Obama okay with Beijing monitoring Indo-Pak ties: What's your take?

Koji

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
Obama will be the president:

to hand Taiwan over to China
lose the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq
dissolve NATO
destroy the dollar
turn USA into a third world country
take USA from a superpower to a welfare state
bankrupt the nation
have Iran go nuclear
destroy the USA-Israeli alliance
make NPT,CTBT,FMCT useless
Taiwan is going no where, NATO almost dissolved under BUSH after his gung-ho invasions. The US is not bankrupt, and its debt increased substantially under Bush, and the NPT was only threatened under BUSH's relations with India.

You've got it all wrong, and I suggest you start riding the Obama train :stinker::stinker: Bush is long gone, and so is India in the minds of Americans.
 

Koji

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
if you are japanese why the hell do you care about USA and China fighting??
Look where we are situated..right smack in the middle. Of course we don't want a confrontation with our #1 and #2 traders. Doesn't take a genius to see that.
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
obama ( sorry for earlier spelling mistakes, now that i have cooled down ! ) is hoping to buy time against china's phenomenal rise ! ( deja vu - nehru's same "strategy" in '62 ? USA will find itself mauled by china and their share of global influence seriously reduced.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,556
Country flag
and trade with Japan will be the deciding factor for the war yeah right. There will be a war no matter what anyone says it always happens that way in history number 1 and number 2 also fight for the top spot and trade with Japan will not be the deciding factor.
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
Must read

Obama in China: The Real Story

By far the most significant news from Obama’s trip to the Far East came before he got there. Speaking at a conference in Beijing just hours before Air Force One arrived, a top Chinese financial official attacked the Federal Reserve, and, by extension, the rest of the American government for stoking another speculative bubble, which could have disastrous consequences for the global economy.

As the Financial Times reported yesterday, Lix Mingkang, China’s top banking regulator, said the Fed’s policy of keeping interest rates artificially low “is boosting speculative investments in stock and property markets and will pose new, real and insurmountable risks to the global recovery and particularly to the recovery in emerging markets.”

In particular, Mingkang said, the Fed’s cheap-money policy was encouraging investors to borrow heavily in dollars and then use the money to buy higher-yielding investments in other countries, such as stocks, bonds, and real estate. This “huge carry trade” was having a “massive impact on global asset prices,” Mingkang insisted.

The Chinese have been grumbling for some time about what they see as America’s irresponsible economic policies, particularly its deliberate effort to devalue the dollar, but this is the first time a senior Beijing official has been so explicit in its criticisms of the Fed.

To be sure, there is an element here of Beijing trying to deflect criticism from its own irresponsibility in maintaining an artificially low exchange rate, but that doesn’t detract from the importance of the growing rift between the United States and its biggest creditor. According to an interesting piece on U.S.-China financial relations by Steven Dunaway, of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Chinese government now owns about $1.6 trillion in dollar assets, mostly in the form of Treasury bonds and other U.S.-backed securities. With every downward lurch of the dollar in the foreign exchange markets, the value of these Chinese assets falls.

It was surely no coincidence, therefore, that Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, made a rare comment about the dollar yesterday. (Usually, the Fed chairman leaves the Treasury Secretary to comment on such matters.) Speaking at the Economic Club of New York, Bernanke said the Fed was monitoring the currency markets closely and will conduct policy in a way that will “help ensure that the dollar is strong.”

Whether this will satisfy the Chinese remains to be seen.

Read more: Obama in China: The Real Story: Rational Irrationality : The New Yorker

----------------


US : National Debt Now Tops $12 Trillion

It's another record-high for the U.S. National Debt which today topped the $12-trillion mark. Divided evenly among the U.S. population, it amounts to $38,974.34 for every man, woman and child.

Technically, the debt hit the new high yesterday, but it was posted on the Treasury Department website just after 3:00 p.m. ET today. The exact calculation of the debt is a 16-digit tongue-twister and red-ink tsunami: $12,031,299,186,290.07

This latest milestone in the ever-rising journey of the National Debt comes less than eight months after it hit $11 trillion for the first time. The latest high-point is not unexpected, considering the federal deficit for the just-ended 2009 fiscal year hit an all-time high at $1.42-trillion – more than triple the previous year's record high.

Much of the increase in the deficit and debt is attributed to government spending outpacing revenue – both exacerbated by the recession and the government response to it – including hundreds of billions in bailouts and stimulus spending and tax cuts along with decreased tax revenues due to rising unemployment.

In recent days, President Obama has spoken of the need to bring the rising deficit and debt under control.

"I intend to take serious steps to reduce America's long-term deficit – because debt-driven growth cannot fuel America's long-term prosperity," he said in remarks prepared for delivery to the leader's meeting last Sunday at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit.

The National Debt has increased about $1.6 trillion on Mr. Obama's watch, though less than $4.9 trillion run up during the presidency of George W. Bush.

But the White House budget review issued in August projects that by the end of the current fiscal year on Sept 30th, the National Debt could top $14 trillion.

It gets worse. The same document projects that by the end of the decade, the National Debt will hit $24.5 trillion -- exceeding the Gross Domestic Product projected for 2019 of $22.8 trillion.

The new debt number adds urgency to Treasury Department calls on Congress to quickly raise the statutory limit on the National Debt which now stands at $12.104 trillion. The debt ceiling was last raised in February as part of the $787 billion Recovery Act stimulus bill.

The debt also costs a fortune to maintain. In the fiscal year just ended, the National Debt cost taxpayers over $383 billion. And that amount means the government is only paying 3.3 percent interest. If interest rates go up, so does the amount paid on the debt.

And we're paying it to scores foreign countries which hold $3.5 trillion of the U.S. Debt.
China leads the pack holding nearly $800 billion in U.S. Government securities, followed closely by Japan with $731 billion.

Among the smaller nations lending the U.S. money are Luxembourg, Taiwan, Singapore and Ireland.

Mr. Obama has said he hopes the health care plan pending in Congress will serve to curb the growth in the debt by reducing the amount government spends on health care. But it's a claim disputed by critics who say it will have the opposite effect.

National Debt Now Tops $12 Trillion - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

----------------------


Obama Invites Chinese Banks to Buy American Banks

President Obama may return from his trip to China this week with some sorely needed help for ailing U.S. banks: buyers.

The South China Morning Post reports today that American and Chinese government officials are negotiating an agreement to spur lenders in the People’s Republic to acquire small and midsize banks in the U.S. (registration required). The sides hope to announce the deal before Obama wraps up his visit on Wednesday.

The [agreement], if announced, would signal a significant turnaround of Washington’s stance towards Chinese investment in the U.S. and also comes at a time that cash-rich China, with more than US$2 trillion worth of foreign exchange reserves, is buying overseas assets aggressively.

“Turnaround” is putting it mildly. The U.S. has tied itself in knots in recent years fending off Chinese companies eager to buy American enterprises. Most notably, when Chinese state-owned oil company CNOOC in 2005 bid $18.5 billion in cash to buy California’s Unocal, American lawmakers erupted. Dangerous to national security! A giveaway of vital natural resources! Those people eat chicken feet! (For the record, they’re delicious.)

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a multi-agency government panel that assesses cross-border mergers, eventually nixed the deal. Grandstanding pols may have been pleased, but Unocal shareholders probably weren’t — CNOOC’s offer easily topped a rival bid for Unocal by another American oil company, Chevron, which eventually walked away with the prize. Chinese telecom gear maker Huawei last year abandoned a joint deal for 3Com merely on the risk that CFIUS might block the transaction.

Such flaps recalled concerns about Japanese investment in the U.S. in the 1980s (U.S. authorities went so far as to make it harder for Japanese corporate employees to get visas to work stateside.) Such episodes reveal growing American anxiety about challenges from powerful economic rivals, as well as our place in a multi-polar world. An important difference, however, is that while Japanese companies work hand-in-hand with their government, many of China’s large enterprises work hand-in-fist as state-controlled entities.

Another contrast has to do, of course, with the countries themselves. Japan Inc., mired in its “lost decade,” soon fizzled. But China, while certain to see many ups and downs in coming years (especially on the political front), is a budding superpower. And the country’s rise is surfacing a deep American ambivalence toward China over whether it is best viewed as a free-market friend or a Cold War-era foe.

Certainly, China’s involvement in the U.S. economy is double-edged. Beijing’s taste for Treasury securities and other U.S. debt has kept the American economy afloat. But as our trade deficit shows, it has also encouraged us to live well beyond our means. More broadly, the huge inflows of foreign capital in the U.S. that began in the mid-’90s facilitated the ensuing financial bubble by depressing interest rates.

Despite such concerns, there’s a strong economic case for inviting Chinese banks to enter the U.S. (In the interest of semi-brevity, I’ll withhold my opinion on how China’s human rights record should figure in the matter.) For one thing, they’re already here. Minsheng Bank bought a roughly 10 percent stake in San Francisco’s UCBH Holdings, which operated the United Commercial Bank, in 2007.

Notably, Minsheng, which has more $130 billion in assets, isn’t state-run — in 1996 it became the first private commercial bank in China. The company emerged from banking reforms instituted by Chinese authorities in the 1990s to modernize the country’s financial system. Other changes, prompted in part by China’s joining the WTO, included the adoption of market-based interest rates and a move to loosen control on foreign exchange.

Foreign banks have been making acquisitions in China for a while now. The biggest such investor is HSBC. By 2008, the U.K. financial giant had spent $5 billion to buy stakes in a range of mainland companies, including Bank of Shanghai and Ping An Insurance. In 2007, HSBC formed HSBC Bank (China) in Shanghai as a wholly foreign-owned bank.

Citigroup, whose business on the mainland dates back to the early 1900s, owns a nearly 20 percent stake in Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, just below a government limit on foreign ownership of domestic banks. Citi also has a piece of Guangdong Development Bank. In addition, four major Chinese banks — the Bank of China, Bank of Communications, China Construction Bank, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China — have attracted a slew of overseas investors.

For now, the growth of Chinese banks in the U.S. is unlikely to provoke the same hand-wringing as CNOOC’s designs on the American oil patch. The agreement being hatched between Washington and Beijing concerns smaller banks, not global ones. More important, the U.S. desperately needs willing buyers to mop up injured banks, more of which fail every week. The federal Public-Private Investment Program, which is aimed at helping banks cleanse their portfolios of toxic assets, is only slowly gaining speed. U.S. banks and investors are moving in, but not quickly enough.

If Chinese financial companies pass on the chance to buy American, it’s unlikely to be because of nationalist sentiment here at home. That’s passing. Recently, for example, China’s sovereign wealth fund bought a $2.2 billion stake in Virginia energy company AES, with nary a whimper from Congress.

Rather, it will stem from a healthy sense of caveat emptor. United Commercial Bank closed earlier this month, taking Minsheng Bank’s investment down with it. As one Chinese banking executive told the Morning Post, “The U.S. side is very keen for the mainland banks to invest, but we are very cautious.”

Obama Invites Chinese Banks to Buy American | BNET Financial Services Blog | BNET


--------------

Obama: China has helped US pull out of recession

BEIJING — President Barack Obama says that China's partnership has helped the United States pull out of the worst recession in a generation.

Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao appeared together and spoke to reporters after a pair of meetings on Tuesday. Obama says a revised economic approach will help increase U.S. exports and create jobs while helping bring about higher living standards in China.

Obama says his government is committed to a strategy of spending less and saving more.

The United States' budget deficit is soaring to a yearly record of $1.42 trillion and China is the No. 1 lender to Washington. Beijing has expressed concern that the falling price of the dollar threatens the value of its U.S. holdings.

The Associated Press: Obama: China has helped US pull out of recession

------

China Can't Kill The Dollar


Before President Barack Obama touched down in China for his three-day visit this week, the country's top banking regulator joined the ranks of those complaining about the U.S. Federal Reserve's low interest rates and the falling dollar. The combination, said Liu Mingkang, has fed speculation in stock and property markets (especially in Asia) and threatens the worldwide economic recovery.

What can China do about it? As long as the country banks on Americans to buy Chinese products, economists say, not much.

"They don’t have any credibility," said Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist at Miller Tabak. China has played the same game for years, keeping its currency cheap so that other countries will buy its goods. The U.S. certainly cares about what its largest creditor thinks, Greenhaus said, but has little reason to change course. A cheaper currency boosts U.S. exports, just as it does for China, and the Federal Reserve won't raise rates at the risk of choking the economy.

The two countries are effectively locked in an embrace: China buys U.S. debt and the U.S. buys China's goods. "It's a symbiotic relationship," Greenhaus said.

The Fed has kept interest rates low to spur borrowing and encourage economic growth, thereby creating a new carry trade. Investors borrow cheap dollars and lend them in a currency from a country with a higher yield and then pocket the difference. The Dollar/Aussie carry trade has been especially popular since the Australian central bank raised interest rates to 3.5%. Each trade sells U.S. dollars to buy Aussies and helps push the dollar lower and the Aussie higher. Remember this next time an analyst says that the Aussie is climbing because Australia is commodities-rich--there's some truth to it, but there's also some momentum at work.

When the dollar falls, China rushes into the market to keep its currency close to 6.84 to the dollar, selling the yuan to buy assets priced in dollars. Letting the dollar weaken against the yuan would make Chinese products more expensive to American consumers, so China keeps its currency pegged and, as a result, has piled up more U.S. debt than any other country. At last count, China held $797 billion in Treasury securities, up from $573.7 billion in August 2008.

The largest creditor to the U.S. would appear to have plenty of leverage, the ability to wreak havoc if it doesn't get its way. The nightmare scenario, as imagined by the doomsayers, has China selling off its vast store of Treasury notes or maybe refusing to show up to the next Treasury auction. Yields on Treasury debt skyrocket, the U.S. defaults and Americans wake up in a Cormac McCarthy novel.

But in reality, China has too much to lose to make any rash moves, said Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics. If it stopped buying U.S. debt, the value of its $797 billion Treasury hoard would plummet along with the dollar. A soaring yuan would also hurt exports, which have dropped for 12 months in a row. That's one reason China rejects cajoling from the Obama administration to let its currency float freely.

If it wants to fight an asset bubble, the People's Bank of China could begin raising rates by the middle of next year, say researchers at JPMorgan Chase. And the bank recently hinted that it would allow for more flexibility in its exchange rate. Don't expect much. JPMorgan's researchers estimate one dollar could fetch 6.5 yuan by the end of next year.

China Can't Kill The Dollar - Forbes.com
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,556
Country flag
obama ( sorry for earlier spelling mistakes, now that i have cooled down ! ) is hoping to buy time against china's phenomenal rise ! ( deja vu - nehru's same "strategy" in '62 ? USA will find itself mauled by china and their share of global influence seriously reduced.
USA is buying time until it can get out of this economic downturn, once out or further deeper in only point to one direction war. Same thing happened in ww2 great depression lead to ww2 and now it will lead to war against China.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Being snubbed by the #1 power and giving the go-ahead for China to do whatever it wants in South Asia has got to hurt.
When was India snubbed and when did US gave go-ahead to do whatever China wants to do in Asia. Don't take things for granted and make silly statements. In the joint statement there is only mention of China and US help India and Pak improve relations and stability. It means nothing. But India takes it seriously when others talk about interfering in Indo-Pak affairs. India has shown finger to US many a times in case of Indo-Pak conflicts citing it as a bilateral issue.

India will show even bigger finger if China were to talk and interfere in Indo-Pak affairs. It already does indirectly by maintaining Pak as proxy in South Asia but it cannot do anything further than this. I say, first China should solve its border dispute with India even before talking about interfering in Indo-Pak affairs. It is already hyperventilating after the Dalai Lama's visit to Tawang.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,556
Country flag
Taiwan is going no where, NATO almost dissolved under BUSH after his gung-ho invasions. The US is not bankrupt, and its debt increased substantially under Bush, and the NPT was only threatened under BUSH's relations with India.

You've got it all wrong, and I suggest you start riding the Obama train :stinker::stinker: Bush is long gone, and so is India in the minds of Americans.
well Bush is no longer president Obummer will get the credit for all this, he took the job as president to fix these things and he hasn't so Obummer gets 100% of the blame. 12 trillion in debt approachin 80% of the GDP is bankrupt but you can call it what you like, regardless what USA does makes no difference to India it couldn't stop Dalai Lama .
 

Koji

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
When was India snubbed and when did US gave go-ahead to do whatever China wants to do in Asia. Don't take things for granted and make silly statements. In the joint statement there is only mention of China and US help India and Pak improve relations and stability. It means nothing. But India takes it seriously when others talk about interfering in Indo-Pak affairs. India has shown finger to US many a times in case of Indo-Pak conflicts citing it as a bilateral issue.

India will show even bigger finger if China were to talk and interfere in Indo-Pak affairs. It already does indirectly by maintaining Pak as proxy in South Asia but it cannot do anything further than this. I say, first China should solve its border dispute with India even before talking about interfering in Indo-Pak affairs. It is already hyperventilating after the Dalai Lama's visit to Tawang.
Uh....Giving a go ahead for China to interfere with internal affairs in India and Pakistan is a pretty big snub!

China did hyperventilate over the Dalai Lama's visit, but India tried to compensate by restricting media! Now, is that a fully raised middle finger? Or just a timid one? LOL
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
Don't you get the new situation? The Chinese and Americans are on better terms with each other than ever. There will not be a fight...co-operation instead will prevail.
LOL This is not co-operation. This is blackmail.
US is China's biggest marker, China has no choice but to rescue US or risk losing trillions in securities and exports.

Being snubbed by the #1 power and giving the go-ahead for China to do whatever it wants in South Asia has got to hurt. But you gotta see that this was a long time coming, an US Admiral even stated that he wants in increased Chinese Naval presence in the Indian Ocean.
Nobody stopped China from doing what it wanted to. China supplied nukes to Pak, built ports, highways etc.

US president also stated that he wanted to see more freedoms in China, yawn?
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,556
Country flag
you are right Singh it does not matter what USA says to China, India will decide if and when talks take place and how they take place and they definetly will not have Chinese there that is a 100% guarantee, never had after Bill clinton said the same thing ,and won't after obummer either.
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Uh....Giving a go ahead for China to interfere with internal affairs in India and Pakistan is a pretty big snub!
That is exacty what I'm asking. Where did it say that US gave go-ahead to China that it can interfere in Indo-pak affairs. Again don't take things out of context than what is implied in the statement. It will be better for you to go grab the joint statement and read it for yourself before you comeback here and make silly statements again.

China did hyperventilate over the Dalai Lama's visit, but India tried to compensate by restricting media! Now, is that a fully raised middle finger? Or just a timid one? LOL
Your myth of restricting media on Dalai Lama's visit has been quashed in that thread. It is only bunch of planted stories in some media outlets. Many videos, government official denials have been posted for your convenience. If you have any more queries take it into that thread.

What is important is, allowing Dalai Lama whom China considers as a splittist to go and visit a place which China considers is part of it. If this is not snubbing then what is??. :lol:
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
Uh....Giving a go ahead for China to interfere with internal affairs in India and Pakistan is a pretty big snub!
Internal affairs? Do you think India ever allowed US to interfere in its internal affairs ?

Oh my God Obama just screwed you guys for a couple of trillion and in return you are gloating because he said that US and China both want to see peace in South Asia. LOL.

China did hyperventilate over the Dalai Lama's visit, but India tried to compensate by restricting media! Now, is that a fully raised middle finger? Or just a timid one? LOL
was that an adequate compensation ;)

A Chinese traitor visiting occupied China and China can't do a thing about it .
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
you are right Singh it does not matter what USA says to China, India will decide if and when talks take place and how they take place and they definetly will not have Chinese there that is a 100% guarantee, never had after Bill clinton said and same and won't after obummer either.
This joint statement is squarely aimed at Pakistan. China realizes that it is Pakistan, its "friend" that is the cause of misery in the region (South Asia-Turkestan).

South Asia is perhaps the worse term to use because India and Pakistan act in isolation and not as a part of South Asia.
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
Koji is just trying to get people riled up here, and enjoy the fun.

First of all this is a huge over-reaction by the Indian media over a non-issue.

Obama is not giving any kind of green light to China to do anything. The Americans know that China has no standing with India on any issue regarding Pakistan.

It seems like the Indian Media like TOI and HT keep making bombastic statements and articles based on the most trivial things.

I dont know why a major paper like TOI has such poor editorial oversight. Time and again I have read articles that blow up some innocuous statement by a US official into some big theory, conspiracy, over-the-top articles, etc.

Obama did not say he wanted China to monitor India-Pak....he just said that China should help the process, probably because of China's influence with Pak.

It seems like TOI is just a newspaper with poor quality control and they rush to publish anything that they get from various sources without doing the due diligence on the stories. Its becoming a trend. HT is not much better.

India deserves a better English newspaper with a higher quality of content and tighter oversight.
 

Mohan

Respected Member
Regular Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
182
Likes
3
I feel this is a carefully planned ploy of US by giving a green signal to China in the south Asia will naturally heat up things between India and China.A kind of more hostilities in the border and through Pakistan which will not be tolerated by India which will rise the ante.

US will watch sitting in the fence and jump in or keep supplying arms to India.Kill 3 birds in one stone.While we are busy in these things they will have time to pull out of the present economic situation.
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
Uh....Giving a go ahead for China to interfere with internal affairs in India and Pakistan is a pretty big snub!
And then seeing China having zero success in being able mediate is an equally big setback for its baby-steps to becoming a nosy superpower. If US wasn't able to mediate for the past several decades being an established superpower, China can't, either.
 

Sridhar

House keeper
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
3,474
Likes
1,061
Country flag
India has refused to react saying there is “no point in doing so.”

The statement by U.S. President Barack Obama and his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao, issued on Tuesday in Beijing, supports the “improvement and growth of relations between India and Pakistan.”
It says “the two sides are ready to strengthen communication, dialogue and cooperation on issues related to South Asia and work together to promote peace, stability and development in that region.”
“In the present circumstances, I hope Mr. Obama and Mr. Hu Jintao are not confusing hope with facts,” observed the former External Affairs Minister, Natwar Singh. “India has consistently extended its hand of friendship to Pakistan but the response has been wholly unsatisfactory. The government and the people of India want warm and cordial relations with Pakistan so do the people of Pakistan. Regrettably the establishment of Pakistan is not in favour,” he added.
The former Foreign Secretary, Salman Haider, was surprised that such observations had been made because the U.S. knows it would be regarded as some sort of provocation to India. “But India should not get overexcited, for, it is a confident country which has done well and is in command of its processes. The statement should not give a message to Pakistan that it could start attempting the involvement of others in our bilateral affairs. We have repeatedly told our friends not to interfere. This is not a good formulation and is not at all helpful,” he said.
Not first time
However, this is not the first time that a U.S.-China summit-level joint statement has mentioned India. Meeting soon after the Pokhran tests in 1998, the then U.S. President Bill Clinton and the former Chinese President, Jiang Zemin, had issued a statement that was more specific on Kashmir, the main irritant in India-Pakistan relations. The statement expressed the “commitment” of the U.S. and China to help peacefully resolve “the difficult and long-standing differences between them [India and Pakistan], including the pending issue of Kashmir.”
As joint statements go, the recent as well as the earlier ones also dwell on the international situation in other parts of the world such as the Six-Party Talks on a nuclear-free Korean peninsula, the Iranian nuclear issue and the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan among others.

The Hindu : Front Page : Surprise over U.S.-China joint statement
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
I only see US and China cuddling up to each other. Nothing serious. China will not interfere in South Asia. It will be status quo.
 

ppgj

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,029
Likes
168
who is USA to give a go ahead to china to interfere in indo pak relations? for 6 decades, US could not do much, so what they or anybody can do now?
i think we are making a mountain of a mole.
US needs india's help for their afpak war.
obama is just setting up the chinese to buy more T-bonds to stabilise american economy and unfortunately chinese can't do much except buy because they have cornered themselves. they have to keep dollar value at a reasonable level lest they suffer.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top