- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Messages
- 27,491
- Likes
- 189,827
Nothing wrong, the downward motion of edge flaps just increased the angle of attack. Either the aircraft is still climbing or the Mach number is in the lower sub-sonic region during the time of shot taken.Leading edge flaps are not looking in good shape in FoC Tejas specially left one. Maybe I'm wrong.
You're wrong..lolLeading edge flaps are not looking in good shape in FoC Tejas specially left one. Maybe I'm wrong.
You're wrong..lol
What do you mean "not looking in good shape"..They're among the most essential surfaces for this fighter to fly safely. It looks to be working perfectly fine. Airflow over it that creates some shade gradients is your issue?
Nothing wrong, the downward motion of edge flaps just increased the angle of attack. Either the aircraft is still climbing or the Mach number is in the lower sub-sonic region during the time of shot taken.
nice picture and nice aircraft
In absence of real photos with Derby-ER & Python-5 together, I'm making fanarts of those...
View attachment 110297View attachment 110299
be that as it may...it will be nice to see both wings featuring dual rack ejector pylons especially now that ASPJ will be will not crowd the wings most probably...
Not happening.. Too draggy. Even US does only photoshootbe that as it may...it will be nice to see both wings featuring dual rack ejector pylons especially now that ASPJ will be will not crowd the wings most probably...
that is not the real agenda...u can rest assured that pak will try and do the same with jf17...phir crash hone pe param ananda hum log lenge...provided pilot is safe with another tweet from martin-baker ! besides, when has publicity done any harm...thats a sure shot way to boost indian arms export as well...not all nations need dogfighters...those who are looking for cheap high tech bomb trucks, might just find it appealing given Tejas' far superior MTOW!Not happening.. Too draggy. Even US does only photoshoot
Tried & failed (China obviously, not them). The Jf-17 dual-rack exists only in DCSu can rest assured that pak will try and do the same with jf17...
what does "carried underslug" mean ?
Tried & failed (China obviously, not them). The Jf-17 dual-rack exists only in DCS
I feel very sorry for Sitara. It was a very ambitious project and materialized in record time. Had designing gone well, they would have been flying in numbers. By the way, what is the status of this plane.LCA is not a HAL product
in that case IRST wont have any hardpoint left to be fitted in right? or is ASPJ going to have any IRST or pylon-based IRST in future?View attachment 110700
Like this
I don't understand the meme
Central pylon I thinkin that case IRST wont have any hardpoint left to be fitted in right? or is ASPJ going to have any IRST or pylon-based IRST in future?
LOL,I don't understand the meme
Both looks ugly to me
Be as it may, here is a better one
View attachment 110702
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 86 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |