Military Formations

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,834
Nothing new.

The Ops of War 'Withdrawal' is more organised than that.

Sadly, it is no longer practised or taught in the IA.

It is a very effective way to ensure that a withdrawal does not turn into rout and once a strategic line of defence is achieved, the enemy is halted and own forces go into offensive.

Leap frogging is what is done at every level of tactical formation - Fire and Move.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Dont know how historically correct this battle is but I liked this movie when I saw it on Star Movies a year ago.
Must have been really scary to be in the 1st line
From Mel Gibson's "The Patriot" I think. The Continentals lost the Battle of Camden but won at Cowpens and besieged the British at Yorktown with help of the French fleet. General Cornwallis made his second in command actually perform the surrender.

Siege of Yorktown - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
In infantry tactics, leapfrogging (also called The Buddy System) is a technique for advancing personnel and/or equipment on or past a target area being defended by an opposing force. This technique is taught in U.S. Army Basic Training and reinforced with all unit and advanced training throughout a soldier's career. It can be modified for use with equipment as well as personnel.
FM3-21.11 Chapter 3
3-1. TACTICAL MOVEMENT AND ENEMY CONTACT

Do not confuse movement with maneuver. Maneuver is defined as movement supported by fire to gain a position of advantage over the enemy. At company level, there is considerable overlap between the two. Tactical movement differs from maneuver, however, in that maneuver is movement while in contact, but tactical movement is movement in preparation for contact. The process by which units transition from tactical movement to maneuver is called "actions on contact." Actions on contact are covered in Section IV of Chapter 4. Figure 3-1, illustrates the relationship between movement techniques (traveling, traveling overwatch, and bounding overwatch), the possibility of enemy contact, and transition to maneuver.


Figure 3-1. Transition from movement techniques to maneuver.
 

ALBY

Section Moderator
Mod
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
3,511
Likes
6,768
Country flag
THE BATTLE OF CANNAE

Fought in the summer of 216 BC between the forces of the Carthaginian general Hannibal and a Roman army under the dual command of Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terrentius Varro. The battle of Cannae was to be Hannibal's finest hour and the worst defeat ever suffered by Roman arms.

After a miraculous crossing of Italy's northern alps Hannibal's army comprising a mixture of Gaul's, Spaniard's, Numidian's, Celt's and Carthaginian's proceeded into the interior of the country easily defeating Roman forces at the battles of the Ticinus and Trebia rivers in 218 BC. Continuing southward Hannibal then defeated a Roman army sent against him at lake Trasimenus in 217 BC.

In an attempt to convert Rome's allies to his cause, Hannibal choose to bypass the capital city of Rome and ravage the countryside where he came up against yet another Roman army barring his passage at Cannae. Hannibal carefully studied the situation and had some misgivings for this Roman army was double in size to any other he had yet encountered.

The field at Cannae was flat and wide open, the two opposing armies would have no surprises to offer one another. Hannibal, with an army of 45,000 men (35,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry) would face a much larger Roman army numbering 80,000 men (75,000 infantry and 5,000 cavalry).

Both Roman commanders Paullus and Varro, had agreed before hand that each would command the army one day in turn, it was on the day of battle that Varro would find himself in overall command. Varro decided the Romans would utilize their overwhelming superiority in numbers to attack and crush Hannibal's center

On the Roman right flank stood the Roman cavalry 3000 strong which faced Hannibal's Celts and ced Hannibal's Celts and Spaniards numbering 7,000 horseman. On the Roman left flank were some 2000 cavalry supplied by Rome's allies which were opposed by Hannibal's 3,000 Numidian cavalry.

Varro formed up his infantry into three extremely deep lines so as to bring their full weight to bear on Hannibal's center. Hannibal's infantry line was convex in formation protruding outward towards the Romans with the wings bending back from the Carthaginian center.

Hannibal placed his African infantry on the corners of this convex formation to be sure these forces would not be engaged in the battle to soon, he then formed up his cavalry on the outer flanks of the African infantry.

Although puzzled by this formation Varro was still confident in that before him stood a motley collection of mercenaries representing over five different nationalities. This was an army that fought solely for pay, the Romans were fighting for their very homeland against an invader.

Adding to Varro's overconfidence was that under his command was the largest army Rome had ever put into the field. Varro thus believed that his superiority in numbers combined with a massive frontal attack would punch through Hannibal's center and would easily win the day for Rome. Varro thus ordered his troops to advance.
The entire Roman army now lumbered forward, as they came within range of their foe they hurled their javelins into the front ranks of the enemy causing heavy casualties. The Romans then unsheathed their swords and the two infantry lines collided. The weight of the Roman attack on the Carthaginian center soon began to achieve its main goal as Hannibal's line began to fall back so as to straighten and then slowly recede into the shape of a concave line.

Believing that Hannibal's front line was in retreat and about to break, Varro continued pouring his forces into the concave. Hannibal now ordered his African troops on his flanks to move forward and form a line along the side the Roman attack. As the Romans continued to advance they began to lose cohesion and mobility as their ranks became more and more constricted.

Hannibal now ordered both his cavalry wings forward to attack the cavalry formations protecting the Roman flanks. The Roman horseman were easily driven from the battle field leaving Paullus wounded and dying. Meanwhile on the Carthaginian right the Numidian's and the cavalry of Rome's allies were engaged in fierce combat with neither gaining an advantage.

After chasing the Roman horseman from the battle field Hannibal's left wing cavalry commander Hasdrubal, reorganized his cavalry and charged across the battle field to strike Rome's allied cavalry from the rear.
These horseman would quickly find themselves caught between the two Carthaginian forces and chose to give up the fight and flee, taking the Roman commander Varro with them. With Paullus dead or dying and Varro now absent the Roman army found itself leaderless and without overall command at a critical moment in the battle.

By this time the Roman's had advanced deeper into the concave with the rear infantry ranks continually pushing forward against the backs of their comrades. As the Romans continued blindly onward they became confined and packed together within an ever shrinking area. As a result they lost the ability to maneuver or use their weapons effectively.

Hannibal's African infantry forming on the sides of the Roman attack now began to turn inward constricting the Roman infantry further. Hasdrubal reformed his cavalry once again and began to attack the Roman's from their rear. The Roman army was now totally encircled with every Roman now fighting for his very survival.

The Roman pocket was slowly reduced in size as tens of thousands were slain. When the slaughter was finally over the Roman army which started the battle with such high expectations of overall victory, had been utterly annihilated.

The Carthaginian victory at Cannae marked the apex of Hannibal's military carrier. 50,000 Roman's now lay dead, with 20,000 others taken prisoner and 10,000 barely escaping with their lives. Carthaginian losses numbered a mere 6,000 men.

The war however would continue for another fourteen years until Hannibal's recall to defend Carthage itself culminating in Hannibal's complete defeat at the battle of Zama in 202 BC which would end the war in absolute victory for Rome.

After the war Hannibal's rise in Carthaginian politics was feared by the Roman's and he was forced to flee. When the Roman's caught up with him in 183 BC, he committed suicide rather than surrender.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

civfanatic

Retired
Ambassador
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,562
Likes
2,570
The Spartans, for whatever reason, are incredibly overrated, to the point where they are well-known only for the battles which they LOST. At Thermopylae there were at least 7,000 other Greeks along with the Spartans (probably much more). The Greek historians are well-known to exaggerate battles, especially the size of the enemy forces and the disparity between them and the enemy, to make their victories (or defeats) seem more glorious. I don't know who Herodotus thought he was kidding when he said the Persians had over 2 million men at Thermopylae; the limited technology of the time would make fielding such an army a logistical impossibility. Unfortunately there are no surviving Persian accounts of the battle, so we may never have a clear picture of what actually happened.

If the Spartans are the most overrated of the Greek armies, then the Thebans are undoubtedly the most underrated. In 371 B.C.E. they decisively defeated a larger force of Spartans through clever use of an "echelon" formation (see Battle of Leuctra). While the Spartans used the standard Greek phalanx, with a fairly uniform distribution meant to optimize depth and width and the best troops located in the right flank, the Thebans at Leuctra concentrated more of their troops in their right flank while advancing in a staggered manner, such that the powerful Theban right flank engaged and destroyed the elite Spartan troops in a concentrated attack..

The diagram below illustrates the standard Greek phalanx (above) compared to the staggered echelon used by the Thebans at Leuctra (below). The red indicates a concentration of elite troops.



Of course, the true military champions of Greece were neither the Spartans nor the Thebans but the Macedonians under Phillip and his son Alexander.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top