Many of the tells proves indeed ramayana occured pre 3000 BCE . The time between mahabharat , krishna had almost gap of many generatione's of and Mahabharata happened around 3100 BCE to 3200 BCE then ramanaya proceeded that by almost many centuries. Suryavansh was established around 8,000 BCE .
Yes, this is correct.
My personal belief is Ramayan is at least 8000 (possible much more) years old. Hindu historians and scriptures have an accurate and unbroken list of kings spanning hundreds of generations beginning from Brahma/ Manu and also have lists starting around famous rulers such as Ishvaku, Raghu and many other path breaking souls associated with various vanshas.
Whole confusion in minds of deracinated Indians is because they start calculating from a false/westerner made starting point and go backwards from there.
For example all these "pivotal historic moments of humanity" are currently taught as gospel and are false:
Agriculture was first created around 8000 years ago in Middle East - false
The Wheel was invented around 5000 years ago in ME - false
Written Language came to India only 2500 years ago - false
Proto-Indo-European language 3000 years old - wrong
Sanskrit flowing from PIE language 2500 years old - false
Thus sanskrit literature such as Mahabharat, Ramayan, Puran created 2000 years ago - false
All these human milestones are actually 3-4 times older than presently accepted by the western academia. They will gradually accept human civilization to be much older over next 20-30 years as western propaganda and western dominance decreases.
Have a look at the laughable fairytales they passed on as truths in the past:
Till 1920s British taught that Budha and Mauryan Kings like Asoka did not historically exist and were mythical creations despite the evidence to contrary. This made it easier for them to impart the idea that only british united India and India never existed as a nation before.
Then a few decades later, in face of mounting pressure they accepted Asoka existed but dated it to 5th century ACE to fit all Indian history into their 2000 year biblical view.
Then a few decades later they grudgingly accepted Asoka date as 3rd century BCE.
Same exercise is being done with Lord Rama and Krishna now by the "unbiased and scientific" historians.
All current stakeholders in the world barring Hindus have a vested interest in forcing a wrong view of human civilization as true history on global population.
Christians and Muslims: Their holy books tell them a;; that is good in the world is only world is 2000 years old thus if something older exists it invalidates their god and religion. Grudgingly some christians and muslims over time accepted jewish old testament as part of their canon which pushes back their known history to 4000 years old. Anything older than 4000 years can not be allowed to be shown in good light. Thus till 1990s every Indian related history, be it indus valley, vedas, ramayans etc was forced to fit into 2000 BCE timeframe by the western historians.
Second, for them all major human inventions such as farming, animal domestication, invention of wheel, formation of city states happened in middle east. Because it is holy land for them. Israel/Palestine for jews n christians and arabia for muslims. Thus excessive focus on Mesopotamian and Egyptian history. All mesopotamian and egyptian civilizational achievements are accepted as true while Indian civilizational achievements face difficulties being accepted by westerners.
Other strong groups in the world that have a stake in teaching wrong human history:
Western Non-Religious "liberals" "atheists" & commies :
This groups is more fanatic and bigoted than the above group and has a deep vested interest in maintaining false human history. The whole modern liberal mental make up is founded on the fundamental false belief that time is linear and human progression happens in a straight line over time. So, for them something old is by default bad and unworthy and something older is even worse.
This is different from Hindu Dharmic worldview that time is circular and unending and human civilizational development is rhythmic. It is a wave-form. Our scriptures tell us of many universes created and destroyed before this one. They tell us of Yugas and Manus that come and go. Life and creation is a story of ups and downs where people and civilizations follow a cyclic journey of rise and fall based of their karmas while the total divine creation is infinite. So from point of views of Hindus, it is possible for human civilization to have risen in 10000 BC , peaked in 8000 BC and then plateaued and fallen down and then rise again in 2000 AD. This is blasphemy to others. These close-minded "progressives" need everything old to be primitive to validate their own sense of present superiority and progress.
If Hindu view of the world and true history reaches the masses, it will unravel the foundations of the current evil, materialistic, hedonistic, power-hungry elite. That is why all power centers except hindus oppose true learning of human roots. It will undo their centuries-old house of lies built over millions of dead bodies.
