United States of Hindu Empire
- May 29, 2009
Above links are very informative,realistic and seems like helping USA to ensure no future nuclear attack is possible in given context.I keep bringing these documents but no one is reading them
Nuclear Warfare 101
Nuclear Warfare 102
Nuclear Warfare 103
Stuart Slade was a nuclear weapons targeteer. Most of you need to understand what is required to fight a nuclear war before I can present Dr Jeffery's The Minimum Means of Reprisal paper which while focuses on the Chinese details very well the concept of nuclear deterrence as opposed to nuclear warfighting.
Most of you are right now focused on nuclear warfighting and not on deterrence. There is a big difference.
But In past and in future textbook deterrence was/may not be of any help,
1.There are thousands of cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki(many states those who don't have such deterrence).
2.why nuclear technology/weapons are proliferating very fast specially post cold war?
3.Why Saddam hussein was threatened of nuclear consequences in first war.
4. why pakistan and india are set to increasing nuclear stock pile/deterrence?
5.Smart bomb /Terrorist attack/attack without signatures?
6. Nuclear accident/Misinterpretation(minimum reprisal or minimum revenge)
I mean; will someone read these articles (literally making fun of these nuclear war fights because of practicalities in deterrence) before setting fuse on 'Fat man'?