Adm Kenobi
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2021
- Messages
- 207
- Likes
- 1,291
1. You were the one who said "Well, I must have misremembered, it should be a replacement for Type 052B"He is not a substitute for 052b. At that time, because China did not have enough funds and technology, it did not have the ability to build a large number of destroyers.
The weapons and radars of 053h3 and 052 are roughly the same, and can quickly replace old ships
It should be difficult for Indians to understand this logic. At that time, Taiwan could become independent at any time, and it needed to quickly replenish modern ships. Time is everything. You can say that China has 052C/D in two years, and there is no need for so many 053h3. But if tomorrow When war breaks out, we need a modern navy to escort the landing fleet
The same goes for the Su 30mk of the Air Force, we can wait a few years to get the same fighter as the Su 30mkI, but we can't wait
2. 053H3' radar & weapons are not "roughly the same" as 052B, the only *major* similarity is the use of same AShM.
3. The time period you talked about in your previous post- "performance of the 053h3 frigates in the 1990-2000 period was not out of date". FYI 053H3 were commissioned in *late* 1990s & half were commissioned in early-mid 2000s. Referring it as 1990-2000 would be hardly correct.
4. 053H3 weren't a replacement for the destroyer series (051s & 052s) as you have mentioned it to be in your previous posts.
5. I'm not talking about the feasibility of 053H3 in PLAN during that time period, but you saying it is a replacement for the limited production of 052B. It's not a replacement for limited production of 052B but a different project with a different size and **different role**.
I'd suggest reading this conversation from the beginning before replying.