plugwater
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 4,154
- Likes
- 1,081
Indian VVS, I think, they will order as the minimum 200-250 such machines, and if the growth rates of this country are preserved at the level of the present decade, i.e., order 7-8%, it is possible to hope also for the more scale purchases.
Finally, the order 30% buyers of the market for the heavy fighters of third country it will be reserved for THE PACK [FA] at least because this is American and Chinese proposal. The number of states, for example, in southeastern Asia, will be oriented to the purchase of precisely Russian- Indian machines for military-political reasons.
- You it does not seem that the fighter of the 5th generation - this is faster the arrogant project, than which has real applied value? We nevertheless were late with this aircraft, American- that to us no longer to overtake. Yes even so whether already it for us is necessary? Here, for example, Europe not at all conducts the development of the fighters of the 5th generation, there counts on the deep modernization of the existing machines. It can be, and us it was to be been more modestly and been concentrated during the development “Su-35” and “MiG-35”?
- No. In contrast to Russia the European Countries do not encounter the real threat of their safety, but for waging of semi-colonial expeditionary wars completely it suffices to have aviation complexes on the base of the platforms of the fourth generation. Russia in this respect is located in much the more indeterminate position.
Our country borders on the number of the states, which carry out demonstratively [rusofobskuyu] foreign policy. The fighters F, completely can appear in arsenal of some of them into the next 15-20 years. But in the Far East some our neighbors have themselves to Russia territorial claims, and these neighbors also, it is completely probable, they will possess the fighters of the fifth generation, including of heavy class.
Finally we simply do not know, what peace in 2040 or 2050 will be. But life cycle PACK [FA], I will repeat, it will be prolonged approximately until now.
Furthermore, it is simply foolish to reject the natural competitive advantages, which Russia in the segment of heavy fighters possesses. At present our country controls (without taking into account internal American market) to half of the World Market for these machines. But such segments, where the Russian companies would be world leaders and occupied tens of percent of global market, very a little.
Finally, program PACK [FA] made it possible to preserve the foremost even Soviet school of military aircraft construction. This would be impossible, if by [aviaprom] it limited only to the modernization of the machines of the previous generation. But in the case of the loss of school for its recreation tens of billions of dollars would be required, but the main thing is/are not less than 20-30 years of persistent work and shift of several generations of engineers and designers. Similarly, precisely, this occurred in Russia in the region of designing the commercial airplanes. But if in commercial aviation it is possible to attempt to overcome delays via international cooperation, then in the military affairs this is much less probable. Here we must design exclusively for our own possibilities.
http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translat...tsiya-suhogo.html&lp=ru_en&btnTrUrl=Translate
Finally, the order 30% buyers of the market for the heavy fighters of third country it will be reserved for THE PACK [FA] at least because this is American and Chinese proposal. The number of states, for example, in southeastern Asia, will be oriented to the purchase of precisely Russian- Indian machines for military-political reasons.
- You it does not seem that the fighter of the 5th generation - this is faster the arrogant project, than which has real applied value? We nevertheless were late with this aircraft, American- that to us no longer to overtake. Yes even so whether already it for us is necessary? Here, for example, Europe not at all conducts the development of the fighters of the 5th generation, there counts on the deep modernization of the existing machines. It can be, and us it was to be been more modestly and been concentrated during the development “Su-35” and “MiG-35”?
- No. In contrast to Russia the European Countries do not encounter the real threat of their safety, but for waging of semi-colonial expeditionary wars completely it suffices to have aviation complexes on the base of the platforms of the fourth generation. Russia in this respect is located in much the more indeterminate position.
Our country borders on the number of the states, which carry out demonstratively [rusofobskuyu] foreign policy. The fighters F, completely can appear in arsenal of some of them into the next 15-20 years. But in the Far East some our neighbors have themselves to Russia territorial claims, and these neighbors also, it is completely probable, they will possess the fighters of the fifth generation, including of heavy class.
Finally we simply do not know, what peace in 2040 or 2050 will be. But life cycle PACK [FA], I will repeat, it will be prolonged approximately until now.
Furthermore, it is simply foolish to reject the natural competitive advantages, which Russia in the segment of heavy fighters possesses. At present our country controls (without taking into account internal American market) to half of the World Market for these machines. But such segments, where the Russian companies would be world leaders and occupied tens of percent of global market, very a little.
Finally, program PACK [FA] made it possible to preserve the foremost even Soviet school of military aircraft construction. This would be impossible, if by [aviaprom] it limited only to the modernization of the machines of the previous generation. But in the case of the loss of school for its recreation tens of billions of dollars would be required, but the main thing is/are not less than 20-30 years of persistent work and shift of several generations of engineers and designers. Similarly, precisely, this occurred in Russia in the region of designing the commercial airplanes. But if in commercial aviation it is possible to attempt to overcome delays via international cooperation, then in the military affairs this is much less probable. Here we must design exclusively for our own possibilities.
http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translat...tsiya-suhogo.html&lp=ru_en&btnTrUrl=Translate