Lula wins Brazilian Presedential Elections

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,243
Likes
55,890
Country flag
Quoting The Hindu
Brazil’s Lula defeats Bolsonaro to win Presidency again in stunning comeback
Brazil’s veteran leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was elected president Sunday, beating his far-right rival in a down-to-the-wire poll
Brazil’s former President and presidential candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva speaks at an election night gathering on the day of the Brazilian presidential election run-off, in Sao Paulo, Brazil on October 30, 2022. | Photo Credit: Reuters
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil’s new President

Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on October 30 defeated incumbent Jair Bolsonaro in an election that marked a stunning comeback for the leftist leader and the end of the country’s most right-wing government in decades.

Mr. Lula had 50.8% of votes compared with 49.2% for Mr. Bolsonaro with 99.1% of voting machines counted, which the Supreme Electoral Court said was enough to “mathematically define” the outcome of the race.
The vote was a rebuke for the fiery far-right populism of Mr. Bolsonaro, who emerged from the back benches of Congress to forge a novel conservative coalition but lost support as Brazil ran up one of the worst death tolls of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mr. Lula called for “peace and unity” Sunday in bitterly divided Brazil, saying the country was no longer an international pariah, and highlighting the need for a “living Amazon”.

In his victory speech, Mr. Lula reached out to supporters and rivals alike, highlighting the need for “a Brazil of peace, democracy, and opportunity.”

He touched on gender and racial equality and the urgent need to deal with a hunger crisis affecting 33.1 million Brazilians.

“The wheel of the economy will turn again,” he promised.


‘Earth needs a living Amazon’
“It is in no one’s interest to live in a divided nation in a permanent state of war,” the 77-year-old said. “This country needs peace and unity. This population doesn’t want to fight anymore.”

“Today we tell the world that Brazil is back. It is too big to be banished to this sad role of global pariah.”

All eyes in western capitals have been on the outcome of the election, with the future of the Amazon rainforest and its impact on the global climate emergency at stake.

The issue took a backseat in an election dominated by personal attacks and economical concerns.

“Brazil is ready to take back its role in the fight against the climate crisis, protecting all of our biomes, especially the Amazon forest,” said Mr. Lula. “Brazil and the planet need a living Amazon.”

‘Pink’ wave
French President Emmanuel Macron congratulated Mr. Lula adding in a Twitter post that the two leaders would “renew ties of friendship between their countries”.

U.S. President Joe Biden on Sunday congratulated the Brazilian President-elect for his victory in “free, fair and credible elections,” in a statement adding that he looks forward to continued cooperation between the countries.

Supporters of Brazil’s former president and presidential candidate Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva react as they gather on the day of the Brazilian presidential election run-off, in Brasilia, Brazil on October 30, 2022. | Photo Credit: Reuters
His victory consolidates a new “pink tide” in Latin America, after landmark leftist victories in Colombia and Chile’s elections, echoing a regional political shift two decades ago that introduced Mr. Lula to the world stage.

A former union leader born into poverty, Mr. Lula organized strikes against Brazil’s military government in the 1970s. His two-term presidency was marked by a commodity-driven economic boom and he left office with record popularity.

However, his Workers Party was later tarred by a deep recession and a record-breaking corruption scandal that jailed him for 19 months on bribery convictions, which were overturned by the Supreme Court last year.

In his third term, Mr. Lula will confront a sluggish economy, tighter budget constraints and a more hostile legislature. Mr. Bolsonaro’s allies form the largest bloc in Congress after this month’s general election revealed the enduring strength of his conservative coalition.

Mr. Bolsonaro has repeatedly made baseless claims of electoral fraud and last year openly discussed refusing to accept the results of the vote. Electoral authorities are bracing for him to dispute the outcome, sources told Reuters, including security preparations in case his supporters take to the streets.

Voting is electronic and the results were announced within two hours of polling stations closing at 5 p.m. (2000 GMT).

Mr. Lula will take office on January 1.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,213
Country flag
Quoting The Hindu
Brazil’s Lula defeats Bolsonaro to win Presidency again in stunning comeback
Brazil’s veteran leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was elected president Sunday, beating his far-right rival in a down-to-the-wire poll
Brazil’s former President and presidential candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva speaks at an election night gathering on the day of the Brazilian presidential election run-off, in Sao Paulo, Brazil on October 30, 2022. | Photo Credit: Reuters
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil’s new President

Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on October 30 defeated incumbent Jair Bolsonaro in an election that marked a stunning comeback for the leftist leader and the end of the country’s most right-wing government in decades.

Mr. Lula had 50.8% of votes compared with 49.2% for Mr. Bolsonaro with 99.1% of voting machines counted, which the Supreme Electoral Court said was enough to “mathematically define” the outcome of the race.
The vote was a rebuke for the fiery far-right populism of Mr. Bolsonaro, who emerged from the back benches of Congress to forge a novel conservative coalition but lost support as Brazil ran up one of the worst death tolls of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mr. Lula called for “peace and unity” Sunday in bitterly divided Brazil, saying the country was no longer an international pariah, and highlighting the need for a “living Amazon”.

In his victory speech, Mr. Lula reached out to supporters and rivals alike, highlighting the need for “a Brazil of peace, democracy, and opportunity.”

He touched on gender and racial equality and the urgent need to deal with a hunger crisis affecting 33.1 million Brazilians.

“The wheel of the economy will turn again,” he promised.


‘Earth needs a living Amazon’
“It is in no one’s interest to live in a divided nation in a permanent state of war,” the 77-year-old said. “This country needs peace and unity. This population doesn’t want to fight anymore.”

“Today we tell the world that Brazil is back. It is too big to be banished to this sad role of global pariah.”

All eyes in western capitals have been on the outcome of the election, with the future of the Amazon rainforest and its impact on the global climate emergency at stake.

The issue took a backseat in an election dominated by personal attacks and economical concerns.

“Brazil is ready to take back its role in the fight against the climate crisis, protecting all of our biomes, especially the Amazon forest,” said Mr. Lula. “Brazil and the planet need a living Amazon.”

‘Pink’ wave
French President Emmanuel Macron congratulated Mr. Lula adding in a Twitter post that the two leaders would “renew ties of friendship between their countries”.

U.S. President Joe Biden on Sunday congratulated the Brazilian President-elect for his victory in “free, fair and credible elections,” in a statement adding that he looks forward to continued cooperation between the countries.

Supporters of Brazil’s former president and presidential candidate Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva react as they gather on the day of the Brazilian presidential election run-off, in Brasilia, Brazil on October 30, 2022. | Photo Credit: Reuters
His victory consolidates a new “pink tide” in Latin America, after landmark leftist victories in Colombia and Chile’s elections, echoing a regional political shift two decades ago that introduced Mr. Lula to the world stage.

A former union leader born into poverty, Mr. Lula organized strikes against Brazil’s military government in the 1970s. His two-term presidency was marked by a commodity-driven economic boom and he left office with record popularity.

However, his Workers Party was later tarred by a deep recession and a record-breaking corruption scandal that jailed him for 19 months on bribery convictions, which were overturned by the Supreme Court last year.

In his third term, Mr. Lula will confront a sluggish economy, tighter budget constraints and a more hostile legislature. Mr. Bolsonaro’s allies form the largest bloc in Congress after this month’s general election revealed the enduring strength of his conservative coalition.

Mr. Bolsonaro has repeatedly made baseless claims of electoral fraud and last year openly discussed refusing to accept the results of the vote. Electoral authorities are bracing for him to dispute the outcome, sources told Reuters, including security preparations in case his supporters take to the streets.

Voting is electronic and the results were announced within two hours of polling stations closing at 5 p.m. (2000 GMT).

Mr. Lula will take office on January 1.
Lula is a US-skeptic. This election will definitely upset the CIA.
 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
3,795
Likes
19,403
Country flag
Lula is a US-skeptic. This election will definitely upset the CIA.
Well Lula was originally anti-anglosphere back in those times and very pro-russia - but he also turned politically weak since supposedly right wing party won elections and so; this time he is getting lots of backing (in monetary terms as well) from same anglosphere because they are angry at Bolsonaro for not toeing their line. This flip-flop opportunist chhap situation is why many people are not trusting him despite their disapproval of Bolsonaro.
 

IBSA

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
1,155
Likes
1,596
Country flag
Lula begun his political career as a workers' syndicalist leader of metallurgic sector leading strikes in the 80's years at the last days of military rule. It were this trajectory who given to Lula his image of the workers' candidate, reforced by his poor origin in countryside and migrant life to São Paulo City in seek to better life conditions. So, Brazil redemocratize itself, and Lula run for President in the nexts election arriving to victory in 2002 and 2006. In that two terms Lula represented the rising of worker class to the power.

But Brazil deindustrialized since then, and without industries the worker class also perished. The Lula III dont was elected by the workers vote, but by the votes of the lumpen class, which born due to the growing impoverishment of the urban people, that class of all sorts of social scum, robbers, beggars, prostictutes, trash collectors, street dwellers, etc., so Lula now represents the political rising of the lumpens.

This permanent unemployed mass gained economic assistence of gov during the pandemics and now elected their representants so none opposition's politicist try to cut off their benefits, that will be funded by the taxpayers, that is, the workers of a diminuted middle class. The riches basically dont pay taxes because if a politic try to tax them, they stop to donate money to his campaign and the system overthrow him.
 

IBSA

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
1,155
Likes
1,596
Country flag
Brazil is divided in five regions (North, Northeast, Center-West, Southeast and South). Bolsonaro won in 4 of 5 regions, including in Southeast, the most populated of country, while Lula only won in one region, the Northeast, the second most populated region and his traditional political basis, where Lula born, and even this way Lula won the national election. This is strange, isn't?

1667624409822.png
 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
3,795
Likes
19,403
Country flag
Brazil is divided in five regions (North, Northeast, Center-West, Southeast and South). Bolsonaro won in 4 of 5 regions, including in Southeast, the most populated of country, while Lula only won in one region, the Northeast, the second most populated region and his traditional political basis, where Lula born, and even this way Lula won the national election. This is strange, isn't?

View attachment 180431
You think....probably american voting machines are responsible ?
Why do you people even use american voting machines to start with ? i looked in wikipedia and found in past there were lots of electronics companies in past there making first and second generation personal computers (clones of zx spectrum etc but still) there and even now there are these active companies






this is more than enough to make your own voting machines.

Here in India we use our own EVM that employs write-one type ROM in it so once votes are recorded you cannot temper with it, besides our EVMs are just very basic electronic recorders without any sort of external connectivity in it, comprised of two units - "ballot unit" showing list of candidates and buttons for each, and "control unit" having main circuitry - nowadays we have started adding additional simple printer with a window on it that drops printout of the candidate you voted as a ;proof; thing to voters that their vote indeed had gone to their desired candidate; later these printouts are also accounted for during final evaluation to be sure of fair voting.
for more info refer to this,

in past we used to deploy traditional paper based ballots and manual counting but obviously it resulted in lots of malpractices with goons of politicians tempering with it by stuffing their votes, stealing opposite candidates' votes and what not.
with EVM we have grossly reduced this sort of malpractices here as tempering with it is damn hard (of course unless you deploy booth capturing and such malpractices, there is also concerns with replacing ;control unit; with pre-filled votes - but these things are damn rare)

apart from EVM - our election comission here is a constitutional body itself made independent from usual government interfering

So what is status of voting machines and election conductors in Brasil ?
 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
3,795
Likes
19,403
Country flag
@IBSA do keep us posted on Brazil economy post Lula win.

curious to know what happens when a LW govt takes over from a RW in current global circumstances.

more over Lula govt will get a free pass on many things by western liberal MSM.
It would be interesting to see how he and his govt responds to BRICS now, though he was originally supportive of that in past (when he used to be pro-russia etc) but since he got this win from ;patronage; of the anglospehere such supportiveness cannot be expected much in this newer times.
 

IBSA

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
1,155
Likes
1,596
Country flag
@IBSA do keep us posted on Brazil economy post Lula win.

curious to know what happens when a LW govt takes over from a RW in current global circumstances.

more over Lula govt will get a free pass on many things by western liberal MSM.
Till now Lula didnt name any minister, only the members of transition team, almost 300 people distributed in 31 areas, which reflects what shall be the future gov's Ministeries, much more than his first term, when the transition gov team had near 50 members distributed in 5 folds. So I expect in Lula III an oversized State weighing on economy.

For Economy Ministery some names were suggested, such his Vice-President Geraldo Alckmin, who could to accumulate posts on gov; Henrique Meirelles, former Central Bank President; and Fernando Haddad, former Education Minister, but none definitive yeat.

Furthermore, Lula wants to remove the spend's roof, who limits the expenditure's size that government can do in the next 20 years. I'm in favor this also, so the State can to stimulate the national economy with investments and works, but in Lula case, he wants to spend public money only with social assistance in the next 4 years. Instead try to generate employs and income for people, Lula wants basically give money for the poor, leaving them unemployed and gov dependents.
 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
3,795
Likes
19,403
Country flag
1679916209009.png

@IBSA do courts in Brazil charge people with muh raycism muh homophobia reee in general ? if not you think this is a new globohomo sponsored development there after Lula's alleged win in that election there recently ?

besides, imagine taking side of an outright cheating subhuman like Lewis Hamilton 😒 he himself got disqualified many times over charges of cheating and so in various tournaments
 

IBSA

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
1,155
Likes
1,596
Country flag
View attachment 198088
@IBSA do courts in Brazil charge people with muh raycism muh homophobia reee in general ? if not you think this is a new globohomo sponsored development there after Lula's alleged win in that election there recently ?

besides, imagine taking side of an outright cheating subhuman like Lewis Hamilton 😒 he himself got disqualified many times over charges of cheating and so in various tournaments
Yes. This globohomo activism against 'muh racism muh homophobia' even arrived in Brazil a long years. Brazilian politics is well americanized even. Here the Judiciary activism is becoming anything equivalent to racism. Fatphobia, ageism, poorphobia, etc. are the new terms they created to joint the usual racism, homophobia, misogyn. Everythinhg is racism, prejudice currently. The politically correctness dominated the media, the universities, the companies, the social networks. You have to be very carefull to what you speak or risks to be cancelled or even prosecuted by the law.

Piquet gave a interview in which he used the word 'neguinho' to refer to Hamilton. The words 'nego' (sounds like nigga) and its diminutive form 'neguinho' (sounds like little nigga) are words well utilised in the coloquial language of the Brazilian people. They even haven't a racial meaning more. They can to refer to anyone basically. Brazilian people utilises these terms to refer to a third person in a phrase, even a hypothetical person.

If Piquet offended Hamilton, then he who should to sue Piquet in the Brazilian Justice and asks for a moral indemnization. But Hamilton claimed nothing. I think Hamilton even dont know this interview gave by Piquet to a Brazilian media in portuguese language. It was NGO's who sued Piquet in Justice saying Piquet offended Hamilton calling him 'neguinho'.

If Piquet offended Hamilton, then the money should go to Hamilton's bank account, but it will be sent to a fund destinated to promotion of racial equality and against the discrimination of LGBTQ%$*@¨&++ community.

And the $ 5 million amount was estimated not based in law's parameters but in the amount donated by Piquet to Bolsonaro's campaign. So Piquet's condemnation seems very like a political revenge and not justice.
 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
3,795
Likes
19,403
Country flag
He's a commie with pro-China affinities.
Came to power on the back of Globohomo machinations vs the Brazilian Trump :bplease:
still it's good to see him doing something right that's pro-India in ;big picture; way
rest things can be managed i guess
 

shade

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
14,301
Likes
87,002
Country flag
still it's good to see him doing something right that's pro-India in ;big picture; way
rest things can be managed i guess
It's not pro-India, it's pro-China, the current scheme is for RMB to be the major non-Dollar currency, it's by design of chings

If you mean some BRICS gold backed currency then that will probably end in regime change like it happened with Gaddafi.

The urge to bring Freedumbs and Democrazy to Libya had intensified apparently after Gadaffi began pushing for a gold backed currency to replace the (((petrodollar))) model which led to USD being the "world currency".

It's very curious how US is "ok" with Chinese influence spreading in their "backdoor" i.e Brazil
Normally in Cold War the US reaction to the same would be like your average momin's when his beloved prophet is insulted.
 

Johny_Baba

अज्ञानी
Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Messages
3,795
Likes
19,403
Country flag
Another crazy conspiracy theory is actually getting proven true?

The discreet US campaign to defend Brazil’s election
Amid widespread speculation about a coup attempt, the Biden administration pressured politicians and generals to respect the result
===============================================

Michael Stott in London, Michael Pooler and Bryan Harris in São Paulo

14 HOURS AGO

===============================================

As Brazil prepared to hold a presidential election last October, many governments around the world viewed the vote with a mounting sense of foreboding.

The far-right incumbent, Jair Bolsonaro, was openly flirting with subverting the country’s democracy. He attacked the electoral process, claiming that the electronic voting machines used by Brazilian authorities were unreliable and calling for a paper ballot instead. He constantly hinted at the risk of the election being stolen, echoing claims made by Donald Trump in the US. But in the end, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s win in October was accepted without serious challenge by Bolsonaro and the veteran leftwing politician was inaugurated on January 1. The fact that the election was not seriously challenged is a testament to the strength of Brazil’s institutions.

But it was also in part the result of a quiet, year long pressure campaign by the US government to urge the country’s political and military leaders to respect and safeguard democracy, which has not been widely reported. The aim was to drum home two consistent messages to restive generals in Brazil and Bolsonaro’s close allies: Washington was neutral on the election result but would not stand for any attempt to question the voting process or the result. The Financial Times has spoken to six former or current US officials involved in the effort, as well as to several key Brazilian institutional figures, to piece together the story of how the Biden administration engaged in what one former top state department official calls a “very unusual” messaging campaign in the months leading up to the vote, using both public and private channels. All were at pains to underline that most of the credit for saving Brazil’s democracy in the face of Bolsonaro’s onslaught belongs to the Brazilians themselves and to their democratic institutions, which held firm in the face of extraordinary challenges from a president bent on retaining power.

“It’s Brazilian institutions that really made sure that the elections took place,” says a senior US administration official. “What was important was that we conveyed the right messages and maintained policy discipline.” The US had a clear geopolitical incentive to want to demonstrate a capacity to shape events in the region. Long the dominant outside power in Latin America, it has seen its influence eroded in recent years by a growing Chinese presence. The administration also had a more direct motivation. After the January 6 insurrection by Trump supporters at the Capitol in Washington attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, President Joe Biden felt very strongly about any attempt by Bolsonaro to question the outcome of a free and fair election, US officials say.

The campaign was not without risk. The US has been frequently criticised in the region for interfering in its internal affairs; in 1964 Washington backed a military coup in Brazil that overthrew the government of leftist president João Goulart and ushered in a 21-year dictatorship.

Those events fuelled longstanding scepticism of the US among the Brazilian left, including Lula, who in 2020 said Washington was “always behind” efforts to undermine democracy in the region. The Biden administration had to find a way to get its message across without the US becoming a political football in a fiercely contested election.

The solution was a concerted but unannounced campaign across multiple branches of the US government, including the military, the CIA, the state department, the Pentagon and the White House. “This was a very unusual engagement,” says Michael McKinley, a former top state department official and ex-ambassador to Brazil. “It was almost a calendar year of strategy, being carried out with a very specific objective in mind, not to support one Brazilian candidate over another, but heavily focused on the [electoral] process, on making sure the process worked.”

Supporting the electoral process

The effort began, according to former top state department official Tom Shannon, with the visit of Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan to Brazil in August 2021. An embassy statement said the visit “reaffirmed the longstanding strategic relationship between the United States and Brazil” but Sullivan left his meeting with Bolsonaro worried, according to Shannon. “Bolsonaro continued to talk about fraud in US elections and continued to understand his relationship with the United States in terms of his relationship with President Trump”, says Shannon, who is also a former US ambassador to Brazil and maintains close contacts in the country. “Sullivan and the team that went with him came away thinking that Bolsonaro was entirely capable of attempting to manipulate election results or deny them as [Donald] Trump had done. So there was a lot of thought put into how the United States could be supportive of the electoral process without appearing to be interfering. And that’s how it starts.”

As election season began, Brazil was a political tinderbox. The country was profoundly divided between Bolsonaro, a former army captain and close ally of Trump, and Lula, a leftwing icon whose achievements in reducing poverty in his first two terms had been overshadowed by a corruption conviction and a jail term. Lula was released early and his conviction was later overturned on procedural grounds.

The risks to Brazil’s democracy were clear in a country with a modern history of military dictatorship. Bolsonaro had lionised the regime which ran Brazil from 1964 to 1985, and in his first term had showered the armed forces and police with praise and money, raising their budgets and handing key government positions to serving military officers.

In August 2021, he ordered tanks to roll past congress and the supreme court in a parade on the day legislators were voting on his ultimately unsuccessful proposal to reinstate paper ballots.

Some generals were uncomfortable with Bolsonaro’s attempts to politicise an institution which had tried to stay out of politics since returning power to civilians in 1985 and were worried about the risks of the military stepping outside the constitution. Hamilton Mourão, Bolsonaro’s vice-president, was one of those.

Shannon recalls a visit by Mourão to New York for a private lunch with investors last July, while tensions were running high. After batting away questions about the risks of a coup, repeating that he was confident Brazil’s armed forces were committed to democracy, Mourão entered a lift to leave and the former ambassador joined him.

“As the door was closing, I said to him: ‘You know your visit here is very important. You heard from people around the table regarding their concerns. And I share those concerns and, quite frankly, I’m very worried. Mourão turned to me and he said: ‘I’m very worried too’.” Mourão’s spokesman declined to comment.

Electronic Voting

That same month Bolsonaro formally launched his bid for re-election. “The army”, he told supporters, “is on our side.”

A few days before the campaign announcement, the president redoubled efforts to cast doubt on the electoral process. He summoned around 70 ambassadors to a meeting in Brasília and made a presentation questioning the reliability of Brazil’s electronic voting system. The country helped pioneer electronic voting in 1996 and is the only nation in the world to collect and count votes entirely digitally. Now, Bolsonaro was suggesting the machines were prone to fraud. Alarmed US officials decided they needed to step up their messaging campaign. Bolsonaro, they reasoned, had drawn the international community into the voting machine controversy by calling the meeting and Washington now needed to make its views even clearer.

The next day, the state department issued an unusual endorsement of the voting system, saying that “Brazil’s capable and time-tested electoral system and democratic institutions serve as a model for nations in the hemisphere and the world.” “The statement by the US was very important, especially for the military,” one top Brazilian official says. “They get equipment from the US and do training there, so having good relations with the US is very important for the Brazilian military . . . The statement was an antidote against military intervention.”

A week later, secretary of defence Lloyd Austin used a visit to a regional defence ministers’ meeting in Brasília to send a clear message. Military and security forces needed to be under “strong civilian control”, he said in a speech. In private, Austin and other officials spelt out to Brazil’s military the consequences of supporting any unconstitutional action, such as a coup. “There would be significant negative ramifications for the bilateral military-to-military relationship if they were to do something and they needed to respect the outcome of the election”, a senior administration official says.

Further reinforcement of the message to Brazil’s top brass came from General Laura Richardson, head of US Southern Command which covers Latin America, during visits last September and in November 2021, officials said. CIA chief William Burns also came and told the Bolsonaro administration not to mess with the elections. “The secretary of defence, the head of the CIA, the national security adviser all visited in an election year,” says McKinley. “Is this usual? No, it’s not.”

The US also provided some practical help to the election process, helping to overcome supply chain difficulties to obtain components, especially semiconductors, needed to manufacture new machines. The former US ambassador to Brazil, Anthony Harrington, was able to leverage connections inside chipmaker Texas Instruments to, he says, “distinguish semiconductor needs and give priority to the impact on democratic elections”.

The US state department and some senior Brazilian officials also asked Taiwanese authorities to give priority to Brazil’s need for semiconductors made by Nuvoton, a Taiwanese company, which are used in the voting machines, according to two sources. At the same time as the US was conducting its own messaging campaign, key figures in Brazil’s institutions were holding their own private meetings with military chiefs to try to persuade them to stay within the bounds of the constitution and raising the alarm abroad about the risks of a coup. Some of those involved have spoken to the Financial Times, requesting anonymity because of the sensitivity of the discussions. Many still prefer to avoid any mention of their roles.

A senior Brazilian official who was closely involved recalls that Bolsonaro’s navy minister, Admiral Almir Garnier Santos, was the most “difficult” of the military chiefs. “He was really tempted by more radical action,” says the official. “So we had to do a whole lot of dissuasion work, the state department and the US military command said they would tear up the [military] agreements with Brazil, from training to other types of joint operations.”

At a tense dinner in late August with military chiefs lasting until two in the morning, key civilian figures attempted to persuade them that the voting machines were not rigged against Bolsonaro and that they should respect the election. The timing was crucial: Bolsonaro was calling for mass demonstrations in his support on Brazil’s independence day, September 7. Garnier did not respond to requests for comment.

Luís Roberto Barroso, a supreme court judge who at the time headed Brazil’s electoral court, says he also played a part in soliciting the statement from the US state department. “I asked [Douglas Koneff, then acting US ambassador to Brazil] a couple times . . . for declarations about the integrity and credibility of our voting system and the importance of our democracy,” Barroso recalls. “He did make a statement, and more than that he got the state department to make a statement supporting democracy in Brazil and the integrity of the system.” The US embassy declined to comment on details of confidential meetings held during the election period.

Inner Circle

As the election neared, senior US officials believed that Bolsonaro also needed to hear from more voices within his own circle.

They identified key lieutenants and political allies, not all of whom were happy about the president’s attempts to stay in power whatever happened, to urge him to respect the results of the election. Arthur Lira, head of the lower house of congress, vice-president Mourão, Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas, Bolsonaro’s infrastructure minister, and Admiral Flávio Rocha, the secretary of strategic affairs in the presidency, were all conduits for US messages about the need to protect the integrity of the elections, according to those involved.

US officials stayed in regular communication with them and other key figures in the Bolsonaro government. “We got the sense that the people around Bolsonaro were urging him to do the right thing,” a senior administration official says. In the October 2 vote no candidate won an overall majority. But after the run-off vote later that month, it became clear that Lula had scored a narrow yet unarguable victory. Several key Bolsonaro allies including de Freitas and Lira, quickly recognised the leftist’s win. “Within 24 hours they accepted the results of the second round,” McKinley says. “What a blow to anyone who was thinking there was room to challenge the results.”

Shocked by the result, Bolsonaro disappeared from public view and did not concede, but reluctantly ordered officials to co-operate with a transfer of power. As Lula’s January 1 inauguration approached, tensions continued. On December 12, pro-Bolsonaro rioters attacked police and set fire to vehicles in Brasília. A week later, the former army captain attended a dinner with some more moderate members of his inner circle, one of those present says.

With doubts over his willingness to hand the presidential sash over to Lula at the inauguration, some of Bolsonaro’s allies sought to persuade him to bring forward his plans to travel abroad and to skip the inauguration, the person present says.

When Bolsonaro left Brazil for Florida two days before Lula was sworn in, the Americans, along with many Brazilians, breathed a sigh of relief. But the danger had not passed.

On January 8, thousands of Bolsonaro supporters staged an insurrection in Brasília, storming congress, the supreme court and the presidential palace demanding military intervention. Brazil’s military did intervene within hours — but to quash the protests. More than 1,000 demonstrators were arrested. Police investigators would later find draft documents in the possession of Bolsonaro’s justice minister, Anderson Torres, and one of his closest aides, army Lieutenant-Colonel Mauro Cid, which outlined steps to overturn the results of the election and maintain power.

Torres, who spent five months in jail this year as he awaits trial, says the document found in his home was “leaked out of context” and “without legal validity”. Cid could not be reached for comment. The US decided to make one last push in favour of respecting the election. Biden was in Mexico at the time of the insurrection for a North American leaders’ summit, and saw what was happening on the news. “He asked right then to speak with Lula,” says a senior administration official. “After the call, he proposed to Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau and to Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador that we issue a trilateral joint statement supporting Lula and Brazil. It was a first of its kind for North America.”

With the rioters arrested, the military under control and Lula in power, Brazil’s democracy appears to have survived the potential threat. For the Biden administration, relations with Brazil have improved but there has still been friction with the new government.

Lula showed little public recognition of the US campaign to protect the election. His first official visit to Washington in February was a low-key affair lasting a day. In April he took a big delegation to China for a three-day, two-city tour. On that trip, Lula rejected US sanctions on Huawei, the Chinese tech company, lashed out at the west’s military support for Ukraine and endorsed Beijing’s drive for alternatives to the US dollar.

A spokesperson for Lula insists that he talked in Washington about “defending democracy and threats from the extreme right” and that a longer trip to the US is being considered. “People here understand that there are going to be political differences,” says Shannon. “But there’s a tone of anger and resentment underlying all of this which really caught people by surprise . . . It’s as if he doesn’t know or doesn’t want to acknowledge what we did.”

Brazil is NOT some oonga boonga small 'democracy'; crazy how far Muricans can go. If they can do it in Brazil they can do it pretty much everywhere (barring maybe a few notable exceptions whom you can count in your fingers).
paging our Brazilian friend @IBSA
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,213
Country flag
paging our Brazilian friend @IBSA
Rumour has it that despite Lula's overt display of distrust with the US, he is basically toeing the line that Jair Bolsonaro was toeing. This has resulted in trade policies that are more bluster than substance. Despite the talks of a Brazilian-Argentine currency effort, very few tangible gains could come out of it, as Brazil's trade is highly American/Euro-centric and Sino-centric.

There is a significant amount of election engineering, bribing of election commission members, etc., that the US engages in. I know a couple of Brazilian friends IRL from my work and they mentioned to me that the reason why Brazilians are forced to bite their tongue is because US State supports the huge mining MNCs that are as armed & ruthless as a foreign invading force.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top