Pakistan to rake up Kashmir at the International Court of Justice (ICJ)

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,024
Country flag
ICJ will not take the case but I hope they do.

The obvious document demands porks to withdraw. Once the ICJ orders porks to do this, real fun begins. Porks will protest / cry but won't withdraw and will lose all credibility in front of the whole wide world.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,024
Country flag
Also, India will get one more document from ICJ to support its cause and help India to force the porks out militarily.
 

F-14B

#iamPUROHIT
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
2,076
Likes
4,006
Country flag
Pakistani establishment has shot itself in the foot let them go and take it up with the International Court of Justice at the Hague if India Place its cards right Pakistan will lose t h e i r half of Kashmir as well because as members pointed out the UN resolution of 1948 explicitly asks both Pakistan and India to withdraw the Troops 2 pre 1947 boundaries of the state of Jammu and Kashmir this is where India can push its case and exposed the fact that the Pakistani government is the original aggressor in Kashmir and not India so keep your fingers crossed and wait for the judgement
 

square

Strategic Issues
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
1,636
Likes
1,464
i may troll , but lets first talk logic....

icj cannot rule over the bilateral treaties.....shimla agreement !!!

now its turn to troll.....
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,024
Country flag
i may troll , but lets first talk logic....

icj cannot rule over the bilateral treaties.....shimla agreement !!!

now its turn to troll.....
I know. ICJ will reject to take up the case in the first place forcing porkis to rub their nose at chinese shoes again.
 

Screambowl

Ghanta Senior Member?
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,950
Likes
7,908
Country flag
UN resolution of 1948 explicitly asks both Pakistan and India to withdraw the Troops 2 pre 1947 boundaries
Correction to it.

It asks ONLY PAKISTAN to withdraw it's troops, regulars and irregulars and bring demography pre47 stage and subsequent to that India will REDUCE ( not remove) it's forces. :p

Plus Pakistan going to ICJ means cancelling Simla agreement. LOL!
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,024
Country flag
Cancelling Simla agreement is a good thing for us. Nothing holding us back then.
 

square

Strategic Issues
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
1,636
Likes
1,464
Pakistani establishment has shot itself in the foot let them go and take it up with the International Court of Justice at the Hague if India Place its cards right Pakistan will lose t h e i r half of Kashmir as well because as members pointed out the UN resolution of 1948 explicitly asks both Pakistan and India to withdraw the Troops 2 pre 1947 boundaries of the state of Jammu and Kashmir this is where India can push its case and exposed the fact that the Pakistani government is the original aggressor in Kashmir and not India so keep your fingers crossed and wait for the judgement
once the shimla agreement signed , all previous UN resolutions automatically became null & void !!!
 

Cutting Edge 2

Space Power
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
984
Likes
1,969
Stupid idiot Pakis.

ICJ is an arbitration court. That means both countries must except its jurisdiction for them to take case.

We are clear that we don't want any mediation on bilateral issues. Hence case closed.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,024
Country flag
Stupid idiot Pakis.

ICJ is an arbitration court. That means both countries must except its jurisdiction for them to take case.

We are clear that we don't want any mediation on bilateral issues. Hence case closed.
Must accept its decision, sure. But pakis started crying when ICJ told them to hold Kulbhushan death sentence and some even said that ICJ cannot tell us whether to hang Kulbhushan or not.
 

Srinivas_K

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
7,420
Likes
12,945
Country flag
Must accept its decision, sure. But pakis started crying when ICJ told them to hold Kulbhushan death sentence and some even said that ICJ cannot tell us whether to hang Kulbhushan or not.

The case was taken based on Vienna convention, Both India and Pakistan are signatories of this treaty and have to take ICJ into consideration.

Kashmir is a different case, it is an internal matter of India.
 

SATISH

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,038
Likes
303
Country flag
It says regulars and irregulars......that is where Pakistan flawed.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top