Main Battle Tanks and Armour Technology

If Tanks have to evolve, which path they should follow?

  • Light Vehicles-Best for mobility

    Votes: 24 7.1%
  • Heavy Armour-Can take heavy punishment.

    Votes: 57 16.9%
  • Modular Design-Allowing dynamic adaptions.

    Votes: 198 58.6%
  • Universal Platform-Best for logistics.

    Votes: 59 17.5%

  • Total voters
    338

BON PLAN

-*-
Contributor
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
6,339
Likes
6,841
Country flag
you can consider a prototype but all in all I'd prefer a comparison of the four
The bigger the gun is (and not comparing a modern gun with a ww2 one of course...) the higher energy it has.
The longer the rod is, the higher energy it gave to the bullet.
 

Blood+

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
2,267
Likes
3,582
Country flag
Chinese VN-20 infantry fighting vehicle seems to be a mixed bag. It's a beast in terms of tonnage and armament compared to the western IFVs, but seems a bit unwieldy for its role.



Check this analysis out:

Let's be real here, its armor will be just as useless as that of any other IFVs against the weapons it'd expected to be facing such as RCL guns and ATGMs or even tanks. A STANAG Level VI is gonna be just vulnerable as IV.
 

Bleh

Laughing member
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
5,985
Likes
25,367
Country flag
Check out the image below. I have circled the external component of the Shtora ECM system on a Russian tank. Can't find any similar images of Indian T-90S tanks. Pickleball Opinion
Indian T-90s don't have shtora.. it's replaced by ERA tiles.

PS: there's no image attached & noone cares about gay-tennis
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top