there is something interesting on the first page which reminds me something similar on the QBZ95 uesd by some SWAT team of police..INSAS with Carrying Handle and Optical Instrument mounted on it:
'single-hand' means ,as you can see, soldier releases the empty Mag , plugs in the new one and reloads with the 'left hand' only...the following video demonstrates another STANDARD method with both hands and hand changing in process...I do suggest those Type97 5.56mm players to have a look at this ,it might help to improve the T97's 'bad reputation' of Mag changinga clip to demonstrate the quick Mag Change method. also know as ' single-hand Mag Changing' method
US land warrior program, wired
French Program, Wired
Russian program, With wireless
Turkish program, Wired
----------------------Italian Program, Wired
There is a dedicated thread > http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/...r-shot-non-line-sight-infantry-weapons-9.htmlChinese program, Wired
oops....some posts were deleted, we lost a page and my images 'flooded' posts came back to the Page3, which might bring some trouble for those with old computer or poor bandwidth....sorry about that...
there is something interesting on the first page which reminds me something similar on the QBZ95 developed for the SWAT team of police..
what's your points?@shiphone, Regardless your previous posts, you were unable to answer the points i raised ..
============== =>>INSAS LMG at full auto, In sitting position ..
what's your points?
1. QBZ95 's bad iron sight ?---I think it's quite clear now.
...(a).you quoted the wrong pic of Type81-1
...(b).at least some Indian in Canada owning the T97 with his own experiece has corrected you.and further more, many T97 player has no problem with this Iron sight it self...
2. the so called 'heavy recoil'? --- obviously this is another baseless claim. I don't know where you get that...
3. the high 'line of sight' and Cheek rest issue?,yes ,this is the problem of QBZ95 (Type97 as well).but this just happend in Optical sights mounted cases...
....(a) the rifile was designed in early 1990's , at that time the optical sights were not as popular as today...the iron sight is primary sight method
....(b) PLA Army is the largest Army with the largest Infantry units ...I don't think we could afford too many modern Optical sights for the whole army
....(c) we don't think QBZ95 has much difference with other Rifiles(FAMAS, M16 none-flattop version) on these issues...
....(d) no change or any improvement on this issue so far? no ...just wait please, I would explain later
two clips of video to expose some strange statement about so called ' heavy recoil' issue....
shooting on the move excercise------------some SF unit from the Army
some PLA Marine unit
Australian Army Skills at Arms Meeting 2013 http://www.army.gov.au/Army-life/Sport-and-recreation/AASAMGet both QBZ and M16, try out at some firing range in US ..
To get the feeling what i am saying ..
PLA team makes a fine figure in AASAM
(China Military Online)
08:27, May 21, 2013
BEIJING, May 20, (ChinaMil) -- As the Australian Army Skill At Arms Meeting (AASAM) concluded on May 17, 2013, the shooting team of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), made up by the officers and men from the Beijing Military Area Command (MAC) of the PLA, bravely won three gold medals and three bronze medals in the sniper contests and gained the title of the "Champion Sniper Team", scoring the first among all competition teams.
In the matches of military rifles, machine guns and light-arm pistols, the PLA team collected 7 gold medals, 7 silver medals, and 20 bronze medals, ranking the third among all competition teams in winning the most championships and medals.
More than 340 competitors in 20 teams from 17 countries, including China, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and others, participated in the 37 international competition events in this year's AASAM. This was the first time for the PLA to organize a team for the AASAM, with 14 team members joining 35 events.
During the intense competitions among the competitors from all the participating countries, the individual comprehensive results of all the 14 PLA competitors were listed among the leading 20, which showcased the toughly-tempered comprehensive quality of Chinese PLA servicemen.
After the competitions, Angus Bell, chairman of the AASAM organization committee, sent a letter to the Ministry of National Defense (MND) of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and praised that Chinese soldiers showed not only exceedingly high standards of professional marksmanship but also high morale, deserving to be the model for all the teams of all the participating countries.
Kunal, I'm still not sure how you've proven the QBZ-95 and its later variants have demonstrably worse recoil than the INSAS. Can you put up some diagrams or figures to back up your claims?
Got it. It seems to be an intentional design tradeoff; I am fairly certain the short-stroke gas piston of the QBZ/AK/INSAS/Galil/G-36 is much more reliable than a direct impingement system a la AR-15/M-16/M-4.I cannot find any cutway diagram of QBZ-95 nor INSAS over Web, If had would explain ..
In theory, i have already explain ..
Will add little more, Being bullpup QBZ-95 recoil is absorbed directly over shoulders, And as QBZ based on AK, The vibration and recoil is more than any AR-15, Being bullpup also meant this rifle gives its operator a good amount of disturbance while aiming as the cheek is right over the firing mechanism ..
This is not the case with traditional designs, I will also add that TAR-21 is also a bullpup but does not have issues like in FAMAS or QBZ-95 ..
US Army has targets which fall when hit and then pop up again. There are no scoring rings on the target. Score is targets hit at different ranges.Love to see the result of his shooting on move from iron sight but the video dont show it, camera just stop.