PM Modi's photos, Indian flags spotted as massive protests continue in Balochistan

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,286
Likes
56,235
Country flag
PM Modi's photos, Indian flags spotted as massive protests continue in Balochistan

Zee Media Bureau
Balochistan: Days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke about atrocities being carried out on the people of Balochistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK), Baloch 'freedom fighters' on Wednesday held a protest in support of PM Modi's statement.
On Wednesday, several freedom fighters raised the Indian national flag and held a demonstration in support of Indian PM Modi's stand on human rights violations in Balochistan.



Related Video
Panel discussion on the increasing trouble for Pakistan over Balochistan
The protestors were seen carrying pictures of Narendra Modi and deceased Baloch martyr and freedom fighter Akbar Bugti. The masked protesters carried placards reading 'Stop Baloch Genocide' and were also seen trampling the Pakistani flag.
Protests have been continuing in the region for the past four days in Sui, Dera Bugti, Jafarabad and Nasirabad among other locations in Balochistan.
Protests going on for past 4 days in Sui, Dera Bugti, Jafarabad & Nasirabad among other locations in Balochistanpic.twitter.com/CAzQ6b3BXe

— ANI (@ANI_news) August 24, 2016
Last week, Balochistan chief minister Nawab Sanaullah Zehri and commander of southern command Lieutenant General Aamir Riaz said that they would welcome Baloch leaders' return to the country, according to a report published in Dawn.
The invite was extended at the national flag-hoisting ceremony at the Quaid-i-Azam Residency in Ziarat, a district in Balochistan, on the occasion of the 70th Independence Day celebrations of Pakistan on Sunday.
Zehri also invited the self-exiled Baloch leaders to come back to Pakistan.
On August 15, in a first for any Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi referred to human rights abuses in Balochistan+ and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
"The world is watching. People of Balochistan, Gilgit, Baltistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir have thanked me a lot in the past few days. I am grateful to them," Modi said, referring to his comments last week on excesses in Pakistan's Balochistan and PoK.
:biggrin2:
He said the way people from these Pakistani regions "wished me well, gives me great joy".
Watch video here:

#WATCH Protests going on for past 4 days in different locations of Balochistan; Indian flag & PM Modi's pics seenhttps://t.co/wvBoYOW8CY

— ANI (@ANI_news) August 24, 2016
@Blackwater @roma @Screambowl @OneGrimPilgrim @Ancient Indian
Free Baluchistan!
:peace:
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,286
Likes
56,235
Country flag
Bangladesh, Afghanistan already supporting India on Balochistan issue. We just need Iran's help too, and as always US ditched us by declaring that it wont support freedom of balochistan.

US says it doesn’t support Balochistan’s independence
US didn't even supported Bangladesh.
Could they stop?
We detached the Bengal away before US Navy could reach here.
This time, we have even a relatively more capable firepower.
 

Navnit Kundu

Pika Hu Akbarrr!!
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
1,394
Likes
3,097
Bangladesh, Afghanistan already supporting India on Balochistan issue. We just need Iran's help too, and as always US ditched us by declaring that it wont support freedom of balochistan.

US says it doesn’t support Balochistan’s independence
This is the same US which also didn't support Bangladesh's independence (or the independence of black slaves, or the right of women to vote, or the right of Assad to rule Syria, or Russia's claims to Crimea, or China's claims on SCS). We all know how well that worked out for them. Fortunately, the world doesn't run on what the US thinks. Nothing can stop an idea whose time has come.

Just go through this video, it will melt your heart. This is an idea whose time has not only come, but is long overdue.

 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,231
Country flag
Trending on Twitter:
#IndiaForBalochistan
#FreeBalochistan
By the way, what a beautiful sight!
:biggrin2:
@Navnit Kundu (watched you in latest replies, welcome back buddy) @rock127 @sayareakd @LETHALFORCE @A chauhan @ezsasa
Thanks for the tag... just saw that in news and was gonna post.may be some people can use avatars of Baloch martyrs for some time.Pakis use avatar of Terrorist Burhan.

So let me add up... they are not having any guns or even "stones".It's a peaceful protest against large scale GENOCIDE of Baloch by Pakjabis.






@Abhijat @A chauhan @Alien @alphacentury @Ancient Indian @anupamsurey @Bharat Ek Khoj @blueblood @brational @Bangalorean @Blackwater @Bornubus @bose @cobra commando @DingDong @DFI_COAS @ersakthivel @fooLIam @gpawar @guru-dutt @hit&run @HariPrasad-1 @jackprince @Kharavela @Illusive @I_PLAY_BAD @LETHALFORCE @Lions Of Punjab @maomao @Mad Indian @OneGrimPilgrim @Peter @piKacHHu @pmaitra @porky_kicker @Razor @raja696 @Rowdy @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @saty @sydsnyper @Srinivas_K @Screambowl @sorcerer @Simple_Guy @Sylex21 @wickedone @tarunraju @TrueSpirit2 @thethinker @vayuu1 @VIP @Vishwarupa @VIP @Varahamihira @roma @Navnit Kundu

Our esteemed Terrorist Paki Panel: @Neo @Raja.pakistani @Zarvan @musalman @Zulfiqar Khan

Indian flag raised in Balochistan and Pak flag burned.You are doing GENOCIDE of Baloch as you did to Bangladesh.Baloch needs a Plebscite now and have right for self--determination.

Balochistan is a DISPUTED TERRITORY.

FREE FREE Balochistan.


Bangladesh, Afghanistan already supporting India on Balochistan issue. We just need Iran's help too, and as always US ditched us by declaring that it wont support freedom of balochistan.

US says it doesn’t support Balochistan’s independence
US might give a underhand support to Baloch Freedom.

US would not forget that Pakis cheated by hiding OBL(who slaughtered 3000 Americans in US) and they are still supporting Terrorism in AFG.

US would always like to punish Pakis for their double cross.
 

Navnit Kundu

Pika Hu Akbarrr!!
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
1,394
Likes
3,097
US didn't even supported Bangladesh.
Could they stop?
We detached the Bengal away before US Navy could reach here.
This time, we have even a relatively more capable firepower.
We must (and I think covertly we are) send heavy duty weapons like field artillery and tanks and combat helicopters (basically force multipliers) to Afghanistan. If Afghanistan army doesn't have enough trained soldiers to handle the technical expertise to handle the equipment, simply send Indian troops with the equipment, it will be the equivalent of deploying one strike corp inside Afghanistan instead of having 3 strike corps in India itself. Move another strike corp towards the China border (which we already did). That way, China is deterred from sending any surplus troops to Pakistan in the event of a clash for fear of losing Tibet. That way we keep China out of any potential conflict, at the same time we discomfort Pakistani planners strategically as they will be faced with strike corps on both their east and west. Once this type of strategic layout is achieved, what happens next hardly matters. This is the kind of stalemate which no enemy would be able to risk challenging.

So place the Balochistan Strike Corp in Afghanistan, Sindh Strike Corp in Gujarat, and Punjab Strike Corp in Indian Punjab and Tibet Strike Corp in Arunachal. Once the arrangements are thus made, Pakistan will be under pressure to either move or thin out their troops from the Gilgit-Baltistan region to reinforce their southern flanks to prepare for an Indian strike core attack on multiple fronts. Consequently their resources will be stretched on all 4 theaters of war, Baluchistan, Sindh, Punjab, Kashmir. Once their military is stretched thin and lose the capacity to deploy to stabilize the internal situation, start covert warfare inside Pakistan using Pakistani dissident groups, basically Mukti Bahini Part 2.

Moral of the story is, encircle Pakistan, keep them encircled forever, keep China on the edge in Tibet, this is the only language these people understand. I sense a war brewing. The most strategic time to strike is when US is busy with elections, that way, Killary Hilton cannot take firm steps against India for fear of antagonizing her core voter base which is Indian immigrants. No matter what position she takes, she will lose the brown vote, either Indian or Pakistani. If we don't do it now, it will be difficult to do it in the next 4 years as we will ourselves be busy cowering under all the covert warfare imposed on us by Killary, if she wins.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,286
Likes
56,235
Country flag
We must (and I think covertly we are) send heavy duty weapons like field artillery and tanks and combat helicopters (basically force multipliers) to Afghanistan. If Afghanistan army doesn't have enough trained soldiers to handle the technical expertise to handle the equipment, simply send Indian troops with the equipment, it will be the equivalent of deploying one strike corp inside Afghanistan instead of having 3 strike corps in India itself. Move another strike corp towards the China border (which we already did). That way, China is deterred from sending any surplus troops to Pakistan in the event of a clash for fear of losing Tibet. That way we keep China out of any potential conflict, at the same time we discomfort Pakistani planners strategically as they will be faced with strike corps on both their east and west. Once this type of strategic layout is achieved, what happens next hardly matters. This is the kind of stalemate which no enemy would be able to risk challenging.

So place the Balochistan Strike Corp in Afghanistan, Sindh Strike Corp in Gujarat, and Punjab Strike Corp in Indian Punjab and Tibet Strike Corp in Arunachal. Once the arrangements are thus made, Pakistan will be under pressure to either move or thin out their troops from the Gilgit-Baltistan region to reinforce their southern flanks to prepare for an Indian strike core attack on multiple fronts. Consequently their resources will be stretched on all 4 theaters of war, Baluchistan, Sindh, Punjab, Kashmir. Once their military is stretched thin and lose the capacity to deploy to stabilize the internal situation, start covert warfare inside Pakistan using Pakistani dissident groups, basically Mukti Bahini Part 2.

Moral of the story is, encircle Pakistan, keep them encircled forever, keep China on the edge in Tibet, this is the only language these people understand. I sense a war brewing. The most strategic time to strike is when US is busy with elections, that way, Killary Hilton cannot take firm steps against India for fear of antagonizing her core voter base which is Indian immigrants. No matter what position she takes, she will lose the brown vote, either Indian or Pakistani. If we don't do it now, it will be difficult to do it in the next 4 years as we will ourselves be busy cowering under all the covert warfare imposed on us by Killary, if she wins.
IMO ending the game is better than keeping busy.
The main reason we are yet to actually demonstrate the power outside the IOR is pakistan who's equipped to counter balance India.
If we do something, they try to make or acquire similar always to balance to the weight. They can't balance actually, but it's a psychological pressure where we have set up some policies and resources towards the too. They keep dancing in UN for CTBT and missile test ban between India and Pakistan (as if our policies are pakistan centric) to restore peace in "South Asia" (as if India has nothing to do beyond "South Asia").
And most importantly, country who used bombers on it's own citizens keep wasting our UN's time by singing of pellets.

Any tool of war, trade route, weapon or base can easily be set up to counter us.
Either pakistan must be disintegrated completely to get collapsed or it must be disintegrated to become enough small that has no significant impact (something like Bangladesh, if Baluchistan and Sindh are ever departed, it will make them landlocked, making them almost useless to be used against India).

Once, it becomes ineffective, it won't be difficult for India to multiply the hegemony and really project power around Indian Ocean and world without any problem.
 

Flame Thrower

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
1,675
Likes
2,731
This is good to see that few words have spread like a wild fire....

And the best part is within 10 days we got support of Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

I think Iran will try to stay quiet on this issue. WORST CASE may try to prevent Baluchistan to break from Pak. Iran has a good reason, I.e., a part of Baluchistan is still in Iran. If Baluchistan is created in near future Iran might loose a chunk of its land.

If Iran supports Baluchistan in couple of days/weeks then Pak is a good as dead. There will be huge war, possibly NUCLEAR

Let's see how World reacts to this.
US is Against Baluch
China is quiet, So is Russia(we need someone with VETO power on our side) and rest of the World

This is a dirty game, though Pak started it in mid July. We paid them in their own coin.

I am sure GOI had prepared for all possible scenarios.
 

Navnit Kundu

Pika Hu Akbarrr!!
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
1,394
Likes
3,097
IMO ending the game is better than keeping busy.
The main reason we are yet to actually demonstrate the power outside the IOR is pakistan who's equipped to counter balance India.
If we do something, they try to make or acquire similar always to balance to the weight. They can't balance actually, but it's a psychological pressure where we have set up some policies and resources towards the too. They keep dancing in UN for CTBT and missile test ban between India and Pakistan (as if our policies are pakistan centric) to restore peace in "South Asia" (as if India has nothing to do beyond "South Asia").
And most importantly, country who used bombers on it's own citizens keep wasting our UN's time by singing of pellets.

Any tool of war, trade route, weapon or base can easily be set up to counter us.
Either pakistan must be disintegrated completely to get collapsed or it must be disintegrated to become enough small that has no significant impact (something like Bangladesh, if Baluchistan and Sindh are ever departed, it will make them landlocked, making them almost useless to be used against India).

Once, it becomes ineffective, it won't be difficult for India to multiply the hegemony and really project power around Indian Ocean and world without any problem.
Next 4 months will tell. It seems VERY likely that there will either be a massive war or a Kargil type conflict. The signs of an impending war are all here. India is sending senior officials to various countries to build a narrative in our favor, just like Indira Gandhi had done in 1971. MJ Akbar is in Syria to counter OIC sponsored diplomatic aggression. The Indian news channels showing dead soldiers, wailing wives and mothers is an indication that the government PR machinery is building up a narrative in the sub-conscious mind of the civilians and preparing the civilians for the prospect of a war. When have we seen any other soldier get the kind of coverage which Col. Mahadik got? When have we seen any elected official of India speak about a free Balochistan? (the PM no less). Altaf Hussain is sending messages to boost the morale of his Muhajir brothers, Afghanistan is openly asking for arms, Pashtoons are burning Pakistan flags on the border gates. Everyone grab some popcorn, this is going to get interesting!

Balochistan in itself lacks the critical mass to break away due to its large area and low population, it will need the population of Sindh to make a difference. I think Balochistan and Sindh are going to be snatched away from Pakistan as a package deal. Ek pe ek free.
 

Navnit Kundu

Pika Hu Akbarrr!!
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
1,394
Likes
3,097
I think Iran will try to stay quiet on this issue. WORST CASE may try to prevent Baluchistan to break from Pak. Iran has a good reason, I.e., a part of Baluchistan is still in Iran. If Baluchistan is created in near future Iran might loose a chunk of its land.
This reason is touted by many people but I think from a cold and calculated perspective, a Baluchistan under a nuclear armed Sunni Pakistan, which is also a stooge of the US, is far more dangerous to Iran than a free Baluchistan with no nukes and no US presence. Right now, the CIA and Israel likely runs ops into Iran and use Baluchistan as a conduit for insertion and extraction of operatives. Once it is liberated, that chunk of land will in fact fall in Iran's sphere of influence. Iran has a strong reason to support Pakistani side of Baluchistan to break away so that Iran can have more control over the entire Baluchistan region and grow its regional presence, which it cannot do now, because of Pakistan.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,286
Likes
56,235
Country flag
Neither Gulf nor west supporting Pakistan on Kashmir issue

Many Western capitals have so far exercised restraint over the Kashmir issue.
NEW DELHI: Pakistan's Kashmir bogey, unlike in the past, has failed to cut much ice either in the Gulf or West. While the Organisation of Islamic Conferenceissued a customary statement condemning the violence in Kashmir, the Gulf states which had witnessed three PM-level visits in less than a year's time, have not issued any statement so far favouring Pakistan on the Kashmir issue.
This clearly indicates the eroding global support for Pakistan's decades-old campaign on Kashmir, if not a snub. The stand taken by the Gulf countries is particularly significant, given the fact that they have traditionally backed Pakistan despite their economic and people-to-people ties with India.
Since the NDA government came to power in May 2014, both the Prime Minister and foreign ministers have made several visits to the region. In less than one year, Narendra Modi made separate trips to the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar stepping up security and economic engagements by a few notches. To further cement ties, monarchs from the UAE and Qatar visited India in the past one week. MoS MJ Akbar even made trips to Lebanon, Syria and Iraq - a first by an Indian leader to these strife—torn countries in many years.
But it's not just the Gulf, even North Africa - a Muslim majority region --hasn't come out in Islamabad's defence. Delhi has been engaging with this region through high-level visits to Morocco and Tunisia and is ready to host Egyptian President Sisi next week, his second trip here in as many years.
Meanwhile, Iran issued a subdued one line statement on Kashmir in the backdrop of PM's trip to Tehran and tri-lateral pact between Delhi, Kabul and Tehran on Chabahar port that aims to promote a major regional connectivity hub.
But it's not just the Gulf, even North Africa - a Muslim majority region --hasn't come out in Islamabad's defence. Delhi has been engaging with this region through high-level visits to Morocco and Tunisia and is ready to host Egyptian President Sisi next week, his second trip here in as many years.
Meanwhile, Iran issued a subdued one line statement on Kashmir in the backdrop of PM's trip to Tehran and tri-lateral pact between Delhi, Kabul and Tehran on Chabahar port that aims to promote a major regional connectivity hub.
While the traditional partners of Islamabad have maintained their official line, the capitals in the West too had not shown much enthusiasm despite several briefings by Pakistan foreign ministry during the past two months.
Besides brief statements from the US state department on ending violence and suggesting an Indo-Pak dialogue, many Western capitals have so far exercised restraint over the Kashmir issue.
Even the European Union has adopted a similar stand despite the UN Secretary General speaking against the violence in J&K. Explaining the phenomenon, a Gulf-based expert on India-West Asian affairs who did not wish to be identified, told ET that international support to Kashmir is on the decline.
READ MORE:
Tehran|Pakistan|Narendra Modi|Kashmir|Islamic Conference|Islamabad|Iran
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,286
Likes
56,235
Country flag
US Expresses Concern Over Human Rights Situation In Pakistan-occupied Kashmir

Protests in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir over rising human rights violations.
Washington: Expressing concern over the human rights situation in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), the US has called for working out differences peacefully and through a "valid political process".
"We do have concerns about the human rights situation there (PoK), have reported it for several years in our Human Rights report," State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner told reporters at his daily news conference yesterday.
"We are always urging all parties in Pakistan to work out their differences peaceably and through a valid political process," he said when asked about the human rights situation in PoK.
Earlier this month, protesters took to streets in the Gilgit-Baltistan region against human rights abuses and brutality by the Pakistani security forces.
 

vayuu1

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2015
Messages
1,031
Likes
1,765
Country flag
Next 4 months will tell. It seems VERY likely that there will either be a massive war or a Kargil type conflict. The signs of an impending war are all here. India is sending senior officials to various countries to build a narrative in our favor, just like Indira Gandhi had done in 1971. MJ Akbar is in Syria to counter OIC sponsored diplomatic aggression. The Indian news channels showing dead soldiers, wailing wives and mothers is an indication that the government PR machinery is building up a narrative in the sub-conscious mind of the civilians and preparing the civilians for the prospect of a war. When have we seen any other soldier get the kind of coverage which Col. Mahadik got? When have we seen any elected official of India speak about a free Balochistan? (the PM no less). Altaf Hussain is sending messages to boost the morale of his Muhajir brothers, Afghanistan is openly asking for arms, Pashtoons are burning Pakistan flags on the border gates. Everyone grab some popcorn, this is going to get interesting!

Balochistan in itself lacks the critical mass to break away due to its large area and low population, it will need the population of Sindh to make a difference. I think Balochistan and Sindh are going to be snatched away from Pakistan as a package deal. Ek pe ek free.
If that happens, mark my words whole pak will disintegrate, if this indeed happens, our next target should be China, support those who want freedom from China, more importantly, support democracy in China.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk
 

Rahul Singh

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,652
Likes
5,790
Country flag
Bangladesh, Afghanistan already supporting India on Balochistan issue. We just need Iran's help too, and as always US ditched us by declaring that it wont support freedom of balochistan.

US says it doesn’t support Balochistan’s independence
It could be biggest supporter under the table. Who has most to gain if CPEC is scuttled besides India? It's USA. Only problem is because of USA's vested intrests in Pakistan it will never support Balochistan openly.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,286
Likes
56,235
Country flag
Praising Modi for raising Baloch issue increases responsibility, says defence expert
JAMMU: A defence expert has said that the praise showered on Prime Minister Narendra Modi by activists of the Baloch Republican Party (BRP) and their move to hold up his pictures and wave Indian flags in their territory, increases India’s responsibility towards realising the goal of delivering freedom to the people of Balochistan.
M M Khajuria told ANI that the Baloch people expect Prime Minister Modi and the Indian media to lend them a helping hand and support their cause internationally.
“They have come out into the open to resist and declare that they appreciate what the Prime Minister of India and the Indian media is doing for them, and they expect them to lend them a helping hand and support their cause in the world forum. This, in fact, increases our (India's) responsibility towards the freedom movement in Balochistan, and, I think, India must devise ways and means of coming up to their expectations,” Khajuria added.
While the protests have been going on for the past few days in several locations in Balochistan, protesters in Dera Bugti held up pictures of the Indian Prime Minister, late Baloch leader Akbar Bugti and his grandson Brahumdagh Bugti, and raised slogans against Islamabad. They also burnt Pakistan’s national flag.
Slogans were also raised against Balochistan Chief Minister Nawab Sanaullah Khan Zehri for declaring Bugti a traitor and thanking the Indian Prime Minister for highlighting the atrocities meted out to the people in the region by Islamabad.
Stating that the freedom movement in Balochistan seemed to have got a fillip after the Indian Prime Minister’s reference, Khajuria said, “The kind of acceptance of reality that the people of Balochistan are fighting for their freedom, this is the recognition of the support that the people of Balochistan expect from India, the international forum as well, in awakening world opinion about what they are going through and what they have gone through since 2002.”
On the United States State Department’s expression of concern over human rights violation in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), Khajuria said that Washington has been forced into doing so after India raised the issue.
The Prime Minister, in his concluding remarks at a recently held all-party meeting to discuss the flare-up in Kashmir in the wake of the killing of Hizbul Mujahideen militant Burhan Wani, had said “Pakistan forgets that it rains bombs from fighter planes on citizens of its country.”
“Time has now come that Pakistan will have to answer to the world about the atrocities being committed on people in Balochistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir,” he added.
During nation’s 70th Independence Day speech, Prime Minister Modi signalled a distinct hardening of posture against Pakistan, by raising human rights violations in Balochistan and PoK.
Prime Minister Modi said the people of PoK and Balochistan had thanked him for flagging the human rights abuses by Pakistan's security forces.
The Prime Minister's comments were criticised as "crossing a red line" by the Pakistan Government, a charge New Delhi has rejected.
 

aditya10r

Mera Bharat mahan
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
5,718
Likes
11,618
Country flag
Long live the resistance
Baluchistan hoga azad po
This is good to see that few words have spread like a wild fire....

And the best part is within 10 days we got support of Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

I think Iran will try to stay quiet on this issue. WORST CASE may try to prevent Baluchistan to break from Pak. Iran has a good reason, I.e., a part of Baluchistan is still in Iran. If Baluchistan is created in near future Iran might loose a chunk of its land.

If Iran supports Baluchistan in couple of days/weeks then Pak is a good as dead. There will be huge war, possibly NUCLEAR

Let's see how World reacts to this.
US is Against Baluch
China is quiet, So is Russia(we need someone with VETO power on our side) and rest of the World

This is a dirty game, though Pak started it in mid July. We paid them in their own coin.

I am sure GOI had prepared for all possible scenarios.
hold your horses
if theres a nuclear war then indian govt will make sure every porki on this planet dies a very painful death
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
pakistan...the land of "pipe"-dreams
Unlike USA, India has shown the world, in real how to fight a war and end the paki pigs and bring democracy by supporting the Bangladesh Freedom Struggle loooong back.

USA can learn a few cool things from the Indian army and Indian administration on how to bring real democracy by waging war!and supporting real human rights cause and how to support and sustain the democracy and friendship.(too many ands!!*phew)

Balochistan can be freed, if US stop supporting Pakistan: Ahmer Musti khan


NEW DELHI: Balochistan can be freed if US stops supporting Pakistan, feels Baloch activist Ahmer Musti Khan who earlier heckled Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif speech.

"I must assure you our Baloch people are so confident of victory that they believe that once US stops supporting Pakistan, we can force them out of Balochistan," Musti Khan said in an exclusive interview with ANI.

Sharif on Friday was heckled by Musti Khan while delivering his speech at the US Institute of Peace (USIP), a prominent independent think-tank.

Musti Khan demanded freedom of Balochistan provinces where Pakistani army has been engaged in torture and killings of Baloch people demanding freedom. The activist also called Sharif a 'friend of al-Qaida founder Osama Bin Laden.'

Musti Khan who earlier justified his agitation saying that he did it to expose Pakistan terror in Afghanistan and war crimes in Balochistan, hopes that his heckling of Sharif speech would make a difference in the days ahead.

To end the disruption, he was then removed from the hall by the private security of the USIP. The official Secret Service did interrogate him, but was not detained. "I told them that Pakistan receives US dollars but is an avowed enemy of the US. That was it. As much as I know, the US is sympathetic to the Baloch cause. Maybe because it understands Pakistan wants to work with China in Balochistan, which hurts vital interests of the US. Unfortunately some arms manufacturers in US have lot of clout at the Capitol Hill. That is the main problem.

When asked about the black out of the incident by the Pakistan media, the activist said that it clearly shows the control of the media by the intelligence services of that country.


'Pakistan media thinks if it does not report a reality the truth will die. Pakistan media is hands in gloves with the intelligence services of that country. As a journalist myself, I know quite well media houses cannot challenge the military narrative on Balochistan," he said


The activist also expects Modi administration to have a solid policy of support for Balochistan.

"As a rising power in the world India must openly support a free Balochistan not in the interests of the Baloch people but in the interests of 1.4 billion Indians," he added.



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...tan-Ahmer-Musti-khan/articleshow/49517579.cms
.................

pak and the over confident chinese with their deception seriously undermined the power of coercive chaos controlled by US in the region :D..Their bad!!

Balochistan was on the simmer for so long because of American interest in the region.Now that the americans want to exit out they should ensure that pak wont grow into a powerful regional pest with the help of arrogant retard china.


china should take a clue on the inability of pak army and pak administration to counter terrorism in pakistan from the simple episode on how pak supported Laden by harboring him inside the pak armie's own premises despite taking so much money from USA to "hunt" down Laden.
:D :D :D
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top