true. But QLZ-87 will come handy when taking out machine gun NEST/defensive posture from long distance(600m-1700m) in mountains.PLA weapons are indeed better in some aspect but again not very good in weight issues ..
For example QLZ-87 grenade launcher vs OFB MGL ..
obviously it's not the PLZ05 but a M109...
PLZ-05 or the Type 05 is a 155 mm self-propelled howitzer
RL only useful in line of sight only.True so does any RL, But point what mention here is weight ..
Mountain troops are lighter in equipment, To take a bunker a light RL is a better option ..
Hey Kunal mate, Whenever the PLA guys try or able to hack into our computer are we able to counter hack them??That is incorrect, A MGL or GL is not accurate if used in such a position, and a RL such as 84mm RCL CG used by IA can be used in elevated mode but inaccurate too ..
In military a GL is used in LOS or little elevated, But used indirect attack behind rock etc, Is the work of 51mm motar used by IA ..
Chinese AK copy is Type 56.BTW, does anyone know how much of an improvement is the Type 81 (Chinese AKM) over the original AK series of assault rifless.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Indian army foils PLA's incursion attempt at Pangong||Indian Army||3|
|Indian Army responds to PLA, moves deadlier drones along LAC||Indian Air Force||0|
|Chinese PLA stops Army from patrolling in Indian territory||Defence & Strategy||8|
|Demchok (T-Point), where Indian Army & PLA meet face to face||China||0|