are initiated by women .............so 50% of the men are abusive ?? :scared2::scared2:)

leave your husband even if you are a mother ( demand alimony & dont care about kid ) & you will still get a prince charming ?? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
she maybe putting out statements about her commitment to feminism but me dont know if she could promote it at terms of ' rewards ' , like ' a commitment of feminism gonna bring great payoffs ' ,

you twisted meaning of the word ' slavery ' but let me try to explain what me said with example you given ,
yeah cooking and cleaning for family is not a slavery but when it is done voluntarily and by that what me saying is that if woman is doing by her own wish ,

now before you say , " what do you mean by her own wish ??? isnt thats her job as a wife ??? " ,
so yeah it is her job as a wife more like a duty as a mother ,

but country like india where society prefer to keep women bound to cooking and cleaning to keep them subjected then quickly society starts to associate them with cooking and cleaning ' only ,

did you never heard indian phrases saying that only cooking and cleaning is a woman world and no woman should not step out of their that world , they should not aspire and desire anything besides it ,

women should not give their opinions because it do not matters anyway nor their respect and with position like that how long their respect could hold ,

and even the unmarried women should not expect anything beyond that no matter their education...even if they are educated ,

so even their education cannot earn them a respect , makes them more venerable ,

a man could pay for womans jewellery or could just demand them from dowry from her family and even if pays for jewellery on his own he could demand them back to payoff his debt which makes it returnable deposit ,

so a wife could be pretty much working for free ,

and as a non tea - drinker guy me dont even know what is this obsession of tea or obsession for comparing demand for tea as a compensation with everything a man has provided to his wife ,

and come on , a husband who keeps account of food and clothes provided to his wife is probably very shitty even shittier husband and a man ,

now me not talking about meghan markle here ,
but you are confusing equal partners at the context of business partners but equal partners means equally respected as her man by her husband himself and others of his family ,
of course if she is a woman deserving it ,

and with that me dont know if feminism basically teaches a woman to be a bitch and even neglect her own children as you said but there could be some feminist who takes things too far .
 

Haldiram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
5,708
Likes
28,559
Country flag
so a wife could be pretty much working for free
Would she be doing that voluntarily if she had an an alternative option?

If the oppression is so glaringly obvious, why do women voluntarily get into these relationships and even continue being in those relationships? do younger women not see the elder women in this oppressive setup and say "screw it! I don't want this."?

There is no such thing as an equal relationship. Just observe any relationship, there is always one person who is providing disproportionately more. In most cases, it is the man. You are so fixated on the trope of the tea that you forget that the very house that the tea is being made in has been paid for by the husband. The wife becomes 50% inheritor of his property on the day she gets married to him. The husband earns money, and in most cases also shops for grocery on his way back home from office, and you're telling me that the woman cannot freaking boil it up and serve it? because it's 'free labor'?

I have a dozen male cousins and most of them are married to women who have professional degrees. All of these women, without exception, never went to work after they realized that their husbands were well to do and the household runs just fine on a single income. It is these kind of women who then log on to Quora when their husbands leave for office every morning, and try to bluepill people like you about how being a house wife is about being 'pro choice' and how 'all labor must be valued' and 'housewives must be paid a salary'. They can't even cook a decent meal. That's the bane of marrying 'modern' women. Neither are they earning like educated men, nor are they cooking like the rural uneducated women they love to diss. Their education is just a bargaining chip they use to score a better husband. It's the worst of both worlds for the poor husbands. Might as well have married an uneducated woman. At least one would have gotten a good cup of tea.

If she had literally any marketable skills, she is welcome to work and earn and the couple can employ a maid to take care of the household chores. You can pay a thousand bucks a month and it's taken care of. It's not rocket science. End of the debate. In this day and age where cost of living is touching the roof, which husband wont want another source of income? Who is stopping them from finding a job? End this victimhood drama. No one forces women into it. They do it because they get a massive economic upgrade from marrying up. They go from owning no assets to being co-owners of their husband's property in one swift move. Stop making it look like she's sacrificing something to become someone's maid. Which woman marries a man poorer than her?

You have eaten a bowl of blue pills for breakfast.
 
Last edited:

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
shiny new coat of arms of meghan , duchess of sussex ,

 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
1,319
Likes
3,588
Country flag
:dude: Seriously,a whole fuckin' thread on this damned wedding ?

and some ------ 'GULAAMI DNAs' showing over this...:facepalm:

Anyway,as for Harry and Megan's so called Royal Wedding,i have only this thing to say...

 
Last edited by a moderator:

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
prince harry currently net worth of 25 million dollars and meghan markle net worth is 5 million dollars and many more to come as harry gonna inheritance money from his father and meghan could contribute 209 million dollars annually to british fashion from unofficial endorsements .
 

Haldiram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
5,708
Likes
28,559
Country flag
prince harry currently net worth of 25 million dollars and meghan markle net worth is 5 million dollars and many more to come as harry gonna inheritance money from his father and meghan could contribute 209 million dollars annually to british fashion from unofficial endorsements .
You need to stop following British tabloid news, ----------. There are many things that are far more intellectually stimulating to pursue, like Sasuraal Simar Ka.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
prince harry and meghan markle had to returned 9 million dollars worth of gifts to avoid brand endorsements .
 

salute

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
2,174
Likes
1,086
this thread not meant to hurt sentiments a modi chamcha member babaji :troll: who is a spawn of ' chamchakhori seeds ' with profile picture looks like a pedophile weed addicted from asharam of asaram babaji and many other members of a similar hatch , :tsk:

yeah they do want to show their commitment of bjp chamchagiri but its just a thread about royal british wedding ,
forum is not just about bjp praising but there is europe thread at world affair segment ,

his and other members ranting is actually because of their other issue with me and yeah they dont give sh*t about royal british wedding but they do sh*t when me talk that other thing ,

so this me say to them , :yo:

 
Last edited:

Haldiram

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
5,708
Likes
28,559
Country flag
Me no watch Royal bedding. Me only watch Baalika Vadhu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top