"Foreign Agents" Law Hits Hundreds of NGOs
NOVEMBER 20, 2013
In early March 2013 the Russian government launched an unprecedented, nationwide campaign of inspections of thousands of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to identify advocacy groups the government deems "foreign agents" and force them to register as such. The list below tracks the legal consequences of the law on dozens of NGOs. :ranger:
Since the beginning of the "foreign agents" campaign, various prosecutors' offices and the Ministry of Justice filed nine administrative cases against NGOs and an additional five administrative cases against NGO leaders for failure to register under the "foreign agents" law. Prosecutors lost nine of these fourteen cases in courts. These were cases filed against the Perm Regional Human Rights Center, the GRANI Center for Civic Analysis and Independent Research, the Perm Civic Chamber, the Side by Side LGBT Film Festival and its director, Coming Out (an LGBT group) and its director, and the Memorial Anti-Discrimination Center and its director. The prosecutors won administrative cases against the Kostroma Center for Support of Public Initiatives and the center's director.
The Ministry of Justice filed administrative cases against the Golos Association, an election monitoring group, and its director and against Regional Golos, and won all three cases in courts. Additionally, the prosecutors brought civil law suits against three NGOs: Women of Don in Novocherkassk, the Center for Social Policy and Gender Studies in Saratov, and the Memorial Anti-Discrimination Center. Notably, the suit against the Memorial Anti-Discrimination Center was nearly identical to the administrative case against the group that the prosecutors had lost.
The Ministry of Justice ordered the two NGOs against which it had filed administrative cases (both Golos groups) to suspend their activities for several months. Also, at least three groups (the Golos Association, the Kostroma Center for Support of Public Initiatives, and the Side by Side LGBT Film Festival) initiated proceedings on their own to wind up operations in order to avoid further repressive legal action.
The prosecutors also filed at least 12 administrative cases against NGOs for refusing to provide documents during the inspection campaign and lost two of them (against the Rainbow Foundation in Moscow and the Foundation for Development of Modern Civil Society Institutions in Lipetsk).
At least 11 NGOs filed lawsuits against prosecutors' notices ordering the groups to register under the "foreign agents" law, which they had received in the wake of the inspection campaign. By late November, at least three groups won their cases (Yekaterinburg's Information and Human Rights Center, Perm's GRANI Center for Civic Analysis and Independent Research, and the Perm Civil Chamber).
Human Rights Watch is also aware of at least three NGOs in different regions of Russia that succeeded in getting the prosecutors' warnings annulled in courts (MASHR in Ingushetia, the Movementfor Fair Elections in Kurgan, and Golos in Siberia). At least two more warnings (against Assistance to Cystic Fibrosis Patients in Moscow region and the Phoenix Foundation in Vladivostok, respectively) were revoked by the prosecutor's offices themselves.
Thirteen leading rights groups jointly filed a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights challenging the "foreign agents" law. The application is currently under review. In August Russia's ombudsman, Vladimir Lukin, filed an appeal with the country's Constitutional Court on behalf of four organizations challenging warnings from the prosecutor's offices to register and fines groups had incurred for failing to register. Two other groups filed separate petitions with the Constitutional Court challenging the "foreign agents" measure's compliance with the Russian constitution.
I. Civil law suits – 4 NGOs
The Russian Civil Procedure Code gives the prosecutor's office powers to file a civil law suit "in defense of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens, general public or interests of the Russian Federation, its subjects and municipal entities." Prosecutors began to use this provision against NGOs in order to force them register as "foreign agents." If the prosecutors win those suits in court, relevant groups will have to register as "foreign agent" organizations within two weeks of the court ruling coming into force.
Anti-DiscriminationCenter "Memorial" (St. Petersburg)
After the courts repeatedly quashed the prosecutors' administrative cases against ADC "Memorial" and its director due to a number of violations in case files (for details, see Section III), on July 12 the prosecutor's office filed a civil law suit against the group claiming that its failure to register as a "foreign agent" was unlawful and impaired the legitimate interests of the general public. The arguments used in this civil suit are practically identical to the ones used in the administrative cases against the group, which had been rejected by the courts. Court hearings on the civil suit started on August 5, but were three times to date.
On November 25 the prosecutor petitioned the judge that the group's activities should be recognized as "foreign agent's activities". Also the prosecutor presented new expert evaluation concluding that ADC "Memorial" carried out "political activities" according to the Russia legislation on political parties. The next hearings are scheduled on December 12.
Women of Don (Novocherkassk)
On September 3, after Women of Don had refused to comply with the prosecutors' orders to register as a "foreign agent" organization (for details, see Section IV), the prosecutor's office filed a civil law suit against the group. The suit argues that the group engaged in "
political activities," inter alia, by publishing on its website its annual reports on activities, which the group submitted to the Ministry of Justice as required by law. According to the prosecutors, the information included in the report on roundtables and other public events organized by the group to discuss the issue of police reform "shapes public opinion and is aimed at changing government policies." Court hearings started on October 31. Next hearings are scheduled on December 4.
Center for Social Policy and Gender Studies (Saratov)
After the group disagreed with the prosecutor's notice of violations (for details, see Section IV), on September 10 the prosecutor's office filed a civil law suit against the group. In addition to the group's activities, which were previously cited as "political" in the notice of violations, the prosecutor's lawsuit also mentions a petition campaign that several activists started to protect the group from the "foreign agents" law and a public statement made in support of the group by a number of Dutch NGOs. The latter, according to the prosecutor, demonstrates that "the organization's foreign colleagues position it as an organization participating in the country's public and political life, influencing the development of democratic processes in the country, i.e. as political."
Court hearings started on September 20 but were postponed three times until November 27. On November 27, the judge supported the prosecutor's demand and ruled that the group should register as a "foreign agent" NGO. The group will appeal the verdict to a higher instance court.
"Coming-out" (Saint-Petersburg)
Though both district and Saint-Petersburg city courts overturned the verdicts to fine the group and its director on August 14 and September 27 (for details, see Section III), Saint-Petersburg Central district prosecutor filed civil law suit case against the group on October 29. First court hearings were scheduled on November 20 but were postponed on December 4
II. Suspension of activities – 2 NGOs
If the authorities consider that a group is performing the functions of a "foreign agent', but has not submitted the documents to register itself as such, the Ministry of Justice may order the activities to be suspended for a period of up to six months. During this period the group may not appear in mass media, organize public actions, or use its bank accounts.
Association of NGOs in Defence of Voters' Rights "Golos" (Moscow)
In April a court found the group and its director guilty of violating the law on "foreign agents" and fined both of them (for details, please, see Section III). Following this, on June 25, the Ministry of Justice ordered that the group's activities be suspended for six months. On July 15 the group lodged a judicial appeal against the decision. Court hearings are scheduled for December 10. :ranger:
Regional Public Association in Defense of Democratic Rights and Freedoms "Golos" (Moscow)
In April a court found the group guilty of violating the law on "foreign agents" and fined it (for details, see Section III). Following this, on September 30 the Ministry of Justice ordered that its activities be suspended for three months.
III. Administrative Court Cases - 9 NGOs
If a court of law finds an organization responsible for failure to register as a "foreign agent," these groups may be fined up to 500,000 rubles (over US$16,000) and their leaders personally – up to 300,000 rubles (approximately $10,000).
Association of NGOs in Defense of Voters' Rights "Golos" (Moscow)
According to the protocol from the Ministry of Justice dated April 9, the group drafted and promoted a unified Electoral Code and allegedly received foreign funding in the form of the Andrey Sakharov Freedom Award from the Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC). Notably, Golos had sent the monetary prize in question back to the NHC. The organization was fined 300,000 rubles (approximately $10,000) by the Presnenskiy court of Moscow on April 25. The head of Golos was also personally fined 100,000 rubles (approximately $3,300). Golos appealed the court ruling on May 8. On June 14 the appeals court upheld the ruling of the Presnenskiy Court.
Kostroma Center for Support of Public Initiatives (Kostroma)
According to the protocol from the Kostroma regional prosecutor's office dated April 15, the group conducted a roundtable on United States-Russia relations attended by a US embassy representative. On May 29 a Kostroma court found the group in violation of the "foreign agents" law and fined the group 300,000 rubles (approximately $10,000). The group's leader was also personally fined 100,000 rubles (approximately $3,300). The group appealed the ruling. Court hearings started on July 29 but were postponed until August 12. On August 12 the appeals court upheld the ruling. Following this, on August 13 the group filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court challenging the law on "foreign agents" as violating freedom of association guaranteed by the Russian Constitution.
Anti-Discrimination Center "Memorial" (St. Petersburg)
According to the protocol from the Admiralteyskiy District prosecutor's office of St. Petersburg dated April 30, the group receives foreign funding and published a report on police abuse of Roma, migrants, and civil activists that was presented to the United Nations Committee Against Torture. On May 27 the court returned the case to the prosecutor's office as unsubstantiated. The prosecutor's office sought to overturn the court's ruling, but on June 27 and July 16 higher courts dismissed the prosecutor's appeal. On October 7 the Leninsky District Court again dismissed the prosecutor office's appeal against its director and the organization itself.
"Coming Out" (St. Petersburg)
According to the protocol from the Central District prosecutor's office of St. Petersburg dated April 30, this LGBT rights group receives funding from the Consulate General of the Netherlands and the Embassy of Norway and allegedly engaged in "political activities," in particular by holding a silent rally using the slogans, "We are for traditional values: love, family, respect of human dignity" (organized by independent activists), by organizing a campaign against the adoption of the ban on "homosexual propaganda" in St. Petersburg (notably, the campaign was conducted before the "foreign agents" law came into effect), and by publishing the brochure, "Discrimination of LGBT Individuals: What, How and Why?" Administrative court hearings started on May 27 and were postponed twice until June 19. On June 19 a St. Petersburg court ruled the group had violated the law and fined it 500,000 rubles (approximately $16,500). On June 25 the court also fined the group's director 300,000 rubles (approximately $10,000) for violating the law. The group appealed the court ruling and on July 25 the appeals court vacated the ruling and returned it to the court of first instance for re-examination. On August 14 the appeals court also vacated the ruling to fine the group's director and closed the case against her. On September 27 the St. Petersburg City Court also vacated the ruling to fine the organization itself and closed the case against it by formal reason.
"Side by Side" LGBT Film Festival (St. Petersburg)
According to the protocol from the Central District prosecutor's office of St. Petersburg dated May 6, the group published a brochure titled, "The International LGBT Movement: from Local Practices to Global Politics" and participated in a public awareness-raising campaign, "Let's Stop the Homophobic Bill Together." Notably, the campaign was conducted in 2011, before the "foreign agents" law entered into force. On June 6 a local court in St. Petersburg ruled the group had violated the law and fined it 500,000 rubles (approximately $16,500). The group appealed the court ruling. On July 26 the appeals court upheld it but reduced the size of the fine to 400,000 rubles (approximately $13,000). The ruling entered into force on July 26. On October 4 the St. Petersburg City Court vacated the ruling fining the organization itself and closed the case against it because of the previous verdict's procedure violation.
On August 9 a court also fined Side by Side's director 300,000 rubles (approximately $10,000) for violating the "foreign agents" law, but on November 11 the appeals court vacated this ruling.
Regional Public Association in Defense of Democratic Rights and Freedoms "Golos" (Moscow)
According to the protocol from the Ministry of Justice dated May 13, in December 2012 the group – a member of the "Golos" Association – allegedly received foreign funding of more than 4 million rubles (approximately $133,000) in total and conducted work on the project, "Raising transparency of the Russian electoral process by discussing and promoting a unified Electoral Code." On June 4 a Moscow court ruled the group had violated the law and fined it 300,000 rubles (approximately $10,000). The group appealed the ruling. On September 17 a higher instance court rejected the group's appeal.
Center for Civic Analysis and Independent Research / GRANI (Perm)
According to the protocol from the Perm regional prosecutor's office dated June 6, the inspection of the group's activities in April 2013 revealed violations of the law on "foreign agents."
The group in 2013 received foreign funding of 751,000 rubles (approximately $25,000) and allegedly engaged in "political activities" by shaping public opinion on state policies. In 2013 the group published the results of the study, "Russian non-political activism" conducted in 2012 under a project funded by the C.S. Mott Foundation. In December 2012 the group submitted to the regional legislative assembly proposals for amendments to the draft law on support of socially oriented NGOs in the Perm region, and in January 2013 its leader took part in a round table organized by the Perm Legislative Assembly, which discussed this draft and recommended introducing a set of amendments in line with recommendations by participants. On April 22 the prosecutor's office issued a notice of violations to the group (as noted in section II) instructing it to register as a "foreign agent" NGO. On May 6 the group replied to the notice challenging it and emphasizing that the group's staffers are members of several advisory bodies for the state authorities, including the working group of the federal government's commission on coordinating the "Open Government," the regional governor's council on entrepreneurship, and the collegium of the regional territorial development ministry. On May 16 the group's governing bodies ruled not to implement the prosecutor's orders, as GRANI's activities are aimed not at changing state policy but at facilitating its implementation as regards the rights and freedoms enshrined in Russia's constitution. Once informed of the group's decision, the prosecutor's office concluded that the group was in persistent violation of the law on "foreign agents" and referred the case to court. Administrative court hearings started on July 5 and were postponed until July 17. On July 17 the court quashed the case. On July 25 the prosecutor's office appealed to overturn the court ruling, but on August 14 the appeals court upheld it. On September 18 the Perm regional court dismissed the prosecutor's appeal.
Perm Civic Chamber (Perm)
According to the protocol from the Perm regional prosecutor's office dated June 28, the April 2013 inspection of the group's activities found violations of the law on "foreign agents."
The group's work is mostly financed from foreign sources. For example, in 2011 it received a grant from a foreign donor for the project "Perm United Service for Support of Non-Profit Groups and Organizations." The group is also a partner in the project "Protection of the Right to Information in the Perm Region" implemented by the Perm Regional Human Rights Center and financed by the UN Democracy Fund. The prosecutor's office stated that an analysis of grant agreements, reports on project implementation, and other information on the group's activity showed that foreign organizations fund the group's participation in political activity in the Russian Federation. The prosecutor's office also said the center's involvement in "political activity" is also established by the fact that its members shape public opinion on state policies by publishing material that is available to a wide audience on the Internet. The prosecutor's office cited as an example the fact that in February 2013 a member of the Perm Civic Chamber, Igor Averkiev, published news of his withdrawal from the Political Council of the Perm region's governor on the Internet and it contained criticism of this body's activity. Previously, on April 25, the prosecutor's office issued a notice of violations to the group (as noted below in Section II) instructing it to register as a "foreign agent" NGO. After the group publicly declared that it will not implement the prosecutor's orders, the prosecutor's office concluded that the group was in persistent violation of the law on "foreign agents" and referred the case to court. At a hearing held on July 17 the court quashed the case. On July 25 the prosecutor's office appealed to overturn the court ruling, but on September 5 the appeals court upheld the ruling. On October 14 the Perm regional court dismissed the prosecutor's appeal.
Perm Regional Human Rights Center (Perm)
According to the protocol from the Perm regional prosecutor's office dated July 2, the inspection of the group's activities in April 2013 revealed violations of the law on "foreign agents."
The group's activity is mostly financed from foreign sources: from 2010 to 2012 it received 5.6 million rubles (approximately $175,000) from international and foreign organizations for various projects. In January 2013 the group received a donation from the UN Democracy Fund for the project "Protection of the Right to Information in the Perm Region," aimed at improving transparency of state and municipal authorities. The prosecutor's office stated that an analysis of grant agreements, reports on projects implementation, and other information on the group's activity shows that foreign organizations fund the group's participation in political activity in the Russian Federation. The prosecutor's office said the center's involvement in "political activity" is also established by the fact that its members shape public opinion on state policies by publishing material that is available to a wide audience on the Internet. Examples of the latter cited by the prosecutor's office werePerm at a Crossroads:The Little Man in the Stream of Reform, a book published by the center in March 2013, and articles, "Perm under the reformers' bombardment" and "Komi-Permyaks – look from the abyss." Previously, on April 25 the prosecutor's office issued a notice of violations to the group (as noted below in Section II) instructing it to register as a "foreign agent" NGO. On May 27 the center's governing bodies ruled not to implement the prosecutor's orders, as the group's activities under the UN-funded project cannot be considered political. Once informed of the group's decision, the prosecutor's office concluded that the group was in persistent violation of the law on "foreign agents" and referred the case to court. On July 18 a court quashed the case against the center. In late July the prosecutor's office appealed to overturn the court ruling, but on August 23 the appeals court upheld the ruling. On October 14 the Perm regional court dismissed the prosecutor's appeal.
IV. Official Notices of Violations - 18 NGOs
The groups below received official orders to "eliminate violations," i.e. direct orders by the prosecutor's office to register as "foreign agents" within one month of their respective dates of notice.
Center for Civic Analysis and Independent Research / GRANI (Perm)
A case was referred to court for alleged persistent refusal by the organization to comply with the "foreign agents" law (for details, please see section III). The group challenged the notice and lodged a judicial appeal on June 7. Court hearings started on July 1 but were postponed until July 11. On July 11 the court further postponed the hearings until there has been a ruling in the administrative case against the group. On November 11 the court quashed the notice.
Baikal Environmental Wave (Irkutsk)
According to a notice issued by the prosecutor's office dated April 23, the group's statue provides for "active advocacy on environmental issues with state and municipal authorities," which constitutes "political activity" within the meaning of the law. The group filed a written objection to the notice with the regional level prosecutor's office, but on July 18 the prosecutor's office upheld it. The group then lodged a judicial appeal. Court hearings started on September 9 but were postponed until October 16. On October 16 the Kirovsky district court of Irkutsk dismissed the group's appeal.
Center for Social Policy and Gender Studies (Saratov)
According to the notice dated April 24, both the group's statute provisions and its current work relate to "political activities." In April 2013 the group, which receives foreign funding, organized the event, "Review of the social policy in the post-Soviet area: ideologies, actors and cultures" and published the book, Critical Analysis of Social Policy in the Countries of Former Soviet Union, thereby aiming to influence public opinion. On June 25 the group filed a motivated written objection to the notice with the prosecutor's office.
Information and Human Rights Center (Yekaterinburg)
According to the notice dated April 26, the group receives foreign funding and participates in "political activities" through carrying out projects aimed at "overcoming totalitarian stereotypes by influencing public opinion with awareness-raising activities, facilitating the establishment of the rule of law by informing citizens about constitutional norms, ensuring the priority of individual rights in state practices and public life by remembrance of terror victims in the past and defending the rights of citizens in the present, as well as countering violent, unlawful, totalitarian ways of ruling the state by organizing public events (rallies, exhibitions, etc.)." Also, in September 2012, the group conducted a round table on the rights of conscripts and military servicemen, addressing a set of recommendations to the Ministry of Defense and the government and therefore trying to influence governmental policies in this area. The group challenged the prosecutor's notice of violations and lodged a judicial appeal on September 30. On November 20, a local court quashed the notice of violations.
Regional Public Association in Defense of Democratic Rights and Freedoms "Golos" (Moscow)
The prosecutor's office issued a "notice of violations" to the group on April 26. On May 27 the group appealed the notice to the courts. The court hearings were scheduled for June 25 but were postponed twice. On July 10 the court upheld the notice of violations. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Justice opened an administrative case against the group before the expiration of a one-month period given by the prosecutor to "eliminate the violations" listed in the notice (for details, please see Section III).
Human Rights Center "Memorial" (Moscow)
According to the notice dated April 29, some of group's objectives in its statute relate to "political activity" and the group also carries out programs and projects that monitor politically motivated administrative detentions and criminal prosecutions. The organization challenged the legality of their inspection by the Moscow prosecutor's office in March 2013 and lodged a judicial appeal. On May 24 the Zamoskvoretsky District Court of Moscow rejected the complaint by "Memorial" as ungrounded. The group challenged the prosecutor's notice of violations and lodged a judicial appeal on May 28. Court hearings were scheduled for June 28 but have been postponed three times until November 18. On November 18 the court satisfied the group's motion to postpone the hearings until either the Constitutional Court delivers its judgment on the compliance of the law on "foreign agents" with Russia's Constitution or the joint NGO application to the European Court of Human Rights is communicated to the Russian authorities. Hearings are preliminarily scheduled to resume on February 4, 2014.
"Women of Don" (Novocherkassk)
According to the notice dated April 29, after the law on "foreign agents" entered into force, the group received foreign funding and "carried out activities aimed at shaping public opinion and influencing decision-making by the authorities through conducting events with public participation, publishing propaganda information materials online, as well as [doing so] in the course of private meetings with imprisoned individuals." Thus, the group published on its website policy proposals on police reform and conclusions on the ineffectiveness of current state policy in this field. In April 2013 the group organized an inter-regional seminar attended by the media, the participants of which declared a detention of an NGO leader in Krasnodar unlawful, opened for signing a petition in his support, and addressed an appeal to the Russian President, as well as "expressed negative attitudes regarding the activities of state authorities and highlighted the necessity to solve problems [independently] without appealing to competent governmental agencies." Also, in April 2013 the prosecutor's office received a letter from an imprisoned individual who stated that while meeting with him in her capacity as a Public Oversight Commission member, the group's leader "called him for active actions in support of the group's activities on changing the legislation regulating the penitentiary system."
On July 20 the group's governing bodies ruled not to implement the prosecutor's order to register as a "foreign agent," as it was not involved in any "political activities."
Center for Support of Democratic Youth Initiatives / Youth "Memorial" (Perm)
According to the notice dated April 29,
the group's statute objectives include defending the political rights of youth. The organization aspires to influence public opinion with regard to governmental policies and receives funding from the US-based National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for a project aimed at "developing democratic activism among Russian youth." The group also implements a project on human rights education funded by the Germany-based "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future" Foundation (EVZ) and published a collection of articles expressing political views of the project's participants. According to the prosecutor's office, both donor institutions "define their objective as influencing political processes worldwide." Moreover, in 2012 the group conducted activities aimed at monitoring rights violations in the military and providing direct assistance to conscripts and military servicemen who suffered abuse. The authorities also flag that the very fact that the organization is well known for promoting the alternative civil service proves that its work relates to "political activities." The group challenged the prosecutor's notice of violations and lodged a judicial appeal. Court hearings started on August 6 but were postponed twice until November 27.
Interregional Human Rights Association "AGORA" (Kazan)
According to the notice dated April 30, the group implements a project on Internet freedom funded by Internews, supporting "activities of lawyers capable of influencing policy and law enforcement practice" and aiming at "adoption of regulations on administrative procedures for implementing the law on Internet by the government and the State Agency for Supervision of Communications [Roskomnadzor]." The notice also flags that the group is accredited by the Ministry of Justice as an independent expert entity authorized to conduct anticorruption evaluation of legal acts and their drafts.
"Panorama" Center (Moscow)
According to the notice dated May 6, the group implements a foreign-funded research project on political processes, which involves holding roundtables and discussions and publishing information regarding the drawbacks of current legislation and the evolvement of public protests in Russia. On June 6 the group's governing bodies ruled not to implement the prosecutor's order to register as a "foreign agent," as it was not involved in any "political activities," and filed a written objection to the notice with the prosecutor's office.
"Lawyers for Constitutional Rights and Freedoms" / JURIX (Moscow)
According to the notice dated May 7, the group's statute provides for carrying out various activities "in the field of law and public policy."
The group receives foreign funding and its staff members participated in the advocacy campaign against the adoption of a ban on "homosexual propaganda" in St. Petersburg, including by providing legal expertise on the draft law and taking part in the public hearings at the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg as well as televised debates on the issue. The group filed a written objection to the notice with the prosecutor's office, who rejected the appeal on August 7. The group then lodged a judicial appeal to challenge the notice. Court hearings started on November 18, but the court satisfied the group's motion to postpone the hearings until either the Constitutional Court delivers its judgment on the compliance of the law on "foreign agents" with Russia's Constitution or the joint NGO application to the European Court on Human Rights is communicated to the Russian authorities. Hearings are preliminarily scheduled to resume on February 4, 2014.
"Public Verdict" Foundation(Moscow)
According to the notice dated May 8,
the group carries out political activities, which are mostly financed from foreign sources. In the view of the prosecutor's office, the group's activity "is aimed at interfering with governmental policy in the field of law enforcement by proposing legislative amendments, shaping public opinion on the necessity of changing law enforcement policy currently exercised by the authorities, and gaining public support for its actions aimed at exhorting greater influence on the authorities." The prosecutors consider the following actions as examples of the group's "political activities": "involving society in discussing the reform of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, monitoring citizens' rights observance while conducting public events, providing legal assistance to the individuals accused under the 'Bolotnaya case,' preparing and coordinating the work on drafting the Alternative NGO Report to the UN Committee against Torture [on Russia's compliance with the UN Convention against Torture]," offering "recommendations to participants of public protests regarding [appropriate] behavior at the rallies," and "organizing and supporting campaigns of petitions to state authorities." The group challenged the prosecutor's notice of violations and lodged a judicial appeal on June 13. Court hearings were scheduled for June 28, but have been postponed three times until November 18. On November 18 the court satisfied the group's motion to postpone the hearings until either the Constitutional Court delivers its judgment on the compliance of the law on "foreign agents" with Russia's Constitution or the joint NGO application to the European Court on Human Rights is communicated to the Russian authorities. Hearings are preliminarily scheduled to resume on February 4, 2014.
Independent Council of Legal Expertise / NEPS (Moscow)
According to the notice dated May 6, the group's work is related to "political activities" and it should register as a "foreign agent" NGO.
Moscow School of Political Studies (Moscow)
According to a notice dated May 8, the group's work is related to "political activities" and must register as a "foreign agent" NGO.
Yaroslavl Regional Hunters' and Fishermen Society (Yaroslavl)
According to the notice dated April 16, some of the provisions in the group's statute relate to "political activity" and it should register as a "foreign agent" NGO. :thumb:
Russia: "Foreign Agents" Law Hits Hundreds of NGOs: Updated November 29, 2013 | Human Rights Watch
Russia: "Foreign Agents" Law Hits Hundreds of NGOs: Updated November 29, 2013 | Human Rights Watch