IndianHawk
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 9,058
- Likes
- 37,675
We are building our own destroyers . Then why are we buying imported frigates.?????
Political reasons, to get Russia out of a mess.We are building our own destroyers . Then why are we buying imported frigates.?????
much more than that probably include some tech transfer on some other sensitive projectsPolitical reasons, to get Russia out of a mess.
Yes, very much a possibility. Im thinkin about the Indian SSN programme in design/development stage.much more than that probably include some tech transfer on some other sensitive projects
Often a Ship or an Aircraft or even a Vehicle are designed around a specific engine in mind. If it was possible India would have opted for GE engines instead of Ukranian at design stage. Now coming to why Kirloskar or Tata cannot design it? They have to start making Gas turbines first. The only company of whom I have some hope that they would spend some money on R&D in Turbines is Kalyani.can Indian companies like Kirloskar make such engines & propulsion systems ??
why Big Indian companies are not Investing in such technologies ?
We are building our own destroyers . Then why are we buying imported frigates.?????
Political reasons, to get Russia out of a mess.
This can be the ONLY justifiable reason, no matter how poorly Russia performs for India they keep getting these "bones" tossed to them. The Ka-226 deal is a prime example- it's not wanted/needed by the IA/IAF, is more expensive than its competitors and it isn't even ordered yet but still the GoI persists with the deal/much more than that probably include some tech transfer on some other sensitive projects
Navy required new vessels fast but most dock running behind time and these were almost complete and plus they have some good ASW capability and plus there some deals for ToT which can be used for next batch of shipsWe are building our own destroyers . Then why are we buying imported frigates.?????
Nah, this isn't required, the P-17As are fully designed and work will begin before any such ToT would be transfered, there's no need for the ToT for a ship inferior to the P-17A by every metric.plus there some deals for ToT which can be used for next batch of ships
Offtopic, but there was an old Chinese member @niceguy, who used to prefix and suffix his posts with LOL. It was hilarious.LOL....Just like China is not building but assembling stolen parts....LOL
<Others>Add "LOL" at the start and also at the end of each reply to 50 cent chinese farts. So that they are able to process it </Others>
Project 17A is yet to start construction (should start this year) the launch is in 2020 .It will be divided into batch of certain no of ships .The 1st batch will not benifit much from ToT but the 2nd batch willNah, this isn't required, the P-17As are fully designed and work will begin before any such ToT would be transfered, there's no need for the ToT for a ship inferior to the P-17A by every metric.
Yes but specifically, what tech will be useful for the P-17As? As I said, the P-17As would be superior in every way. It would be like saying ToT for a Hindustan Ambasador would be useful when making a La Ferrari.Project 17A is yet to start construction (should start this year) the launch is in 2020 .It will be divided into batch of certain no of ships .The 1st batch will not benifit much from ToT but the 2nd batch will
Thats the first lesson on syntax that most Chinese bots learnt from their famous - a le-education camp hot favorite - AaoMaoGook Led Book publishing company's "How to tloll on intelnet folOfftopic, but there was an old Chinese member @niceguy, who used to prefix and suffix his posts with LOL. It was hilarious.
Doesn't BHEL make Gas Turbines for elect power generation ? There should be expertise there to design and manufacture GTs for other applications. I expect that it is a question of an individual or group taking the initiative and having backing from Gov't / DRDO / Armed forces etc !?Often a Ship or an Aircraft or even a Vehicle are designed around a specific engine in mind. If it was possible India would have opted for GE engines instead of Ukranian at design stage. Now coming to why Kirloskar or Tata cannot design it? They have to start making Gas turbines first. The only company of whom I have some hope that they would spend some money on R&D in Turbines is Kalyani.
BHEL "makes" gas turbines, just as HAL "makes" turbofansDoesn't BHEL make Gas Turbines for elect power generation ? There should be expertise there to design and manufacture GTs for other applications. I expect that it is a question of an individual or group taking the initiative and having backing from Gov't / DRDO / Armed forces etc !?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | Talks on for building 3 More Talwars | Indian Navy | 49 | |
CCP seeks its own Apollo moment – and more | China | 0 | ||
R | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Talks To Tucker Carlson About Secret Service, Neocons, Assassinations & More | Europe and Russia | 0 | |
W | 75 more J 10 C fighter for Pakistan Air Force | Pakistan | 0 |